Assessing improvement in detection of breast cancer with three-dimensional automated breast US in women with dense breast tissue: The somoinsight study

Radiology

Volumn 274, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 663-673

  Brem, Rachel F ^a   Tabár, László ^b   Duffy, Stephen W ^c   Inciardi, Marc F ^d   Guingrich, Jessica A ^e   Hashimoto, Beverly E ^f   Lander, Marla R ^g   Lapidus, Robert L ^h   Peterson, Mary Kay ⁱ   Rapelyea, Jocelyn A ^a   Roux, Susan ^j   Schilling, Kathy J ^k   Shah, Biren A ^l   Torrente, Jessica ^a   Wynn, Ralph T ^m   Miller, Dave P ⁿ  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b FALUN HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^c QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e OSF SAINT FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^f VIRGINIA MASON MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^g Desert Comprehensive Cancer Center   (United States)

^h Doctor's Hospital   (United States)

ⁱ Radiology Regional Center   (United States)

^j Montage Cardiology   (United States)

^k BOCA RATON REGIONAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^l HENRY FORD HOSPITAL   (United States)

^m New York Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital   (United States)

ⁿ ICON CLINICAL RESEARCH   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; BREAST TUMOR; CLINICAL TRIAL; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; ECHOGRAPHY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; EVALUATION STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; STANDARDS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 84924308435     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14132832     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. American Cancer Society. Breast Cancer Facts & Figures 2011-2012. Atlanta, Ga: American Cancer Society, 2012
2. Duffy SW, Tabár L, Chen HH, et al. The impact of organized mammography service screening on breast carcinoma mortality in seven Swedish counties. Cancer 2002;95(3): 458-469
3. Rosenberg RD, Hunt WC, Williamson MR, et al. Effects of age, breast density, ethnicity, and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: Review of 183,134 screen ing mammograms in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Radiology 1998;209(2):511-518
4. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: An analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 2002;225(1):165-175
5. Ursin G, Ma H, Wu AH, et al. Mammographic density and breast cancer in three ethnic groups. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003;12(4):332-338
6. Byrne C, Schairer C, Wolfe J, et al. Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995;87(21):1622-1629
7. Boyd NF, Byng JW, Jong RA, et al. Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: Results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995;87(9):670-675
8. Saftlas AF, Wolfe JN, Hoover RN, et al. Mammographic parenchymal patterns as indicators of breast cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol 1989;129(3):518-526
9. Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007;356(3): 227-236
10. Harvey JA, Bovbjerg VE. Quantitative assessment of mammographic breast density: Relationship with breast cancer risk. Radiology 2004;230(1):29-41
11. McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: A meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15(6): 1159-1169
12. Stomper PC, D'Souza DJ, DiNitto PA, Arredondo MA. Analysis of parenchymal density on mammograms in 1353 women 25-79 years old. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167(5): 1261-1265
13. Shannon K.M., Chittenden A.Genetic testing by cancer site: Breast. Cancer J:2012, 18;4, 310-319.
14. Parris T, Wakefield D, Frimmer H. Real world performance of screening breast ultrasound following enactment of Connecticut Bill 458. Breast J 2013;19(1):64-70
15. Berg WA, Zhang Z, Lehrer D, et al. Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk. JAMA 2012;307(13):1394-1404
16. Brem RF, Rapelyea JA, Torrente J, et al. Interpretation time of 3D automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) [abstr]. Presented at the 2012 annual meeting of the American Roentgen Ray Society, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, April 2012; 45
17. D'Orsi CJ, Bassett LW, Berg WA, et al. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data Systems, BI-RADS: Mammography. 4th ed. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 2003
18. Leifland K, Wilczek B. Integration of automated 3D breast ultrasound (ABUS) into the routine workflow of a high-volume hospital-based breast cancer screening program in Stockholm, Sweden [abstr]. In: Radiological Society of North America scientific assembly and annual meeting program. Oak Brook, Ill: Radiological Society of North America, 2012; 238
19. Giger ML, Miller DP, Bancroft Brown J, et al. Clinical reader study examining the performance of mammography and automatic breast ultrasound in breast cancer screening [abstr]. In: Radiological Society of North America scientific assembly and annual meeting program. Oak Brook, Ill: Radiological Society of North America, 2012; 180
20. Allegra CJ, Aberle DR, Ganschow P, et al. National Institutes of Health State-of-The- Science Conference statement: Diagnosis and management of ductal carcinoma in situ September 22-24, 2009. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010;102(3):161-169
21. Kumar S, Sacchini V. The surgical management of ductal carcinoma in situ. Breast J 2010;16(suppl 1):S49-S52
22. Berg WA. Supplemental screening sonography in dense breasts. Radiol Clin North Am 2004;42(5):845-851.
23. Duffy SW, Tabar L, Vitak B, et al. The relative contributions of screen-detected in situ and invasive breast carcinomas in reducing mortality from the disease. Eur J Cancer 2003;39(12):1755-1760
24. Hooley RJ, Greenberg KL, Stackhouse RM, Geisel JL, Butler RS, Philpotts LE. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: Initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41. Radiology 2012; 265(1):59-69
25. Kaplan SS. Clinical utility of bilateral wholebreast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue. Radiology 2001;221(3): 641-649
26. Leconte I, Feger C, Galant C, et al. Mammography and subsequent whole-breast sonography of nonpalpable breast cancers: The importance of radiologic breast density. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180(6):1675-1679
27. Schaefer FK, Waldmann A, Katalinic A, et al. Influence of additional breast ultrasound on cancer detection in a cohort study for quality assurance in breast diagnosis: Analysis of 102,577 diagnostic procedures. Eur Radiol 2010;20(5):1085-1092
28. Weigert J, Steenbergen S. The connecticut experiment: The role of ultrasound in the screening of women with dense breasts. Breast J 2012;18(6):517-522
29. Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, et al. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA 2008;299(18):2151-2163
30. Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 2004;233(3):830-849
31. Kelly KM, Dean J, Comulada WS, Lee SJ. Breast cancer detection using automated whole breast ultrasound and mammography in radiographically dense breasts. Eur Radiol 2010;20(3):734-742
32. Kelly KM, Dean J, Lee SJ, Comulada WS. Breast cancer detection: Radiologists' performance using mammography with and without automated whole-breast ultrasound. Eur Radiol 2010;20(11):2557-2564
33. Warner E, Plewes DB, Hill KA, et al. Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination. JAMA 2004;292(11): 1317-1325.