Multifunctional fibers for simultaneous optical, electrical and chemical interrogation of neural circuits in vivo

Nature Biotechnology

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 277-284

  Canales, Andres ^a   Jia, Xiaoting ^b   Froriep, Ulrich P ^b   Koppes, Ryan A ^b   Tringides, Christina M ^a   Selvidge, Jennifer ^a   Lu, Chi ^a   Hou, Chong ^a   Wei, Lei ^b   Fink, Yoel ^a,b   Anikeeva, Polina ^a,b  

^a Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BENDING (DEFORMATION); DRUG DELIVERY; FIBERS; MOBILE SECURITY; PROBES;

BRAIN MACHINE INTERFACE; CELLULAR LEVELS; HIGH FLEXIBILITY; HIGH RESOLUTION; MULTIPLE MATERIALS; NEURAL RECORDINGS; OPTICAL STIMULATION; TISSUE RESPONSE;

BRAIN;

POLYMER; GLASS FIBER; METAL;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CONNECTOME; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; ELECTRODE; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; ELECTROSTIMULATION; FIBER OPTIC BIOSENSOR; FOREIGN BODY REACTION; IN VIVO STUDY; MICROFLUIDIC ANALYSIS; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; OPTOGENETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TISSUE REACTION; ANIMAL; BLOOD BRAIN BARRIER; C57BL MOUSE; DRUG EFFECTS; IMPLANT; MALE; NERVE CELL NETWORK; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; TRANSGENIC MOUSE;

ANIMALIA; MUS;

ANIMALS; BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS; ELECTRODES; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; FOREIGN-BODY REACTION; IMPLANTS, EXPERIMENTAL; MALE; METALS; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MICE, TRANSGENIC; NERVE NET; OPTICAL FIBERS; OPTOGENETICS;

EID: 84924426421     PISSN: 10870156     EISSN: 15461696     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3093     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Holtmaat, A. & Svoboda, K. Experience-dependent structural synaptic plasticity in the mammalian brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 647-658 (2009).
2. Gradinaru, V., Mogri, M., Thompson, K.R., Henderson, J.M. & Deisseroth, K. Optical deconstruction of parkinsonian neural circuitry. Science 324, 354-359 (2009).
3. Zhang, F., Aravanis, A.M., Adamantidis, A., de Lecea, L. & Deisseroth, K. Circuit-breakers: optical technologies for probing neural signals and systems. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 8, 577-581 (2007).
4. Ramirez, S. et al. Creating a false memory in the hippocampus. Science 341, 387-391 (2013).
5. Znamenskiy, P. & Zador, A.M. Corticostriatal neurons in auditory cortex drive decisions during auditory discrimination. Nature 497, 482-485 (2013).
6. Kravitz, A.V., Tye, L.D. & Kreitzer, A.C. Distinct roles for direct and indirect pathway striatal neurons in reinforcement. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 816-818 (2012).
7. Anikeeva, P. et al. Optetrode: a multichannel readout for optogenetic control in freely moving mice. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 163-170 (2012).
8. Rubehn, B., Wolff, S.B., Tovote, P., Luthi, A. & Stieglitz, T. A polymer-based neural microimplant for optogenetic applications: design and first in vivo study. Lab Chip 13, 579-588 (2013).
9. Zhang, J. et al. Integrated device for optical stimulation and spatiotemporal electrical recording of neural activity in light-sensitized brain tissue. J. Neural Eng. 6, 055007 (2009).
10. Campbell, P.K., Jones, K.E., Huber, R.J., Horch, K.W. & Normann, R.A. A silicon-based, three-dimensional neural interface: manufacturing processes for an intracortical electrode array. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 38, 758-768 (1991).
11. Jog, M.S. et al. Tetrode technology: advances in implantable hardware, neuroimaging, and data analysis techniques. J. Neurosci. Methods 117, 141-152 (2002).
12. Kennedy, P.R. The cone electrode: a long-term electrode that records from neurites grown onto its recording surface. J. Neurosci. Methods 29, 181-193 (1989).
13. McNaughton, B.L., O'Keefe, J. & Barnes, C.A. The stereotrode: a new technique for simultaneous isolation of several single units in the central nervous system from multiple unit records. J. Neurosci. Methods 8, 391-397 (1983).
14. Seymour, J.P., Langhals, N.B., Anderson, D.J. & Kipke, D.R. Novel multi-sided, microelectrode arrays for implantable neural applications. Biomed. Microdevices 13, 441-451 (2011).
15. Borschel, G.H., Kia, K.F., Kuzon, W.M. & Dennis, R.G. Mechanical properties of acellular peripheral nerve. J. Surg. Res. 114, 133-139 (2003).
16. Green, M.A., Bilston, L.E. & Sinkus, R. In vivo brain viscoelastic properties measured by magnetic resonance elastography. NMR Biomed. 21, 755-764 (2008).
17. Ward, M.P., Rajdev, P., Ellison, C. & Irazoqui, P.P. Toward a comparison of microelectrodes for acute and chronic recordings. Brain Res. 1282, 183-200 (2009).
18. Polikov, V.S., Tresco, P.A. & Reichert, W.M. Response of brain tissue to chronically implanted neural electrodes. J. Neurosci. Methods 148, 1-18 (2005).
19. Saxena, T. et al. The impact of chronic blood-brain barrier breach on intracortical electrode function. Biomaterials 34, 4703-4713 (2013).
20. Seymour, J.P. & Kipke, D.R. Neural probe design for reduced tissue encapsulation in CNS. Biomaterials 28, 3594-3607 (2007).
21. Lee, H., Bellamkonda, R.V., Sun, W. & Levenston, M.E. Biomechanical analysis of silicon microelectrode-induced strain in the brain. J. Neural Eng. 2, 81-89 (2005).
22. Kim, D.H. et al. Dissolvable films of silk fibroin for ultrathin conformal bio-integrated electronics. Nat. Mater. 9, 511-517 (2010).
23. Kuo, J.T.W. et al. Novel flexible Parylene neural probe with 3D sheath structure for enhancing tissue integration. Lab Chip 13, 554-561 (2013).
24. Minev, I.R., Moshayedi, P., Fawcett, J.W. & Lacour, S.P. Interaction of glia with a compliant, microstructured silicone surface. Acta Biomater. 9, 6936-6942 (2013).
25. Takeuchi, S., Suzuki, T., Mabuchi, K. & Fujita, H. 3D flexible multichannel neural probe array. J. Micromech. Microeng. 14, 104-107 (2004).
26. Goff, D.R. Fiber Optic Reference Guide: a Practical Guide to Communications Technology (Focal Press, 2002).
27. Yaman, M. et al. Arrays of indefinitely long uniform nanowires and nanotubes. Nat. Mater. 10, 494-501 (2011).
28. LeChasseur, Y. et al. A microprobe for parallel optical and electrical recordings from single neurons in vivo. Nat. Methods 8, 319-325 (2011).
29. Abouraddy, A.F. et al. Towards multimaterial multifunctional fibres that see, hear, sense and communicate. Nat. Mater. 6, 336-347 (2007).
30. Merolli, A. et al. Response to polyetherimide based composite materials implanted in muscle and in bone. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 10, 265-268 (1999).
31. Yalon, M., Goldberg, E.P., Osborn, D., Stacholy, J. & Sheets, J.W. Polycarbonate intraocular lenses. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 14, 393-395 (1988).
32. Khanarian, G. & Celanese, H. Optical properties of cyclic olefin copolymers. Opt. Eng. 40, 1024-1029 (2001).
33. Aden, M., Roesner, A. & Olowinsky, A. Optical characterization of polycarbonate: influence of additives on optical properties. J. Polym. Sci. B Polym. Phys. 48, 451-455 (2010).
34. Tye, K.M. & Deisseroth, K. Optogenetic investigation of neural circuits underlying brain disease in animal models. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 251-266 (2012).
35. Arenkiel, B.R. et al. In vivo light-induced activation of neural circuitry in transgenic mice expressing channelrhodopsin-2. Neuron 54, 205-218 (2007).
36. Cardin, J.A. et al. Targeted optogenetic stimulation and recording of neurons in vivo using cell-type-specific expression of channelrhodopsin-2. Nat. Protoc. 5, 247-254 (2010).
37. Schmitzer-Torbert, N., Jackson, J., Henze, D., Harris, K. & Redish, A.D. Quantitative measures of cluster quality for use in extracellular recordings. Neuroscience 131, 1-11 (2005).
38. Steenland, H.W., Liu, H. & Horner, R.L. Endogenous glutamatergic control of rhythmically active mammalian respiratory motoneurons in vivo. J. Neurosci. 28, 6826-6835 (2008).
39. Kozai, T.D. et al. Ultrasmall implantable composite microelectrodes with bioactive surfaces for chronic neural interfaces. Nat. Mater. 11, 1065-1073 (2012).
40. Ferguson, J.E., Boldt, C. & Redish, A.D. Creating low-impedance tetrodes by electroplating with additives. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 156, 388-393 (2009).
41. Williams, J.C., Hippensteel, J.A., Dilgen, J., Shain, W. & Kipke, D.R. Complex impedance spectroscopy for monitoring tissue responses to inserted neural implants. J. Neural Eng. 4, 410-423 (2007).
42. Lind, G., Linsmeier, C.E. & Schouenborg, J. The density difference between tissue and neural probes is a key factor for glial scarring. Sci. Rep. 3, 2942 (2013).
43. Prasad, A. et al. Comprehensive characterization and failure modes of tungsten microwire arrays in chronic neural implants. J. Neural Eng. 9, 056015 (2012).
44. Woolley, A.J., Desai, H.A. & Otto, K.J. Chronic intracortical microelectrode arrays induce non-uniform, depth-related tissue responses. J. Neural Eng. 10, 026007 (2013).
45. Karumbaiah, L. et al. Relationship between intracortical electrode design and chronic recording function. Biomaterials 34, 8061-8074 (2013).
46. Yizhar, O., Fenno, L.E., Davidson, T.J., Mogri, M. & Deisseroth, K. Optogenetics in neural systems. Neuron 71, 9-34 (2011).
47. Gradinaru, V. et al. Molecular and cellular approaches for diversifying and extending optogenetics. Cell 141, 154-165 (2010).
48. Chow, B.Y. et al. High-performance genetically targetable optical neural silencing by light-driven proton pumps. Nature 463, 98-102 (2010).
49. Mattis, J. et al. Principles for applying optogenetic tools derived from direct comparative analysis of microbial opsins. Nat. Methods 9, 159-172 (2012).
50. Quian Quiroga, R., Nadasdy, Z. & Ben-Shaul, Y. Unsupervised spike detection and sorting with wavelets and superparamagnetic clustering. Neural Comput. 16, 1661-1687 (2004).