Comparison between 3D volumetric rendering and multiplanar slices on the reliability of linear measurements on CBCT images: An in vitro study

Journal of Applied Oral Science

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 56-63

  Fernandes, Thais Maria Freire ^a   Adamczyk, Julie ^b   Poleti, Marcelo Lupion ^a   Henriques, José Fernando Castanha ^c   Friedland, Bernard ^b   Garib, Daniela Gamba ^c  

^a UNIVERSIDADE NORTE DO PARANÁ   (Brazil)

^b HARVARD SCHOOL OF DENTAL MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Cone beam computed tomography; Mandible; Reliability

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANATOMIC LANDMARK; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; CEPHALOMETRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MANDIBLE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; REFERENCE VALUE; REPRODUCIBILITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANATOMIC LANDMARKS; CEPHALOMETRY; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MANDIBLE; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84924453206     PISSN: 16787757     EISSN: 16787765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/1678-775720130445     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. 1 Ballrick JW, Palomo JM, Ruch E, Amberman BD, Hans MG. Image distortion and spatial resolution of a commercially available conebeam computed tomography machine. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134(4):573-82.
2. 2 Baumgaertel S, Palomo JM, Palomo L, Hans MG. Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography dental measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136(1):19-25.
3. 3 Baumrind S, Frantz RC. The reliability of head film measurements. 1. Landmark identification. Am J Orthod. 1971;60(2):111-27.
4. Berco M, Rigali PH Jr, Miner RM, DeLuca S, Anderson NK, Will LA. Accuracy and reliability of linear cephalometric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography scans of a dry human skull. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136(1):17e1-9.
5. Bogdanich W, McGinty JC. Radiation worries for children in dentists’ chairs [online]. The New York Times. 2010. Nov. 22 [cited 2013. Sep. 3]. Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/23/us/23scan.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0.
6. 6 Brown AA, Scarfe WC, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG. Linear accuracy of cone beam CT derived 3D images. Angle Orthod. 2009;79(1):150-7.
7. 7 Cavalcanti MG, Haller JW, Vannier MW. Three-dimensional computed tomography landmark measurement in craniofacial surgical planning: experimental validation in vitro. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999;57(6):690-4.
8. Damstra J, Fourie Z, Huddleston Slater JJ, Ren Y. Accuracy of linear measurements from cone-beam computed tomographyderived surface models of different voxel sizes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137(1):16 e1-6.
9. 9 Friedland B, Donoff B, Dodson TB. The use of 3-dimensional reconstructions to evaluate the anatomic relationship of the mandibular canal and impacted mandibular third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66(8):1678-85.
10. 10 Grauer D, Cevidanes LS, Proffit WR. Working with DICOM craniofacial images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136(3):460-70.
11. 11 Gribel BF, Gribel MN, Frazão DC, McNamara JA Jr, Manzi FR. Accuracy and reliability of craniometric measurements on lateral cephalometry and 3D measurements on CBCT scans. Angle Orthod. 2011;81(1):26-35.
12. 12 Hilgers ML, Scarfe WC, Scheetz JP, Farman AG. Accuracy of linear temporomandibular joint measurements with cone beam computed tomography and digital cephalometric radiography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;128(6):803-11.
13. 13 Houston WJ. The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod. 1983;83(5):382-90.
14. 14 Kau CH, Richmond S, Palomo JM, Hans MG. Three-dimensional cone beam computerized tomography in orthodontics. J Orthod. 2005;32(4):282-93.
15. 15 Kobayashi K, Shimoda S, Nakagawa Y, Yamamoto A. Accuracy in measurement of distance using limited cone-beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19(2):228-31.
16. 16 Kragskov J, Bosch C, Gyldensted C, Sindet-Pedersen S. Comparison of the reliability of craniofacial anatomic landmarks based on cephalometric radiographs and three-dimensional CT scans. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1997;34(2):111-6.
17. 17 Lamichane M, Anderson NK, Rigali PH, Seldin EB, Will LA. Accuracy of reconstructed images from cone-beam computed tomography scans. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136(2):156-7.
18. 18 Lascala CA, Panella J, Marques MM. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom). Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004;33(5):291-4.
19. 19 Liedke GS, Silveira HE, Silveira HL, Dutra V, Figueiredo JA. Influence of voxel size in the diagnostic ability of cone beam tomography to evaluate simulated external root resorption. J Endod. 2009;35(2):233-5.
20. 20 Lou L, Lagravere MO, Compton S, Major PW, Flores-Mir C. Accuracy of measurements and reliability of landmark identification with computed tomography (CT) techniques in the maxillofacial area: a systematic review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;104(3):402-11.
21. 21 Ludlow JB, Laster WS, See M, Bailey LJ, Hershey HG. Accuracy of measurements of mandibular anatomy in cone beam computed tomography images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;103(4):534-42.
22. 22 Molen AD. Considerations in the use of cone-beam computed tomography for buccal bone measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137:S130-5.
23. 23 Moreira CR, Sales MA, Lopes PM, Cavalcanti MG. Assessment of linear and angular measurements on three-dimensional conebeam computed tomographic images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;108(3):430-6.
24. 24 Navarro RL, Oltramari-Navarro PV, Fernandes TM, Oliveira GF, Conti AC, Almeida MR, et al. Comparison of manual, digital and lateral CBCT cephalometric analyses. J Appl Oral Sci. 2013;21(2):167-76.
25. 25 Oliveira-Santos C, Capelozza AL, Dezzoti MS, Fischer CM, Poleti ML, Rubira-Bullen IR. Visibility of the mandibular canal on CBCT cross-sectional images. J Appl Oral Sci. 2011;19(3):240-3.
26. 26 Pinsky HM, Dyda S, Pinsky RW, Misch KA, Sarment DP. Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements using cone-beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006;35(6):410-6.
27. 27 Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc. 2006;72(1):75-80.
28. SEDENTEXCT Project. Radiation protection: Cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial radiology. Evidence based guidelines [online]. 2011 [cited September 3, 2013]. Available from: http://www.eadmfr.info/sites/default/files/guidelines_final.pdf.
29. Silva MA, Wolf U, Heinicke F, Bumann A, Visser H, Hirsch E. Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;133(5):640.e1-5.
30. 30 Tomasi C, Bressan E, Corazza B, Mazzoleni S, Stellini E, Lith A. Reliability and reproducibility of linear mandible measurements with the use of a cone-beam computed tomography and two object inclinations. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011;40(4):244-50.