Accuracy of Blood Glucose Meters for Self-Monitoring Affects Glucose Control and Hypoglycemia Rate in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes

Diabetes Technology and Therapeutics

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 275-282

  Boettcher, Claudia ^a   Dost, Axel ^b   Wudy, Stefan A ^a   Flechtner Mors, Marion ^c   Borkenstein, Martin ^d   Schiel, Ralf ^e   Weitzel, Dieter ^f   Bechtold Dalla Pozza, Susanne ^g   Wolf, Johannes ^h   Holl, Reinhard W ^c  

^a JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b JENA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ULM MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

^d MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

^e MEDIGREIF Inselklinik Heringsdorf Department of Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases   (Germany)

^f DEUTSCHE KLINIK FÜR DIAGNOSTIK   (Germany)

^g UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^h St Vincent Children's Hospital   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE; HEMOGLOBIN A1C; GLYCOSYLATED HEMOGLOBIN; HEMOGLOBIN A1C PROTEIN, HUMAN;

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; BLOOD GLUCOSE METER; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; CHILD; FEMALE; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; HYPOGLYCEMIA; HYPOGLYCEMIC COMA; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; LABORATORY TEST; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF EXAMINATION; SELF MONITORING; AUSTRIA; BLOOD; COMPLICATION; DEVICES; DIABETIC COMA; EVALUATION STUDY; FACTUAL DATABASE; GERMANY; INFANT; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REFERENCE VALUE; STANDARDS;

ADOLESCENT; AUSTRIA; BLOOD GLUCOSE SELF-MONITORING; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DATA ACCURACY; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; DIABETIC COMA; FEMALE; GERMANY; HEMOGLOBIN A, GLYCOSYLATED; HUMANS; HYPOGLYCEMIA; INFANT; MALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REFERENCE VALUES;

EID: 84925059938     PISSN: 15209156     EISSN: 15578593     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/dia.2014.0262     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bergenstal RM, Gavin JR; Global Consensus Conference on Glucose Monitoring Panel: The role of self-monitoring of blood glucose in the care of people with diabetes: report of a global consensus conference.AmJMed 2005;118(Suppl 9A):1S-6S.
2. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group: The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993;329:977-986.
3. Boulton AJM, Del Prato S: Regulation of medical devices used in diabetology in Europe: time for reform? Diabetologia. 2012;55:2295-2297.
4. International Organization for Standardization: In Vitro Diagnostic Test Systems - Requirements for Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems for Self-Testing in Managing Diabetes Mellitus. ISO 15197:2003. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2003.
5. International Organization for Standardization: In Vitro Diagnostic Test Systems - Requirements for Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems for Self-Testing in Managing Diabetes Mellitus. ISO 15197:2013. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2013.
6. Clarke WL, Cox D, Gonder-Frederick LA, et al.: Evaluating clinical accuracy of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Care 1987;10:622-628.
7. Parkes JL, Slatin SL, Pardo S, et al.: A new consensus error grid to evaluate the clinical significance of inaccuracies in the measurement of blood glucose. Diabetes Care 2000;23:1143-1148.
8. Freckmann G, Baumstark A, Jendrike N, et al.: System accuracy evaluation of 27 blood glucose monitoring systems according to DIN EN ISO 15197. Diabetes Technol Ther 2010;12:221-341.
9. Hasslacher C, Kulozik F, Platten I: Accuracy of self monitoring blood glucose systems in a clinical setting: application of new planned ISO-standards. Clin Lab 2013;59:727-733.
10. Brazg RL, Klaff LJ, Parkin CG: Performance variability of seven commonly used self-monitoring of blood glucose systems: clinical considerations for patients and providers. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2013;7:144-152.
11. Freckmann G, Schmid C, Baumstark A, et al.: System accuracy evaluation of 43 blood glucose monitoring systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose according to DIN EN ISO 15197. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2012;6:1060-1075.
12. Boyd JC, Bruns DE: Quality specifications for glucose meters: assessment by simulations modeling of errors in insulin dose. Clin Chem 2001;47:209-214.
13. Breton MD, Kovatchev BP: Impact of blood glucose self-monitoring errors on glucose variability, risk for hypoglycemia, and average glucose control in type 1 diabetes: an in silico study. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2010;4:562-570.
14. Budimann ES, Samant N, Resch A: Clinical implications and economic impact of accuracy differences among commercially available blood glucose monitoring systems. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2013;7:365-380.
15. Clarke W, Jones T, Rewers A, et al.: Assessment and management of hypoglycemia in children and adolescents with diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes 2009;10(Suppl 12):134-145.
16. Matthews DE, Farewell VT: Using and Understanding Medical Statistics. Basel: S. Karger AG, 2007.
17. Tack C, Pohlmeier H, Behnke T, et al.: Accuracy evaluation of five blood glucose monitoring systems obtained from the pharmacy: a European multicenter study with 453 subjects. Diabetes Technol Ther 2012;14:330-337.
18. Pfützner A, Mitri M, Musholt P, et al.: Clinical assessment of the accuracy of blood glucose measurement devices. Curr Med Res Opin 2012;28:525-531.
19. Hortensius J, Singerland RJ, Kleefstra N, et al.: Self-monitoring of blood glucose: the use of the first or the second drop of blood. Diabetes Care 2011;34:556-560.
20. Perwien AR, Johnson SB, Dymtrow D, et al.: Blood glucose monitoring skills in children with type I diabetes. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2000;39:351-357.
21. Bundesärztekammer: Bekanntmachungen: Richtlinie der Bundesärztekammer zur Qualitätssicherung laboratoriumsmedizinischer Untersuchungen. Dtsch Arztebl 2008;105:A341-A355.
22. International Organization for Standardization: Medical Laboratories - Requirements for Quality and Competence. ISO 15189:2012. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2012.
23. Baumstark A, Pleus S, Schmid C, et al.: Lot-to-lot variability of test strips and accuracy assessment of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose according to ISO 15197. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2012;6:1076-1086.
24. Abbott Diabetes Care, Abbott Laboratories: Important: Urgent Product Recall FreeStyle Blood Glucose Monitoring System. 2014. https://www.abbottdiabetescare.com/press-room/2014/2014-b.html (accessed June 15, 2014).
25. Abbott Diabetes Care, Abbott Laboratories: Important: Medical Devices Notification FreeStyle Lite Blood Glucose Test Strips Lot Number 0822524. 2009. https://www.abbottdiabetescare.com/press-room/2009/2009-c.html (accessed June 15, 2014).
26. U.S. Food and Drug Administration: Bayer Diabetes Care Contour Test Strips Recall Notice Test Strip Recall for Contour TS. 2007. www.fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/SafetyInformation/SafetyAlertsforHumanMedicalSafetyAl/ucm155017.htm (accessed June 15, 2014).
27. Raine CH, Schrock LE, Edelman SV, et al: Significant insulin dose errors may occur if blood glucose results are obtained from miscoded meters. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2007;1:205-210.
28. Haller MJ, Shuster JJ, Schatz D, et al.: Adverse impact of temperature and humidity on blood glucose monitoring reliability: a pilot study. Diabetes Technol Ther 2007;9:1-9.
29. The Diabetes Research in Children Network (DIRECNET) Research Group: A multicenter study of the accuracy of the One Touch Ultra home glucose meter in children with type1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther 2003;5:933-941.
30. Arabadjief D, Nichols JH: Assessing glucose meter accuracy. Curr Med Res Opin 2006;22:2167-2174.
31. Roche Diagnostics, Accu-Chek Sites. Urgent Medical Device Correction: Accu-Chek Compact Plus Test Strips Patients-End Users. 2014. https://www.accu-chek.com/us/compact-plus-alert.html (accessed June 15, 2014).
32. Campbell MS, Schatz DA, Chen V, et al.: A contrast between children and adolescents with excellent and poor control: the T1D Exchange Clinic Registry experience. Pediatr Diabetes 2014;15:110-117.
33. Rosenbauer J, Dost A, Karges B, et al.: Improved metabolic control in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a trend analysis using prospective multicenter data from Germany and Austria. Diabetes Care 2012;35:80-86.
34. Ziegler R, Heidtmann B, Hilgard D, et al.: Frequency of SMBG correlates with HbA1c and acute complications in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes 2011;12:11-17.
35. Tsiouli E, Alexopoulos EC, Stefanaki C, et al.: Effect of diabetes-related family stress on glycemic control in young patients with type 1 diabetes: systematic review. Can Fam Physician 2013;59:143-149.
36. Hood KK, Rausch JR, Dolan LM: Depressive symptoms predict change in glycemic control in adolescents with type1 diabetes: rates, magnitude, and moderators of change. Pediatr Diabetes 2011;12:718-723.
37. Chase HP, Lockspeiser T, Peery B, et al.: The impact of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial and Humalog insulin on glycohemoglobin levels and severe hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2001;24:430-434.
38. Gaudieri PA, Chen R, Greer TF, et al.: Cognitive function in children with type 1 diabetes. A meta-analysis. Diabetes Care 2008;31:1892-1897.
39. Hannonen R, Tupola S, Ahonen T, et al.: Neurocognitive functioning in children with type-1 diabetes with and without episodes of severe hypoglycaemia. Dev Med Child Neurol 2003;45:262-268.
40. Åsvold BO, Sand T, Hestad K, et al.: Cognitive function in type 1 diabetic adults with early exposure to severe hypoglycemia. A 16-year follow up study. Diabetes Care 2010;33:1945-1947.
41. Edge J, Ford-Adams ME, Dunger DB: Causes of death in children with insulin dependent diabetes 1990-96. Arch Dis Child 1999;81:318.