Task and Spatial Frequency Modulations of Object Processing: An EEG Study

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 7, 2013, Pages

  Craddock, Matt ^a   Martinovic, Jasna ^b   Müller, Matthias M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; GAMMA RHYTHM; GRAMMAR; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; MENTAL LOAD; NORMAL HUMAN; SEMANTICS; SPATIAL FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANIMALS; BRAIN MAPPING; DOGS; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84881145724     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070293     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. VanRullen R, (2007) The power of the feed-forward sweep. Adv Cogn Psychol 3: 167-176. doi:10.2478/v10053-008-0022-3. PubMed: 20517506.
2. Bar M, (2003) A cortical mechanism for triggering top-down facilitation in visual object recognition. J Cogn Neurosci 15: 600-609. doi:10.1162/089892903321662976. PubMed: 12803970.
3. DiCarlo JJ, Zoccolan D, Rust NC, (2012) How Does the Brain Solve Visual Object Recognition? Neuron 73: 415-434. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.01.010. PubMed: 22325196.
4. Bullier J, (2001) Integrated model of visual processing. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 36: 96-107. doi:10.1016/S0165-0173(01)00085-6. PubMed: 11690606.
5. Hegdé J, (2008) Time course of visual perception: Coarse-to-fine processing and beyond. Prog Neurobiol 84: 405-439. doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2007.09.001. PubMed: 17976895.
6. Schyns PG, Oliva A, (1994) From Blobs to Boundary Edges: Evidence for Time- and Spatial-Scale-Dependent Scene Recognition. Psychol Sci 5: 195-200. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00500.x.
7. Peyrin C, Michel CM, Schwartz S, Thut G, Seghier M, et al. (2010) The Neural Substrates and Timing of Top-Down Processes during Coarse-to-Fine Categorization of Visual Scenes: A Combined fMRI and ERP Study. J Cogn Neurosci 22: 2768-2780. doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21424. PubMed: 20044901.
8. Goffaux V, Peters J, Haubrechts J, Schiltz C, Jansma B, et al. (2010) From Coarse to Fine? Spatial and Temporal Dynamics of Cortical Face Processing. Cerebral Cortex. Available: http://cercor.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2010/06/24/cercor.bhq112.full. Accessed 5 December 2010.
9. Bar M, Kassam KS, Ghuman AS, Boshyan J, Schmid AM, et al. (2006) Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 449-454. doi:10.1073/pnas.0507062103. PubMed: 16407167.
10. Kveraga K, Boshyan J, Bar M, (2007) Magnocellular Projections as the Trigger of Top-Down Facilitation in Recognition. J Neurosci 27: 13232-13240. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3481-07.2007. PubMed: 18045917.
11. Marr D, (1982) Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company.
12. Navon D, (1977) Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cogn Psychol 9: 353-383. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(77)90012-3.
13. Badcock JC, Whitworth FA, Badcock DR, Lovegrove WJ, (1990) Low-frequency filtering and the processing of local-global stimuli. Perception 19: 617-629. doi:10.1068/p190617. PubMed: 2102996.
14. Hughes HC, Fendrich R, Reuter-Lorenz PA, (1990) Global Versus Local Processing in the Absence of Low Spatial Frequencies. J Cogn Neurosci 2: 272-282. doi:10.1162/jocn.1990.2.3.272.
15. Navon D, (2003) What does a compound letter tell the psychologist's mind? Acta Psychol 114: 273-309. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.06.002.
16. Rosch E, Mervis CB, Gray WD, Johnson DM, Boyes-Braem P, (1976) Basic objects in natural categories. Cogn Psychol 8: 382-439. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(76)90013-X.
17. Jolicoeur P, Gluck MA, Kosslyn SM, (1984) Pictures and names: Making the connection. Cogn Psychol 16: 243-275. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(84)90009-4. PubMed: 6734136.
18. Rogers TT, Patterson K, (2007) Object categorization: Reversals and explanations of the basic-level advantage. J Exp Psychol Gen 136: 451-469. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.136.3.451. PubMed: 17696693.
19. Tanaka JW, Taylor M, (1991) Object categories and expertise: Is the basic level in the eye of the beholder? Cogn Psychol 23: 457-482. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(91)90016-H.
20. Grill-Spector K, Kanwisher N, (2005) Visual recognition: As soon as you know it is there, you know what it is. Psychol Sci 16: 152-160. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00796.x. PubMed: 15686582.
21. Mack ML, Wong AC, Gauthier I, Tanaka JW, Palmeri TJ, (2009) Time course of visual object categorization: Fastest does not necessarily mean first. Vision Res 49: 1961-1968. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2009.05.005. PubMed: 19460401.
22. Thorpe S, Fize D, Marlot C, (1996) Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature 381: 520-522. doi:10.1038/381520a0. PubMed: 8632824.
23. VanRullen R, Thorpe SJ, (2001) The Time Course of Visual Processing: From Early Perception to Decision-Making. J Cogn Neurosci 13: 454-461. doi:10.1162/08989290152001880. PubMed: 11388919.
24. Macé MJ, Joubert OR, Nespoulous JL, Fabre-Thorpe M, (2009) The Time-Course of Visual Categorizations: You Spot the Animal Faster than the Bird. PLOS ONE 4: e5927. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005927. PubMed: 19536292.
25. Oliva A, Schyns PG, (1997) Coarse Blobs or Fine Edges? Evidence That Information Diagnosticity Changes the Perception of Complex Visual Stimuli. Cogn Psychol 34: 72-107. doi:10.1006/cogp.1997.0667. PubMed: 9325010.
26. Schyns PG, Oliva A, (1999) Dr. Angry and Mr. Smile: when categorization flexibly modifies the perception of faces in rapid visual presentations. Cognition 69: 243-265. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00069-9. PubMed: 10193048.
27. Sowden PT, Schyns PG, (2006) Channel surfing in the visual brain. Trends Cogn Sci 10: 538-545. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.10.007. PubMed: 17071128.
28. Morrison DJ, Schyns PG, (2001) Usage of spatial scales for the categorization of faces, objects, and scenes. Psychon Bull Rev 8: 454-469. doi:10.3758/BF03196180. PubMed: 11700896.
29. Shulman GL, Wilson J, (1987) Spatial frequency and selective attention to local and global information. Perception 16: 89-101. doi:10.1068/p160089. PubMed: 3671045.
30. Collin CA, McMullen PA, (2005) Subordinate-level categorization relies on high spatial frequencies to a greater degree than basic-level categorization. Percept Psychophys 67: 354-364. doi:10.3758/BF03206498. PubMed: 15971697.
31. Harel A, Bentin S, (2009) Stimulus type, level of categorization, and spatial-frequencies utilization: implications for perceptual categorization hierarchies. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 35: 1264-1273. doi:10.1037/a0013621. PubMed: 19653764.
32. Martinovic J, Gruber T, Müller M, (2009) Priming of object categorization within and across levels of specificity. Psihologija 42: 27-46. doi:10.2298/PSI0901027M.
33. Tanaka J, Luu P, Weisbrod M, Kiefer M, (1999) Tracking the time course of object categorization using event-related potentials. Neuroreport 10: 829-835. doi:10.1097/00001756-199903170-00030. PubMed: 10208556.
34. Goffaux V, Jemel B, Jacques C, Rossion B, Schyns P, (2003) ERP evidence for task modulations on face perceptual processing at different spatial scales. Cogn Sci 27: 313-325. doi:10.1016/S0364-0213(03)00002-8.
35. Mazerolle EL, D'Arcy RC, Marchand Y, Bolster RB, (2007) ERP assessment of functional status in the temporal lobe: Examining spatiotemporal correlates of object recognition. Int J Psychophysiol 66: 81-92. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2007.06.003. PubMed: 17673323.
36. Gruber T, Müller MM, (2002) Effects of picture repetition on induced gamma band responses, evoked potentials, and phase synchrony in the human EEG. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 13: 377-392. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(01)00130-6. PubMed: 11919002.
37. Martinovic J, Gruber T, Müller MM, (2007) Induced Gamma Band Responses Predict Recognition Delays during Object Identification. J Cogn Neurosci 19: 921-934. doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.6.921. PubMed: 17536963.
38. Martinovic J, Gruber T, Müller MM, (2008) Coding of Visual Object Features and Feature Conjunctions in the Human Brain. PLOS ONE 3: e3781. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003781. PubMed: 19023428.
39. Anaki D, Zion-Golumbic E, Bentin S, (2007) Electrophysiological neural mechanisms for detection, configural analysis and recognition of faces. NeuroImage 37: 1407-1416. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.05.054. PubMed: 17689102.
40. Itier RJ, Taylor MJ, (2004) N170 or N1? Spatiotemporal Dif Between Object Face Process Using ERPs Cereb Cortex 14: 132-142.
41. Fintzi AR, Mahon BZ, (2013) A Bimodal Tuning Curve for Spatial Frequency Across Left and Right Human Orbital Frontal Cortex During Object Recognition. Cereb Cortex. Available: http://cercor.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2013/01/09/cercor.bhs419. Accessed 11 January 2013.
42. Busch NA, Debener S, Kranczioch C, Engel AK, Herrmann CS, (2004) Size matters: effects of stimulus size, duration and eccentricity on the visual gamma-band response. Clin Neurophysiol 115: 1810-1820. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2004.03.015. PubMed: 1526186016/j.clinph.2004.03.015.
43. Yuval-Greenberg S, Tomer O, Keren AS, Nelken I, Deouell LY, (2008) Transient Induced Gamma-Band Response in EEG as a Manifestation of Miniature Saccades. Neuron 58: 429-441. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.03.027. PubMed: 18466752.
44. Hassler U, Barreto NT, Gruber T, (2011) Induced gamma band responses in human EEG after the control of miniature saccadic artifacts. NeuroImage 57: 1411-1421. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.062. PubMed: 21645624.
45. Keren AS, Yuval-Greenberg S, Deouell LY, (2010) Saccadic spike potentials in gamma-band EEG: Characterization, detection and suppression. NeuroImage 49: 2248-2263. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.057. PubMed: 19874901.
46. Martinovic J, Busch NA, (2011) High frequency oscillations as a correlate of visual perception. Int J Psychophysiol 79: 32-38. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.07.004. PubMed: 20654659.
47. Schendan HE, Stern CE, (2007) Where Vision Meets Memory: Prefrontal Posterior Networks for Visual Object Constancy during Categorization and Recognition. Cereb Cortex: bhm 197. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm197.
48. Jasper H, (1958) The ten twenty electrode system of the international federation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 10: 371-375.
49. Metting van Rijn AC, Peper A, Grimbergen CA, (1990) High-quality recording of bioelectric events. Part 1. Interference reduction, theory and practice. Med Biol Eng Comput 28: 389-397. doi:10.1007/BF02441961. PubMed: 2277538.
50. Metting van Rijn AC, Peper A, Grimbergen CA, (1991) High-quality recording of bioelectric events. Part 2. Low-noise, low-power multichannel amplifier design. Med Biol Eng Comput 29: 433-440. doi:10.1007/BF02441666. PubMed: 1787761.
51. Delorme A, Makeig S, (2004) EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods 134: 9-21. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009. PubMed: 15102499.
52. Oostenveld R, Fries P, Maris E, Schoffelen JM, (2011) FieldTrip: open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Comput Intell Neurosci:(2011): pp. 1-1:9. doi:10.1155/2011/156869. PubMed: 21253357.
53. Nolan H, Whelan R, Reilly RB, (2010) FASTER: Fully Automated Statistical Thresholding for EEG artifact Rejection. J Neurosci Methods 192: 152-162. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.07.015. PubMed: 20654646.
54. Olejnik S, Algina J, (2003) Generalized Eta and Omega Squared Statistics: Measures of Effect Size for Some Common Research Designs. Psychol Methods 8: 434-447. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.8.4.434. PubMed: 14664681.
55. Bakeman R, (2005) Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs. Behav Res Methods 37: 379-384. doi:10.3758/BF03192707. PubMed: 16405133.
56. Baguley T, (2012) Serious stats: a guide to advanced statistics for the behavioral sciences. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, England; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
57. Mitra PP, Pesaran B, (1999) Analysis of Dynamic Brain Imaging Data. Biophys J 76: 691-708. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77236-X. PubMed: 9929474.
58. Goffaux V, Gauthier I, Rossion B, (2003) Spatial scale contribution to early visual differences between face and object processing. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 16: 416-424. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(03)00056-9. PubMed: 12706221.
59. Rossion B, Joyce CA, Cottrell GW, Tarr MJ, (2003) Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word, and object processing in the visual cortex. NeuroImage 20: 1609-1624. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.07.010. PubMed: 14642472.
60. Schendan HE, Lucia LC, (2010) Object-sensitive activity reflects earlier perceptual and later cognitive processing of visual objects between 95 and 500ms. Brain Res 1329: 124-141. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2010.01.062. PubMed: 20122902.
61. Rossion B, Pourtois G, (2004) Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart's object pictorial set: The role of surface detail in basic-level object recognition. Perception 33: 217-236. doi:10.1068/p5117. PubMed: 15109163.
62. Steinhauer K, Drury JE, Portner P, Walenski M, Ullman MT, (2010) Syntax, concepts, and logic in the temporal dynamics of language comprehension: evidence from event-related potentials. Neuropsychologia 48: 1525-1542. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.01.013. PubMed: 20138065.