Assessment as a positive influence on 21st century teaching and learning: A systems approach to progress

Psicologia Educativa

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 65-77

  Pellegrino, James W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment; Cognition; Design; Instruction; Learning; Measurement; Testing

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924527051     PISSN: 1135755X     EISSN: 21740526     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pse.2014.11.002     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Achieve (2013). Next Generation Science Standards. Retrieved from http://www. nextgenscience.org/.
2. A.C. Alonzo, and A.W. Gotwals Learning progression in science: Current challenges and future directions 2012 Sense Publishers Rotterdam, Netherlands
3. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2001). Atlas of science literacy. Washington, DC: Author.
4. Behrens, J.T.; & DiCerbo, K.E. (2013). Technological implications for assessment ecosystems: Opportunities for digital technology to advance assessment. Published by the Gordon Commission on the Future of Assessment in Education. Retrieved from http://www.gordoncommission.org/publications-reports/assessment- psychometric.html.
5. Bennett, R.E. (2013). Preparing for the future: What educational assessment must do. Published by the Gordon Commission on the Future of Assessment in Education. Retrieved from http://www.gordoncommission.org/publications-reports/assessment- paradigms.html.
6. Bereiter, C.; & Scardamalia, M. (2013). What will it mean to be an educated person in the mid-21st century? Published by the Gordon Commission on the Future of Assessment in Education. Retrieved from http://www.gordoncommission.org/publications-reports/assessment-paradigms.html.
7. P. Black, and D. Wiliam Assessment and classroom learning Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 5 1998 7 73
8. J.D. Bransford, A.L. Brown, R.R. Cocking, M.S. Donovan, and J.W. Pellegrino How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (expanded ed.) 2000 National Academies Press Washington, DC
9. T. Carpenter, E. Fennema, and M. Franke Cognitively guided instruction: A knowledge base for reform in primary mathematics instruction Elementary School Journal 97 1 1996 3 20
10. P. Cobb, T. Wood, E. Yackel, J. Nicholls, G. Wheatley, B. Trigatti, and M. Perlwitz Assessment of a problem-centered second-grade mathematics project Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 22 1 1991 3 29
11. Common Core State Standards Initiative (2010a). English language arts standards. Washington, DC: National Governors Association and Council of Chief State School Officers. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/the-standards/english- language-artsstandards.pdf.
12. Common Core State Standards Initiativa (2010b). Mathematics standards. Washington, DC: National Governors Association and Council of Chief State School Officers. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI-Math%20Standards.pdf.
13. Corcoran, T.B.; Mosher, F.A.; & Rogat, A. (2009). Learning progressions in science: An evidence-based approach to reform. New York, NY: Columbia University, Teachers College, Consortium for Policy Research in Education, Center on Continuous Instructional Improvement.
14. L. Darling-Hammond The flat world and education: How America's commitment to equity will determine our future 2010 Teachers College Press NY
15. Darling-Hammond, L.; & Adamson, F. (2010). Beyond Basic Skills: The Role of Performance Assessment in Achieving 21st Century Standards of Learning. Stanford, CA: Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education.
16. Darling-Hammond, L.; Herman, J.; Pellegrino, J.W.; Abedi, J.; Aber, J.L.; Baker, E.;... Steel, C.M. (2013). Criteria for high-quality assessment. Stanford, CA: Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education. Retrieved from: http://edpolicy.stanford.edu/publications/pubs/847.
17. Daro, P.; Mosher, F.A.; Corcoran, T.; Barrett, J.; & Consortium for Policy Research in Education. (2011). Learning trajectories in mathematics: A foundation for standards, curriculum, assessment, and instruction. Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
18. P. Deane, and Y. Song A case study in principled assessment design: Designing assessments to measure and support the development of argumentative reading and writing skills Psicología Educativa 20 2014 99 108
19. J. de la Torre, and N. Minchen Cognitively diagnostic assessments and the cognitive diagnosis model framework Psicología Educativa 20 2014 89 97
20. R.G. Duncan, and C. Hmelo-Silver Learning progressions: Aligning curriculum, instruction, and assessment Journal for Research in Science Teaching 46 2009 606 609
21. R.A. Duschl, H.A. Schweingruber, and A.W. Shouse Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grade K-8. 2007 The National Academies Press Washington DC
22. Forster, M.; & Masters, G. (2001). Progress maps. Victoria, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
23. Gordon Commission on the Future of Assessment in Education (2013b). Policy report. Retrieved from http://www.gordoncommission.org/publications-reports.html.
24. Gordon Commission on the Future of Assessment in Education (2013a). Technical report. Retrieved from http://www.gordoncommission.org/publications-reports. html.
25. Gorin, J.S. (2013). Assessment as evidential reasoning. Published by the Gordon Commission on the Future of Assessment in Education. Retrieved from http://www.gordoncommission.org/publications-reports/assessment-psychometric. html.
26. S. Griffin, and R. Case Re-thinking the primary school math curriculum: An approach based on cognitive science Issues in Education 3 1 1997 1 49
27. Herman, J.L.; Wilson, M.R.; Shavelson, R.; Timms, M.; and Schneider, S. (2005, April). The CAESL assessment model. Paper presented at American Educational Research Association annual conference, Montreal, Canada.
28. Hickey, D.; & Pellegrino, J.W. (2005). Theory, level, and function: Three dimensions for understanding transfer and student assessment. In J. P. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 251-293). Greenwich, CO: Information Age Publishing.
29. Kaestle, C. (2013). Testing policy in the United States: A historical perspective. Published by the Gordon Commission on the Future of Assessment in Education. Retrieved from http://www.gordoncommission.org/publications-reports/assessment- education.html.
30. J. Kilpatrick, J. Swafford, and B. Findell Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. 2001 National Academies Press Washington, DC
31. D. Koretz Measuring up: What educational testing really tells us 2009 Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA
32. R. Linn Assessments and accountability Educational Researcher 29 2 2000 4 16
33. Linn, R.L. (2013). Test-based accountability. Published by the Gordon Commission on the Future of Assessment in Education. Retrieved from http://www. gordoncommission.org/publications-reports/assessment-education.html.
34. Marion, S.; & Pellegrino, J.W. (2006, Winter). A validity framework for evaluating the technical quality of alternate assessments. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 47-57.
35. Masters, G.; & Forster, M. (1996). Progress maps. Assessment resource kit. Victoria, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.
36. R.J. Mislevy Test theory reconceived Journal of Educational Measurement 33 1996 379 416
37. R.J. Mislevy, and G. Haertel Implications of evidence-centered design for educational assessment Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 25 2006 6 20
38. R.J. Mislevy, and M.M. Riconscente Evidence-centered assessment design: Layers, concepts, and terminology S. Downing, T. Haladyna, Handbook of test development 2006 Erlbaum Mahwah, NJ 61 90
39. National Research Council (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K-12 Science Education Standards, Board on Science Education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
40. National Research Council (2003). Assessment in support of learning and instruction: Bridging the gap between large-scale and classroom assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
41. P.T. Ng Educational reform in Singapore: From quantity to quality Education Research on Policy and Practice 7 2008 5 15
42. PARCC (Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers) (2014). The PARCC assessment: Item development. Retrieved from http://www.parcconline.org/assessment-development.
43. Pellegrino, J.W.; Baxter, G.P.; & Glaser, R. (1999). Addressing the "two disciplines" problem: Linking theories of cognition and learning with assessment and instructional practice. In A. Iran-Nejad & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education (vol. 24, pp. 307-353). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
44. J.W. Pellegrino, N. Chudowsky, and R. Glaser Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. 2001 National Academies Press Washington, DC
45. Pellegrino, J.W.; DiBello, L.V.; & Brophy, S. (2014). The science and design of assessment in engineering education. In A. Johri & B. Olds (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of engineering education research (pp. 571-598). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
46. Pellegrino, J.W.; & Hickey, D. (2006). Educational assessment: Towards better alignment between theory and practice. In L. Verschaffel, F. Dochy, M. Boekaerts, & S. Vosniadou (Eds.), Instructional psychology: Past, present and future trends. Sixteen essays in honour of Erik De Corte (pp. 169-189). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
47. Pellegrino, J.W.; & Hilton, M.L. (Eds.) (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
48. Pellegrino, J.W.; Wilson, M.; Koenig, J. & Beatty, A. (Eds.) (2014). Developing assessments for the next generation science standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
49. E. Quellmalz, and J.W. Pellegrino Technology and testing Science 323 2009 75 79
50. M.A. Ruiz-Primo, R.J. Shavelson, L. Hamilton, and S. Klein On the evaluation of systemic science education reform: Searching for instructional sensitivity Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39 2002 369 393
51. R. Sadler Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems Instructional Science 18 1989 119 144
52. SBAC (Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium) (2014). The SBAC assessment: Item writing and review. Retrieved from http://www.smarterbalanced.org/smarter- balanced-assessments/item-writing-and-review/.
53. D. Schum Evidence and inference for the intelligence analyst 1987 University of America Press Lantham, MD
54. L.A. Shepard The role of assessment in a learning culture Educational Researcher 29 7 2000 4 14
55. C.E. Snow, M. Burns, and M. Griffin Preventing reading difficulties in young children. 1998 National Academies Press Washington, DC
56. R.J. Stiggins Student-centered classroom assessment 1997 Prentice-Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ
57. Webb, N.L. (1997). Criteria for alignment of expectations and assessments in mathematics and science education (National Institute for Science Education and Council of Chief State School Officers Research Monograph No. 6). Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
58. G. Wiggins Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance 1998 Jossey-Bass San Francisco, CA
59. Wiliam, D. (2007). Keeping learning on track: formative assessment and the regulation of learning. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 1053-1098). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
60. Wilson, M.; Draney, K.; & Kennedy, C. (2001). GradeMap [computer program]. Berkeley, CA: BEAR Center, University of California, Berkeley.
61. M. Wilson, and K. Sloane From principles to practice: An embedded assessment system Applied Measurement in Education 13 2000 181 208
62. Wilson, M.R.; & Bertenthal, M.W. (Eds.),. (2006). Systems for state science assessments. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
63. M. Zieky An introduction to the use of evidence-centered design in test development Psicología Educativa 20 2014 79 87