Evaluating vaccination strategies to control foot-and-mouth disease: A model comparison study

Epidemiology and Infection

Volumn 143, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 1256-1275

  Roche, S E ^a   Garner, M G ^a   Sanson, R L ^b   Cook, C ^c   Birch, C ^c   Backer, J A ^d   Dube, C ^e   Patyk, K A ^f   Stevenson, M A ^g   Yu, Z D ^h   Rawdon, T G ^h   Gauntlett, F ^c  

^a Department of Agriculture   (Australia)

^b ASUREQUALITY LIMITED   (New Zealand)

^c VETERINARY LABORATORIES AGENCY   (United Kingdom)

^d WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^e CANADIAN FOOD INSPECTION AGENCY   (Canada)

^f UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^h Ministry for Primary Industries   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Disease spread; Foot and mouth disease; Model comparison; Modelling; Relative validation; Vaccination

Indexed keywords

FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE VACCINE; VIRUS VACCINE;

ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; BOVINAE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROL STRATEGY; DOMESTIC ANIMAL; DRUG EFFECT; EPIDEMIC; FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE; INFECTION CONTROL; NETHERLANDS; NEW ZEALAND; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; SHEEP; SIMULATION; SWINE; TREATMENT PLANNING; UNITED KINGDOM; UNITED STATES; VACCINATION; VIRUS TRANSMISSION; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CANADA; CATTLE DISEASES; DISEASE OUTBREAKS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE VIRUS; FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE; PROCEDURES; VETERINARY; VIROLOGY;

ANIMALS; AUSTRALIA; CANADA; CATTLE; CATTLE DISEASES; DISEASE OUTBREAKS; FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE; FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE VIRUS; GREAT BRITAIN; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NETHERLANDS; UNITED STATES; VACCINATION; VIRAL VACCINES;

EID: 84925212072     PISSN: 09502688     EISSN: 14694409     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0950268814001927     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Boklund A, et al. Comparing control strategies against foot-and-mouth disease: will vaccination be cost effective in Denmark? Preventive Veterinary Medicine 2013; 111: 206-219.
2. Gloster J, et al. Airborne spread of foot-and-mouth disease - model intercomparison. Veterinary Journal 2010; 183: 278-286.
3. Morris RS, et al. Decision support tools for foot and mouth disease control. Revue Scientifique et Technique de l'Office International des Epizooties 2002; 21: 557-567.
4. Garner MG, Beckett SD. Modelling the spread of foot-and-mouth disease in Australia. Australian Veterinary Journal 2005; 83: 758-766.
5. Garner MG, Hamilton SA. Principles of epidemiological modelling. Revue Scientifique et Technique de l'Office International des Epizooties 2011; 30: 407-416.
6. de Jong MCM. Mathematical modelling in veterinary epidemiology: why model building is important. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 1995; 25: 183-193.
7. Kitching RP, et al. Use and abuse of mathematical models: an illustration from the 2001 foot and mouth disease epidemic in the United Kingdom. Revue Scientifique et Technique de l'Office International des Epizooties 2006; 25: 293-311.
8. Dubé C, et al. A comparison of predictions made by three simulation models of foot-and-mouth disease. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 2007; 55: 280-288.
9. Sanson RL, et al. Foot and mouth disease model verification and 'relative validation' through a formal model comparison. Revue Scientifique et Technique de l'Office International des Epizooties 2011; 30: 527-540.
10. Anon. Exercise Silver Birch 2010: national foot-and-mouth disease exercise evaluation and lessons identified report. Animal Health, Contingency Planning Division, London, United Kingdom, 2011 (https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment-data/file/183984/Exercise-SB-Evaluation-Report-vFinal.pdf). Accessed 25 October 2013.
11. Sakamoto K. Mechanism of FMD outbreaks and its control in Asian region. Journal of Disaster Research 2012; 7: 258-263.
12. Akashi H. The 2011 foot and mouth disease outbreak in Miyazaki Prefecture. Journal of Disaster Research 2012; 7: 252-257.
13. OIE. Terrestrial Animal Health Code, Edition 22. Paris: World Organisation for Animal Health, 2013 (http://www.oie.int/en/international-standard-setting/terrestrialcode/). Accessed 1 November 2013.
14. Dürr S, et al. Evaluation of the benefit of emergency vaccination in a foot-and-mouth disease free country with low livestock density. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 2014; 113: 34-46.
15. Porphyre T, et al. Vaccination against foot-and-mouth disease: do initial conditions affect its benefit? PLoS ONE 2013, 8: e77616.
16. Backer JA, et al. Vaccination against foot-and-mouth disease I: Epidemiological consequences. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 2012; 107: 27-40.
17. Roche SE, et al. How do resources influence control measures during a simulated outbreak of foot and mouth disease in Australia? Preventive Veterinary Medicine 2014; 113: 436-446.
18. Beckett SD, Garner MG. Simulating disease spread within a geographic information system environment. Veterinaria Italiana 2007; 43: 595-604.
19. Animal Health Australia. Disease strategy: foot-and-mouth disease (version 3.3). Australian Veterinary Emergency Plan (AUSVETPLAN), Edition 3. Standing Council on Primary Industries, Canberra, Australia, 2012.
20. Harvey N, et al. The North American Animal Disease Spread Model: a simulation model to assist decision making in evaluating animal disease incursions. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 2007; 14: 176-197.
21. Sanson RL. The development of a decision support system for an animal disease emergency (unpublished PhD dissertation). Palmerston North, New Zealand: Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Massey University, 1993.
22. Stevenson MA, et al. InterSpread Plus: a spatial and stochastic simulation model of disease in animal populations. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 2013; 109: 10-24.
23. Isham V. Stochastic models for epidemics with special reference to AIDS. Annals of Applied. Probability 1993; 3: 1-27.
24. Backer JA, et al. Vaccination against foot-and-mouth disease II: regaining FMD-free status. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 2012b; 107: 41-50.
25. Defra. Foot and mouth disease control strategy for Great Britain. Animal Health and Veterinary Laboratories Agency, London, UK, 2011(https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment-data/file/69456/fmd-control-strategy111128.pdf). Accessed 19 November 2013.
26. Baddeley A, Turner R. Spatstat: an R package for analyzing spatial point patterns. Journal of Statistical Software 2005; 12: 1-42.
27. R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2013.
28. Barnett P, et al. Aspects of emergency vaccination against foot and mouth disease. Comparative Immunology, Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 2002; 25: 345-364.
29. Tomassen FHM, et al. A decision tree to optimise control measures during the early stage of a foot and mouth disease epidemic. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 2002; 54: 301-324.
30. Abdalla A, et al. Foot and mouth: evaluating alternatives for controlling disease outbreaks. ABARE eReport 05.6. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 2005.
31. Keeling MJ, et al. Modelling vaccination strategies against foot-and-mouth disease. Nature 2003; 421: 136-142.
32. Tildesley MJ, et al. Optimal reactive vaccination strategies for a foot-and-mouth outbreak in the UK. Nature 2006; 440: 83-86.
33. Gibbens JC, et al. Descriptive epidemiology of the 2001 foot and mouth disease epidemic in Great Britain: the first five months. Veterinary Record 2001; 149: 729-743.
34. Ward MP, et al. Simulation of foot-and-mouth disease spread within an integrated livestock system in Texas, USA. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 2009; 88: 286-297.