Failure of clinical practice guidelines to meet Institute of Medicine Standards: Two more decades of little, if any, progress

Archives of Internal Medicine

Volumn 172, Issue 21, 2012, Pages 1628-1633

  Kung, Justin ^a   Miller, Ram R ^c   Mackowiak, Philip A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c GLAXOSMITHKLINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL; ARTICLE; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD;

EID: 84870516788     PISSN: 00039926     EISSN: 15383679     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/2013.jamainternmed.56     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Kuehn BM. IOM sets out "gold standard" practices for creating guidelines, systematic reviews. JAMA. 2011;305(18):1846-1848.
2. Bennett WL, Odelola OA, Wilson LM, et al. Evaluation of guideline recommendations on oral medications for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(1, pt 1):27-36.
3. Boyd CM, Darer J, Boult C, Fried LP, Boult L, Wu AW. Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases: implications for pay for performance. JAMA. 2005;294(6):716-724. (Pubitemid 41159291)
4. O'Connor PJ. Adding value to evidence-based clinical guidelines. JAMA. 2005;294(6):741-743. (Pubitemid 41159295)
5. Shaneyfelt TM, Centor RM. Reassessment of clinical practice guidelines: go gently into that good night. JAMA. 2009;301(8):868-869.
6. Laine C, Taichman DB,Mulrow C. Trustworthy clinical guidelines. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154(11):774-775.
7. Angell M. Industry-sponsored clinical research: a broken system. JAMA. 2008;300(9):1069-1071.
8. Pogach L, Aron DC. Sudden acceleration of diabetes quality measures. JAMA. 2011;305(7):709-710.
9. Lee SJ,Walter LC. Quality indicators for older adults: preventing unintended harms. JAMA. 2011;306(13):1481-1482.
10. Eddy DM, Adler J, Patterson B, Lucas D, Smith KA, Morris M. Individualized guidelines: the potential for increasing quality and reducing costs. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154(9):627-634.
11. Guyatt G, Akl EA, Hirsh J, et al. The vexing problem of guidelines and conflict of interest: a potential solution. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(11):738- 741.
12. Rothman DJ, McDonald WJ, Berkowitz CD, et al. Professional medical associations and their relationships with industry: a proposal for controlling conflict of interest. JAMA. 2009;301(13):1367-1372.
13. Diamond GA, Kaul S. The disconnect between practice guidelines and clinical practice: stressed out. JAMA. 2008;300(15):1817-1819.
14. Graham R, Mancher M, Wolman DM, et al Committee on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines; Board on Health Care Services. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2011.
15. Shaneyfelt TM, Mayo-Smith MF, Rothwangl J. Are guidelines following guidelines? the methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines in the peer-reviewed medical literature. JAMA. 1999;281(20):1900-1905. (Pubitemid 29242803)
16. US Department of Health and Human Services Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. http://www.guidelines.gov/index.aspx. Accessed August 1, 2012.
17. Sniderman AD, Furberg CD. Why guideline-making requires reform. JAMA. 2009;301(4):429-431.
18. Brawley O, Byers T, Chen A, et al. New American Cancer Society process for creating trustworthy cancer screening guidelines. JAMA. 2011;306(22):2495- 2499.
19. Grilli R, Magrini N, Penna A, Mura G, Liberati A. Practice guidelines developed by specialty societies: the need for a critical appraisal. Lancet. 2000;355(9198):103-106. (Pubitemid 30068554)
20. Shojania KG, Sampson M, Ansari MT, Ji J, Doucette S, Moher D. How quickly do systematic reviews go out of date? a survival analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(4):224-233. (Pubitemid 351664578)