Early and late effects of objecthood and spatial frequency on event-related potentials and gamma band activity

BMC Neuroscience

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Craddock, Matt ^a,b   Martinovic, Jasna ^c   Müller, Matthias M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Electroencephalography (EEG); Gamma band; Object recognition; Oscillations

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; FREQUENCY MODULATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; NOVEL OBJECT RECOGNITION TEST; SPATIAL FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; EVOKED RESPONSE; GAMMA RHYTHM; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; TIME FACTOR; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; GAMMA RHYTHM; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84925126328     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712202     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12868-015-0144-8     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Bar M. A cortical mechanism for triggering top-down facilitation in visual object recognition. J Cogn Neurosci. 2003;15:600-9.
2. Bullier J. Integrated model of visual processing. Brain Res Rev. 2001;36:96-107.
3. Hegdé J. Time course of visual perception: coarse-to-fine processing and beyond. Prog Neurobiol. 2008;84:405-39.
4. Bar M, Kassam KS, Ghuman AS, Boshyan J, Schmid AM, Dale AM, et al. Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2006;103:449-54.
5. Badcock JC, Whitworth FA, Badcock DR, Lovegrove WJ. Low-frequency filtering and the processing of local - global stimuli. Perception. 1990;19:617-29.
6. Hughes HC, Fendrich R, Reuter-Lorenz PA. Global versus local processing in the absence of low spatial frequencies. J Cogn Neurosci. 1990;2:272-82.
7. Navon D. Forest before trees: the precedence of global features in visual perception. Cogn Psychol. 1977;9:353-83.
8. Marr D. Vision: a computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company; 1982.
9. Collin CA, McMullen PA. Subordinate-level categorization relies on high spatial frequencies to a greater degree than basic-level categorization. Percept Psychophys. 2005;67:354-64.
10. Pourtois G, Dan ES, Grandjean D, Sander D, Vuilleumier P. Enhanced extrastriate visual response to bandpass spatial frequency filtered fearful faces: time course and topographic evoked-potentials mapping. Hum Brain Mapp. 2005;26:65-79.
11. Nakashima T, Kaneko K, Goto Y, Abe T, Mitsudo T, Ogata K, et al. Early ERP components differentially extract facial features: evidence for spatial frequency-and-contrast detectors. Neurosci Res. 2008;62:225-35.
12. Craddock M, Martinovic J, Müller MM. Task and spatial frequency modulations of object processing: an EEG study. PLoS One. 2013;8:e70293.
13. Tallon-Baudry C, Bertrand O. Oscillatory gamma activity in humans and its role in object representation. Trends Cogn Sci. 1999;3:151-62.
14. Martinovic J, Busch NA. High frequency oscillations as a correlate of visual perception. Int J Psychophysiol. 2011;79:32-8.
15. Martinovic J, Gruber T, Müller MM. Coding of visual object features and feature conjunctions in the human brain. PLoS One. 2008;3:e3781.
16. Busch NA, Debener S, Kranczioch C, Engel AK, Herrmann CS. Size matters: effects of stimulus size, duration and eccentricity on the visual gamma-band response. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;115:1810-20.
17. Gruber T, Müller MM. Effects of picture repetition on induced gamma band responses, evoked potentials, and phase synchrony in the human EEG. Cogn Brain Res. 2002;13:377-92.
18. Gruber T, Müller MM. Oscillatory brain activity dissociates between associative stimulus content in a repetition priming task in the human EEG. Cereb Cortex. 2005;15:109-16.
19. Martinovic J, Gruber T, Müller MM. Induced gamma band responses predict recognition delays during object identification. J Cogn Neurosci. 2007;19:921-34.
20. Martinovic J, Gruber T, Ohla K, Müller MM. Induced gamma-band activity elicited by visual representation of unattended objects. J Cogn Neurosci. 2009;21:42-57.
21. Fründ I, Busch NA, Körner U, Schadow J, Herrmann CS. EEG oscillations in the gamma and alpha range respond differently to spatial frequency. Vision Res. 2007;47:2086-98.
22. Busch NA, Herrmann CS, Müller MM, Lenz D, Gruber T. A cross-laboratory study of event-related gamma activity in a standard object recognition paradigm. Neuroimage. 2006;33:1169-77.
23. Yuval-Greenberg S, Tomer O, Keren AS, Nelken I, Deouell LY. Transient induced gamma-band response in EEG as a manifestation of miniature saccades. Neuron. 2008;58:429-41.
24. Hassler U, Barreto NT, Gruber T. Induced gamma band responses in human EEG after the control of miniature saccadic artifacts. Neuroimage. 2011;57:1411-21.
25. Keren AS, Yuval-Greenberg S, Deouell LY. Saccadic spike potentials in gamma-band EEG: characterization, detection and suppression. Neuroimage. 2010;49:2248-63.
26. Adjamian P, Holliday IE, Barnes GR, Hillebrand A, Hadjipapas A, Singh KD. Induced visual illusions and gamma oscillations in human primary visual cortex. Eur J Neurosci. 2004;20:587-92.
27. Hadjipapas A, Adjamian P, Swettenham JB, Holliday IE, Barnes GR. Stimuli of varying spatial scale induce gamma activity with distinct temporal characteristics in human visual cortex. Neuroimage. 2007;35:518-30.
28. Fintzi AR, Mahon BZ. A bimodal tuning curve for spatial frequency across left and right human orbital frontal cortex during object recognition. Cereb Cortex. 2013;24(5):1311-8.
29. Truccolo WA, Ding M, Knuth KH, Nakamura R, Bressler SL. Trial-to-trial variability of cortical evoked responses: implications for the analysis of functional connectivity. Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;113:206-26.
30. Olejnik S, Algina J. Generalized eta and omega squared statistics: measures of effect size for some common research designs. Psychol Methods. 2003;8:434-47.
31. Jasper H. The ten twenty electrode system of the international federation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1958;10:371-5.
32. Metting van Rijn A, Peper A, Grimbergen C. High-quality recording of bioelectric events. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1990;28:389-97.
33. MettingvanRijn A, Peper A, Grimbergen C. High-quality recording of bioelectric events. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1991;29:433-40.
34. Delorme A, Makeig S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods. 2004;134:9-21.
35. Nolan H, Whelan R, Reilly RB. FASTER: fully automated statistical thresholding for EEG artifact rejection. J Neurosci Methods. 2010;192:152-62.
36. Goffaux V, Gauthier I, Rossion B. Spatial scale contribution to early visual differences between face and object processing. Cogn Brain Res. 2003;16:416-24.
37. Itier RJ, Taylor MJ. N170 or N1? Spatiotemporal differences between object and face processing using ERPs. Cereb Cortex. 2004;14:132-42.
38. Rossion B, Joyce CA, Cottrell GW, Tarr MJ. Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word, and object processing in the visual cortex. Neuroimage. 2003;20:1609-24.
39. Rousselet GA, Pernet CR. Quantifying the time course of visual object processing using ERPs: it's time to up the game. Front Psychol. 2011;2:107.
40. Vanrullen R. Four common conceptual fallacies in mapping the time course of recognition. Front Psychol. 2011;2:365.
41. Oostenveld R, Fries P, Maris E, Schoffelen J-M. FieldTrip: open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Intell Neurosci. 2011;2011:1:1-9.
42. Mitra PP, Pesaran B. Analysis of dynamic brain imaging data. Biophys J. 1999;76:691-708.
43. Schendan HE, Lucia LC. Object-sensitive activity reflects earlier perceptual and later cognitive processing of visual objects between 95 and 500 ms. Brain Res. 2010;1329:124-41.
44. De Cesarei A, Mastria S, Codispoti M. Early spatial frequency processing of natural images: an ERP study. PLoS One. 2013;8:e65103.
45. Goffaux V, Jemel B, Jacques C, Rossion B, Schyns P. ERP evidence for task modulations on face perceptual processing at different spatial scales. Cognit Sci. 2003;27:313-25.
46. Vogel EK, Luck SJ. The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process. Psychophysiology. 2000;37:190-203.
47. Herrmann CS, Munk MHJ, Engel AK. Cognitive functions of gamma-band activity: memory match and utilization. Trends Cogn Sci. 2004;8:347-55.
48. Hübner R. The effect of spatial frequency on global precedence and hemispheric differences. Percept Psychophys. 1997;59:187-201.
49. Kauffmann L, Ramanoel S, Peyrin C. The neural bases of spatial frequency processing during scene perception. Front Integr Neurosci 2014;8.
50. Kitterle FL, Hellige JB, Christman S. Visual hemispheric asymmetries depend on which spatial frequencies are task relevant. Brain Cogn. 1992;20:308-14.
51. Peyrin C, Chauvin A, Chokron S, Marendaz C. Hemispheric specialization for spatial frequency processing in the analysis of natural scenes. Brain Cogn. 2003;53:278-82.
52. Peyrin C, Mermillod M, Chokron S, Marendaz C. Effect of temporal constraints on hemispheric asymmetries during spatial frequency processing. Brain Cogn. 2006;62:214-20.
53. Rebaï M, Bernard C, Lannou J, Jouen F. Spatial frequency and right hemisphere: an electrophysiological investigation. Brain Cogn. 1998;36:21-9.