Temporal aspects of consumer preferences

Current Opinion in Food Science

Volumn 3, Issue , 2015, Pages 41-46

  Delarue, Julien ^a   Blumenthal, David ^a  

^a Université Paris Saclay   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924326160     PISSN: 22147993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cofs.2014.12.001     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Lenfant F., Loret C., Pineau N., Hartmann C., Martin N. Perception of oral food breakdown. The concept of sensory trajectory. Appetite 2009, 52:659-667.
2. de Wijk R.A., Engelen L., Prinz J.F. The role of intra-oral manipulation in the perception of sensory attributes. Appetite 2003, 40:1-7.
3. Chen J. Food oral processing-a review. Food Hydrocoll 2009, 23:1-25.
4. Mesurolle J., Saint-Eve A., Déléris I., Souchon I. Impact of fruit piece structure in yogurts on the dynamics of aroma release and sensory perception. Molecules 2013, 18:6035-6056.
5. Doyennette M., Déléris I., Féron G., Guichard E., Souchon I., Trelea I.C. Main individual and product characteristics influencing in-mouth flavour release during eating masticated food products with different textures: mechanistic modelling and experimental validation. J Theor Biol 2014, 340:209-221.
6. Paulsen M.T., Næs T., Ueland Ø., Rukke E.-O., Hersleth M. Preference mapping of salmon-sauce combinations: the influence of temporal properties. Food Qual Prefer 2013, 27:120-127.
7. Baker A.K., Ross C.F. Wine finish in red wine: the effect of ethanol and tannin concentration. Food Qual Prefer 2014, 38:65-74.
8. Burseg K.M.M., Camacho S., Knoop J., Bult J.H.F. Sweet taste intensity is enhanced by temporal fluctuation of aroma and taste, and depends on phase shift. Physiol Behav 2010, 101:726-730.
9. Lee W.E. A suggested instrumental technique for studying dynamic flavor release from food products. J Food Sci 1986, 51:249-250.
10. Lee W., Pangborn R.M. Time-intensity: the temporal aspects of sensory perception. Food Technol 1986, 40:82.
11. Methven L., Rahelu K., Economou N., Kinneavy L., Ladbrooke-Davis L., Kennedy O.B., Mottram D.S., Gosney M.A. The effect of consumption volume on profile and liking of oral nutritional supplements of varied sweetness: sequential profiling and boredom tests. Food Qual Prefer 2010, 21:948-955.
12. Carstens E., Iodi Carstens M., Dessirier J.-M., O'Mahony M., Simons C.T., Sudo M., Sudo S. It hurts so good: oral irritation by spices and carbonated drinks and the underlying neural mechanisms. Food Qual Prefer 2002, 13:431-443.
13. Cabanac M., Fantino M. Origin of olfacto-gustatory alliesthesia: intestinal sensitivity to carbohydrate concentration?. Physiol Behav 1977, 10:9-1045.
14. Rolls B.J., Rolls E.T., Rowe E.A., Sweeney K. Sensory specific satiety in man. Physiol Behav 1981, 27:137-142.
15. Rozin P., Ebert L., Schull J. Some like it hot: a temporal analysis of hedonic responses to chili pepper. Appetite 1982, 3:13-22.
16. Taylor D.E., Pangborn R.M. Temporal aspects of hedonic responses. J Sens Stud 1990, 4:241-247.
17. Lee W.E., Barrick D.M., Welling E.S. Time-intensity study of prolonged sweet stimuli. J Food Sci 1992, 57:524-529.
18. Sudre J., Pineau N., Loret C., Martin N. Comparison of methods to monitor liking of food during consumption. Food Qual Prefer 2012, 24:179-189.
19. Galmarini M.V., Symoneaux R., Visalli M., Zamora M.C., Schlich P. Static vs. dynamic liking in chewing gum: a new approach using a background task and a natural setting. Food Qual Prefer 2015, 40, Part B:381-386. 10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.01.002.
20. Thomas A., Visalli M., Cordelle S., Schlich P. Temporal drivers of liking. Food Qual Prefer 2015, 40, Part B:365-375. 10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.03.003.
21. Veldhuizen M.G., Wuister M.J.P., Kroeze J.H.A. Temporal aspects of hedonic and intensity responses. Food Qual Prefer 2006, 17:489-496.
22. Boutrolle I., Arranz D., Rogeaux M., Delarue J. Comparing central location test and home use test results: application of a new criterion. Food Qual Prefer 2005, 16:704-713.
23. Köster E.P. The psychology of food choice: some often encountered fallacies. Food Qual Prefer 2003, 14:359-373.
24. Delarue J., Loescher E. Dynamics of food preferences: a case study with chewing gums. Food Qual Prefer 2004, 15:771-779.
25. Hyde R.J., Witherly S.A. Dynamic contrast a sensory contribution to palatability. Appetite 1993, 21:1-16.
26. Boutrolle I., Delarue J., Köster E., Aranz D., Danzart M. Use of a test of perceived authenticity to trigger affective responses when testing food. Food Qual Prefer 2009, 20:418-426.
27. Rozin P., Tuorila H. Simultaneous and temporal contextual influences on food acceptance. Food Qual Prefer 1993, 4:11-20.
28. Weenen H., Stafleu A., de Graaf C. Dynamic aspects of liking: post-prandial persistence of sensory specific satiety. Food Qual Prefer 2005, 16:528-535.
29. Kahneman D. Evaluation by moments: past and future. Choices, Values, and Frames 2000, 693-708. Cambridge University Press. D. Kahneman, A. Tversky (Eds.).