Assessing Upper Extremity Motor Function in Practice of Virtual Activities of Daily Living

IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 287-296

  Adams, Richard J ^a   Lichter, Matthew D ^a   Krepkovich, Eileen T ^a   Ellington, Allison ^b   White, Marga ^b   Diamond, Paul T ^b  

^a Barron Associates Inc   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Human computer interaction; human motion tracking; human motor performance; occupational therapy; patient rehabilitation; virtual reality

Indexed keywords

ANIMATION; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER GRAPHICS; MEDICAL COMPUTING; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; PATIENT REHABILITATION; PATIENT TREATMENT; TARGET TRACKING;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING (ADLS); HUMAN MOTION TRACKING; HUMAN MOTOR; REHABILITATION PROGRAMS; SPEARMAN'S RANK CORRELATION ANALYSIS; UNSCENTED KALMAN FILTER; WOLF MOTOR FUNCTION TESTS;

VIRTUAL REALITY;

AGED; AMBULATORY MONITORING; ARM; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; EVALUATION STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION; PARESIS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VERY ELDERLY;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARM; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, NEUROLOGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, AMBULATORY; MOVEMENT; PARESIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84924874257     PISSN: 15344320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2014.2360149     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. A. S. Go, D. Mozaffarian, and V. L. Roger, Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics 2013 Update: Report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee American Heart Assoc., Dallas, 2013.
2. D. Edwards, M. Hahn, C. Baum, M. Perlmutter, C. Sheedy, and A. Dromerick, "Screening patients with stroke for rehabilitation needs: Validation of the post-stroke rehabilitation guidelines," Neurorehab. Neural Res., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 42-48, 2006.
3. B. Johansson, "Current trends in stroke rehabilitation. A review with focus on brain plasticity," Acta Neurol. Scand., vol. 123, no. 3, pp. 147-159, 2011.
4. M. Hallett, "Plasticity of the human motor cortex and recovery from stroke," Brain Res., vol. 36, no. 2-3, pp. 169-174, Oct. 2001.
5. R. Nudo, "Adaptive plasticity in motor cortex: Implications for rehabilitation after brain injury," J. Rehabil. Med., vol. 41, no. Suppl:7-10, May 2003.
6. P. Lum, S. Mulroy, R. Amdur, P. Requejo, B. Prilutsky, and A. Dromerick, "Gains in upper extremity function after stroke via recovery or compensation: Potential differential effects on amount of real-world limb use," Top. Stroke Rehab., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 237-253, 2009.
7. J. Tretriluxana, N. Runnarong, S. Tretriluxana, N. Prayoonwiwat, R. Vachalathiti, and C. Winstein, "Feasibility investigation of the Accelerated Skill Acquisition Program (ASAP): Insights into reach-to-grasp coordination of individuals with postacute stroke," Top. Stroke Rehab., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 151-160, 2013.
8. M. J. D. Taylor, D. McCormick, S. Teshk, R. Impson, and M. Griffin, "Activity-promoting gaming systems in exercise and rehabilitation," J. Rehabil. Res. Dev., vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 1171-1186, 2011.
9. D. Rand, R. Kizony, and P. L. Weiss, "The Sony PlayStation II EyeToy: Low-cost virtual reality for use in rehabilitation," J. Neurol. Phys. Ther., vol. 32, pp. 155-163, Dec. 2008.
10. M. K. Holden, "Virtual environments for motor rehabilitation: Review," Cyberpsych. Beh., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 187-211, 2005.
11. G. Saposnik and M. Levin, "Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: A meta-analysis and implications for clinicians," Stroke, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 1380-1386, 2011.
12. G. G. Fluet and J. E. Deutsch, "Virtual reality sensorimotor rehabilitation post-stroke: The promise and current state of the field," Curr. Phys. Med. Rehabil. Rep., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 9-20, 2013.
13. S. Subramanian, C. Lourenc¸o, G. Chilingaryan, H. Sveistrup, and M. Levin, "Arm motor recovery using a virtual reality intervention in chronic stroke: Randomized control trial," Neuroreh. Neural Res., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 13-23, 2013.
14. P. Garrett, C. A. Brown, S. Hart-Hester, E. Hamadain, C. Dixon, W. Pierce, and W. Rudman, "Identifying barriers to the adoption of new technology in rural hospitals: A case report," Perspect. Health Inf. Manag., vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 1-11, 2006.
15. S. L. Wolf et al., "Assessing Wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke," Stroke, vol. 32, pp. 1635-1639, 2001.
16. D. M. Morris, G. Uswatte, J. E. Crago, E. W. Cook, III, and E. Taub, "The reliability of the Wolf motor function test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke," Arch. Phys. Med. Rehab., vol. 82, pp. 750-755, Jun. 2001.
17. A. McLaughlin, M. Gandy, J. Allaire, and L. Whitlock, "Putting fun into aging - Overcoming usability and motivational issues in video games for older adults," Ergonomics Design, vol. 20, pp. 13-20, 2012.
18. M. Lowenthal, Lives in Distress. New York, NY, USA: Basic Books, 1964.
19. M. Lawton and E. Brody, "Assessment of older people: Self maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living," Gerontologist, vol. 9, pp. 179-186, 1969.
20. th Int. Symp. Aerospace/Defense Sensing, Simulation and Controls, Orlando, FL, USA, 1997.
21. E. A. Wan and R. van der Merwe, "The unscented Kalman filter," in Kalman Filtering and Neural Networks. New York, USA: Wiley, 2001, pp. 221-280.
22. D. Tolani and N. I. Badler, "Real-time inverse kinematics of the human arm," Presence, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 393-401, 1996.
23. M. Kallmann, "Analytical inverse kinematics with body posture control," Computer Animation Virtual Worlds, vol. 19, pp. 79-91, 2008.
24. B. Kopp, A. Kunkel, H. Flor, T. Platz, U. Rose, K. Mauritz, K. Gresser, K. McCulloch, and E. Taub, "The Arm Motor Ability Test: Reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of an instrument for assessing disabilities in activities of daily living," Arch. Phys. Med. Rehab., vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 615-20, 1997.
25. B. Rohrer, S. Fasoli, H. Krebs, R. Hughes, B. Volpe, W. Frontera, J. Stein, and N. Hogan, "Movement smoothness changes during stroke recovery," J. Neurosci., vol. 22, no. 18, pp. 8297-8304, 2002.
26. N. Hogan and D. Sternad, "Sensitivity of smoothness measures to movement duration, amplitude, and arrests," J. Motor Behav., vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 529-34, 2009.
27. R. J. Adams, D. Klowden, and B. Hannaford, "Virtual training for a manual assembly task," Haptics-e: Electronic J. Haptics Res., vol. 2, no. 2, 2001.
28. B. Rohrer, S. Fasoli, H. I. Krebs, B. Volpe, W. R. Frontera, J. Stein, and N. Hogan, "Submovements grow larger, fewer, and more blended during stroke recovery," Motor Contr., vol. 8, pp. 472-483, 2004.
29. J. Rosen, J. C. Perry, N. Manning, S. Burns, and B. Hannaford, "The human arm kinematics and dynamics during daily activities - Toward a 7 DOF upper limb powered exoskeleton," in Proc. Int. Conf. Advanced Robotics (ICAR), Seattle, WA, USA, 2005.
30. E. L. Lehmann and H. J. M. D'Abrera, Nonparametrics: Statistical Methods Based on Ranks. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall, 1998.
31. J. Myerson, S. Robertson, and S. Hale, "Aging and intraindividual variability in performance: Analyses of response time distributions," J. Exp. Anal. Beh., vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 319-337, 2007.
32. R. West, K. Murphy, M. Armilio, F. Craik, and D. Stuss, "Lapses of intention and performance variability reveal age-related increases in fluctuations of executive control," Brain Cognition, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 402-19, 2002.
33. th Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Medicine and Biology Soc., San Diego, CA, USA, 2012.