Exploring the impact of workplace cyberbullying on trainee doctors

Medical Education

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 436-443

  Farley, Samuel ^a   Coyne, Iain ^b   Sprigg, Christine ^a   Axtell, Carolyn ^a   Subramanian, Ganesh ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^c NOTTINGHAM UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGGRESSION; BULLYING; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNET; JOB SATISFACTION; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MENTAL STRESS; PHYSICIAN; PSYCHOLOGY; UNITED KINGDOM; WORKPLACE;

ADULT; AGGRESSION; BULLYING; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; INTERNET; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; JOB SATISFACTION; MALE; PHYSICIANS; STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; WORKPLACE;

EID: 84924967301     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: 13652923     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/medu.12666     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Japan Institute for Labour Policy and Training. Workplace Bullying and Harassment. JILPT Report 12. Tokyo: JILPT 2013.
2. Zapf D. Mobbing in Organisationen. Ein Überblick zum Stand der Forschung. [Mobbing in organisations. A state-of-the-art review.]. Z Arbeits Organ Psychol 1999;43:1-25.
3. Hubert AB, van Veldhoven M. Risk sectors for undesirable behaviour and mobbing. Eur J Work Organ Psychol 2001;10:415-24.
4. General Medical Council. National Training Survey 2013: Undermining. London: GMC 2013.
5. Quine L. Workplace bullying in junior doctors: questionnaire survey. BMJ 2002;324 (7342):878-9.
6. Payne KFB, Wharrad H, Watts K. Smartphone and medical related App use among medical students and junior doctors in the United Kingdom (UK): a regional survey. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2012;12 (1):121.
7. Ling JM, Lim KZ, Ng WH. Use of multimedia messaging system (MMS) by junior doctors for scan image transmission in neurosurgery. World Neurosurg 2012;77 (2):384-7.
8. Baruch Y. Bullying on the net: adverse behaviour on e-mail and its impact. Inform Manag 2005;42 (2):361-71.
9. Smith PK, Mahdavi J, Carvalho M, Fisher S, Russell S, Tippett N. Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2008;49 (4):376-85.
10. Slonje R, Smith PK. Cyberbullying: another main type of bullying? Scand J Psychol 2008;49 (2):147-54.
11. Tokunaga RS. Following you home from school: a critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimisation. Comput Hum Behav 2010;26 (3):277-87.
12. Dooley JJ, Pyzalski J, Cross D. Cyberbullying versus face-to-face bullying. Z Psychol 2009;217 (4):182-8.
13. Kane K, Montgomery K. A framework for understanding dysempowerment in organisations. Hum Resour Manag 1998;37:263-75.
14. Bowling NA, Beehr TA. Workplace harassment from the victim's perspective: a theoretical model and meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol 2006;91 (5):998-1012.
15. Frazier PA. Perceived control and distress following sexual assault: a longitudinal test of a new model. J Pers Soc Psychol 2003;84:1257-69.
16. Bowling NA, Michel JS. Why do you treat me badly? The role of attributions regarding the cause of abuse in subordinates' responses to abusive supervision. Work Stress 2011;25 (4):309-20.
17. Smith CA, Ellsworth PC. Patterns of appraisal and emotion related to taking an exam. J Pers Soc Psychol 1987;52 (3):475-88.
18. Brown J, Weiner B. Affective consequences of ability versus effort ascriptions: controversies, resolutions, and quandaries. J Educ Psychol 1984;76:146-58.
19. Bies R, Moag J. Interactional justice: communication criteria of fairness. In: Lewicki RJ, Sheppard BH, Bazerman MH, eds. Research on Negotiations in Organizations, 1st edn. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press 1986;43-55.
20. Hershcovis MS, Barling J. Comparing victim attributions and outcomes for workplace aggression and sexual harassment. J Appl Psychol 2010;95 (5):874-88.
21. Tepper BJ. Consequences of abusive supervision. Acad Manage J 2000;43 (2):178-90.
22. Davies H, Archer J, Southgate L, Norcini J. Initial evaluation of the first year of the Foundation Assessment Programme. Med Educ 2009;43:74-81.
23. Academy of Medical Royal Colleges. The Foundation Programme Curriculum: July 2012. London: AMRC 2012.
24. Privitera C, Campbell M. Cyberbullying: the new face of workplace bullying. Cyberpsychol Behav 2009;12 (4):395-400.
25. UK Foundation Programme Office. The Foundation Programme Annual Report 2012. Report No. 4. Cardiff: UK FPO 2013.
26. Einarsen S, Hoel H, Notelaers G. Measuring exposure to bullying and harassment at work: validity, factor structure and psychometric properties of the Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised. Work Stress 2009;23:24-44.
27. Groth M, Goldman BM, Gilliland SW, Bies RJ. Commitment to legal claiming: influences of attributions, social guidance, and organisational tenure. J Appl Psychol 2002;87 (4):781-8.
28. Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scale. J Pers Soc Psychol 1988;54:1063-70.
29. Bowling NA, Beehr TA, Bennett MM, Watson CP. Target personality and workplace victimisation: a prospective analysis. Work Stress 2010;24 (2):140-58.
30. Scarpello V, Campbell JP. Job satisfaction: are all the parts there? Pers Psychol 1983;36 (3):577-600.
31. Ganzach Y. Intelligence and job satisfaction. Acad Manage J 1998;41 (5):526-39.
32. Goldberg DP, Williams P. The User's Guide to the General Health Questionnaire. Windsor: NFER-Nelson 1988.
33. Stanton JM, Balzer WK, Smith PC, Parra LF, Ironson G. A general measure of work stress: the Stress in General Scale. Educ Psychol Meas 2001;61 (5):866-88.
34. Jamieson S. Likert scales: how to (ab)use them. Med Educ 2004;38:1217-8.
35. Pearson ES. The analysis of variance in the case of non-normal variation. Biometrika 1931;23:114-33.
36. Hayes AF. Beyond Baron and Kenny: statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Commun Monogr 2009;76 (4):408-20.
37. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 1986;51 (6):1173-82.
38. Sobel M. Some new results on indirect effects and their standard errors in covariance structure models. In: Tuma N, ed. Sociological Methodology. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association 1986;159-86.
39. Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods 2008;40 (3):879-91.
40. Preacher KJ, Kelley K. Effect size measures for mediation models: quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects. Psychol Methods 2011;16 (2):93-115.
41. Frazier PA. Victim attributions and post-rape trauma. J Pers Soc Psychol 1990;59:298-304.
42. Healy JM, Stewart AJ, Copeland AP. The role of self-blame in children's adjustment to parental separation. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 1993;19:279-89.
43. Byron K. Carrying too heavy a load? The communication and miscommunication of emotion by email. Acad Manage Rev 2008;33 (2):309-27.
44. National Health Service Commissioning Board. Respect in the Workplace Policy, Version 1. Leeds: NHS Commissioning Board 2012.
45. Byron K, Baldridge D. Toward a model of nonverbal cues and emotion in email. In: Weaver KM, ed. Best paper proceedings of the Academy of Management annual meeting, Organizational Communication and Information Systems Division. Briarcliff Manor, NY: Pace University 2005;B1-B6.
46. Hoel H, Faragher B, Cooper CL. Bullying is detrimental to health, but all bullying behaviours are not necessarily equally damaging. Br J Guid Counsell 2004;32:367-87.
47. Postmes T, Spears R, Lea M. The formation of group norms in computer mediated communication. Hum Commun Res 2000;26:341-71.
48. Bosslet G, Torke A, Hickman S, Terry C, Helft P. The patient-doctor relationship and online social networks: results of a national survey. J Gen Intern Med 2011;26 (10):1168-74.
49. Greysen SR, Kind T, Chretien KC. Online professionalism and the mirror of social media. J Gen Intern Med 2010;25 (11):1227-9.
50. Shore R, Halsey J, Shah K, Crigger BJ, Douglas SP. Report of the AMA Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs: professionalism in the use of social media. The Journal of Clinical Ethics 2010;22 (2):165-172.