Evaluation of the antibacterial effects of vancomycin hydrochloride released from agar-gelatin-bioactive glass composites

Biomedical Materials (Bristol)

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Rivadeneira, Josefina ^a   Di Virgilio, Ana Laura ^b   Audisio, M Carina ^c   Boccaccini, Aldo R ^d   Gorustovich, Alejandro A ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE BUENOS AIRES   (Argentina)

^b FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS EXACTAS   (Argentina)

^c UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE SALTA   (Argentina)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

bioactive glass; biopolymers; staphylococci; vancomycin hydrochloride

Indexed keywords

ALGAE; BACTERIA; BIOPOLYMERS; DRUG PRODUCTS; ENZYME INHIBITION; POLYSACCHARIDES;

ANTI-BACTERIAL ACTIVITY; ANTIBACTERIAL EFFECTS; BACTERIAL INHIBITION; STAPHYLOCOCCI; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS EPIDERMIDIS; STATISTICAL DIFFERENCES; VANCOMYCIN;

BIOACTIVE GLASS;

AGAR; AGAR GELATIN BIOACTIVE GLASS COMPOSITE; DRUG CARRIER; GELATIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; VANCOMYCIN; ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; GLASS; WATER;

ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL CELL; CELL GROWTH; CELL VIABILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; IN VITRO STUDY; INCUBATION TIME; NONHUMAN; PLATE COUNT; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS EPIDERMIDIS; SUSTAINED DRUG RELEASE; WATER TRANSPORT; CALIBRATION; CHEMISTRY; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; DRUG EFFECTS; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROBIAL SENSITIVITY TEST; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SPECTROPHOTOMETRY; STAPHYLOCOCCAL INFECTIONS;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); STAPHYLOCOCCUS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS EPIDERMIDIS;

AGAR; ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; CALIBRATION; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS; GELATIN; GLASS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROBIAL SENSITIVITY TESTS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; SPECTROPHOTOMETRY; STAPHYLOCOCCAL INFECTIONS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS EPIDERMIDIS; VANCOMYCIN; WATER;

EID: 84924342222     PISSN: 17486041     EISSN: 1748605X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1748-6041/10/1/015011     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Boateng S, Matthews K H, Stevens H N and Eccleston G M 2008 Wound healing dressings and drug delivery systems: a review J. Pharm. Sci. 97 2892-923
2. Kim G H, Kang Y M, Kang K N, Kim D Y, Kim H J, Min H, Kim J H and Kim M S 2011 Wound dressing for wound healing and drug delivery Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 8 1-7
3. El-Husseiny M, Patel S, MacFarlane R J and Haddad F S 2011 Biodegradable antibiotic delivery systems J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 93 151-7
4. Mogoşanu G D and Grumezescu A M 2014 Natural and synthetic polymers for wounds and burns dressing Int. J. Pharm. 463 127-36
5. Cen L, Liu W, Cui L, Zhang W and Cao Y 2008 Collagen tissue engineering: development of novel biomaterials and applications Pediatr. Res. 63 492-6
6. Neffe A T, Wischke C, Racheva M and Lendlein A 2013 Progress in biopolymer-based biomaterials and their application in controlled drug delivery Expert Rev. Med. Devices 10 813-33
7. Agrawal P, Soni S, Mittal G and Bhatnagar A 2014 Role of polymeric biomaterials as wound healing agents Int. J. Low Extrem Wounds 13 180-90
8. Elsner J J, Berdicevsky I and Zilberman M 2011 In vitro microbial inhibition and cellular response to novel biodegradable composite wound dressings with controlled release of antibiotics Acta Biomater. 7 325-36
9. Jia W T, Zhang X, Luo S H, Liu X, Huang W H, Rahaman M N, Day D E, Zhang C Q, Xie Z P and Wang J Q 2010 Novel borate glass/chitosan composite as a delivery vehicle for teicoplanin in the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis Acta Biomater. 6 812-9
10. Hum J and Boccaccini A R 2012 Bioactive glasses as carriers for bioactive molecules and therapeutic drugs: a review J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 23 2317-33
11. Arcos D and Vallet-Regí M 2013 Bioceramics for drug delivery Acta Mater. 46 890-911
12. Olalde B, Garmendia N, Sáez-Martínez V, Argarate N, Nooeaid P, Morin F and Boccaccini A R 2013 Multifunctional bioactive glass scaffolds coated with layers of poly(d,l-lactide-co-glycolide) and poly(n-isopropylacrylamide-co-acrylic acid) microgels loaded with vancomycin Mater Sci. Eng. C 33 3760-7
13. Li W, Ding Y, Rai R, Roether J A, Schubert D W and Boccaccini A R 2014 Preparation and characterization of PHBV microsphere/45S5 bioactive glass composite scaffolds with vancomycin releasing function Mater. Sci. Eng. C 41 320-8
14. Li W, Nooeaid P, Roether J A, Schubert D W and Boccaccini A R 2014 Preparation and characterization of vancomycin releasing PHBV coated 45S5 Bioglass® -based glass-ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 34 505-14
15. Zhang K, Ma Y and Francis L F 2002 Porous polymer/bioactive glass composites for soft-to-hard tissueinterfaces J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 61 551-63
16. Verrier S, Blaker J J, Maquet V, Hench L L and Boccaccini A R 2004 PDLLA/Bioglass composites for soft-tissue and hard-tissue engineering: an in vitro cell biology assessment Biomaterials 25 3013-21
17. Gorustovich A A, Roether J A and Boccaccini A R 2010 Effect of bioactive glasses on angiogenesis: a review of in vitro and in vivo evidences Tissue Eng. B 16 199-207
18. Day R M 2005 Bioactive glass stimulates the secretion of angiogenic growth factors and angiogenesis in vitro Tissue Eng. 11 768-77
19. Leach J K, Kaigler D, Wang Z, Krebsbach P H and Mooney D J 2006 Coating of VEGF-releasing scaffolds with bioactive glass for angiogenesis and bone regeneration Biomaterials 27 3249-55
20. Vargas G E, Haro Durand L A, Cadena V, Romero M, Mesones R V, Mačković M, Spallek S, Spiecker E, Boccaccini A R and Gorustovich A A 2013 Effect of nano-sized bioactive glass particles on the angiogenic properties of collagen based composites J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 24 1261-9
21. Leu A, Stieger S M, Dayton P, Ferrara K W and Leach J K 2009 Angiogenic response to bioactive glass promotes bone healing in an irradiated calvarial defect Tissue Eng. A 15 877-85
22. Gerhardt L C et al 2011 The pro-angiogenic properties of multi-functional bioactive glass composite scaffolds Biomaterials 32 4096-108
23. Xynos I D, Edgar A J, Buttery L D K, Hench L L and Polak J M 2001 Gene-expression profiling of human osteoblasts following treatment with the ionic products of Bioglass® 45S5 dissolution J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 55 151-7
24. Lin C, Mao C, Zhang J, Li Y and Chen X 2012 Healing effect of bioactive glass ointment on full-thickness skin wounds Biomed. Mater. 7 045017
25. Wu C, Ramaswamy Y, Zhu Y, Zheng R, Appleyard R, Howard A and Zreiqat H 2009 The effect of mesoporous bioactive glass on the physiochemical, biological and drug-release properties of poly(dl-lactide-co-glycolide) films Biomaterials 30 2199-208
26. Kouhi M, Morshed M, Varshosaz J and Fathi MH 2013 Poly (e-caprolactone) incorporated bioactive glass nanoparticles and simvastatin nanocomposite nanofibers: preparation, characterization and in vitro drug release for bone regeneration applications Chem. Eng. J. 228 1057-65
27. Bigi A, Cojazzi G, Panzavolta S, Roveri N and Rubini K 2002 Stabilization of gelatin films by crosslinking with genipin Biomaterials 23 4827-32
28. Ulubayram K, Eroglu I and Hasirci N 2002 Gelatin microspheres and sponges for delivery of macromolecules J. Biomater. Appl. 16 227-41
29. Wang T, Zhu X-K, Xue X-T and Wu D-Y 2012 Hydrogel sheets of chitosan, honey and gelatin as burn wound dressings Carbohydr. Polym. 88 75-83
30. Thu H E and Ng S F 2013 Gelatine enhances drug dispersion in alginate bilayer film via the formation of crystalline microaggregates Int. J. Pharm. 454 99-106
31. Van den Bosch E and Gielens C 2003 Gelatin degradation at elevated temperature Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 32 129-38
32. Sakai S, Hashimoto I and Kawakami K 2007 Synthesis of an agarose-gelatin conjugate for use as a tissue engineering scaffold J. Biosci. Bioeng. 103 22-26
33. Bao L, Yang W, Mao X, Mou S and Tang S 2008 Agar/collagen membrane as skin dressing for wounds Biomed. Mater. 3 044108
34. Verma P, Verma V, Ray P and Ray R 2009 Agar-gelatin hybrid sponge-induced 3D in vitro 'liver-like' HepG2 spheroids for the evaluation of drug cytotoxicity J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 3 368-76
35. Shome A, Dutta S, Maiti S D and Das P K 2011 In situ synthesized Ag nanoparticle in self-assemblies of amino acid based amphiphilic hydrogelators: development of antibacterial soft nanocomposites Soft. Matter 7 3011-22
36. Saxena A, Tahir A, Kaloti M, Ali J and Bohidar HB 2011 Effect of agar-gelatin compositions on the release of salbutamol tablets Int. J. Pharma. Investig. 1 93-8
37. Deng Y, Zhao X, Zhou Y, Zhu P, Zhang L and Wei S 2013 In vitro growth of bioactive nanostructured apatites via agar-gelatin hybrid hydrogel J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 9 1972-83
38. Verma V, Verma P, Kar S, Ray P and Ray AR 2007 Fabrication of agar-gelatin hybrid scaffolds using a novel entrapment method for in vitro tissue engineering applications Biotechnol. Bioeng. 96 392-400
39. Cabanas M V, Pena J, Roman J and Vallet-Regi M 2009 Tailoring vancomycin release from beta-TCP/agarose scaffolds Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 37 249-56
40. Rivadeneira J, Carina Audisio M, Boccaccini A R and Gorustovich A A 2013 In vitro antistaphylococcal effects of a novel 45S5 bioglass/agar-gelatin biocomposite films J. Appl. Microbiol. 115 604-12
41. Zhou J, Fang T, Wang Y and Dong J 2012 The controlled release of vancomycin in gelatin/beta-TCP composite scaffolds J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 100 2295-301
42. Robson M C, Mannari R J, Smith P D and Payne W G 1999 Maintenance of wound bacterial balance Am. J. Surg 178 399-402
43. Edwards R and Harding K G 2004 Bacteria and wound healing Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 17 91-6
44. Jacobsen F, Fisahn C, Sorkin M, Thiele I, Hirsch T, Stricker I, Klaassen T, Roemer A, Fugmann B and Steinstraesser L 2011 Efficacy of topically delivered moxifloxacin against wound infection by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and methicillin-resistant S. aureus Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 55 2325-34
45. Gallant-Behm C L, Yin H Q, Liu S, Heggers J P, Langford R E, Olson M E, Hart D A and Burrell R E 2005 Comparison of in vitro disc diffusion and time kill-kinetic assays for the evaluation of antimicrobial wound dressing efficacy Wound Repair Regen. 13 412-21
46. Mota J, Yu N, Caridade S G, Luz G M, Gomes M E, Reis R L, Jansen J A, Walboomers X F and Mano J F 2012 Chitosan/bioactive glass nanoparticle composite membranes for periodontal regeneration Acta Biomater. 8 4173-80
47. Maquet V, Boccaccini A R, Pravata L, Notingher I and Jérôme R 2003 Preparation, characterization, and in vitro degradation of bioresorbable and bioactive composites based on Bioglass-filled polylactide foams J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 66A 335-46
48. Maquet V, Boccaccini A R, Pravata L, Notingher I and Jérôme R 2004 Porous poly(alphahydroxyacid)/Bioglass composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: I. Preparation and in vitro characterisation Biomaterials 25 4185-94
49. Peter M, Binulal N S, Nair S V, Selvamurugan N, Tamura H and Jayakumar R 2010 Novel biodegradable chitosan-gelatin/nano-bioactive glass ceramic composite scaffolds for alveolar bone tissue engineering Chem. Eng. J. 158 353-61
50. Misra S K, Mohn D, Brunner T J, Stark W J, Philip S E, Roy I, Salih V, Knowles J C and Boccaccini A R 2008 Comparison of nanoscale and microscale bioactive glass on the properties of P(3HB)/bioglass composites Biomaterials 29 1750-61
51. Zhu Y and Kaskel S 2009 Comparison of the in vitro bioactivity and drug release property of mesoporous bioactive glasses (MBGs) and bioactive glasses (BGs) scaffolds Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 118 176-82
52. van de Belt H, Neut D, Uges D R, Schenk W, van Horn J R, van der Mei H C and Busscher H J 2000 Surface roughness, porosity and wettability of gentamicin-loaded bone cements and their antibiotic release Biomaterials 21 1981-7
53. Campoccia D, Montanaro L, Speziale P and Arciola C R 2010 Antibiotic-loaded biomaterials and the risks for the spread of antibiotic resistance following their prophylactic and therapeutic clinical use Biomaterials 31 6363-77
54. Whitehead K and Verran J 2006 The effect of surface topography on the retention of microorganisms Food Bioprod. Proccess 84 253-9
55. Pratten J, Nazhat S N, Blaker J J and Boccaccini A R 2004 In vitro attachment of S. epidermidis to surgical sutures with and without Ag-containing bioactive glass coating J. Biomater. Appl. 19 47-57
56. Misra S K et al 2010 Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) multifunctional composite scaffolds for tissue engineering applications Biomaterials 31 2806-15
57. Gottenbos B, Grijpma D, Van Der Mei H, Feijen J and Busscher H 2001 Antimicrobial effects of positively charged surfaces on adhering gram-positive and gram negative bacteria J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 48 7-13
58. Stoor P, Kirstila V, Soderling E, Kangasniemi I, Hebst K and Yli-Urpo A 1996 Interactions between bioactive glass and periodontal pathogens Microb. Ecol. Health Dis. 9 109-14
59. Mitik-Dineva N, Wang J, Truong V K, Stoddart P, Malherbe F, Crawford R J and Ivanova E P 2009 Escherichia coli, P. aeruginosa, and S. aureus attachment patterns on glass surfaces with nanoscale roughness Curr. Microbiol. 58 268-73
60. Desrousseaux C, Sautou V, Descamps S and Traoré O J 2013 Modification of the surfaces of medical devices to prevent microbial adhesion and biofilm formation Hosp. Infect. 85 87-93