Product carbon footprints and their uncertainties in comparative decision contexts

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2015, Pages

  Henriksson, Patrik J G ^a   Heijungs, Reinout ^b   Dao, Hai M ^c   Phan, Lam T ^d   De Snoo, Geert R ^a   Guinée, Jeroen B ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b VU University   (Netherlands)

^c CAN THO UNIVERSITY   (Viet Nam)

^d Research Institute for Aquaculture No 2   (Viet Nam)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATMOSPHERIC DISPERSION; CARBON FOOTPRINT; CATFISH; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DEPENDENT SAMPLING; FARMING SYSTEM; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; LIFE CYCLE; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NONHUMAN; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; SAMPLING; UNCERTAINTY; VIET NAM; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; FISHERY; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING;

PANGASIUS;

ANIMALS; CARBON FOOTPRINT; CATFISHES; FISHERIES; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; VIETNAM;

EID: 84924940426     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121221     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Beattie G. Psychological effectiveness of carbon labelling. Nat Clim Chang. 2012; 2: 214-217.
2. ISO 14044. Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Requirements and guidelines. Geneva, Switzerland; 2006.
3. ISO 14067. Greenhouse gases - Carbon footprint of products - Requirements and guidelines for quantification and communication. Geneva, Switzerland; 2012.
4. ISO 14040. Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework. Geneva, Switzerland; 2006.
5. BSI. PAS 2050 - Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services; 2008.
6. JRC. ILCD Handbook - General guide for LCA - Detailed guidance; 2010.
7. Vandenbergh M, Dietz T, Stern P. Time to try carbon labelling. Nat Clim Chang. 2011; 1: 4-6.
8. Upham P, Dendler L, Bleda M. Carbon labelling of grocery products: public perceptions and potential emissions reductions. J Clean Prod. 2011; 19: 348-355.
9. De Koning A, Schowanek D, Dewaele J, Weisbrod A, Guinée J. Uncertainties in a carbon footprint model for detergents; quantifying the confidence in a comparative result. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2009; 15: 79-89.
10. Yoshida H, Clavreul J, Scheutz C, Christensen TH. Influence of data collection schemes on the Life Cycle Assessment of a municipal wastewater treatment plant. Water Res. 2014; 56: 292-303. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.03.014 PMID: 24699421
11. Hertwich EG, Hammitt JK, Pease WS. A Theoretical Foundation for Life-Cycle Assessment - Recognizing the Role of Values in Environmental Decision Making. 2000; J Ind Ecol 4: 13-28. doi: 10.1162/108819800569267
12. Linkov I, Seager TP. Coupling multi-criteria decision analysis, life-cycle assessment, and risk assessment for emerging threats. Environ Sci Technol. 2011; 45: 5068-5074. doi: 10.1021/es100959q PMID: 21524065
13. Prado-Lopez V, Seager TP, Chester M, Laurin L, Bernardo M, et al. Stochastic multi-attribute analysis (SMAA) as an interpretation method for comparative life-cycle assessment (LCA). Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2013; 19: 405-416.
14. California Air Resources Board. California Code of Regulations. Subchapter 10. Climate Change. Article 4. Regulations to Achieve Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions. Subarticle 7. Low Carbon Fuel Standard: 121; 2012
15. European Comission. Directive 2009/30/EC of the European Parliament and the Council: 26; 2009
16. Finnveden G. Data Quality of Life Cycle Inventory Data - Rules of Thumb. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 1998; 3: 65-66.
17. Hanssen OJ, Asbjørnsen OA. Statistical properties of emission data in life cycle assessments. J Clean Prod. 1996; 4: 149-157.
18. Huijbregts MAJ. Application of Uncertainty and Variability in LCA Part I : A General Framework for the Analysis of Uncertainty and Variability in Life Cycle Assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 1998; 3: 273-280.
19. Huijbregts MAJ. Application of Uncertainty and Variability in LCA Part II : Dealing with Parameter Uncertainty and Uncertainty due to Choices in Life Cycle Assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 1998; 3: 343-351.
20. Huijbregts MAJ, Norris G, Bretz R, Ciroth A, Maurice B, et al. Framework for Modelling Data Uncertainty in Life Cycle Inventories. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2001; 6: 127-132.
21. Weidema B, Wesnaes MS. Data quality management for life cycle inventories - an example of using data quality indicators. J Clean Prod. 1996; 4: 167-174. doi: 10.1016/S0959-6526(96)00043-1
22. Van der Harst E, Potting J. Variation in LCA results for disposable polystyrene beverage cups due to multiple data sets and modelling choices. Environ Model Softw. 2014; 51: 123-135.
23. Röös E, Sundberg C, Hansson P-A. Uncertainties in the carbon footprint of food products: a case study on table potatoes. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2010; 15: 478-488. doi: 10.1007/s11367-010-0171-8
24. Huijbregts M a. J, Gilijamse W, Ragas AMJ, Reijnders L. Evaluating Uncertainty in Environmental Life-Cycle Assessment. A Case Study Comparing Two Insulation Options for a Dutch One-Family Dwelling. Environ Sci Technol. 2003; 37: 2600-2608. PMID: 12831050
25. Van Zelm R, Huijbregts MAJ. Quantifying the trade-off between parameter and model structure uncertainty in life cycle impact assessment. Environ Sci Technol. 2013; 47: 9274-9280. doi: 10.1021/es305107s PMID: 23879394
26. Lloyd SM, Ries R. Characterizing, Propagating, and Analyzing Uncertainty in Life-Cycle Assessment: A Survey of Quantitative Approaches. J Ind Ecol. 2007; 11: 161-179.
27. Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N, Althaus H, Doka G, Dones R, et al. Overview and Methodology. ecoinvent report No. 1. Dübendorf; 2007.
28. Kennedy DJ, Montgomery DC, Quay BH. Data quality. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 1996; 1: 199-207.
29. Ciroth A, Muller S, Weidema B, Lesage P. Empirically based uncertainty factors for the pedigree matrix in ecoinvent. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2013. doi: 10.1007/s11367-013-0670-5
30. Henriksson PJG, Guinée JB, Heijungs R, de Koning A, Green DM. A protocol for horizontal averaging of unit process data - including estimates for uncertainty. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2013; 19: 429-436. doi: 10.1007/s11367-013-0647-4
31. Mattila T, Kujanpää M, Dahlbo H, Soukka R, Myllymaa T. Uncertainty and Sensitivity in the Carbon Footprint of Shopping Bags. J Ind Ecol. 2011; 15: 217-227.
32. Basset-Mens C, Kelliher FM, Ledgard S, Cox N. Uncertainty of global warming potential for milk production on a New Zealand farm and implications for decision making. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2009; 14: 630-638.
33. Bojacá CR, Schrevens E. Parameter uncertainty in LCA: stochastic sampling under correlation. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2010; 15: 238-246.
34. Chen X, Corson MS. Influence of emission-factor uncertainty and farm-characteristic variability in LCA estimates of environmental impacts of French dairy farms. J Clean Prod. 2014; 81: 150-157.
35. Hauck M, Steinmann ZJN, Laurenzi IJ, Karuppiah R, Huijbregts MAJ. How to quantify uncertainty and variability in life cycle assessment: the case of greenhouse gas emissions of gas power generation in the US. Environ Res Lett. 2014; 9: 074005.
36. Heijungs R, Kleijn R. Numerical Approaches Towards Life Cycle Interpretation. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2001; 6: 141-148. doi: 10.1007/BF02978732
37. Heijungs R, Suh S, Kleijn R. LCA Methodology Numerical Approaches to Life Cycle Interpretation. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2005; 10: 103-112. doi: 10.1065/lca2004.06.161
38. Heijungs R, Lenzen M. Error propagation methods for LCA - a comparison. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2013; 19: 1445-1461.
39. Hong J, Shaked S, Rosenbaum RK, Jolliet O. Analytical uncertainty propagation in life cycle inventory and impact assessment: application to an automobile front panel. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2010; 15: 499-510.
40. Lo S-C, Ma H-W, Lo S-L. Quantifying and reducing uncertainty in life cycle assessment using the Bayesian Monte Carlo method. Sci Total Environ. 2005; 340: 23-33. PMID: 15752490
41. Malc¸a J, Freire F. Uncertainty Analysis in Biofuel Systems. J Ind Ecol. 2010; 14: 322-334.
42. Maurice B, Frischknecht R, Coelho-Schwirtz V, Hungerbühler K. Uncertainty analysis in life cycle inventory. Application to the production of electricity with French coal power plants. J Clean Prod. 2000; 8: 95-108. doi: 10.1016/S0959-6526(99)00324-8
43. Mutel CL, de Baan L, Hellweg S. Two-step sensitivity testing of parametrized and regionalized life cycle assessments: methodology and case study. Environ Sci Technol. 2013; 47: 5660-5667. doi: 10.1021/es3050949 PMID: 23656506
44. Röös E, Sundberg C, Hansson P-A. Uncertainties in the carbon footprint of refined wheat products: a case study on Swedish pasta. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2011; 16: 338-350.
45. Sonnemann GW, Schuhmacher M, Castells F. Uncertainty assessment by a Monte Carlo simulation in a life cycle inventory of electricity produced by a waste incinerator. J Clean Prod. 2002; 11: 279-292. doi: 10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00028-8
46. Steinmann ZJN, Hauck M, Karuppiah R, Laurenzi IJ, Huijbregts MAJ. A methodology for separating uncertainty and variability in the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of coal-fueled power generation in the USA. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2014; 19: 1146-1155.
47. Weber CL. Uncertainty and Variability in Product Carbon Footprinting. J Ind Ecol. 2012; 16: 203-211.
48. Henriksson PJG, Zhang W, Nahid SAA, Newton R, Phan LT, et al. Final LCA case study report - Primary data and literature sources adopted in the SEAT LCA studies. SEAT Deliverable D3.5 - Annex report. Leiden, Netherlands; 2014.
49. Myhre G, Shindell D, Bréon F-M, Collins J, Fuglestvedt J, et al. Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing Supplementary Information. In: Stocker T, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen S, et al., editors. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC. p. 44; 2013.
50. IPCC. The International Panel on Climate Change Working group I - Contribution to the IPCC fifth assessment report - Climate Change 2013: The physical science basis Final Draft Underlying Scientific-Technical Assessment; 2013.
51. Heijungs R, Suh S. The Computational Structure of Life Cycle Assessment. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2002.
52. Liu G, Müller DB. Addressing sustainability in the aluminum industry: a critical review of life cycle assessments. J Clean Prod. 2012; 35: 108-117.
53. Ravetz JR. What is Post-Normal Science. Futures. 1999; 31: 647-653.
54. Hoekstra AY, Chapagain AK, Aldaya MM, Mekonnen MM. The Water Footprint Assessment Manual. London and Washington: Earthscan.
55. Swarr TE, Hunkeler D, Klöpffer W, Pesonen H-L, Ciroth A, et al. (2011) Environmental life-cycle costing: a code of practice. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2011; 16: 389-391.