Visibility of the mandibular canal on CBCT crosssectional images

Journal of Applied Oral Science

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 240-243

  Oliveira Santos, Christiano ^a   Capelozza, Ana Lúcia Álvares ^a   Dezzoti, Mariela Siqueira Gião ^a   Fischer, Cássia Maria ^b   Poleti, Marcelo Lupion ^a   Rubira Bullen, Izabel Regina Fischer ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF GOIÁS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Cone beam computed tomography; Mandible; Mandibular nerve

Indexed keywords

EID: 79957943462     PISSN: 16787757     EISSN: 16787765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1678-77572011000300011     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Anderson LC, Kosinsk TF, Mentag PJ. A review of the intraosseous course of the nerves of the mandible. J Oral Implantol. 1991;17:394-403.
2. Angelopoulous C, Thomas SL, Hechler S, Parissis N, Hlavacek M. Comparison between digital panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the identification of the mandibular canal as part of presurgical dental implant assessment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66:2130-5.
3. Carter RB, Keen EM. The intramandibular course of the inferior alveolar nerve. J Anat. 1971;108:433-40.
4. Denio D, Torabinejad M, Bakland LK. Anatomical relationship of the mandibular canal to its surrounding structures in mature mandibles. J Endod. 1992;18:161-5.
5. Gowgiel JM. The position and course of the mandibular canal. J Oral Implantol. 1992;18:383-5.
6. Kamburoǧlu K, Kiliç C, Özen T, Yüksel SP. Measurements of mandibular canal region obtained by cone-beam computed tomography: a cadaveric study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;107:e34-e42.
7. Kobayashi K, Shimoda S, Nakagawa Y, Yamamoto A. Accuracy in measurement of distance using limited cone-beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19:228-31.
8. Liang X, Jacobs R, Hassan B, Li L, Pauwels R, Corpas L, et al. A comparative evaluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Multi-Slice CT (MSCT). Part I. On subjective image quality. Eur J Radiol. 2010;75(2):265-9.
9. Lindh C, Petersson A. Radiologic examination for location of the mandibular canal: a comparison between panoramic radiography and conventional tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1989;4:249-53.
10. Lofthag-Hansen S, Gröndahl K, Ekestubbe A. Cone-beam CT for preoperative implant planning in the posterior mandible: visibility of anatomic landmarks. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009;11:246-55.
11. Lou L, Lagravere MO, Compton S, Major PW, Flores-Mir C. Accuracy of measurements and reliability of landmark identification with computed tomography techniques in the maxillofacial area: a systematic review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;104:402-11
12. Loubele M, Jacobs R, Maes F, Denis K, White S, Coudyzer W, et al. Image quality vs radioation dose of four cone beam computed tomography scanners. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008;37:309-19.
13. Monsour PA, Dudhia R. Implant radiography and radiology. Aust Dent J. 2008;53(Sp. issue 1):S11-25.
14. Naitoh M, Katsumata A, Kubota Y, Hayashi M, Ariji E. Relationship between cancellous bone density and mandibular canal depiction. Implant Dent. 2009;18:112-8.
15. Paes Ada SF, Moreira CR, Sales MAO, Cavalcanti MGP. Comparative study of single and multislice computed tomography for assessment of the mandibular canal. J Appl Oral Sci. 2007;15:220-4.
16. Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc. 2006;72:75-80.
17. Tantanapornkul W, Okouchi K, Fujiwara Y, Yamashiro M, Maruoka Y, Ohbayashi N, et al. A comparative study of cone-beam computed tomography and conventional panoramic radiography in assessing the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;103:253-9.
18. Wadu SC, Penhall B, Townsend GC. Morphological variability of the human inferior alveolar nerve. Clin Anat. 1997;10:82-7.
19. Ziegler CM, Woertche R, Brief J, Hassfeld S. Clinical indications for digital volume tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2002;31:126-30.