The density difference between tissue and neural probes is a key factor for glial scarring

Scientific Reports

Volumn 3, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Lind, Gustav ^a   Linsmeier, Cecilia Eriksson ^a   Schouenborg, Jens ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL NUCLEUS ANTIGEN; ECTODYSPLASIN A; NERVE PROTEIN; NEUN PROTEIN, RAT;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; FEMALE; GLIA; IMPLANT; METABOLISM; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RAT; SCAR;

ANIMALS; ANTIGENS, NUCLEAR; CICATRIX; ECTODYSPLASINS; FEMALE; IMPLANTS, EXPERIMENTAL; NERVE TISSUE PROTEINS; NEUROGLIA; RATS;

EID: 84900338328     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep02942     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Kipke, D. R. et al. Advanced neurotechnologies for chronic neural interfaces: new horizons and clinical opportunities. J Neurosci 28, 11830-11838 (2008).
2. Schouenborg, J. Biocompatible multichannel electrodes for long-term neurophysiological studies and clinical therapy-novel concepts and design. Prog Brain Res 194, 61-70, doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-53815-4.00017-0 (2011).
3. Polikov, V. S., Tresco, P. A. & Reichert, W. M. Response of brain tissue to chronically implanted neural electrodes. J Neurosci Methods 148, 1-18 (2005).
4. Rousche, P. J. & Normann, R. A. Chronic recording capability of the Utah Intracortical Electrode Array in cat sensory cortex. J Neurosci Methods 82, 1-15 (1998).
5. Williams, J. C., Rennaker, R. L. & Kipke, D. R. Long-term neural recording characteristics of wire microelectrode arrays implanted in cerebral cortex. Brain Res Brain Res Protoc 4, 303-313 (1999).
6. Marin, C. & Fernandez, E. Biocompatibility of intracortical microelectrodes: current status and future prospects. Front Neuroeng 3, 8, doi:10.3389/fneng.2010.00008 (2010).
7. McConnell, G. C., Butera, R. J. & Bellamkonda, R. V. Bioimpedance modeling to monitor astrocytic response to chronically implanted electrodes. J Neural Eng 6, 055005 (2009).
8. Szarowski, D. H. et al. Brain responses to micro-machined silicon devices. Brain Res 983, 23-35 (2003).
9. Williams, J. C., Hippensteel, J. A., Dilgen, J., Shain, W. & Kipke, D. R. Complex impedance spectroscopy for monitoring tissue responses to inserted neural implants. Journal of Neural Engineering 4, 410-423, doi:10.1088/1741- 2560/4/4/007 (2007). (Pubitemid 350242918)
10. Biran, R., Martin, D. C. & Tresco, P. A. Neuronal cell loss accompanies the brain tissue response to chronically implanted silicon microelectrode arrays. Exp Neurol 195, 115-126 (2005).
11. Edell, D. J., Toi, V. V., McNeil, V. M. & Clark, L. D. Factors influencing the biocompatibility of insertable silicon microshafts in cerebral cortex. IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering 39, 635-643, doi:10.1109/10.141202 (1992). (Pubitemid 23002705)
12. McConnell, G. C. et al. Implanted neural electrodes cause chronic, local inflammation that is correlated with local neurodegeneration. J Neural Eng 6, 56003 (2009).
13. Gilletti, A. & Muthuswamy, J. Brain micromotion around implants in the rodent somatosensory cortex. Journal of Neural Engineering 3, 189-195, doi:10.1088/1741-2560/3/3/001 (2006). (Pubitemid 44262019)
14. Biran, R., Martin, D. C. & Tresco, P. A. The brain tissue response to implanted silicon microelectrode arrays is increased when the device is tethered to the skull. J Biomed Mater Res A 82, 169-178 (2007).
15. Kim, Y. T., Hitchcock, R. W., Bridge, M. J. & Tresco, P. A. Chronic response of adult rat brain tissue to implants anchored to the skull. Biomaterials 25, 2229-2237 (2004).
16. Thelin, J. et al. Implant size and fixation mode strongly influence tissue reactions in the CNS. PLoS One 6, e16267, doi:10.1371/journal.pone. 0016267 (2011).
17. Freire, M. A. et al. Comprehensive analysis of tissue preservation and recording quality from chronic multielectrode implants. PLoS One 6, e27554, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027554 (2011).
18. Williams, D. F. The Williams dictionary of biomaterials. (Liverpool University Press, 1999).
19. Lind, G., Gallentoft, L., Danielsen, N., Schouenborg, J. & Pettersson, L. M. Multiple implants do not aggravate the tissue reaction in rat brain. PLoS One 7, e47509, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047509 (2012).
20. Lind, G., Linsmeier, C. E., Thelin, J. & Schouenborg, J. Gelatine-embedded electrodes-a novel biocompatible vehicle allowing implantation of highly flexible microelectrodes. Journal of Neural Engineering 7, 046005, doi:10.1088/1741-2560/7/4/046005 (2010).
21. Turner, J. N. et al. Cerebral Astrocyte Response to Micromachined Silicon Implants. Experimental Neurology 156, 33-49 (1999).
22. Eriksson Linsmeier, C. et al. Nanowire biocompatibility in the brain-looking for a needle in a 3D stack. Nano Lett 9, 4184-4190 (2009).
23. Grill, W. M., Norman, S. E. & Bellamkonda, R. V. Implanted neural interfaces: biochallenges and engineered solutions. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 11, 1-24 (2009).
24. He, W., McConnell, G. C. & Bellamkonda, R. V. Journal of Neural Engineering Nanoscale laminin coating modulates cortical scarring response around implanted silicon microelectrode arrays. 3, 316-326, doi:10.1088/1741- 2560/3/4/009 (2006).
25. McConnell, G. C., Schneider, T. M., Owens, D. J. & Bellamkonda, R. V. Extraction force and cortical tissue reaction of silicon microelectrode arrays implanted in the rat brain. IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering 54, 1097-1107, doi:10.1109/TBME.2007.895373 (2007). (Pubitemid 46815118)
26. Seymour, J. P. & Kipke, D. R. Neural probe design for reduced tissue encapsulation in CNS. Biomaterials 28, 3594-3607, doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials. 2007.03.024 (2007). (Pubitemid 46860320)
27. Stice, P., Gilletti, A., Panitch, A. & Muthuswamy, J. Thin microelectrodes reduce GFAP expression in the implant site in rodent somatosensory cortex. Journal of Neural Engineering 4, 42-53 (2007).
28. Beckmann, F. et al. Three-Dimensional Imaging of Nerve Tissue by X-Ray Phase-Contrast Microtomography. Biophysical Journal 76, 98-102, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77181-X (1999).
29. Wanner, I. B. An in vitro trauma model to study rodent and human astrocyte reactivity. Methods Mol Biol 814, 189-219, doi:10.1007/978-1-61779- 452-0-14 (2012).
30. Vetter, R. J., Williams, J. C., Hetke, J. F., Nunamaker, E. A. & Kipke, D. R. Chronic neural recording using silicon-substrate microelectrode arrays implanted in cerebral cortex. IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering 51, 896-904, doi:10.1109/TBME.2004.826680 (2004). (Pubitemid 38661440)
31. Campbell, P. K., Jones, K. E., Huber, R. J., Horch, K. W. & Normann, R. A. A silicon-based, three-dimensional neural interface: manufacturing processes for an intracortical electrode array. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 38, 758-768 (1991).
32. Ludwig, K. A., Uram, J. D., Yang, J., Martin, D. C. & Kipke, D. R. Chronic neural recordings using silicon microelectrode arrays electrochemically deposited with a poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) film. Journal of Neural Engineering 3, 59-70, doi:10.1088/1741-2560/3/1/007 (2006). (Pubitemid 43332372)
33. Kozai, T. D. et al. Ultrasmall implantable composite microelectrodes with bioactive surfaces for chronic neural interfaces. Nat Mater 11, 1065-1073, doi:10.1038/nmat3468 (2012).