In vitro evaluation of aerosol delivery by different nebulization modes in pediatric and adult mechanical ventilators

Respiratory Care

Volumn 59, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 1494-1500

  Wan, Gwo Hwa ^a   Lin, Hui Ling ^a   Fink, James B ^b   Chen, Yen Hey ^a   Wang, Wei Jhen ^c   Chiu, Yu Chun ^d   Kao, Yu Yao ^e   Liu, Chia Jung ^e  

^a CHANG GUNG UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (Taiwan)

^b GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^d NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^e CHANG GUNG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Aerosol drug delivery; Bronchodilator; Endotracheal tube; Mechanical ventilation; Nebulization mode; Small volume nebulizer

Indexed keywords

SALBUTAMOL SULFATE; AEROSOL; BRONCHODILATING AGENT; SALBUTAMOL;

ADULT; AEROSOL; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; BREATHING RATE; CHILD; CONTINUOUS NEBULIZATION MODE; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EXPIRATORY INTERMITTENT NEBULIZATION MODE; HUMAN; HUMIDIFIER; INSPIRATORY INTERMITTENT NEBULIZATION MODE; LUNG MODEL; MECHANICAL VENTILATOR; NEBULIZATION; NEBULIZER; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; SPECTROPHOTOMETRY; TIDAL VOLUME; ADMINISTRATION AND DOSAGE; DEVICES; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; FILTRATION; IN VITRO STUDY; INHALATIONAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; PEDIATRICS; TIME;

ADMINISTRATION, INHALATION; ADULT; AEROSOLS; ALBUTEROL; BRONCHODILATOR AGENTS; CHILD; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FILTRATION; HUMANS; IN VITRO TECHNIQUES; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; NEBULIZERS AND VAPORIZERS; PEDIATRICS; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84924868852     PISSN: 00201324     EISSN: 19433654     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4187/respcare.02999     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Coleman DM, Kelly HW, McWilliams BC. Determinants of aerosolized albuterol delivery to mechanically ventilated infants. Chest 1996;109(6):1607-1613.
2. Dhand R, Tobin MJ. Bronchodilator delivery with metered-dose inhalers in mechanically-ventilated patients. Eur Respir J 1996;9(3): 585-595.
3. Fink JB, Dhand R, Grychowski J, Fahey PJ, Tobin MJ. Reconciling in vitro and in vivo measurements of aerosol delivery from a metered- dose inhaler during mechanical ventilation and defining efficiency-enhancing factors. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;159(1): 63-68.
4. Fink JB, Dhand R, Duarte AG, Jenne JW, Tobin MJ. Aerosol delivery from a metered-dose inhaler during mechanical ventilation. An in vitro model. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;154(2):382-387.
5. Hess DR, Dillman C, Kacmarek RM. In vitro evaluation of aerosol bronchodilator delivery during mechanical ventilation: pressure-control vs. volume control ventilation. Intensive Care Med 2003;29(7): 1145-1150.
6. Miller DD, Amin MM, Palmer LB, Shah AR, Smaldone GC. Aerosol delivery and modern mechanical ventilation: in vitro/in vivo evaluation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003;168(10):1205-1209.
7. O’Riordan TG, Weinstein MD, Mao Y. Bench testing of nebulizers: a comparison of three methods. J Aerosol Med 1999;12(2):59-66.
8. Ari A, Atalay OT, Harwood R, Sheard MM, Aljamhan EA, Fink JB. Influence of nebulizer type, position, and bias flow on aerosol drug delivery in simulated pediatric and adult lung models during mechanical ventilation. Respir Care 2010;55(7):845-851.
9. Garner SS, Wiest DB, Bradley JW. Albuterol delivery by metereddose inhaler with a pediatric mechanical ventilatory circuit model. Pharmacotherapy 1994;14(2):210-214.
10. Pelkonen AS, Nikander K, Turpeinen M. Jet nebulization of budesonide suspension into a neonatal ventilator circuit: synchronized versus continuous nebulizer flow. Pediatr Pulmonol 1997;24(4):282-286.
11. Berlinski A, Willis JR. Albuterol delivery by 4 different nebulizers placed in 4 different positions in a pediatric ventilator in vitro model. Respir Care 2013;58(7):1124-1133.
12. Goode ML, Fink JB, Dhand R, Tobin MJ. Improvement in aerosol delivery with helium-oxygen mixtures during mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;163(1):109-114.
13. Ari A, Areabi H, Fink JB. Evaluation of aerosol generator devices at 3 locations in humidified and non-humidified circuits during adult mechanical ventilation. Respir Care 2010;55(7):837-844.
14. Hughes JM, Saez J. Effects of nebulizer mode and position in a mechanical ventilator circuit on dose efficiency. Respir Care 1987; 32(12):1131-1135.
15. Quinn WW. Effect of a new nebulizer position on aerosol delivery during mechanical ventilation: a bench study. Respir Care 1992; 37(5):423-431.
16. MacIntyre NR, Silver RM, Miller CW, Schuler F, Coleman RE. Aerosol delivery in intubated, mechanically ventilated patients. Crit Care Med 1985;13(2):81-84.
17. Di Paolo ER, Pannatier A, Cotting J. In vitro evaluation of bronchodilator drug delivery by jet nebulization during pediatric mechanical ventilation. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2005;6(4):462-469.
18. Sidler-Moix AL, Dolci U, Berger-Gryllaki M, Pannatier A, Cotting J, Di Paolo ER. Albuterol delivery in an in vitro pediatric ventilator lung model: comparison of jet, ultrasonic, and mesh nebulizers. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2013;14(2):e98–e102.
19. Moraine JJ, Truflandier K, Vandenbergen N, Berré J, Mélot C, Vincent JL. Placement of the nebulizer before the humidifier during mechanical ventilation: effect on aerosol delivery. Heart Lung 2009;38(5):435-439.
20. Dolovich MB, Ahrens RC, Hess DR, Anderson P, Dhand R, Rau JL, et al. Device selection and outcomes of aerosol therapy: evidence-based guidelines: American College of Chest Physicians/American College of Asthma, Allergy, and Immunology. Chest 2005;127(1):335-371.