Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury

Handbook of Clinical Neurology

Volumn 128, Issue , 2015, Pages 455-474

  Maas, Andrew I R ^a   Lingsma, Hester F ^b   Roozenbeek, Bob ^b  

^a ANTWERP UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^b ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Advanced MR imaging; Biomarkers; Discrimination; Prediction model; Prognosis; Traumatic brain injury; Validation

Indexed keywords

BRAIN INJURIES; HUMAN; NEUROIMAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROGNOSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY;

BRAIN INJURIES; HUMANS; NEUROIMAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGNOSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84924972494     PISSN: 00729752     EISSN: 22124152     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-63521-1.00029-7     Document Type: Chapter

References (129)

1. AAAM The Abbreviated Injury Scale, 1990 revision. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine 1990, 15-24. Des Plaines, IL.
2. Aarabi B., Alden T.D., Chestnut R.M., et al. Management and prognosis of penetrating brain injury. J Trauma 2001, 51(Suppl.):S1-S86.
3. Andrews P.J., Sleeman D.H., Statham P.F., et al. Predicting recovery in patients suffering from traumatic brain injury by using admission variables and physiological data: a comparison between decision tree analysis and logistic regression. J Neurosurg 2002, 97:326-336.
4. Arango-Lasprilla J.C., Rosenthal M., Deluca J., et al. Traumatic brain injury and functional outcomes: does minority status matter?. Brain Inj 2007, 21:701-708.
5. Ashwal S., Babikian T., Gardner-Nichols J., et al. Susceptibility-weighted imaging and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in assessment of outcome after pediatric traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006, 87(Suppl. 2):S50-S58.
6. Ashwal S., Cobert C., Aaen G., et al. Prevalence of cerebral microhemorrhage on susceptibility weighted imaging and correlation with long term outcome in pediatric non-accidental trauma. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2009, 13:S87. 10.1016/S1090-3798(09)70272-7.
7. Bahloul M., Chelly H., Ben Hmida M., et al. Prognosis of traumatic head injury in South Tunisia: a multivariate analysis of 437 cases. J Trauma 2004, 57:255-261.
8. Baker S.P., O'Neill B., Haddon W., et al. The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma 1974, 14:187-196.
9. Barer D. Could stroke mega-trials be missing important treatment effects?. Cerebrovasc Dis 1998, (Suppl. 4):47.
10. Barlow P., Teasdale G. Prediction of outcome and the management of severe head injuries: the attitudes of neurosurgeons. Neurosurgery 1986, 19:989-991.
11. Beauchamp M.H., Ditchfield M., Babl F.E., et al. Detecting traumatic brain lesions in children: CT versus MRI versus susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI). J Neurotrauma 2011, 28:915-927.
12. Beaudeux J.L. S100B protein: a novel biomarker for the diagnosis of head injury [in French]. Ann Pharm Fr 2009, 67:187-194.
13. Belli A., Sen J., Petzold A., et al. Extracellular N-acetylaspartate depletion in traumatic brain injury. J Neurochem 2006, 96:861-869.
14. Berger R.P., Beers S.R., Richichi R., et al. Serum biomarker concentrations and outcome after pediatric traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2007, 24:1793-1801.
15. Berger R.P., Bazaco M.C., Wagner A.K., et al. Trajectory analysis of serum biomarker concentrations facilitates outcome prediction after pediatric traumatic and hypoxemic brain injury. Dev Neurosci 2010, 32:396-405.
16. Brain Trauma Foundation Guidelines for the management and prognosis of severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2001, 51(Suppl. 2):S1-S86.
17. Bukur M., Kurtovic S., Berry C., et al. Pre-hospital hypothermia is not associated with increased survival after traumatic brain injury. J Surg Res 2012, 175:24-29.
18. Butcher I., Maas A.I., Lu J., et al. Prognostic value of admission blood pressure in traumatic brain injury; results from the IMPACT study. J Neurotrauma 2007, 24:294-302.
19. Chang R.W.S., Lee B., Jacobs S. Accuracy of decisions to withdraw therapy in critically ill patients: clinical judgment versus a computer model. Crit Care Med 1989, 17:1091-1097.
20. Chastain C.A., Oyoyo U.E., Zipperman M., et al. Predicting outcomes of traumatic brain injury by imaging modality and injury distribution. J Neurotrauma 2009, 26:1183-1196.
21. Chesnut R.M. Secondary brain insults after head injury: clinical perspectives. New Horiz 1995, 3:366-375.
22. Chun K.A., Manley G.T., Stiver S.I., et al. Interobserver variability in the assessment of CT imaging features of traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2010, 27:325-330.
23. Czeiter E., Mondello S., Kovacs N., et al. Brain injury biomarkers may improve the predictive power of the IMPACT outcome calculator. Acta Neurochir 2011, 153:1882.
24. Dardiotis E., Fountas K.N., Dardioti M., et al. Genetic association studies in patients with traumatic brain injury. Neurosurg Focus 2010, 28:E9.
25. Dawes R.M., Faust D., Meehl R.E. Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science 1989, 243:1668-1674.
26. Demetriades D., Murray J., Martin M., et al. Pedestrians injured by automobiles: relationship of age to injury type and severity. J Am Coll Surg 2004, 199:382-387.
27. Egea-Guerrero J.J., Revuelto-Rey J., Murillo-Cabezas F., et al. Accuracy of the S100β protein as a marker of brain damage in traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 2012, 26:76-82.
28. Farace E., Alves W.M. Do women fare worse? A meta-analysis of gender differences in outcome after traumatic brain injury. Neurosurg Focus 2000, 8:e6.
29. Fraser D.D., Close T.E., Rose K.L., et al. Severe traumatic brain injury in children elevates glial fibrillary acidic protein in cerebrospinal fluid and serum. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2011, 12:319-324.
30. Friedman G., Froom P., Sazbon L., et al. Apolipoprotein E-epsilon4 genotype predicts a poor outcome in survivors of traumatic brain injury. Neurology 1999, 52:244-248.
31. Gabbe B.J., Simpson P.M., Sutherland A.M., et al. Functional measures at discharge: are they useful predictors of longer term outcomes for trauma registries?. Ann Surg 2008, 247:854-859.
32. Galanaud D., Perlbarg V., Gupta R., et al. Assessment of white matter injury and outcome in severe brain trauma: a prospective multicenter cohort. Anesthesiology 2012, 117:1300-1310. Neuro Imaging for Coma Emergence and Recovery Consortium.
33. Geurts B.H., Andriessen T.M., Vos P.E., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in traumatic brain injury: a comparison between MR sequences in inter-rater reliability, lesion detection and relationship with outcome. Neuroradiology 2009, 51:S104.
34. Gomez P.A., Lobato R.D., Boto G.R., et al. Age and outcome after severe head injury. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2000, 142:373-380. discussion 380-381.
35. Guzel A., Er U., Tatli M., et al. Serum neuron-specific enolase as a predictor of short-term outcome and its correlation with Glasgow Coma Scale in traumatic brain injury. Neurosurg Rev 2008, 31:439-444. discussion 444-445.
36. Hartings J.A., Bullock M.R., Okonkwo D.O., et al. Spreading depolarisations and outcome after traumatic brain injury: a prospective observational study. Lancet Neurol 2011, 10:1058-1064.
37. Hayes R., Mondello S., Wang K. Clinical studies of the utility of serum biomarkers for the diagnosis, prognosis, and management of traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2011, 28:A24.
38. Heinzelmann M., Platz A., Imhof H.G. Outcome after acute extradural haematoma, influence of additional injuries and neurological complications in the ICU. Injury 1996, 27:345-349.
39. Helmy A., Timofeev I., Palmer C.R., et al. Hierarchical log linear analysis of admission blood parameters and clinical outcome following traumatic brain injury. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2010, 152:953-957.
40. Ho K.M., Burrell M., Rao S., et al. Extracranial injuries are important in determining mortality of neurotrauma. Crit Care Med 2010, 38:1562-1568.
41. Holshouser B., Aaen G., Colbert C., et al. Lactate and decreased NAA predict longterm outcome better than presence of microhemorrhages seen with susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) after non-accidental trauma (NAT). J Neurotrauma 2009, 26:A15.
42. Hukkelhoven C.W., Steyerberg E.W., Rampen A.J., et al. Patient age and outcome following severe traumatic brain injury: an analysis of 5600 patients. J Neurosurg 2003, 99:666-673.
43. Jacobs B., Beems T., Stulemeijer M., et al. Outcome prediction in mild traumatic brain injury: age and clinical variables are stronger predictors than CT abnormalities. J Neurotrauma 2010, 27:655-668.
44. Jennett B., Bond M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet 1975, 1:480-484.
45. Jennett B., Teasdale G., Braakman R., et al. Predicting outcome in individual patients after severe head injury. Lancet 1976, 1:1031-1034.
46. Kaufmann M.A., Buchmann B., Scheidegger D., et al. Severe head injury: should expected outcome influence resuscitation and first-day decisions?. Resuscitation 1992, 23:199-206.
47. Kis D., Mencser Z., Czigner A., et al. Prediction of long term outcome in severe traumatic brain injury using diffusion tensor imaging and probabilistic tractography. Acta Neurochir 2011, 153:1883.
48. Korfias S., Stranjalis G., Boviatsis E., et al. Serum S-100B protein monitoring in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Intensive Care Med 2007, 33:255-260.
49. Krnjak L., Gradišek P., Herman S., et al. High concentrations protein s100b in serum predicts mortality after traumatic brain injury. Eur J Pharm Sci 2011, 44:58-59.
50. Kumar R., Husain M., Gupta R.K., et al. Serial changes in the white matter diffusion tensor imaging metrics in moderate traumatic brain injury and correlation with neuro-cognitive function. J Neurotrauma 2009, 26:481-495.
51. Lannoo E., Van Rietvelde F., Colardyn F., et al. Early predictors of mortality and morbidity after severe closed head injury. J Neurotrauma 2000, 17:403-414.
52. Lefering R., Paffrath T., Linker R., et al. Head injury and outcome - what influence do concomitant injuries have?. J Trauma 2008, 65:1036-1043.
53. Lesko M. Comparing the prognostic performance of S100B with prognostic models in traumatic brain injury. Emerg Med J 2010, 27:A2.
54. Lingsma H.F., Roozenbeek B., Steyerberg E.W., et al. Early prognosis in traumatic brain injury: from prophecies to predictions. Lancet Neurol 2010, 9:543-554.
55. Little R.J.A., Rubin D.B. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data 2002, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ. 2nd edn.
56. Lo T., Jones P., Chambers I., et al. Serum biomarkers and prediction of significantly deranged cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) insult magnitude in childhood brain trauma. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2011, 12:A112.
57. Lumpkins K.M., Bochicchio G.V., Keledjian K., et al. Glial fibrillary acidic protein is highly correlated with brain injury. J Trauma 2008, 65:778-782. discussion 782-784.
58. Maas A.I., Hukkelhoven C.W., Marshall L.F., et al. Prediction of outcome in traumatic brain injury with computed tomographic characteristics: a comparison between the computed tomographic classification and combinations of computed tomographic predictors. Neurosurgery 2005, 57:1173-1182.
59. Maas A.I., Marmarou A., Murray G.D., et al. Prognosis and clinical trial design in traumatic brain injury: the IMPACT study. J Neurotrauma 2007, 24:232-238.
60. Maas A.I.R., Engel D.C., Lingsma H. Prognosis after traumatic brain injury. Youmans Neurological Surgery 2011, 3497-3506. Elsevier-Saunders, Philadelphia, USA. 6th edn. R.H. Winn (Ed.).
61. Mac Donald C.L., Johnson A.M., Cooper D., et al. Detection of blast-related traumatic brain injury in U.S. military personnel. N Engl J Med 2011, 364:2091-2100.
62. Manley G., Knudson M.M., Morabito D., et al. Hypotension, hypoxia, and head injury: frequency, duration, and consequences. Arch Surg 2001, 136:1118-1123.
63. Margulies D.R., Hiatt J.R., Vinson D., et al. Relationship of hyperglycemia and severity of illness to neurologic outcome in head injury patients. Am Surg 1994, 60:387-390.
64. Marmarou A., Lu J., Butcher I., et al. Prognostic value of the Glasgow Coma Scale and pupil reactivity in traumatic brain injury assessed pre-hospital and on enrolment: an IMPACT analysis. J Neurotrauma 2007, 24:270-280.
65. Marshall L.F., Bowers S., Klauber M.R., et al. A new classification of head injury based on computerised tomography. J Neurosurg 1991, 75(Suppl.):S14-S20.
66. Matsushita M., Hosoda K., Naitoh Y., et al. Utility of diffusion tensor imaging in the acute stage of mild to moderate traumatic brain injury for detecting white matter lesions and predicting long-term cognitive function in adults. J Neurosurg 2011, 115:130-139.
67. McHugh G.S., Engel D.C., Butcher I., et al. Prognostic value of secondary insults in traumatic brain injury: results from the IMPACT study. J Neurotrauma 2007, 24:287-293.
68. Meric E., Gunduz A., Turedi S., et al. The prognostic value of neuron-specific enolase in head trauma patients. J Emerg Med 2010, 38:297-301.
69. Mondello S., Linnet A., Buki A., et al. Clinical utility of serum levels of ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase as a biomarker for severe traumatic brain injury. Neurosurgery 2012, 70:666-675.
70. Mondello S., Schmid K., Berger R.P., et al. The challenge of mild traumatic brain injury: role of biochemical markers in diagnosis of brain damage. Med Res Rev 2014, 34:503-531.
71. Perel P., Arango M., et al. Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: practical prognostic models based on large cohort of international patients. BMJ 2008, 336:425-429. MRC CRASH Trial Collaborators.
72. Murillo-Cabezas F., Muñoz-Sánchez M.A., Rincón-Ferrari M.D., et al. The prognostic value of the temporal course of S100beta protein in post-acute severe brain injury: a prospective and observational study. Brain Inj 2010, 24:609-619.
73. Murray G.D., Barer D., Choi S., et al. Design and analysis of phase III trials with ordered outcome scales: the concept of the sliding dichotomy. J Neurotrauma 2005, 22:511-517.
74. Murray G.D., Butcher I., McHugh G.S., et al. Multivariate prognostic analysis in traumatic brain injury: results from the IMPACT study. J Neurotrauma 2007, 24:329-337.
75. Mushkudiani N.A., Engel D.C., Steyerberg E.W., et al. Prognostic value of demographic characteristics in traumatic brain injury: results from the IMPACT study. J Neurotrauma 2007, 24:259-269.
76. Mushkudiani N.A., Hukkelhoven C.W., Hernandez A.V., et al. A systematic review finds methodological improvements necessary for prognostic models in determining traumatic brain injury outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2008, 61:331-343.
77. Naeimi Z.S., Weinhofer A., Sarahrudi K., et al. Predictive value of S-100B protein and neuron specifi c-enolase as markers of traumatic brain damage in clinical use. Brain Inj 2006, 20:463-468.
78. Nylén K., Ost M., Csajbok L.Z., et al. Increased serum-GFAP in patients with severe traumatic brain injury is related to outcome. J Neurol Sci 2006, 240:85-91.
79. Nylén K., Ost M., Csajbok L.Z., et al. Serum levels of S100B, S100A1B and S100BB are all related to outcome after severe traumatic brain injury. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2008, 150:221-227.
80. Olivecrona M., Wildemyr Z., Koskinen L.O. The apolipoprotein E epsilon4 allele and outcome in severe traumatic brain injury treated by an intracranial pressure-targeted therapy. J Neurosurg 2010, 112:1113-1119.
81. Ono J., Yamaura A., Kubota M. Outcome prediction in severe head injury: analyses of clinical prognostic factors. J Clin Neurosci 2001, 8:120-123.
82. Ost M., Nylén K., Csajbok L., et al. Apolipoprotein E polymorphism and gender difference in outcome after severe traumatic brain injury. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2008, 52:1364-1369.
83. Paliotta C., Bakhadirov K., Marquez de la Plata C., et al. Analyzing diffusion tensor imaging data in traumatic axonal injury: what is the best approach?. J Neurotrauma 2009, 26:A36.
84. Panczykowski D.M., Puccio A.M., Scruggs B.J., et al. Prospective independent validation of impact modeling as a prognostic tool in severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2012, 29:47-52.
85. Perel P., Edwards P., Wentz R., et al. Systematic review of prognostic models in traumatic brain injury. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2006, 6:38.
86. Perel P., Arango M., Clayton T., et al. Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: practical prognostic models based on large cohort of international patients. BMJ 2008, 336:425-429.
87. Perlbarg V., Puybasset L., Tollard E., et al. Relation between brain lesion location and clinical outcome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a diffusion tensor imaging study using voxel-based approaches. Hum Brain Mapp 2009, 30:3924-3933.
88. Pruthi N., Chandramouli B.A., Kuttappa T.B., et al. Apolipoprotein E polymorphism and outcome after mild to moderate traumatic brain injury: a study of patient population in India. Neurol India 2010, 58:264-269.
89. Rainey T., Lesko M., Sacho R., et al. Predicting outcome after severe traumatic brain injury using the serum S100B biomarker: results using a single (24h) time-point. Resuscitation 2009, 80:341-345.
90. Ratanalert S., Chompikul J., Hirunpat S. Talked and deteriorated head injury patients: how many poor outcomes can be avoided?. J Clin Neurosci 2002, 9:640-643.
91. Roozenbeek B., Chiu Y., Lingsma H., et al. Predicting 14-day mortality after severe traumatic brain injury: validity of the IMPACT models in the Brain Trauma Foundation TBI-track® New York State database. J Neurotrauma 2012, 29:1306-1312.
92. Roozenbeek B., Lingsma H., Lecky F., et al. Prediction of outcome after moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: external validation of the IMPACT and CRASH prognostic models. Crit Care Med 2012, 40:1609-1617.
93. Rovlias A., Kotsou S. The influence of hyperglycemia on neurological outcome in patients with severe head injury. Neurosurgery 2000, 46:335-343.
94. Rovlias A., Kotsou S. The blood leukocyte count and its prognostic significance in severe head injury. Surg Neurol 2001, 55:190-196.
95. Royston P., Altman D.G., Sauerbrei W. Dichotomizing continuous predictors in multiple regression: a bad idea. Stat Med 2006, 25:127-141.
96. Saggar V., Mittal R.S., Vyas M.C. Hemostatic abnormalities in patients with closed head injuries and their role in predicting early mortality. J Neurotrauma 2009, 26:1665-1668.
97. Salim A., Hadjizacharia P., Dubose J., et al. Persistent hyperglycemia in severe traumatic brain injury: an independent predictor of outcome. Am Surg 2009, 75:25-29.
98. Sarrafzadeh A.S., Peltonen E.E., Kaisers U., et al. Secondary insults in severe head injury - do multiply injured patients do worse?. Crit Care Med 2001, 29:1116-1123.
99. Sawauchi S., Taya K., Murakami S., et al. Serum S-100B protein and neuron-specific enolase after traumatic brain injury [in Japanese]. No Shinkei Geka 2005, 33:1073-1080.
100. Schultke E., Sadanand V., Kelly M.E., et al. Can admission S-100β predict the extent of brain damage in head trauma patients?. Can J Neurol Sci 2009, 36:612-616.
101. Shafi S., Marquez de la Plata C., Diaz-Arrastia R., et al. Racial disparities in long-term functional outcome after traumatic brain injury. J Trauma 2007, 63:1263-1270.
102. Signoretti S., Marmarou A., Aygok G.A., et al. Assessment of mitochondrial impairment in traumatic brain injury using high-resolution proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J Neurosurg 2008, 108:42-52.
103. Signorini D.F., Andrews P.J., Jones P.A., et al. Predicting survival using simple clinical variables: a case study in traumatic brain injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1999, 66:20-25.
104. Sorani M.D., Lee M., Kim H., et al. Race\ethnicity and outcome after traumatic brain injury at a single, diverse center. J Trauma 2009, 67:75-80.
105. Steyerberg E.W. Clinical Prediction Models: a Practical Approach to Development, Validation, and Updating 2008, Springer, New York.
106. Steyerberg E.W., Mushkudiani N., Perel P., et al. Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and international validation of prognostic scores based on admission characteristics. PLoS Med 2008, 5:e165.
107. Stocchetti N., Pagan F., Calappi E., et al. Inaccurate early assessment of neurological severity in head injury. J Neurotrauma 2004, 21:1131-1140.
108. Teasdale G., Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet 1974, 2:81-84.
109. Teasdale G.M., Nicoll J.A., Murray G., et al. Association of apolipoprotein E polymorphism with outcome after head injury. Lancet 1997, 350:1069-1071.
110. Teasdale G.M., Murray G.D., Nicoll J.A. The association between APOE epsilon4, age and outcome after head injury: a prospective cohort study. Brain 2005, 128:2556-2561.
111. Tokutomi T., Miyagi T., Ogawa T., et al. Age-associated increases in poor outcomes after traumatic brain injury: a report from the Japan Neurotrauma Data Bank. J Neurotrauma 2008, 25:1407-1414.
112. Tollard E., Galanaud D., Perlbarg V., et al. Experience of diffusion tensor imaging and 1H spectroscopy for outcome prediction in severe traumatic brain injury: preliminary results. Crit Care Med 2009, 37:1448-1455.
113. Truelle J., Koskinen S., Hawthorne G., et al. Quality of life after traumatic brain injury: the clinical use of the QOLIBRI, a novel disease-specific instrument. Brain Inj 2010, 24:1272-1291.
114. Turgeon A., Mercier E., Simard J.F., et al. Predictive value of s-100(beta) protein for prognosis in patients with moderate and severe TBI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Med 2009, 37:A313.
115. Vach W., Blettner M. Biased estimation of the odds ratio in case-control studies due to the use of ad hoc methods of correcting for missing values for confounding variables. Am J Epidemiol 1991, 134:895-907.
116. Van Beek J.G., Mushkudiani N.A., Steyerberg E.W., et al. Prognostic value of admission laboratory parameters in traumatic brain injury: results from the IMPACT study. J Neurotrauma 2007, 24:315-328.
117. van Leeuwen N., Lingsma H.F., Perel P., et al. Prognostic value of major extracranial injury in traumatic brain injury: an individual patient data meta-analysis in 39,274 patients. Neurosurgery 2012, 70:811-818. discussion 818.
118. von Steinbuechel N., Wilson L., Gibbons H., et al. Quality of Life after Brain Injury (QOLIBRI) - scale development and metric properties. J Neurotrauma 2010, 27:1167-1185.
119. von Steinbuechel N., Wilson L., Gibbons H., et al. Quality of Life after Brain Injury (QOLIBRI) - scale validity and correlates of quality of life. J Neurotrauma 2010, 27:1157-1165.
120. von Steinbuechel N., Wilson L., Gibbons H., et al. QOLIBRI overall scale: a brief index of health-related quality of life after traumatic brain injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2012, 83:1041-1047.
121. Vos P.E., Jacobs B., Andriessen T.M., et al. GFAP and S100B are biomarkers of traumatic brain injury: an observational cohort study. Neurology 2010, 75:1786-1793.
122. Wang X.H., Zhang X.D. Evaluating the prognosis and degree of brain injury by combined S-100 protein and neuron specific enolase determination. Neural Regen Res 2006, 1:649-652.
123. Wilde E.A., Whiteneck G.G., Bogner J., et al. Recommendations for the use of common outcome measures in traumatic brain injury research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010, 91:1650-1660.
124. Wilson J.T.L., Pettigrew L.E.L., Teasdale G.M. Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines for their use. J Neurotrauma 1998, 15:573-585.
125. Yeoman P., Pattani H., Silcocks P., et al. Validation of the IMPACT outcome prediction score using the Nottingham Head Injury Register dataset. J Trauma 2011, 71:387-392.
126. Yuh E.L., Cooper S.R., Ferguson A.R., et al. Quantitative CT improves outcome prediction in acute traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2012, 29:735-746.
127. Yuh E.L., Mukherjee P., Lingsma H.F., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging improves 3-month outcome prediction in mild traumatic brain injury. Ann Neurol 2013, 73:224-235. TRACK-TBI Investigators.
128. Zhou W., Xu D., Peng X., et al. Meta-analysis of APOE4 allele and outcome after traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2008, 25:279-290.
129. Zou M.H., Shi C., Cohen R.A. High glucose via peroxynitrite causes tyrosine nitration and inactivation of prostacyclin synthase that is associated with thromboxane/prostaglandin H2 receptor-mediated apoptosis and adhesion molecule expression in cultured human aortic endothelial cells. Diabetes 2002, 51:198-203.