Effect of temporal constraints on hemispheric asymmetries during spatial frequency processing

Brain and Cognition

Volumn 62, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 214-220

  Peyrin, Carole ^a,b,c   Mermillod, Martial ^c,d   Chokron, Sylvie ^c   Marendaz, Christian ^c  

^a CHU PURPAN   (France)

^b Functional Brain Mapping Laboratory   (Switzerland)

^c CNRS   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ BLAISE PASCAL   (France)

Author keywords

Exposure duration; Hemispheric specialization; Human visual perception; Natural scene; Spatial frequency

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MENTAL FUNCTION; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; MENTAL TASK; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; SPATIAL FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEMPORAL SUMMATION; VISION; VISUAL INFORMATION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; CEREBRAL CORTEX; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; REFERENCE VALUES; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; SPACE PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 33846027874     PISSN: 02782626     EISSN: 10902147     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2006.05.005     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Badcock J.C., Whitworth F.A., Badcock D.R., and Lovegrove W.J. Low frequency filtering and the processing of local-global stimuli. Perception 19 (1990) 617-629
2. Blanca M.J., Zalabardo C., Gari-Criado F., and Siles R. Hemispheric differences in global and local processing dependant on exposure duration. Neuropsychologia 32 (1994) 1343-1351
3. Boles D.B., and Karner T.A. Hemispheric differences in global versus local processing: still unclear. Brain and Cognition 30 (1996) 232-243
4. Breitmeyer B.G. Simple reaction time as a measure of the temporal response properties of transient and sustained channels. Vision Research 15 (1975) 1411-1412
5. Breitmeyer B.G., and Ganz L. Temporal studies with flashed gratings: inferences about human transient and sustained channels. Vision Research 17 (1977) 861-865
6. Bullier J. Integrated model of visual processing. Brain Research. Brain Research Review 36 (2001) 96-107
7. Chokron S., Brickman A.M., Wei T., and Buchsbaum M.S. Hemispheric asymmetry for selective attention. Cognitive Brain Research 9 (2000) 85-90
8. Christman S. Perceptual characteristics in visual laterality research. Brain and Cognition 11 (1989) 238-257
9. Christman S., Kitterle F.L., and Hellige J. Hemispheric asymmetry in the processing of absolute versus relative spatial frequency. Brain and Cognition 6 (1991) 62-73
10. Cook N.D. Homotopic callosal inhibition. Brain and Language 23 (1984) 116-125
11. Corballis P.M. Visuospatial processing and the right-hemisphere interpreter. Brain and Cognition 53 (2003) 171-176
12. Corballis P.M., Funnell M.G., and Gazzaniga M.S. A dissociation between spatial and identity matching in callosotomy patients. Neuroreport 10 (1999) 2138-2187
13. Evert D.L., and Kmen M. Hemispheric asymmetries for global and local processing as a function of stimulus exposure duration. Brain and Cognition 51 (2003) 115-142
14. Fink G.R., Halligan P.W., Marshall J.C., Frith C.D., Frackowiak R.S.J., and Dolan R.J. Where in the brain does visual attention select the forest and the trees?. Nature 382 (1996) 626-628
15. Ginsburg A.P. Spatial filtering and visual form perception. In: Boff K., Kaumann L., and Thomas J. (Eds). Handbook of perception and human performance (1986), Wiley, New York 1-41
16. Grabowska A., and Nowicka A. Visual-spatial-frequency model of cerebral asymmetry: a critical survey of behavioral and electrophysiological studies. Psychological Bulletin 120 (1996) 434-449
17. Guyader N., Chauvin A., Peyrin C., Herault J., and Marendaz C. Image phase or amplitude? Rapid scene categorization is an amplitude based process. Comptes Rendus Biologies 327 (2004) 313-318
18. Han S., Weaver J.A., Murray S.O., Kang X., Yund E.W., and Woods D.L. Hemispheric asymmetry in global/local processing: effects of stimulus position and spatial frequency. NeuroImage 17 (2002) 1290-1299
19. Heinze H.J., Hinrichs H., Scholz M., Burchert W., and Mangun G.R. Neural mechanisms of global and local processing. A combined PET and ERP study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 10 (1998) 485-498
20. Hughes H.C., Nozawa G., and Kitterle F.L. Global precedence, spatial frequency channels, and the statistic of the natural image. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 8 (1996) 197-230
21. Iidaka T., Yamashita K., Kashikura K., and Yonekura Y. Spatial frequency of visual image modulates neural responses in the temporo-occipital lobe. An investigation with event-related fMRI. Cognitive Brain Research 18 (2004) 196-204
22. Ivry R.B., and Robertson L.C. The two sides of perception (1998), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
23. Kenemans J.L., Baas J.M., Mangun G.R., Lijffijt M.N., and Verbaten M.N. On the processing of spatial frequencies as revealed by evoked-potential source modeling. Clinical Neurophysiology 111 (2000) 1113-1123
24. Kitterle F.L., Christman S., and Hellige J.B. Hemispheric differences are found in the identification, but not the detection, of low versus high spatial frequencies. Perception & Psychophysics 48 (1990) 297-306
25. Kitterle F.L., Hellige J.B., and Christman S. Visual hemispheric asymmetries depend on which spatial frequencies are task relevant. Brain and Cognition 20 (1992) 308-314
26. Kitterle F.L., and Selig L.M. Visual field effects in the discrimination of sine-wave gratings. Perception & Psychophysics 50 (1991) 15-18
27. Lamb M.R., Robertson L.C., and Knight R.T. Component mechanisms underlying the processing of hierarchically organized patterns: inferences from patients with unilateral cortical lesions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 16 (1990) 471-483
28. Lamb M.R., and Yund E.W. The role of spatial frequency in the processing of hierarchically organized stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics 54 (1993) 773-784
29. Lux S., Marshall J.C., Ritzl A., Weiss P.H., Pietrzyk U., Shah N.J., et al. A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of local/global processing with stimulus presentation in the peripheral visual hemifields. Neuroscience 124 (2004) 113-120
30. Martin M. Hemispheric specialization for local and global processing. Neuropsychologia 17 (1979) 33-40
31. Martinez A., Moses P., Frank L., Buxton R., Wong E., and Stiles J. Hemispheric asymmetries in global and local processing: evidence from fMRI. NeuroReport 8 (1997) 1685-1689
32. Navon D. Forest before trees: the precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology 9 (1977) 353-383
33. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9 (1971) 97-113
34. Peyrin C., Baciu M., Segebarth C., and Marendaz C. Cerebral regions and hemispheric specialization for processing spatial frequencies during natural scene recognition. An event-related fMRI study. NeuroImage 23 (2004) 697-706
35. Peyrin C., Chauvin A., Chokron S., and Marendaz C. Hemispheric specialization for spatial frequency processing in the analysis of natural scenes. Brain and Cognition 53 (2003) 278-282
36. Peyrin C., Chokron S., Guyader N., Gout O., Moret J., and Marendaz C. Neural correlates of spatial frequency processing: a neuropsychological approach. Brain Research (2006)
37. Peyrin C., Schwartz S., Seghier M., Michel C., Landis T., and Vuilleumier P. Hemispheric specialization of human inferior temporal cortex during coarse-to-fine and fine-to-coarse analysis of natural visual scenes. NeuroImage 28 (2005) 464-473
38. Proverbio A.M., Minniti A., and Zani A. Electrophysiological evidence of a perceptual precedence of global vs. local visual information. Cognitive Brain Research 6 (1998) 321-334
39. Robertson L.C., and Lamb M.R. Neuropsychological contributions to theories of part/whole organization. Cognitive Psychology 23 (1991) 299-330
40. Robertson L.C., Lamb M.R., and Knight R.T. Effects of lesions of temporal-parietal junction on perceptual and attentional processing in humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 8 (1988) 3757-3769
41. Schyns P.G., and Oliva A. From blobs to boundary edges: evidence for time- and spatial-scale-dependant scene recognition. Psychological Science 5 (1994) 195-200
42. Sergent J. The cerebral balance of power: confrontation or cooperation?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 8 (1982) 253-272
43. Sergent J., and Hellige J.B. Role of input factors in visual-field asymmetries. Brain and Cognition 5 (1986) 174-199
44. Van Essen D.C., and DeYoe E.A. Concurrent processing in the primate visual cortex. In: Gazzaniga M.S. (Ed). The cognitive neurosciences (1995), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 383-400
45. Yamaguchi S., Yamagata S., and Kobayashi S. Cerebral asymmetry of the "top-down" allocation of attention to global and local features. Journal of Neuroscience 20 (2000) RC72
46. Yovel G., Levy J., and Yovel I. Hemispheric asymmetries for global and local visual perception: effects of stimulus and task factors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 27 (2001) 1369-1385