Intraindividual Comparison of Two Methods of Volumetric Breast Composition Assessment

Academic Radiology

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 447-452

  Schmachtenberg, Constanze ^a   Hammann Kloss, Sophie ^b   Bick, Ulrich ^a   Engelken, Florian ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^b Evangelisches Geriatriezentrum B   (Germany)

Author keywords

Automatic data processing; Breast density; Human; Mammary glands; Mammography

Indexed keywords

AGE; ARTICLE; BREAST; BREAST EXAMINATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DENSITY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; FIBROGLANDULAR TISSUE VOLUME; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGING SOFTWARE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PERCENT DENSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; VOLUMETRIC BREAST COMPOSITION ASSESSMENT; ADULT; AGED; BREAST TUMOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; IMAGE QUALITY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; ORGAN SIZE; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; ORGAN SIZE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84924245903     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: 18784046     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.12.003     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Assi V., Warwick J., Cuzick J., et al. Clinical and epidemiological issues in mammographic density. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2012, 9(1):33-40.
2. McCormack V.A., dos Santos Silva I. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006, 15(6):1159-1169.
3. Cuzick J., Warwick J., Pinney E., et al. Tamoxifen-induced reduction in mammographic density and breast cancer risk reduction: a nested case-control study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2011, 103(9):744-752.
4. Li J., Humphreys K., Eriksson L., et al. Mammographic density reduction is a prognostic marker of response to adjuvant tamoxifen therapy in postmenopausal patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2013, 31(18):2249-2256.
5. Maskarinec G., Pagano I.S., Little M.A., et al. Mammographic density as a predictor of breast cancer survival: the Multiethnic Cohort. Breast Cancer Res 2013, 15(1):R7.
6. Sandberg M.E., Li J., Hall P., et al. Change of mammographic density predicts the risk of contralateral breast cancer-a case-control study. Breast Cancer Res 2013, 15(4):R57.
7. Drukteinis J.S., Mooney B.P., Flowers C.I., et al. Beyond mammography: new frontiers in breast cancer screening. Am J Med 2013, 126(6):472-479.
8. Bernardi D., Pellegrini M., Di Michele S., et al. Interobserver agreement in breast radiological density attribution according to BI-RADS quantitative classification. Radiol Med 2012, 117(4):519-528.
9. Ciatto S., Houssami N., Apruzzese A., et al. Categorizing breast mammographic density: intra- and interobserver reproducibility of BI-RADS density categories. Breast 2005, 14(4):269-275.
10. Ooms E.A., Zonderland H.M., Eijkemans M.J., et al. Mammography: interobserver variability in breast density assessment. Breast 2007, 16(6):568-576.
11. Byng J.W., Boyd N.F., Fishell E., et al. The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities. Phys Med Biol 1994, 39(10):1629-1638.
12. Engelken F., Singh J.M., Fallenberg E.M., et al. Volumetric breast composition analysis: reproducibility of breast percent density and fibroglandular tissue volume measurements in serial mammograms. Acta Radiol 2014, 55(1):32-38.
13. Singh J.M., Fallenberg E.M., Diekmann F., et al. Volumetric breast density assessment: reproducibility in serial examinations and comparison with visual assessment. Rofo 2013, 185(9):844-848.
14. van Engeland S., Snoeren P.R., Huisman H., et al. Volumetric breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2006, 25(3):273-282.
15. Ciatto S., Bernardi D., Calabrese M., et al. A first evaluation of breast radiological density assessment by QUANTRA software as compared to visual classification. Breast 2012, 21(4):503-506.
16. Jeffreys M., Warren R., Highnam R., et al. Initial experiences of using an automated volumetric measure of breast density: the standard mammogram form. Br J Radiol 2006, 79(941):378-382.
17. Gweon H.M., Youk J.H., Kim J.A., et al. Radiologist assessment of breast density by BI-RADS categories versus fully automated volumetric assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013, 201(3):692-697.
18. Seo J.M., Ko E.S., Han B.K., et al. Automated volumetric breast density estimation: a comparison with visual assessment. Clin Radiol 2013, 68(7):690-695.
19. Wang J., Azziz A., Fan B., et al. Agreement of mammographic measures of volumetric breast density to MRI. PLoS One 2013, 8(12):e81653.
20. Hammann-Kloss J.S., Bick U., Fallenberg E., et al. Volumetric quantification of the effect of aging and hormone replacement therapy on breast composition from digital mammograms. Eur J Radiol 2014, 83(7):1092-1097.
21. Skippage P., Wilkinson L., Allen S., et al. Correlation of age and HRT use with breast density as assessed by Quantra. Breast J 2013, 19(1):79-86.
22. Redondo A., Comas M., Macia F., et al. Inter- and intraradiologist variability in the BI-RADS assessment and breast density categories for screening mammograms. Br J Radiol 2012, 85(1019):1465-1470.
23. Chmura Kraemer H., Periyakoil V.S., Noda A. Kappa coefficients in medical research. Stat Med 2002, 21(14):2109-2129.
24. Sauber N, Chan A, Highnam R. BI-RADS breast density classification - an international standard? Poster Presentation presented at: European Congress of Radiology. Vienna, Austria 2013 Mar 7-11.