Characterizing, propagating, and analyzing uncertainty in life-cycle assessment: A survey of quantitative approaches

Journal of Industrial Ecology

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 161-179

  Lloyd, Shannon M ^a   Ries, Robert ^b  

^a Mfg Technologies Directorate   (United States)

^b University of Pittsburgh   (United States)

Author keywords

Error analysis; Error propagation; Industrial ecology; Modeling; Simulation; Variability

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ERROR ANALYSIS; LIFE CYCLE; RESOURCE ALLOCATION;

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES; ERROR PROPAGATION; INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY; VARIABILITY;

INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT;

DECISION ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ERROR ANALYSIS; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; HEALTH IMPACT; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; MODELING; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 33846894549     PISSN: 10881980     EISSN: 15309290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jiec.2007.1136     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Bare, J. C., G. A. Norris, D. W. Pennington, and T. McKone. 2002. TRACI - The tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts. Journal of Industrial Ecology 6(3-4): 49-78.
2. Basset-Mens, C., H. M. G. van der Werf, P. Durand, and P. Leterme. 2004. Implications of uncertainty and variability in the life cycle assessment of pig farming systems. In Complexity and integrated resources management. Proceedings of the 2nd Biennial Meeting of the International Environmental Modelling and Software Society (iEMSs), edited by C. Pahl-Wostl et al. Manno, Switzerland: International Environmental Modelling and Software Society.
3. Basson, L. and J. G. Petrie. 2004. An integrated approach for the management of uncertainty in decision making supported by LCA-based environmental performance information. In Complexity and integrated resources management. Proceedings of the 2nd Biennial Meeting of the International Environmental Modelling and Software Society (iEMSs), edited by C. Pahl-Wostl et al. Manno, Switzerland: International Environmental Modelling and Software Society.
4. Björklund, A. E. 2002. Survey of approaches to improve reliability in LCA. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 7(2): 64-72.
5. Canter, K. G., D. J. Kennedy, D. C. Montgomery, J. B. Keats, and W. M. Carlyle. 2002. Screening stochastic life cycle assessment inventory models. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 7(1): 18-26.
6. CEC (Commission of the European Communities). 2003. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. Integrated product policy. Building on environmental life-cycle thinking. Report COM(2003) 302 final. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
7. Checkel, M. D., M. Raynolds, and R. A. Fraser. 1999. Application of Monte Carlo analysis to life cycle assessment. SAE Paper 1999-01-0011. Paper presented at Society of Automotive Engineers International Congress and Exposition, Detroit, MI, March 1-4.
8. Chevalier, J. L. and J. F. Le Téno. 1996. Life cycle analysis with ill-defined data and its application to building products. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 1(2): 90.
9. Dones, R., T. Heck, M. Faist Emmernegger, and N. Jungbluth. 2005. Life cycle inventories for the nuclear and natural gas energy systems, and examples of uncertainty analysis. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 10(1): 10-23.
10. Efron, B. and R. Tibshirani. 1993. An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall.
11. Ferret, R., G. Mendoza, and M. Castilla. 2004. The influence of agricultural data uncertainty in the life cycle assessment of biodegradable hydraulic lubricants. In Complexity and integrated resources management. Proceedings of the 2nd Biennial Meeting of the International Environmental Modelling and Software Society (iEMSs), edited by C. Pahl-Wostl et al. Manno, Switzerland: International Environmental Modelling and Software Society.
12. Ferson, S., J. A. Cooper, and D. Myers. 2001. Beyond point estimates - Risk assessment using interval, fuzzy and probabilistic arithmetic. Society for Risk Analysis Workshop Booklet, Applied Biomathematics. New York.
13. Finnveden, G. and L.-G. Lindfors. 1998. Data quality of life cycle inventory data - Rules of thumb. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 3(2): 65-66.
14. Frey, H. C. and S. Li. 2002. Methods and example for development of a probabilistic per-capita emission factor for VOC emissions from consumer/commercial product use. Paper presented at Air & Waste Management Association 95th Conference and Exhibition, Baltimore, MD, June 23-27. Paper 42162.
15. Frey, H. C. and M. J. Small. 2003. Integrated environmental assessment. Part I. Journal of Industrial Ecology 7(1): 9-11.
16. Friedrich, R. and P. Bickel. 2001. Estimation of external costs using the impact-pathway-approach: Results from the ExternE project series. TA-Datenbank-Nachrichten 10(3): 74-82.
17. Frischknecht, R., N. Jungbluth, H.-J. Althaus, G. Doka, R. Dones, T. Heck, S. Hellweg, R. Hischier, T. Nemecek, G. Rebitzer, and M. Spielmann. 2005. The ecoinvent database: Overview and methodological framework. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 10(1): 3-9.
18. Geisler, G., S. Hellweg, and K. Hungerbühler. 2004. Uncertainties in LCA of plant-growth regulators and implications on decision-making. In Complexity and integrated resources management. Proceedings of the 2nd Biennial Meeting of the International Environmental Modelling and Software Society (iEMSs), edited by C. Pahl-Wostl et al. Manno, Switzerland: International Environmental Modelling and Software Society.
19. Geldermann, J., T. Spengler, and O. Rentz. 2000. Fuzzy outranking for environmental assessment case study: Iron and steel making industry. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 115(1): 45-65.
20. Goedkoop, M. and M. Oele. 2004. SimaPro 6 - Introduction to LCA with SimaPro. Amersfoort, the Netherlands: PRé Consultants.
21. Hanssen, O. J. and O. A. Asbjørnsen. 1996. Statistical properties of emission data in life cycle assessments. Journal of Cleaner Production 4(3-4): 149-157.
22. Hedbrant, J. and L. Sörme. 2001. Data vagueness and uncertainties in urban heavy-metal data collection. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution: Focus 1(3-4): 43-53.
23. Heijungs, R. 1996. Identification of key issues for further investigation in improving the reliability of life-cycle assessments. Journal of Cleaner Production 4(3-4): 159-166.
24. Heijungs, R. and M. A. J. Huijbregts. 2004. A review of approaches to treat uncertainty in LCA. In Complexity and integrated resources management. Proceedings of the 2nd biennial meeting of the International Environmental Modelling and Software Society (iEMSs), edited by C. Pahl-Wostl et al. Manno, Switzerland: International Environmental Modelling and Software Society.
25. Hertwich, E. G., T. E. McKone, and W. S. Pease. 1999. Parameter uncertainty and variability in evaluative fate and exposuremodels. Risk Analysis 19(6): 1193-1204.
26. Hoffman, F. and J. Hammonds. 1994. Propagation of uncertainty in risk assessments: The need to distinguish between uncertainty due to lack of knowledge and uncertainty due to variability. Risk Analysis 14(5): 707-712.
27. Hofstetter, P. 1998. Perspectives in life cycle impact assessment: A structured approach to combine models of the technosphere, ecosphere, and valuesphere. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
28. Huijbregts, M. A. 1998. Application of uncertainty and variability in LCA. Part II: Dealing with parameter uncertainty and uncertainty due to choices in life cycle assessment. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 3(6): 343-351.
29. Huijbregts, M. A., U. Thissen, T. Jager, D. van de Meent, and A. M. J. Ragas. 2000. Priority assessment of toxic substances in life cycle assessment. Part II: Assessing parameter uncertainty and human variability in the calculation of toxicity potentials. Chemosphere 41(4): 575-588.
30. Huijbregts, M. A. J., G. Norris, R. Bretz, A. Ciroth, B. Maurice, B. von Bahr, B. Weidema, and A. S. H. de Beaufort. 2001. Framework for modeling data uncertainty in life cycle inventories. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 6(3): 127-132.
31. Huijbregts, M. A. J., W. Gilijamse, A. M. J. Ragas, and L. Reijnders. 2003. Evaluating uncertainty in environmental life-cycle assessment. A case study comparing two insulation options for a Dutch one-family dwelling. Environmental Science and Technology 37(11): 2600-2608.
32. Huijbregts, M., R. Heijungs, and S. Hellweg. 2004. Complexity and integrated resource management: Uncertainty in LCA. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 9(5): 341-342.
33. Huijbregts, M. A. J., L. M. J. Geelen, E. G. Hertwich, T. E. McKone, and D. Van de Meent. 2005. A comparison between the multimedia fate and exposure models CalTOX and uniform system for evaluation of substances adapted for life-cycle assessment based on the population intake fraction of toxic pollutants. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 24(2): 486-493.
34. ISO (International Organization for Standardization). 1998. Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Goal and scope definition and inventory analysis. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
35. Kennedy, D. J., D. C. Montgomery, and B. H. Quay. 1996. Data quality - Stochastic environmental life cycle assessment modeling. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 1(4): 199-207.
36. Kusko, B. H. and R. G. Hunt. 1997. Managing uncertainty in life cycle inventories. SAE Paper 970693. Paper presented at Society of Automotive Engineers International Congress & Exposition, Detroit, MI, February 24-27.
37. Le Téno, J. F. 1999. Visual data analysis and decision support methods for non-deterministic LCA. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 4(1): 41-47.
38. Linkov, I. and D. Burmistrov. 2003. Model uncertainty and choices made by modelers: Lessons learned from the International Atomic Energy Agency model intercomparisons. Risk Analysis 23(6): 1297-1307.
39. MacLeod, M., A. J. Fraser, and D. Mackay. 2002. Evaluating and expressing the propagation of uncertainty in chemical fate and bioaccumulation models. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21(4): 700-709.
40. Maurice, B. 2000. Uncertainty analysis in life cycle inventory. Application to the production of electricity with French coal power plants. Journal of Cleaner Production 8(2): 95-108.
41. McCleese, D. L. and P. T. LaPuma. 2002. Using Monte Carlo simulation in life cycle assessment of electric and internal combustion vehicles. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 7(4): 230-236.
42. McKone, T. E. and K. T. Bogen. 1991. Predicting the uncertainties in risk assessment. Environmental Science and Technology 25(10): 1674-1681.
43. Meier, M. A. 1997. Eco-efficiency evaluation of waste gas purification systems in the chemical industry. In Chemical Industry, LCA Documents, Vol. 2. Bayreuth, Germany: Ecoinforma Press.
44. Meyer, M. A. and J. M. Booker. 2001. Eliciting and analyzing expert judgment: A practical guide. Second edition. Philadelphia: American Statistical Association and the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
45. Morgan, M. G. and M. Henrion. 1990. Uncertainty: A guide to dealing with uncertainty in quantitative risk and policy analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. OMB (Office of Management and Budget). 2003. Circular A-4 Regulatory Analysis. Washington, DC: OMB, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs.
47. President of the United States. 1998. Greening the government through waste prevention, recycling, and federal acquisition. Executive Order 13101. Federal Register 63(179): 49641-49651.
48. Raynolds, M. A., M. D. Checkel, and R. A. Fraser. 1998. Life cycle value assessment (LCVA) comparison of conventional gasoline and reformulated gasoline. SAE Paper 980468. Paper presented at Society of Automotive Engineers International Congress & Exposition, Detroit, MI, February 23-26.
49. Rosenbaum, R., D. W. Pennington, and O. Jolliet. 2004. An implemented approach for estimating uncertainties for toxicological impact characterization. In Complexity and integrated resources management. Proceedings of the 2nd Biennial Meeting of the International Environmental Modelling and Software Society (iEMSs), edited by C. Pahl-Wostl et al. Manno, Switzerland: International Modelling and Software Society.
50. Ross, S., D. Evans, and M. Weber. 2002. How LCA studies deal with uncertainty. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 7(1): 47-52.
51. Saur, K., M. Finkbeiner, R. Hoffman, P. Eyerer, H. Schöch, and H. Beddies. 1998. How to handle uncertainties and assumptions in interpreting LCA results. SAE Paper 982210. Paper presented at Society of Automotive Engineers Total Life Cycle Conference & Exposition. SAE Technical Paper 982210. Graz, Austria, December 1-3.
52. Sonnemann, G., M. Schuhmacher, and F. Castells. 2003. Uncertainty assessment by a Monte Carlo simulation in a life cycle inventory of electricity produced by a waste incinerator. Journal of Cleaner Production 11(3): 279-292.
53. Spielmann, M., R. Scholz, O. Tietje, and P. de Haan. 2005. Scenario modelling in prospective LCA of transport systems. Application of formative scenario analysis. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 10(5): 325-335.
54. Steen, B. 1997. On uncertainty and sensitivity of LCA-based priority setting. Journal of Cleaner Production 5(4): 255-262.
55. Tan, R. R., A. B. Culaba, and M. R. I. Purvis. 2002. Application of possibility theory in the life-cycle inventory assessment of biofuels. International Journal of Energy Research 26(8): 737-745.
56. Tan, R. R., A. B. Culaba, and M. R. I. Purvis. 2004. POLCAGE 1.0 - A possibilistic life-cycle assessment model for evaluating alternative transportation fuels. Environmental Modeling and Software 19(10): 907-918.
57. UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme). 2005. Life cycle initiative. UNEP/Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 〈www.uneptie.org/ pc/sustain/lcinitiative/〉. Accessed 10 January 2005.
58. USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). 1989. Exposure factors handbook. Report EPA/600/8-89/043. Washington, DC, USA: US EPA.
59. USEPA. 2003. Draft guidance on the development, evaluation, and application of regulatory environmental models. Washington, DC: US EPA.
60. Wang, R., U. Diwekar, and C. E. Grégoire Padro'. 2004. Efficient sampling techniques for uncertainties in risk analysis. Environmental Progress 23(2): 141-157.
61. Weckenmann, A. and A. Schwan. 2001. Environmental life cycle assessment with support of fuzzy-sets. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 6(1): 13-18.
62. Weidema, B. P. and M. S. Wesnæs. 1996. Data quality management for life cycle inventories - An example of using data quality indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production 4(3-4): 167-174.
63. Weidema, B., N. Fress, E. H. Petersen, and H. Øllgaard. 2003. Reducing uncertainty in LCI: Developing a data collection strategy. Environmental Project 862 2003. Copenhagen: Danish Environmental Protection Agency.