Negotiating pragmatic competence in computer mediated communication: The case of korean address terms

CALICO Journal

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 264-284

  Kim, Eun Young Ariel ^a   Brown, Lucien ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

Address Terms; Computer mediated Communication (CMC); Identity; Korean; Pragmatic Competence

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924755925     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20569017     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.11139/cj.31.3.264-284     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Barron, A. (2003). Acquisition in interlanguage pragmatics [Pragmatics and beyond 108]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
2. Belz, J. A., & Kinginger, C. (2002). The Cross-linguistic development of address form use in telecollaborative language learning: Two case studies. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 59(2), 189-214. doi: 10.3138/cmlr.59.2.189
3. Belz, J. A., & Kinginger, C. (2003). Discourse options and the development of pragmatic competence by classroom learners of German: The case of address forms. Language learning, 53(4), 591-647. doi: 10.1046/j.1467-9922.2003.00238.x
4. Belz, J. A. (2007). The role of computer mediation in the instruction and development of L2 pragmatic competence. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27, 45-75.
5. Black, R. W. (2006). Language, culture, and identity in online fanfiction. E-Learning and Digital Media, 3(2), 170-184.
6. Blake, R. (2000). Computer mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 120-136.
7. Blattner, G., & Fiori, M. (2009). Facebook in the language classroom: Promises and possibilities. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 6(1), 17-28.
8. Block, D. (2003). The social turn in second language acquisition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
9. Block, D. (2007). Second language identities. London: Continuum.
10. Brown, L. (2010). Questions of appropriateness and authenticity in the representation of Korean honorifics in textbooks for second language learners. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 23(1), 35-50. doi: 10.1080/07908310903474246
11. Brown, L. (2011). Korean honorifics and politeness in second language learning. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
12. Choo, M. (1999). Teaching language styles of Korean. In S. Kang (Ed.), The Korean language in America (pp. 77-95). Monterey, CA: American Association of Teachers of Korean.
13. Du Fon, A. (1999). The acquisition of linguistic politeness in Indonesian as a second language by sojourners in naturalistic interactions (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Hawaii, Honolulu.
14. Gilmore, A. (2004). A comparison of textbook and authentic interactions. ELT Journal, 58(4), 363-374. doi: 10.1093/elt/58.4.363
15. Gilmore, A. (2007). Authentic materials and authenticity in foreign language leaning. Language Teaching, 40, 97-118. doi: 10.1017/S0261444807004144
16. Guarda, M. (2012). Computer-mediated-communication and foreign language education. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 8(3), 15-27.
17. Higgins, C. (2011). “You’re a real Swahili!”: Western women’s resistance to identity slippage in Tanzania. In C. Higgins (Ed.), Identity formation in globalizing contexts (pp. 147-167). Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
18. Hwang, S. (1991). Terms of address in Korean and American cultures. Intercultural Communication Studies, 1(2), 117-134.
19. Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R. (1999). Pragmatics and SLA. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, 81-104.
20. Kern, R. (2006). Perspectives on technology in learning and teaching languages. TESOL Quarterly 40(1), 183-210. doi: 10.2307/40264516
21. Kim-Renaud, Y. (2012). Modern Korean. In N. Tranter (Ed.), The languages of Japan and Korea (pp.123-167). Oxon, England: Routledge.
22. King, R., & Yeon, J. (2000). Elementary Korean. Boston, MA: Tuttle.
23. Kitade, K. (2006). The negotiation model in asynchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC): Negotiation in Task-based Email exchanges. CALICO Journal, 23(2), 319-348.
24. Kramsch, C. (1985). Classroom interaction and discourse options. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 69(4), 169-183.
25. Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews. London, UK: Sage.
26. Lam, W. (2004). Second language socialization in a bilingual chat room. Language Learning and Technology, 8(3), 44-65.
27. Lantolf, J. P. (2006). Sociocultural theory and second language learning: State of the art. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(1), 67-109.
28. Lee, J. (2009). Intheneys thongsin ene-uy hwaksan-kwa hankwuke yenkwu-uy hwaktay [The spread of Internet communication and the expansion of Korean language research]. Seoul: Sotong.
29. Oliveira, S. M. (2005). A retrospective on address in Portugal (1982–2002): Rethinking power and solidarity. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 6(2), 307-323. doi: 10.1075/jhp.6.2.08deo
30. Oliveira, S. M. (2013). Address in computer-mediated communication. In S. Herring, D. Stein and T. Virtanen (Eds.), Pragmatics of computer-mediated communication (pp. 291-313). Berlin: Walter De Gruyter.
31. Ortega, L., & Iberri-Shea, G. (2005). Longitudinal research in second language acquisition: Recent trends and future directions. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 26-45.
32. Park, S.-H. (1975). On special uses of kinship terms in Korea. Korea Journal, 15, 4-8.
33. Park, H.-G. (2006). Chengsonyen-tul-uy sincoe sayngseng-kwa kyengthay-uy kinung pyeni [A study on the formation of the newly-coined words by young people and the functional alteration of their morph]. Wulimankul, 35, 75-105.
34. Park, J.-W. (2005). Hankwuke hochinge cheykyey [The Korean address terms system]. In H.-S. Wang et al. (Eds.), Hankwuk sahoy-wa hochinge [Korean society and address terms] (pp. 75-95). Seoul: Yeklak.
35. Park, Y. (2004). Hankwuke-uy sahoyenehak [Korean sociolinguistics]. Seoul: Hankook-munhwasa.
36. Pellettieri, J. (2000). Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence. In M. Barschauer & R. Kerns (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 59-86). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37. Siegal, M. (1994). Looking east: Learning Japanese as a second language in Japan and the interaction of race, gender and social context (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California-Berkely, California.
38. Taguchi, N. (2011). Teaching pragmatics: Trends and issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 289-310. doi: 10.1017/S0267190511000018
39. Thorne, S. L. (2000). Second language acquisition theory and the truth(s) about relativity. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition (pp. 219-244). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40. Thorne, S. L. (2003). Artifacts and cultures-of-use in international communication. Language Learning and Technology, 7(2), 38-67.
41. Thorne, S. L. (2008). Mediating technologies and second language Learning. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear & D. J. Lue (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 417-449). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42. Thorne, S. L., Black, R. W., & Sykes, J. M. (2009). Second language use, socialization, and learning in internet interest communities and online gaming. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 802-823. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00974.x
43. Wang, H. S. (1999). Speech acts in Korean language textbooks: Representations and authenticity. Journal of Korean Language Education, 10(1), 195-220.
44. Warschauer, M. (1998, January). CALL vs. electronic literacy: Reconceiving technology in the language classroom [Keynote plenary address]. Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research Annual Research Forum, University of Cambridge, England.
45. Wilkinson, S. (2002). The omnipresent classroom during summer study abroad: American students in conversation with their French hosts. The Modern Language Journal, 86(2), 157-173. doi: 10.1111/1540-4781.00142
46. Yi, Y. (2007). Engaging literacy: A biliterate student’s composing practices beyond school. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(1), 23-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2007.03.001
47. Yoo, S. Y. (1998). Kwuke hoching, cichinge-wa chengca taywu emi-uy toklipseng [The independence of address and speech levels in the Korean language]. Kwukehak, 32, 171-200.
48. You, S. H. (2002). Teaching Korean kinship terms to foreign learners of Korean language: Addressing and referencing. In J. J. Ree (Ed.), The Korean language in America Vol. 7 (pp. 307-330). Monterey, CA: American Association of Teachers of Korean.