Induced Gamma-band Activity Elicited by Visual Representation of Unattended Objects

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 42-57

  Martinovic, Jasna ^a,b   Gruber, Thomas ^a   Ohla, Kathrin ^a   Müller, Matthias M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EVOKED RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OSCILLATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; VISION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; FIELD DEPENDENCE-INDEPENDENCE; FIXATION, OCULAR; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); REFERENCE VALUES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 58149485451     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: 15308898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21004     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Altmann, C. F., Grodd, W., Kourtzi, Z., Bülthoff, H. H., & Karnath, H.-O. (2005). Similar cortical correlates underlie visual object identification and orientation judgment. Neuropsychologics, 43, 2101-2108.
2. Beck, D. M., & Lavie, N. (2005). Look here but ignore what you see: Effects of distractors at fixation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 592-607.
3. Bertrand, O., & Pantev, C. (1994). Stimulus frequency dependence of the transient oscillatory auditory evoked response (40 Hz) studied by electric and magnetic recordings in human. In C. Pantev, T. Elbert, & B. Lütkenhöner (Eds.), Oscillatory event-related brain dynamics (pp. 231-242). New York: Plenum.
4. Busch, N. A., Debener, S., Kranczioch, C., Engel, A. K., & Herrmann, C. S. (2004). Size matters: Effects of stimulus size, duration and eccentricity on the visual gamma-band response. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115, 1810-1820.
5. Busch, N. A., Herrmann, C. S., Müller, M. M., Lenz, D., & Gruber, T. (2006). A cross-lab study of event-related gamma activity in a standard object-recognition paradigm. Neuroimage, 33, 1169-1177.
6. Busch, N. A., Schadow, J., Fruend, I., & Herrmann, C. S. (2006). Time-frequency analysis of target detection reveals an early interface between bottom-up and top-down processes in the gamma-band. Neuroimage, 29, 1106-1116.
7. Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134, 9-21.
8. Desimone, R. (1998). Visual attention mediated by biased competition in extrastriate visual cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London, Series B, 353, 1245-1255.
9. Duncan, J. (1980). The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 272-300.
10. Fiebach, C. J., Gruber, T., & Supp, G. G. (2005). Neuronal mechanisms of repetition priming in occipitotemporal cortex: Spatiotemporal evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging and electroencephalography. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 3414-3422.
11. Fründ, I., Busch, N. A., Schadow, J., Gruber, T., Körner, U., & Herrmann, C. S. (2008). Time pressure modulates electrophysiological correlates of early visual processing. PLOS Biology, 3, e1675.
12. Gruber, T., Malinowski, P., & Müller, M. M. (2004). Modulation of oscillatory brain activity & evoked potentials in a repetition priming task in the human EEG. European Journal ofNeuroscience, 19, 1073-1082.
13. Gruber, T., & Müller, M. M. (2002). Effects of picture repetition on induced gamma band responses, evoked potentials, and phase synchrony in the human EEG. Cognitive Brain Research, 13, 377-392.
14. Gruber, T., & Müller, M. M. (2005). Oscillatory brain activity dissociates between associative stimulus content in a repetition priming task in the human EEG. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 109-116.
15. Gruber, T., Müller, M. M., Keil, A., & Elbert, T. (1999). Selective visual-spatial attention alters induced gamma band responses in the human EEG. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110, 2074-2085.
16. Gruber, T., Trujillo-Barreto, J. N., Giabbiconi, C. M., Valdes-Sosa, P. A., & Müller, M. M. (2006). Brain electrical tomography (BET) analysis of induced gamma band responses during a simple object recognition task. Neuroimage, 29, 888-900.
17. Handy, T. C., & Mangun, G. R. (2000). Attention and spatial selection: Electrophysiological evidence for modulation by perceptual load. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 175-186.
18. Handy, T. C., Soltani, M., & Mangun, G. R. (2001). Perceptual load and visuocortical processing: Event-related potentials reveal sensory-level selection. Psychological Science, 12, 213-218.
19. Hasenstaub, A., Shu, Y., Haider, B., Kraushaar, U., Duque, A., & McCormick, D. A. (2005). Inhibitory postsynaptic potentials carry synchronised frequency information in active cortical networks. Neuron, 47, 423-435.
20. Herculano-Houzel, S., Munk, M., Neuenschwander, S., & Singer, W. (1999). Precisely synchronized oscillatory firing patterns require electroencephalographic activation. Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 3992-4010.
21. Herrmann, C. S., Lenz, D., Junge, S., Busch, N. A., & Maess, B. (2004). Memory-matches evoke human gamma-responses. BMC Neuroscience, 5, 13.
22. Herrmann, C. S., Munk, M. H. J., & Engel, A. K. (2004). Cognitive functions of gamma-band activity: Memory match and utilization. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 347-355.
23. Hummel, J. E., & Stankiewicz, B. J. (1996). An architecture for rapid, hierarchical structural description. In T. Inui & J. McClelland (Eds.), Attention and performance: XVI. Information integration in perception and communication (pp. 93-121). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Junghoefer, M., Elbert, T., Tucker, D. M., & Braun, C. (2000). Statistical control of artifacts in dense array EEG/MEG studies. Psychophysiology, 37, 523-532.
25. Karakas, S., & Basar, E. (1998). Early gamma response is sensory in origin: A conclusion based on cross-comparison of results from multiple experimental paradigms. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 31, 13-31.
26. Keil, A., Stolarova, M., Heim, S., Gruber, T., & Müller, M. M. (2003). Temporal stability of high-frequency brain oscillations in the human EEG. Brain Topography, 16, 101-110.
27. Lachter, J., Forster, K. I., & Ruthruff, E. (2004). Forty-five years after Broadbent (1958): Still no identification without attention. Psychological Review, 111, 880-913.
28. Lavie, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 451-468.
29. Lavie, N., Hirst, A., de Fockert, J. W., & Viding, E. (2004). Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 339-354.
30. Luck, S. J. (1995). Multiple mechanisms of visual-spatial attention: Recent evidence from human electrophysiology. Behavioural Brain Research, 71, 113-123.
31. Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
32. Martinovic, J., Gruber, T., & Müller, M. M. (2007). Induced gamma-band responses predict recognition delays during object identification. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 921-934.
33. Morup, M., Hansen, L. K., Herrmann, C. S., Parnas, J., & Arnfred, S. M. (2006). Parallel factor analysis as an exploratory tool for wavelet transformed event-related EEG. Neuroimage, 29, 938-947.
34. Müller, M. M., & Gruber, T. (2001). Induced gamma-band responses in the human EEG are related to attentional information processing. Visual Cognition, 8, 579-592.
35. Müller, M. M., Gruber, T., & Keil, A. (2000). Modulation of induced gamma band activity in the human EEG by attention and visual information processing. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 38, 283-300.
36. Müller, M. M., & Keil, A. (2004). Neuronal synchronization and selective color processing in the human brain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 503-522.
37. Murray, J. E., & Jones, C. (2002). Attention to local form information can prevent access to semantic information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 609-625.
38. Perrin, F., Pernier, J., Bertrand, O., & Echallier, J. F. (1988). Spherical splines for scalp potential and current source density mapping. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 72, 184-187.
39. Peterson, M. A., & Gibson, B. S. (1993). Shape recognition contributions to figure-ground organisation in three-dimensional displays. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 383-429.
40. Peterson, M. A., & Gibson, B. S. (1994a). Must figure-ground organization precede object recognition? An assumption in peril. Psychological Science, 5, 253-259.
41. Peterson, M. A., & Gibson, B. S. (1994b). Object recognition contributions to figure-ground organization: Operations on outlines and subjective contours. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 551-564.
42. Peterson, M. A., & Skow-Grant, E. (2003). Memory and learning in figure-ground perception. In B. Ross & D. Irwin (Eds.), Cognitive vision: Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 42, pp. 1-34). London: Academic Press.
43. Pins, D., Meyer, M. E., Foucher, J., Humphreys, G., & Boucart, M. (2004). Neural correlates of implicit object identification. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1247-1259.
44. Posada, A., Hugues, E., Franck, N., Vianin, P., & Kilner, J. (2003). Augmentation of induced visual gamma activity by increased task complexity. European Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 2351-2356.
45. Reynolds, J. H., & Chelazzi, L. (2004). Attentional modulation of visual processing. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 611-647.
46. Rugg, M. D., Soardi, M., & Doyle, M. C. (1995). Modulation of event-related potentials by the repetition of drawings of novel objects. Cognitive Brain Research, 3, 17-24.
47. Schroeder, C. E., Mehta, A. D., & Foxe, J. J. (2001). Determinants and mechanisms of attentional modulation of neural processing. Frontiers in Bioscience, 6, D672-D684.
48. Schwartz, S., Vuilleumier, P., Hutton, C., Maravita, A., Dolan, R. J., & Driver, J. (2005). Attentional load and sensory competition in human vision: Modulation of fMRI responses by load at fixation during task-irrelevant stimulation in the peripheral visual field. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 770-786.
49. Senkowski, D., & Herrmann, C. S. (2002). Effects of task difficulty on evoked gamma activity and ERPs in a visual discrimination task. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113, 1742-1753.
50. Tallon-Baudry, C., & Bertrand, O. (1999). Oscillatory gamma activity in humans and its role in object representation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 151-162.
51. Tallon-Baudry, C., Bertrand, O., Delpuech, C., & Pernier, J. (1996). Stimulus specificity of phase-locked and non-phase-locked 40 Hz visual response in human. European Journal of Neuroscience, 16, 4240-4249.
52. Tallon-Baudry, C., Bertrand, O., Delpuech, C., & Pernier, J. (1997). Oscillatory gamma-band (30-70 Hz) activity induced by a visual search task in humans. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 722-734.
53. Thoma, V., Hummel, J. E., & Davidoff, J. (2004). Evidence for holistic representations of ignored images and analytic representations of attended images. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 257-267.
54. Treisman, A. M. (1969). Strategies and models of selective attention. Psychological Review, 76, 282-299.
55. Vidal, J. R., Chaumon, M., O'Regan, K. J., & Tallon-Baudry, C. (2006). Visual grouping and the focusing of attention induce gamma-band oscillations at different frequencies in human magnetoencephalogram signals. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1850-1862.