A mutual information analysis of neural coding of speech by low-frequency MEG phase information

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 106, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 554-563

  Cogan, Gregory B ^a,b   Poeppel, David ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Information theory; Magnetoencephalography; Oscillations

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY SYSTEM FUNCTION; FEMALE; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; NERVE CELL; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; THETA RHYTHM;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AUDITORY PATHWAYS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; NEURONS; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 80051502640     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00075.2011     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Adachi Y, Shimogawara M, Higuchi M, Haruta Y, Ochiai M. Reduction of non-periodic environmental magnetic noise in MEG measurement by continuously adjusted least squared method. IEEE Trans Appl Superconduct 11: 668-672, 2002.
2. Dan Y, Alonso JM, Usrey WM, Reid RC. Coding of visual information by precisely correlated spikes in the lateral geniculate nucleus. Nat Neurosci 1: 501-506, 1998.
3. Dell G. A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychol Rev 93: 283-321, 1986.
4. Gandour J, Dzemidzic M, Wong D, Lowe M, Tong Y, Hsieh L, Satthamnuwong N, Lurito J. Temporal integration of speech prosody is shaped by language experience: an fMRI study. Brain Lang 84: 318-336, 2003.
5. Greenberg S. A multi-tier framework for understanding spoken language. In: Listening to Speech: an Auditory Perspective, edited by Greenberg S, Ainsworth WA. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2006.
6. Greenberg S, Hollenback J, Ellis D. Insights into spoken language gleaned from phonetic transcriptions of the Switchboard Corpus. Proc Fourth Intl Conf on Spoken Language (ICSLP), Philadelphia, PA, 1996, S24-S27.
7. Hämäläinen M.S. Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates. Med Biol Eng Comput 32: 35-42, 1994.
8. Howard MF, Poeppel D. Discrimination of speech stimuli based on neuronal response phase patterns depends on acoustics but not comprehension. J Neurophysiol 104: 2500-2511, 2010.
9. Jeong J, Gore JC, Peterson BS. Mutual information analysis of the EEG in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Clin Neurophysiol 112: 827-835, 2001.
10. Kayser C, Montemurro MA, Logothetis NK, Panzeri S. Spike-phase coding boosts and stabilizes information carried by spatial and temporal spike patterns. Neuron 61: 597-608, 2009.
11. Lakatos P, Ankoor SS, Knuth KH, Ulbert I, Karmos G, Schroeder CE. An oscillatory hierarchy controlling neuronal excitability and stimulus processing in the auditory cortex. J Neurophysiol 94: 1904-1911, 2005.
12. Levelt WJM. Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1989.
13. Liégeois-Chauvel C, Musolino A, Badier JM, Marquis P, Chauvel P. Evoked potentials from the auditory cortex in man: evaluation and topography of the middle latency components. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 92: 204-214, 1994.
14. Luo H, Liu Z, Poeppel D. Auditory cortex tracks both auditory and visual stimulus dynamics using low-frequency neuronal phase modulation. PLoS Biol 8: 1-13, 2010.
15. Luo H, Poeppel D. Phase patterns of neuronal responses reliably discriminate speech in human auditory cortex. Neuron 54: 1001-1010, 2007.
16. Magri C, Whittingstall K, Singh V, Logothetis NK, Panzeri S. A toolbox for the fast information analysis of multiple-site LFP, EEG and spike train recordings. BMC Neurosci 10: 81, 2009.
17. Montemurro MA, Rasch MJ, Murayama Y, Logothetis NK, Panzeri S. Phase-of-firing coding of natural visual stimuli in primary visual cortex. Curr Biol 18: 375-380, 2008.
18. Montemurro MA, Senatore R, Panzeri S. Tight data-robust bounds to mutual information combining shuffling and model selection techniques. Neural Comput 19: 2913-2957, 2007.
19. Nirenberg S, Carcieri SM, Jacobs AL, Latham PE. Retinal ganglion cells act largely as independent encoders. Nature 411: 698-701, 2001.
20. Nirenberg S, Latham PE. Decoding neuronal spike trains: how important are correlations? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 7348-7353, 2003.
21. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9: 97-113, 1971.
22. Pannenkamp A, Toepel U, Alter K, Hahne A, Friederici AD. Prosodydriven sentence processing: an event-related brain potential study. J Cogn Neurosci 17: 407-421, 2005.
23. Pantev C, Hoke M, Lehnertz K, Lütkenhöner B, Fahrendorf G, Stöber U. Identification of sources of brain neuronal activity with high spatiotemporal resolution through combination of neuromagnetic source localization (NMSL) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 75: 173-184, 1990.
24. Panzeri S, Senatore R, Montemurro MA, Petersen RS. Correcting for the sampling bias problem in spike train information measures. J Neurophysiol 98: 1064-1072, 2007.
25. Picton TW, John MS, Dimitrijevic A, Purcell D. Human auditory steadystate responses. Int J Audiol 42: 177-219, 2003.
26. Poeppel D. The analysis of speech in different temporal integration windows: cerebral lateralization as "asymmetric sampling in time". Speech Commun 41: 245-255, 2003.
27. Pola G, Thiele A, Hoffman KP, Panzeri S. An exact method to quantify coding the information transmitted by the different mechanisms of correlational coding. Network 14: 35-60, 2003.
28. Reite M, Adams M, Simon J, Teale P, Sheeder J, Richardson D, Grabbe R. Auditory M100 component 1: relationship to Heschl's gyri. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2: 13-20, 1994.
29. Rosen S. Temporal information in speech: acoustic, auditory, and linguistic aspects. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 336: 367-373, 1992.
30. Schneidman E, Bialek W, Berry MJ 2nd. Synergy, redundancy, and independence in population codes. J Neurosci 23: 11539-11553, 2003.
31. Shannon CE. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 27: 379-423, 623-656, 1948.
32. Strong SP, Koberle R, de Ruyter van Steveninck RR, Bialek W. Entropy and information in neural spike trains. Phys Rev Lett 80: 197-200, 1998.
33. Van Veen BD, Van Drongelen W, Yuchtman M, Suzuki A. Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 44: 867-880, 1997.