System accuracy evaluation of 43 blood glucose monitoring systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose according to DIN en ISO 15197

Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Volumn 6, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1060-1075

  Freckmann, Guido ^a   Schmid, Christina ^a   Baumstark, Annette ^a   Pleus, Stefan ^a   Link, Manuela ^a   Haug, Cornelia ^a  

^a Institut Für Diabetes Technologie Forschungs und Entwicklungsgesellschaft MbH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Blood glucose monitoring systems; Conformit europ enne mark; DIN EN ISO 15197:2003; Self monitoring of blood glucose; System accuracy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLOOD GLUCOSE METER; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COMFORT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; EVALUATION STUDY; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; PACKAGING; QUALITY CONTROL; SELF MONITORING; STANDARD; TEST STRIP; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BLOOD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICE APPROVAL; DEVICES; DIABETES MELLITUS; EUROPEAN UNION; EVALUATION; FEMALE; INSTRUMENTATION; INSULIN INFUSION; LEGAL ASPECT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; REPRODUCIBILITY;

OXYGEN;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BLOOD GLUCOSE; BLOOD GLUCOSE SELF-MONITORING; DEVICE APPROVAL; DIABETES MELLITUS; EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES; EUROPEAN UNION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INSULIN INFUSION SYSTEMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OXYGEN; REFERENCE STANDARDS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84875805117     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19322968     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/193229681200600510     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(14):977-86.
2. Blonde L, Karter AJ. Current evidence regarding the value of self-monitored blood glucose testing. Am J Med. 2005;118(Suppl 9A):20S-6S. (Pubitemid 41446939)
3. IDF Clinical Guidelines Task Force. Global Guideline for Type 2 Diabetes: recommendations for standard, comprehensive, and minimal care. Diabet Med. 2006;23(6):579-93.
4. Rodbard HW, Blonde L, Braithwaite SS, Brett EM, Cobin RH, Handelsman Y, Hellman R, Jellinger PS, Jovanovic LG, Levy P, Mechanick JI, Zangeneh F; AACE Diabetes Mellitus Clinical Practice Guidelines Task Force. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists medical guidelines for clinical practice for the management of diabetes mellitus. Endocr Pract. 2007; 13 Suppl 1:1-68.
5. Lagarde WH, Barrows FP, Davenport ML, Kang M, Guess HA, Calikoglu AS. Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Pediatr Diabetes. 2006;7(3):159-64.
6. Bergenstal RM, Gavin JR 3rd; Global Consensus Conference on Glucose Monitoring Panel. The role of self-monitoring of blood glucose in the care of people with diabetes: report of a global consensus conference. Am J Med. 2005;118(Suppl 9A):1S-6S. (Pubitemid 41446936)
7. Martin S, Schneider B, Heinemann L, Lodwig V, Kurth HJ, Kolb H, Scherbaum WA. Self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 2 diabetes and long-term outcome: an epidemiological cohort study. Diabetologia. 2006;49(2):271-8. (Pubitemid 43185395)
8. Polonsky WH, Fisher L, Schikman CH, Hinnen DA, Parkin CG, Jelsovsky Z, Petersen B, Schweitzer M, Wagner RS. Structured self-monitoring of blood glucose significantly reduces A1C levels in poorly controlled, noninsulin-treated type 2 diabetes: results from the Structured Testing Program study. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(2):262-7.
9. Ng WY, Tiong CC, Jacob E. Maltose interference-free test strips for blood glucose testing at point-of-care: a laboratory performance evaluation. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2010;12(11):889-93.
10. Rao A, Wiley M, Iyengar S, Nadeau D, Carnevale J. Individuals achieve more accurate results with meters that are codeless and employ dynamic electrochemistry. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010;4(1):145-50.
11. Rice MJ. Dynamic electrochemistry: a step in the right direction. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011;5(5):1176-8.
12. Musholt PB, Schipper C, Thomé N, Ramljak S, Schmidt M, Forst T, Pfützner A. Dynamic electrochemistry corrects for hematocrit interference on blood glucose determinations with patient self-measurement devices. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011;5(5):1167-75.
13. Kempf K, Heinemann L. Dynamic electrochemistry: an innovative method for high-quality blood glucose monitoring. Diabetologie und Stoffwechsel. 2012;7(2):121-6.
14. International Organization for Standardization. In vitro diagnostic test systems - requirements for blood-glucose monitoring systems for self-testing in managing diabetes mellitus. DIN EN ISO 15197:2003.
15. International Organization for Standardization. In vitro diagnostic test systems - requirements for blood-glucose monitoring systems for self-testing in managing diabetes mellitus. (Draft.) ISO/DIS 15197:2011.
16. Freckmann G, Baumstark A, Jendrike N, Zschornack E, Kocher S, Tshiananga J, Heister F, Haug C. System accuracy evaluation of 27 blood glucose monitoring systems according to DIN EN ISO 15197. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2010;12(3):221-31.
17. Bundesärztekammer. Richtlinie der Bundesärztekammer zur Qualitätssicherung laboratoriumsmedizinischer Untersuchungen. Dtsch Ärztebl. 2008;105(7):341-55.
18. Astles JR, Sedor FA, Toffaletti JG. Evaluation of the YSI 2300 glucose analyzer: algorithm-corrected results are accurate and specific. Clin Biochem. 1996;29(1):27-31. (Pubitemid 26073095)
19. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1(8476):307-10. (Pubitemid 16134762)
20. Krouwer JS, Cembrowski GS. A review of standards and statistics used to describe blood glucose monitor performance. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010;4(1):75-83.
21. Heinemann L, Lodwig V, Freckmann G. Accuracy in blood glucose measurement: what will a tightening of requirements yield? J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012;6(2):435-43.
22. Arzneiversorgungsvertrag (gültig ab 01. Oktober 2010) zwischen den Ersatzkassen und dem Deutschen Apothekerverband e. V. http://www.vdek.com/ vertragspartner/apotheken/Arzneiversorgungsvertrag-1-10-2010.pdf (accessed August 28, 2012).
23. Freckmann G, Haug C, Heinemann L. Blutzuckerselbstmessung heute: Sind alle Geräte gleich? Diabetes Stoffwechsel Herz. 2011;20(4):235-41.
24. Klonoff DC. The need for separate performance goals for glucose sensors in the hypoglycemic, normoglycemic, and hyperglycemic ranges. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(3):834-6. (Pubitemid 38280561)
25. Ginsberg BH. We need tighter regulatory standards for blood glucose monitoring, but they should be for accuracy disclosure. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010;4(5):1265-8.
26. Walsh J, Roberts R, Vigersky RA, Schwartz F. New Criteria for Assessing the Accuracy of Blood Glucose Monitors Meeting, October 28, 2011. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012;6(2):466-74.
27. Twomey PJ. Plasma glucose measurement with the Yellow Springs Glucose 2300 STAT and the Olympus AU640. J Clin Pathol. 2004;57(7):752-4. (Pubitemid 38901492)
28. D'Orazio P, Burnett RW, Fogh-Andersen N, Jacobs E, Kuwa K, Külpmann WR, Larsson L, Lewenstam A, Maas AH, Mager G, Naskalski JW, Okorodudu AO; International Federation of Clinical Chemistry Scientific Division Working Group on Selective Electrodes and Point of Care Testing. Approved IFCC recommendation on reporting results for blood glucose (abbreviated). Clin Chem. 2005;51(9):1573-6. (Pubitemid 41233089)
29. Ginsberg BH. Factors affecting blood glucose monitoring: sources of errors in measurement. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009;3(4):903-13.
30. Hönes J, Müller P, Surridge N. The technology behind glucose meters: test strips. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2008;10(S1):S10-26. (Pubitemid 351725046)
31. Tang Z, Louie RF, Lee JH, Lee DM, Miller EE, Kost GJ. Oxygen effects on glucose meter measurements with glucose dehydrogenase- and oxidase-based test strips for point-of-care testing. Crit Care Med. 2001;29(5):1062-70. (Pubitemid 32424364)
32. Tang Z, Louie RF, Payes M, Chang KC, Kost GJ. Oxygen effects on glucose measurements with a reference analyzer and three handheld meters. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2000;2(3):349-62.
33. Kurahashi K, Maruta H, Usuda Y, Ohtsuka M. Influence of blood sample oxygen tension on blood glucose concentration measured using an enzyme-electrode method. Crit Care Med. 1997;25(2):231-5. (Pubitemid 27086055)
34. Kristensen GB, Monsen G, Skeie S, Sandberg S. Standardized evaluation of nine instruments for self-monitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2008;10(6):467-77.
35. Kuo CY, Hsu CT, Ho CS, Su TE, Wu MH, Wang CJ. Accuracy and precision evaluation of seven self-monitoring blood glucose systems. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011;13(5):596-600.
36. Tack C, Pohlmeier H, Behnke T, Schmid V, Grenningloh M, Forst T, Pfützner A. Accuracy evaluation of five blood glucose monitoring systems obtained from the pharmacy: a european multicenter study with 453 subjects. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012;14(4):330-7.
37. Essack Y, Hoffman M, Rensburg M, Van Wyk J, Meyer CS, Erasmus R. A comparison of five glucometers in South Africa. JEMDSA. 2009;14(2):102-5.
38. Harrison B, Leazenby C, Halldorsdottir S. Accuracy of the CONTOUR® blood glucose monitoring system. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011;5(4):1009-13.
39. Pfützner A, Mitri M, Musholt PB, Sachsenheimer D, Borchert M, Yap A, Forst T. Clinical assessment of the accuracy of blood glucose measurement devices. Curr Med Res Opin. 2012;28(4):525-31.