Neuronal oscillations as a mechanistic substrate of auditory temporal prediction

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Volumn 1337, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 26-31

  Morillon, Benjamin ^a,b   Schroeder, Charles E ^a,c  

^a Department of Medicine   (United States)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c NATHAN S KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Active sensing; Expectation; Neurophysiology; Perception; Sensorimotor

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY RESPONSE; DOMINANCE BEHAVIOR; HEARING; HUMAN; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MOTOR SYSTEM; NERVOUS SYSTEM PARAMETERS; NEUROIMAGING; NEURONAL OSCILLATION; PRIMARY MOTOR CORTEX; SPEECH PERCEPTION; ATTENTION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; NERVE CELL; OSCILLOMETRY; PATHOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; SENSATION; TIME;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ATTENTION; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; HEARING; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURONS; OSCILLOMETRY; PATTERN RECOGNITION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; SENSATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84924532437     PISSN: 00778923     EISSN: 17496632     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1111/nyas.12629     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Helmholtz, H. von. 1856. Handbook of Physiological Optics. Leipzig: Leopold Voss.
2. Friston, K. 2005. A theory of cortical responses. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 360: 815-836.
3. Sadaghiani, S. & A. Kleinschmidt. 2013. Functional interactions between intrinsic brain activity and behavior. NeuroImage 80: 379-386.
4. Ringach, D.L. 2009. Spontaneous and driven cortical activity: implications for computation. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 19: 439-444.
5. Arnal, L. & A.L. Giraud. 2012. Cortical oscillations and sensory predictions. Trends Cogn. Sci. 16: 390-398.
6. Fiser, J., P. Berkes, G. Orbán & M. Lengyel. 2010. Statistically optimal perception and learning: from behavior to neural representations. Trends Cogn. Sci. 14: 119-130.
7. Winkler, I., S.L. Denham & I. Nelken. 2009. Modeling the auditory scene: predictive regularity representations and perceptual objects. Trends Cogn. Sci. 13: 532-540.
8. Nobre, A., G. Rohenkohl, M. Stokes & M. Nobre. 2012. "Nervous anticipation: top-down biasing across space and time." In Cognitive Neuroscience of Attention, 2nd ed. M.I. Posner, Ed.: 159-186. New York: Guilford.
9. Olson, I.R. & M.M. Chun. 2001. Temporal contextual cuing of visual attention. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 27: 1299-1313.
10. Kingstone, A. 1992. Combining expectancies. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 44: 69-104.
11. Large, E.W. & M.R. Jones. 1999. The dynamics of attending: how people track time-varying events. Psychol. Rev. 106: 119-159.
12. Jones, M.R. 1976. Time, our lost dimension: toward a new theory of perception, attention, and memory. Psychol. Rev. 83: 323-355.
13. Jones, M.R. & M. Boltz. 1989. Dynamic attending and responses to time. Psychol. Rev. 96: 459-491.
14. Jones, M.R., H. Moynihan, N. MacKenzie & J. Puente. 2002. Temporal aspects of stimulus-driven attending in dynamic arrays. Psychol. Sci. 13: 313-319.
15. Rohenkohl, G., A.M. Cravo, V. Wyart & A.C. Nobre. 2012. Temporal expectation improves the quality of sensory information. J. Neurosci. 32: 8424-8428.
16. Jaramillo, S. & A.M. Zador, 2011. The auditory cortex mediates the perceptual effects of acoustic temporal expectation. Nat. Neurosci. 14: 246-251.
17. Praamstra, P., D. Kourtis, H.F. Kwok & R. Oostenveld. 2006. Neurophysiology of implicit timing in serial choice reaction-time performance. J. Neurosci. 26: 5448-5455.
18. Alink, A., C.M. Schwiedrzik, A. Kohler, et al. 2010. Stimulus predictability reduces responses in primary visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 30: 2960-2966.
19. Lange, K. 2009. Brain correlates of early auditory processing are attenuated by expectations for time and pitch. Brain Cogn. 69: 127-137.
20. Costa-Faidella, J., T. Baldeweg, S. Grimm & C. Escera. 2011. Interactions between "what" and "when" in the auditory system: temporal predictability enhances repetition suppression. J. Neurosci. 31: 18590-18597.
21. Yaron, A., I. Hershenhoren & I. Nelken. 2012. Sensitivity to complex statistical regularities in rat auditory cortex. Neuron 76: 603-615.
22. Schroeder, C.E. & P. Lakatos. 2009. Low-frequency neuronal oscillations as instruments of sensory selection. Trends Neurosci. 32: 9-18.
23. Lakatos, P., et al. 2013. The spectrotemporal filter mechanism of auditory selective attention. Neuron 77: 750-761.
24. Cravo, A.M., G. Rohenkohl, V. Wyart & A.C. Nobre. 2013. Temporal expectation enhances contrast sensitivity by phase entrainment of low-frequency oscillations in visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 33: 4002-4010.
25. Zion Golumbic, E.M., et al. 2013. Mechanisms underlying selective neuronal tracking of attended speech at a "cocktail party." Neuron 77: 980-991.
26. Elliott, T.M. & F.E. Theunissen. 2009. The modulation transfer function for speech intelligibility. PLoS Comput. Biol. 5: e1000302.
27. Christiansen, T.U. & S. Greenberg. 2009. "Frequency selective filtering of the modulation spectrum and its impact on consonant identification." In Linguistic Theory Raw Sound. A.N. Rasmussen, T. Poulsen, T. Andersen & C.B. Larsen, Eds.: 585-599. Sweden: Samfundslitteratur.
28. Drullman, R., J.M. Festen & R. Plomp. 1994. Effect of reducing slow temporal modulations on speech reception. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95: 2670-2680.
29. Giraud, A.L. & D. Poeppel. 2012. Cortical oscillations and speech processing: emerging computational principles and operations. Nat. Neurosci. 15: 511-517.
30. Bouchard, K.E., N. Mesgarani, K. Johnson & E.F. Chang. 2013. Functional organization of human sensorimotor cortex for speech articulation. Nature 495: 327-332.
31. Abrams, D.A., T. Nicol, S. Zecker & N. Kraus. 2008. Right-hemisphere auditory cortex is dominant for coding syllable patterns in speech. J. Neurosci. 28: 3958-3965.
32. Luo, H. & D. Poeppel. 2007. Phase patterns of neuronal responses reliably discriminate speech in human auditory cortex. Neuron 54: 1001-1010.
33. Morillon, B., C. Liégeois-Chauvel, L. Arnal, et al. 2012. Asymmetric function of theta and gamma activity in syllable processing: an intra-cortical study. Front. Psychol. 3: 248.
34. Gross, J., et al. 2013. Speech rhythms and multiplexed oscillatory sensory coding in the human brain. PLoS Biol. 11: e1001752.
35. Xiang, J., D. Poeppel & J.Z. Simon. 2013. Physiological evidence for auditory modulation filterbanks: cortical responses to concurrent modulations. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 133: EL7-EL12.
36. Ahissar, E., et al. 2001. Speech comprehension is correlated with temporal response patterns recorded from auditory cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 13367-13372.
37. Peelle, J.E., J. Gross & M.H. Davis. 2012. Phase-locked responses to speech in human auditory cortex are enhanced during comprehension. Cereb. Cortex 23: 1378-1387.
38. Luo, H., X. Tian, K. Song, et al. 2013. Neural response phase tracks how listeners learn new acoustic representations. Curr. Biol. 23: 968-974.
39. Giraud, A.L., et al. 2007. Endogenous cortical rhythms determine cerebral specialization for speech perception and production. Neuron 56: 1127-1134.
40. Morillon, B., et al. 2010. Neurophysiological origin of human brain asymmetry for speech and language. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107: 18688-18693.
41. Arieli, A., A. Sterkin, A. Grinvald & A. Aertsen. 1996. Dynamics of ongoing activity: explanation of the large variability in evoked cortical responses. Science 273: 1868-1871.
42. Cogan, G.B. & D. Poeppel. 2011. A mutual information analysis of neural coding of speech by low-frequency MEG phase information. J. Neurophysiol. 106: 554-563.
43. Schroeder, C.E., P. Lakatos, Y. Kajikawa, et al. 2008. Neuronal oscillations and visual amplification of speech. Trends Cogn. Sci. 12: 106-113.
44. Arnal, L.H., K.B. Doelling & D. Poeppel. 2014. Delta-beta coupled oscillations underlie temporal prediction accuracy. Cereb. Cortex doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu103
45. Fuster, J.M. 1990. Prefrontal cortex and the bridging of temporal gaps in the perception-action cycle. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 608: 318-329.
46. Grahn, J.A. & J.B. Rowe. 2012. Finding and feeling the musical beat: striatal dissociations between detection and prediction of regularity. Cereb. Cortex 23: 913-921.
47. Schroeder, C.E., D.A. Wilson, T. Radman, et al. 2010. Dynamics of active sensing and perceptual selection. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 20: 172-176.
48. Schubotz, R.I. 2007. Prediction of external events with our motor system: towards a new framework. Trends Cogn. Sci. 11: 211-218.
49. Bolton, T.L. 1894. Rhythm. Am. J. Psychol. 6: 145-238.
50. Morillon, B., C.A. Kell & A.L. Giraud. 2009. Three stages and four neural systems in time estimation. J. Neurosci. 29: 14803-14811.
51. Coull, J.T., F. Vidal, B. Nazarian & F. Macar. 2004. Functional anatomy of the attentional modulation of time estimation. Science 303: 1506-1508.
52. Grahn, J.A. & J.B. Rowe. 2009. Feeling the beat: premotor and striatal interactions in musicians and nonmusicians during beat perception. J. Neurosci. 29: 7540-7548.
53. Zatorre, R.J., J.L. Chen & V.B. Penhune. 2007. When the brain plays music: auditory-motor interactions in music perception and production. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 8: 547-558.
54. Teki, S., M. Grube, S. Kumar & T.D. Griffiths. 2011. Distinct neural substrates of duration-based and beat-based auditory timing. J. Neurosci. 31: 3805-3812.
55. Coull, J.T. & A.C. Nobre. 1998. Where and when to pay attention: the neural systems for directing attention to spatial locations and to time intervals as revealed by both PET and fMRI. J. Neurosci. 18: 7426-7435.
56. Saleh, M., J. Reimer, R. Penn, et al. 2010. Fast and slow oscillations in human primary motor cortex predict oncoming behaviorally relevant cues. Neuron 65: 461-471.
57. Wachowiak, M. 2011. All in a sniff: olfaction as a model for active sensing. Neuron 71: 962-973.
58. Crapse, T.B. & M.A. Sommer. 2008. Corollary discharge across the animal kingdom. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 9: 587-600.
59. Sommer, M.A. & R.H. Wurtz. 2008. Brain circuits for the internal monitoring of movements. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 31: 317-338.
60. Repp, B.H. & A. Penel. 2004. Rhythmic movement is attracted more strongly to auditory than to visual rhythms. Psychol. Res. 68: 252-270.
61. Morillon, B., C.E. Schroeder & V. Wyart. 2014. Motor contributions to the temporal precision of auditory attention. Nat. Commun. 5: 5255.
62. Kondo, H.M., D. Pressnitzer, I. Toshima & M. Kashino. 2012. Effects of self-motion on auditory scene analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109: 6775-6780.
63. Phillips-Silver, J. & L.J. Trainor. 2005. Feeling the beat: movement influences infant rhythm perception. Science 308: 1430.
64. Descartes, R. 1637. Discours de la Méthode (Pour Bien Conduire Sa Raison et Chercher la Vérité Dans les Sciences).
65. Morillon, B. & A. Barbot. 2013. Attention in the temporal domain: a phase-coding mechanism that controls the gain of sensory processing. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7: e480.
66. Rimmele, J., H. Jolsvai & E. Sussman. 2011. Auditory target detection is affected by implicit temporal and spatial expectations. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23: 1136-1147.
67. Polley, D.B., E.E. Steinberg & M.M. Merzenich. 2006. Perceptual learning directs auditory cortical map reorganization through top-down influences. J. Neurosci. 26: 4970-4982.
68. Doherty, J.R., A. Rao, M.M. Mesulam & A.C. Nobre. 2005. Synergistic effect of combined temporal and spatial expectations on visual attention. J. Neurosci. 25: 8259-8266.
69. Rohenkohl, G., I.C. Gould, J. Pessoa & A.C. Nobre. 2014. Combining spatial and temporal expectations to improve visual perception. J. Vis. 14: 8.
70. VanRullen, R., B. Zoefel & B. Ilhan. 2014. On the cyclic nature of perception in vision versus audition. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 369: 20130214.
71. Goswami, U. 2011. A temporal sampling framework for developmental dyslexia. Trends Cogn. Sci. 15: 3-10.
72. Lehongre, K., F. Ramus, N. Villiermet, et al. 2011. Altered low-γ sampling in auditory cortex accounts for the three main facets of dyslexia. Neuron 72: 1080-1090.
73. Schön, D. & B. Tillmann. 2015. Short- and long-term rhythmic interventions: perspectives for language rehabilitation. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1337: 32-39.