Collaborative Governance

The Oxford Handbook of Governance

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  Ansell, Chris ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaborative governance; Democratic reconstruction; Policy making; Public management; Regulatory negotiation; Stakeholder satisfaction

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924942365     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199560530.013.0035     Document Type: Chapter

References (46)

1. Andranovich, G. 1995. Achieving consensus in public decisionmaking: Applying interest based problem-solving to the challenges of intergovernmental collaboration. Journal of Applied Behavioral Research 31: 429-445.
2. Ansell, C. and Gash, A. 2008. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Theory and Practice 18: 543-571.
3. Beierle, T. and Konisky, D. 2001. What are we gaining from stakeholder involvement? Observations from environmental planning in the Great Lakes. Environmental and Planning C: Government and Policy 19: 515-527.
4. Bentrup, G. 2001. Evaluation of a collaborative model: A case study of analysis of watershed planning in the intermountain west. Environmental Management 27: 739-748.
5. Booher, D. E. 2004. Collaborative governance practices and democracy. National Civic Review 93: 32-46.
6. Bryson, J. M., Cunningham, G. L. and Lokkesmoe, K. J. 2002. What to do when stakeholders matter: The case of problem formulation for the African American Project of Hennepin County, Minnesota. Public Administration Review 62: 568-584.
7. Coglianese, C. 1997. Assessing consensus: The promise and performance of negotiated rulemaking. Duke Law Journal 46: 1255-1349.
8. Dorf, M. C. and Sabel, C. 1998. A constitution of democratic experimentalism. Columbia Law Review 98: 267-473.
9. Ebrahim, A. 2004. Institutitonal preconditions to collaboration: Indian forest and irrigation policy in historical perspective. Administration and Society 36: 208-242.
10. Fisher, R. and Ury, W. 1991. Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. New York. Penguin.
11. Frame, T. M., Gunton, T. and Day, J. C. 2004. The role of collaboration in environmental management: An evaluation of land and resource planning in British Columbia. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 47: 59-82.
12. Freeman, J. 1997. Collaborative governance in the administrative state. University of California Los Angeles Law Review 54: 1-98.
13. Freeman, J. and Langbein, L. I. 2000. Regulatory negotiation and the legitimacy benefit. New York University Environmental Law Journal 9: 61-151.
14. Fung, A. 2004. Empowered Participation: Reinventing Urban Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15. Fung, A., Wright, E. O. and Abers, R. 2003. Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. Brooklyn, NY: Verso.
16. Gray, B. 1989. Collaborating: Finding Common Ground for MultiParty Problems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17. Gunton, T. I. and Day, J. C. 2003. The theory and practice of collaborative planning in resource and environmental management. Environments 31: 5-19.
18. Harter, P. J. 1982. Negotiating regulations: A cure for the malaise? Environmental Impact Assessment Review 3: 75-91.
19. Harter, P. J. 2000. Assessing the assessors: The actual performance of negotiated rulemaking. New York University Environmental Law Journal 9: 32-59.
20. Healey, P. 1998. Collaborative planning in a stakeholder society. The Town Planning Review 69: 1-21.
21. Hirschman, A. O. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22. Huxham, C. and Vangen, S. 2000. Leadership in the shaping and implementation of collaboration agendas: How things happen in a (not quite) joined-up world. The Academy of Management Journal 43: 1159-1175.
23. Huxham, C. Vangen, S., Huxham, C. and Eden, C. 2000. The challenge of collaborative governance. Public Management Review 2: 337-358.
24. Imperial, M. 2005. Using collaboration as a governance strategy: Lessons from six watershed management programs. Administration and Society 37: 281-320.
25. Innes, J. E. 2004. Consensus building: Clarifications for the critics. Planning Theory 3(1): 5-20.
26. Innes, J. E. and Booher, D. E. 1999. Consensus building and complex adaptive systems: A framework for evaluating collaborative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 65: 412-423.
27. Langbein, L. I. 2002. Responsive bureaus, equity, and regulatory negotiation: An empirical view. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 21: 449-465.
28. Langbein, L. I. and Kerwin, C. M. 2000. Regulatory negotiation versus conventional rule-making: Claims, counterclaims, and empirical evidence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10: 599-632.
29. Lasker, R. D. and Weiss, E. S. 2003. Broadening participation in community problem solving: A multidisciplinary model to support collaborative practice and research. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 80: 14-57.
30. Lasker, R. D., Weiss, E. S. and Miller, R. 2001. Partnership synergy: A practical framework for studying and strengthening the collaborative advantage. The Milbank Quarterly 79: 179-205.
31. Leach, W. D., Pelkey, N. W. and Sabatier, P. 2002. Stakeholder partnerships as collaborative policymaking: Evaluation criteria applied to watershed management in California and Washington. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 21: 645-670.
32. McGuire, M. 2006. Collaborative public management: Assessing what we know and how we know it. Public Administration Review 66: 33-43.
33. Margerum, R. D. 2002. Collaborative planning: Building consensus and building a distinct model for practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research 21: 237-253.
34. Moore, E. A. and Koontz, T. M. 2003. Research note: A typology of collaborative watershed groups: Citizen-based, agency-based, and mixed partnerships. Society and Natural Resources 16: 451-460.
35. Murdock, B. S., Wiessner, C. and Sexton, K. 2005. Stakeholder participation in voluntary environmental agreements: Analysis of 10 Project XL case studies. Science, Technology and Human Values 30: 223-250.
36. Newman, J., Barnes, M., Sullivan, H. and Knops, A. 2004. Public participation and collaborative governance. Journal of Social Policy 33: 203-223.
37. Page, S. 2010. Integrative leadership for collaborative governance: Civic engagement in Seattle. The Leadership Quarterly 21: 246-263.
38. Saarikoski, H. 2000. Environmental impact assessment (EIA) as collaborative learning process. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 20: 681-700.
39. Sabel, C. F. and Zeitlin, J. 2008. Learning from difference: The new architecture of experimentalist governance in the EU. European Law Journal 14: 271-327.
40. Schneider, M., Scholz, J., Lubell, M., Mindruta, D. and Edwardsen, M. 2003. Building consensual institutions: Networks and the national estuary program. American Journal of Political Science 47: 143-158.
41. Siriani, C. 2009. Investing in Democracy: Engaging Citizens in Collaborative Governance. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
42. Susskind, L. and Cruikshank, J. 1987. Breaking the Impasse: Consensual Approaches to Resolving Public Disputes. New York: Basic Books.
43. Weber, E. P. and Khademian, A. M. 1997. From agitation to collaboration: Clearing the air through negotiation. Public Administration Review 57: 396-410.
44. Weber, E. P., Lovitch, N. P., and Gaffney, M. 2005. Collaboration, enforcement, and endangered species: A framework for assessing collaborative problem-solving capacity. Society and Natural Resources 18: 677-698.
45. Wondolleck, J. M., Manring, N. J., and Crowfoot, J. E. 1996. Teetering at the top of the ladder: The experience of citizen group participants in alternative dispute resolution processes. Sociological Perspectives 39: 249-262.
46. Yaffee, S. L. and Wondolleck, J. M. 2003. Collaborative ecosystem planning processes in the United States: Evolution and challenges. Environments 31: 59-72.