Quantity implicatures

Quantity Implicatures

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1-212

  Geurts, Bart ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925070373     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511975158     Document Type: Book

References (156)

1. Abbott, B. (2000). Presuppositions as nonassertions. Journal of pragmatics 32: 1419–1437.
2. Altmann, G. and M. Steedman (1988). Interaction with context during human sentence processing. Cognition 30: 191–238.
3. Asher, N. and D. Bonevac (2005). Free choice permission is strong permission. Synthese 145: 303–323.
4. Atlas, J. and S. C. Levinson (1981). It-clefts, informativeness and logical form: radical pragmatics (revised standard version). In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical pragmatics, pp. 1–61. New York: Academic Press.
5. Bach, K. and R. M. Harnish (1979). Linguistic communication and speech acts. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
6. Baldwin, D. A. (1991). Infants’ contribution to the achievement of joint reference. Child development 62: 875–890.
7. Baldwin, D. A. (1993). Infants’ ability to consult the speaker for clues to word reference. Journal of child language 20: 395–418.
8. Baron-Cohen, S., A. Leslie, and U. Frith (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition 21: 37–46.
9. Bartsch, R. (1973). “Negative transportation” gibt es nicht. Linguistische Berichte 27: 1–7.
10. Bartsch, R. (1987). Context-dependent interpretations of lexical items. In J. Groenendijk, D. de Jongh, and M. Stokhof (Eds.), Foundations of pragmatics and lexical semantics, pp. 1–26. Dordrecht: Foris.
11. Beaver, D. and B. Geurts (2010). Presupposition. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy.
12. Bezuidenhout, A. and J. Cutting (2002). Literal meaning, minimal propositions, and pragmatic processing. Journal of pragmatics 34: 433–456.
13. Blutner, R. (2000). Some aspects of optimality in natural language interpretation. Journal of semantics (17): 189–216.
14. Bosch, P. (1984). Lexical learning, context dependence, and metaphor. Indiana University Linguistics Club.
15. Bott, L. and I. A. Noveck (2004). Some utterances are underinformative: the onset and time course of scalar inferences. Journal of memory and language 51: 437–457.
16. Braine, M. D., D. O’Brien, I. Noveck, M. Samuels, R. Lea, S. Fisch, and Y. Yang (1995). Predicting intermediate and multiple conclusions in propositional logic inference problems: further evidence for a mental logic. Journal of experimental psychology: general 124: 263–292.
17. Braine, M. D. and B. Rumain (1981). Development of comprehension of “or”: evidence for a sequence of competencies. Journal of experimental child psychology 31: 46–70.
18. Breheny, R. (2006). Communication and folk psychology. Mind and language 21: 74–107.
19. Breheny, R., N. Katsos, and J. Williams (2006). Are generalised scalar implicatures generated by default? An on-line investigation into the role of context in generating pragmatic inferences. Cognition 100: 434–463.
20. Brown, R. (1958). How shall a thing be called? Psychological review 65: 14–21.
21. Carreiras, M., A. Garnham, J. Oakhill, and K. Cain (1996). The use of stereotypical gender information in constructing a mental model: evidence from English and Spanish. The quarterly journal of experimental psychology 49A: 639–663.
22. Carston, R. (1996). Metalinguistic negation and echoic use. Journal of pragmatics 25: 309–330.
23. Carston, R. (2002). Thoughts and utterances: the pragmatics of explicit communication. Oxford: Blackwell.
24. Chemla, E. (2007). Présuppositions et implicatures scalaires: études formelles et expérimentales. Doctoral dissertation, EHESS, Paris.
25. Chevallier, C., I. A. Noveck, T. Nazir, L. Bott, V. Lanzetti, and D. Sperber (2008). Making disjunctions exclusive. The quarterly journal of experimental psychology 61: 1741–1760.
26. Chien, A. (2008). Scalar implicature and contrastive explanation. Synthese 161: 47–66.
27. Chierchia, G. (2004). Scalar implicatures, polarity phenomena and the syntax/pragmatics interface. In A. Belletti (Ed.), Structures and beyond, pp. 39–103. Oxford University Press.
28. Chierchia, G. (2006). Broaden your views: implicatures of domain widening and the “logicality” of language. Linguistic inquiry 37: 535–590.
29. Chierchia, G., D. Fox, and B. Spector (to appear). The grammatical view of scalar implicatures and the relationship between semantics and pragmatics. In C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger, and P. Portner (Eds.), Handbook of semantics. Mouton de Gruyter.
30. Cohen, L. J. (1971). The logical particles of natural language. In Y. Bar-Hillel (Ed.), Pragmatics of natural language, pp. 50–68. Dordrecht: Reidel.
31. Cohen, L. J. (1977). Can the conversationalist hypothesis be defended? Philosophical studies 31: 81–90.
32. Cruse, D. (1977). The pragmatics of lexical specificity. Journal of linguistics 13: 153–164.
33. De Neys, W. and W. Schaeken (2007). When people are more logical under cognitive load: dual task impact on scalar implicature. Experimental psychology 54: 128–133.
34. Dennett, D. C. (1987). The intentional stance. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
35. Dummett, M. (1973). Frege: Philosophy of language. London: Duckworth.
36. Eckardt, R. (2007). Licensing “or”. In U. Sauerland and P. Stateva (Eds.), Presupposition and implicature in compositional semantics, pp. 34–70. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
37. Evans, J. S. and S. E. Newstead (1980). A study of disjunctive reasoning. Psychological research 41: 373–388.
38. Evans, J. S., S. E. Newstead, and R. M. Byrne (1993). Human reasoning: the psychology of deduction. Hove, East Sussex: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39. Fauconnier, G. (1978). Implication reversal in a natural language. In F. Guenthner and S. Schmidt (Eds.), Formal semantics and pragmatics of natural language, pp. 289–301. Dordrecht: Reidel.
40. Feeney, A., S. Scrafton, A. Duckworth, and S. J. Handley (2004). The story of “some”: everyday pragmatic inference by children and adults. Canadian journal of experimental psychology 58: 121–132.
41. Fox, D. (2007). Free choice and the theory of scalar implicatures. In U. Sauerland and P. Stateva (Eds.), Presupposition and implicature in compositional semantics, pp. 71–120. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
42. Frege, G. (1892). Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 100: 25–50.
43. Frege, G. (1918). Der Gedanke. Beiträge zur Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus 1: 8–77.
44. Gazdar, G. (1979). Pragmatics: implicature, presupposition, and logical form. New York: Academic Press.
45. Geis, M. L. and A. M. Zwicky (1971). On invited inferences. Linguistic inquiry 2: 561–566.
46. Geurts, B. (1998a). The mechanisms of denial. Language 74: 274–307.
47. Geurts, B. (1998b). Scalars. In P. Ludewig and B. Geurts (Eds.), Lexikalische Semantik aus kognitiver Sicht, pp. 85–117. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
48. Geurts, B. (1999a). Presuppositions and pronouns. Oxford: Elsevier.
49. Geurts, B. (1999b). Specifics. In B. Geurts, M. Krifka, and R. van der Sandt (Eds.), Focus and presupposition in multi-speaker discourse, pp. 99–129. Utrecht: ESSLLI 99.
50. Geurts, B. (2003). Reasoning with quantifiers. Cognition 86: 223–251.
51. Geurts, B. (2005). Entertaining alternatives: disjunctions as modals. Natural language semantics 13: 383–410.
52. Geurts, B. (2006). Implicature as a discourse phenomenon. In E. Puig-Waldmüller (Ed.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 11, pp. 261–275. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
53. Geurts, B. (2009). Scalar implicature and local pragmatics. Mind and language 24: 51–79.
54. Geurts, B. and N. Pouscoulous (2009). Embedded implicatures?!? Semantics and pragmatics 2(4): 1–34.
55. Geurts, B. and F. van der Slik (2005). Monotonicity and processing load. Journal of semantics 22: 97–117.
56. Green, G. (1996). Pragmatics and natural language understanding. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
57. Grice, H. P. (1957). Meaning. Philosophical review 66: 377–388. Reprinted in and cited from Grice (1989: 213-223)
58. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts, pp. 41–58. New York: Academic Press. Reprinted in and cited from Grice (1989: 22-40).
59. Grice, H. P. (1978). Further notes on logic and conversation. In P. Cole (Ed.), Syntax and semantics 9: Pragmatics, pp. 113–128. New York: Academic Press. Reprinted in and cited from Grice (1989: 41-57).
60. Grice, H. P. (1981). Presupposition and conversational implicature. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical pragmatics, pp. 183–198. New York: Academic Press. Reprinted in and cited from Grice (1989: 269-282).
61. Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
62. Guasti, M. T., G. Chierchia, S. Crain, F. Foppolo, and A. Gualmini (2005). Why children and adults sometimes (but not always) compute implicatures. Language and cognitive processes 20: 667–696.
63. Hagoort, P. and C. M. Brown (1994). Brain responses to lexical ambiguity resolution and parsing. In C. Clifton, L. Frazier, and K. Rayner (Eds.), Perspectives on sentence processing, pp. 45–81. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
64. Harman, G. H. (1965). The inference to the best explanation. The philosophical review 74: 88–95.
65. Hirschberg, J. (1985). A theory of scalar implicature. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
66. Horn, L. R. (1972). On the semantic properties of the logical operators in English. Ph.D. thesis, University of California at Los Angeles.
67. Horn, L. R. (1984). Towards a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature. In D. Schiffrin (Ed.), Meaning, form, and use in context: linguistic applications, pp. 11–42. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
68. Horn, L. R. (1985). Metalinguistic negation and pragmatic ambiguity. Language 61: 121–174.
69. Horn, L. R. (1989). A natural history of negation. Chicago University Press.
70. Horn, L. R. (1997). All John's children are as bald as the king of France: existential import and the geometry of opposition. CLS 33: 155–179.
71. Horn, L. R. (2000). From if to iff: conditional perfection as pragmatic strengthening. Journal of pragmatics 32: 289–326.
72. Horn, L. R. (2006). The border wars: a neo-Gricean perspective. In K. von Heusinger and K. Turner (Eds.), Where semantics meets pragmatics, pp. 21–48. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
73. Horn, L. R. (2007). Toward a Fregean pragmatics: “Voraussetzung”, “Nebengedanke”, “Andeutung”. In I. Kecskes and L. R. Horn (Eds.), Explorations in pragmatics: linguistic, cognitive and intercultural aspects, pp. 39–69. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
74. Horn, L. R. (2009). WJ-40: Implicature, truth, and meaning. International review of pragmatics 1: 3–34.
75. Huang, Y. T. and J. Snedeker (2006). On-line interpretation of scalar quantifiers: insight into the semantic-pragmatics interface. In Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2006), pp. 351–356.
76. Hurford, J. (1974). Exclusive or inclusive disjunction. Foundations of language 11: 409–411.
77. Jennings, R. (1994). The genealogy of disjunction. Oxford University Press.
78. Johnson, S., V. Slaughter, and S. Carey (1998).Whose gaze will infants follow? the elicitation of gaze-following in 12-month-olds. Developmental science 1: 233–238.
79. Just, M. A. and P. A. Carpenter (1980). A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological review 87: 329–354.
80. Kamp, H. (1973). Free choice permission. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 74: 57–74.
81. Kamp, H. (1979). Semantics versus pragmatics. In F. Guenthner and S. Schmidt (Eds.), Formal semantics and pragmatics of natural language, pp. 255–287. Dordrecht: Reidel.
82. Kamp, H. (1981). A theory of truth and semantic representation. In J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen, and M. Stokhof (Eds.), Formal methods in the study of language, pp. 277–322. Amsterdam: Mathematical Centre Tracts 135.
83. Kamp, H. and U. Reyle (1993). From discourse to logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
84. Karttunen, L. (1971). Discourse referents. Indiana University Linguistics Club. Reprinted in: McCawley (1976: 363-385).
85. Katzir, R. (2007). Structurally-defined alternatives. Linguistics and philosophy 30: 669–690.
86. Klinedinst, N. (2007). Plurals, possibilities, and conjunctive disjunction. UCL working papers in linguistics 19: 261–284.
87. Kutas, M. and S. Hillyard (1980). Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic anomaly. Science 207: 203–205.
88. Landman, F. (1998). Plurals and maximalization. In S. Rothstein (Ed.), Events and grammar, pp. 237–271. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
89. Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.
90. Levinson, S. C. (2000). Presumptive meanings. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
91. Lipton, P. (2004). Inference to the best explanation. London: Routledge.
92. Liszkowski, U., M. Carpenter, T. Striano, and M. Tomasello (2006). Twelve-and 18-month-olds point to provide information. Journal of cognition and development 7: 173–187.
93. Liszkowski, U., M. Carpenter, and M. Tomasello (2008). Twelve-month-olds communicate helpfully and appropriately for knowledgeable and ignorant partners. Cognition 108: 732–739.
94. Matsumoto, Y. (1995). The conversational condition on Horn scales. Linguistics and philosophy 18: 21–60.
95. McCawley, J. D. (Ed.) (1976). Syntax and semantics 7: Notes from the linguistic underground. New York: Academic Press.
96. McCawley, J. D. (1991). Contrastive negation and metalinguistic negation. In Papers from the 27th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society. Part 2: the parasession on negation, pp. 189–206.
97. Mill, J. S. (1865). An examination of Sir William Hamilton's philosophy and of the principal philosophical questions discussed in his writings (2nd ed.). London: Longmans, Green and Co.
98. Milsark, G. (1977). Toward an explanation of certain peculiarities of the existential construction in English. Linguistic analysis 3: 1–29.
99. Mitchell, D. and D. Green (1978). The effects of context and content on immediate processing in reading. The quarterly journal of experimental psychology 30: 609–636.
100. Morgan, J. (1978).Two types of convention in indirect speech acts. In P. Cole (Ed.), Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics, pp. 261–280. New York: Academic Press.
101. Neale, S. (1992). Paul Grice and the philosophy of language. Linguistics and philosophy 15: 509–559.
102. Nieuwland, M. S. and J. J. A. van Berkum (2006). When peanuts fall in love: N400 evidence for the power of discourse. Journal of cognitive neuroscience 18: 1098–1111.
103. Noordman, L. G. (1977). Inferring from language. Doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen.
104. Noveck, I. (2001). When children are more logical than adults: experimental investigations of scalar implicature. Cognition 78: 165–188.
105. Noveck, I. and D. Sperber (2007). The why and how of experimental pragmatics: the case of “scalar inferences”. In N. Burton-Roberts (Ed.), Pragmatics, pp. 184–212. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
106. Noveck, I. A. and A. Posada (2003). Characterising the time course of an implicature. Brain and language 85: 203–210.
107. Nunberg, G. D. (1978). The pragmatics of reference. Indiana University Linguistics Club.
108. Nunberg, G. D. (1979). The non-uniqueness of semantic solutions: polysemy. Linguistics and philosophy: 143–184.
109. Onishi, K. H. and R. Baillargeon (2005). Do 15-month-old infants understand false beliefs? Science 308: 255–258.
110. Papafragou, A. and J. Musolino (2003). Scalar implicatures: experiments at the syntax-semantics interface. Cognition 86: 253–282.
111. Paris, S. G. (1973). Comprehension of language connectives and propositional logical relationships. Journal of experimental child psychology 16: 278–291.
112. Peirce, C. S. (1931). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Volume 1 (edited by Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
113. Pijnacker, J., P. Hagoort, J. Buitelaar, J.-P. Teunisse, and B. Geurts (2009). Pragmatic inferences in high-functioning adults with autism and Asperger syndrome. Journal of autism and developmental disorders 39: 607–618.
114. Pouscoulous, N. (2006). Processing scalar inferences. Doctoral dissertation, EHESS, Paris.
115. Pouscoulous, N., I. Noveck, G. Politzer, and A. Bastide (2007). A developmental investigation of processing costs in implicature production. Language acquisition 14: 347–376.
116. Recanati, F. (1989).The pragmatics of what is said. Mind and language 4: 295–329.
117. Recanati, F. (2003). Embedded implicatures. Philosophical perspectives 17: 299–332.
118. Recanati, F. (2004). Literal meaning. Cambridge University Press.
119. Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch and B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization, pp. 27–48. Lawrence Erlbaum.
120. Russell, B. (2006). Against grammatical computation of scalar implicatures. Journal of semantics 23: 361–382.
121. Sag, I. (1981). Formal semantics and extralinguistic content. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical pragmatics, pp. 273–294. New York: Academic Press.
122. Sauerland, U. (2004). Scalar implicatures in complex sentences. Linguistics and philosophy 27: 367–391.
123. Schulz, K. (2005). A pragmatic solution for the paradox of free choice permission. Synthese 147: 343–377.
124. Schulz, K. and R. van Rooij (2006).Pragmatic meaning and non-monotonic reasoning: the case of exhaustive interpretation. Linguistics and philosophy 29: 205–250.
125. Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: an essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.
126. Searle, J. R. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole and J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts, pp. 59–82. New York: Academic Press.
127. Sedivy, J. C. (2003). Pragmatic versus form-based accounts of referential contrast: evidence for effects of informativity expectations. Journal of psycholinguistic research 32: 3–23.
128. Sedivy, J. C. (2007). Implicature during real time conversation: a view from language processing research. Philosophy compass 2/3: 275–496.
129. Sedivy, J. C., M. K. Tanenhaus, C. Chambers, and G. N. Carlson (1999). Achieving incremental semantic interpretation through contextual representation. Cognition 71: 109–147.
130. Simons, M. (2006). Presupposition without common ground. Unpublished manuscript, Carnegie Mellon University.
131. Soames, S. (1982). How presuppositions are inherited: a solution to the projection problem. Linguistic inquiry 13: 483–545.
132. Southgate, V., A. Senju, and G. Csibra (2007). Action anticipation through attribution of false belief by 2-year-olds. Psychological science 18: 587–592.
133. Spector, B. (2006). Aspects de la pragmatique des opérateurs logiques. Doctoral dissertation, University of Paris VII.
134. Sperber, D. and D. Wilson (1995). Relevance (2nd ed). Oxford: Blackwell.
135. Sperber, D. and D. Wilson (2002). Pragmatics, modularity and mind-reading. Mind and language 17: 3–23.
136. Stalnaker, R. C. (1973). Presuppositions. Journal of philosophical logic 2: 447–457.
137. Stalnaker, R. C. (1974). Pragmatic presuppositions. In M. K. Munitz and P. Unger (Eds.), Semantics and philosophy, pp. 197–214. New York University Press.
138. Storto, G. and M. K. Tanenhaus (2005). Are scalar implicatures computed online? In E. Maier, C. Bary, and J. Huitink (Eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 9, pp. 431–445.
139. Strawson, P. F. (1952). Introduction to logical theory. London: Methuen.
140. Surian, L., S. Caldi, and D. Sperber (2007). Attribution of beliefs by 13-month-old infants. Psychological science 18: 580–586.
141. Thagard, P. and C. Shelley (1997). Abductive reasoning: logic, visual thinking, and coherence. In M. L. Dalla Chiara, K. Doets, D. Mundici, and J. van Benthem (Eds.), Logic and scientific methods, pp. 413–427. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
142. van Berkum, J., D. van den Brink, C. Tesink, M. Kos, and P. Hagoort (2008). The neural integration of speaker and message. Journal of cognitive neuroscience 20: 580–591.
143. van der Auwera, J. (1997a). Conditional perfection. In A. Athanasiadou and R. Dirven (Eds.), On conditionals again, pp. 169–190. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
144. van der Auwera, J. (1997b). Pragmatics in the last quarter century: the case of conditional perfection. Journal of pragmatics 27: 261–274.
145. van der Sandt, R. (1992). Presupposition projection as anaphora resolution. Journal of semantics 9: 333–377.
146. van der Wouden, T. (1997). Negative contexts: collocation, polarity and multiple negation. London: Routledge.
147. van Rooij, R. and K. Schulz (2004). Exhaustive interpretation of complex sentences. Journal of logic, language and information 13: 491–519.
148. von Wright, G. H. (1968). An essay in deontic logic and the general theory of action. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
149. Wainer, J. (2007). Modeling generalized implicatures using non-monotonic logics. Journal of logic, language and information 16: 195–216.
150. Walker, R. C. S. (1975). Conversational implicatures. In S. Blackburn (Ed.), Meaning, reference and necessity, pp. 133–181. Cambridge University Press.
151. Wilson, D. (1975). Presupposition and non-truth-conditional semantics. London: Academic Press.
152. Wilson, D. (2000). Metarepresentation in linguistic communication. In D. Sperber (Ed.), Metarepresentations: a multidisciplinary perspective, pp. 411–448. Oxford University Press.
153. Wilson, D. and R. Carston (2007). A unitary approach to lexical pragmatics: relevance, inference and ad hoc concepts. In N. Burton-Roberts (Ed.), Pragmatics, pp. 230–259. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
154. Wilson, D. and D. Sperber (2004). Relevance theory. In L. R. Horn and G. Ward (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics, pp. 607–632. Oxford: Blackwell.
155. Wimmer, H. and J. Perner (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception. Cognition 13: 41–68.
156. Zimmermann, T. E. (2000). Free choice disjunction and epistemic possibility. Natural language semantics 8: 255–290.