Interobserver agreement in breast radiological density attribution according to BI-RADS quantitative classification;Riproducibilità interlettore del giudizio relativo alla densità radiologica secondo la classificazione quantitativa BI-RADS

Radiologia Medica

Volumn 117, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 519-528

  Bernardi, D ^a   Pellegrini, M ^a   Di Michele, S ^a   Tuttobene, P ^a   Fanto C ^a   Valentini, M ^a   Gentilini, M ^b   Ciatto, S ^c  

^a UO Senologia Clinica e Screening Mammografico   (Italy)

^b Servizio Osservatorio Epidemiologico   (Italy)

^c ULSS 16   (Italy)

Author keywords

Breast; Density; Diagnosis; Mammography

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICS;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84863779643     PISSN: 00338362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11547-011-0777-3     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Wolfe JN (1976) Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammographic parenchimal pattern. Cancer 37:2486-2492
2. Ciatto S, Zappa M (1993) A prospective study of the value of mammographic patterns as indicators of breast cancer risk in a screening experiencE. eur J Radiol 17:122-125 (Pubitemid 23303606)
3. Brisson J, Diorio C, Masse B, (2003) Wolfe's parenchymal pattern and percentage of the breast with mammographic densities: redundant or complementary classification? Cancer epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12:728-732 (Pubitemid 36993162)
4. Vachon CM, Kuni CC, Anderson K et al (2000) Association of mammographic defined percent breast density with epidemiologic risk factors for breast cancer (United States). Cancer Causes Control 11:653-662 (Pubitemid 30636365)
5. Boyd NF, Dite GS, Stone J et al (2002) Heritability of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer. New engl J Med 347:886-894
6. Ursin G, Ma H, Wu H et al (2003) Mammographic density and breast cancer in three ethnic groups. Cancer epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12:332-338 (Pubitemid 36427994)
7. Chen Z, Wuy AH, Gauderman WJ et al (2004) Does mammographic density reflect ethnic differences in breast cancer incidence rates? Am J epidemiol 159:140-147 (Pubitemid 38082522)
8. egan RL, Mosteller RC (1977) Breast cancer mammography patterns. Cancer 40:2087-2090 (Pubitemid 8239695)
9. Ciatto S, Visioli C, Paci e, Zappa M (2004) Breast density as a determinant of interval cancer at mammographic screeninG. Br J Cancer 90:393-396 (Pubitemid 38250634)
10. Peeters PH, Verbeek AL, Hendriks JH et al (1989) The occurrence of interval cancers in the Nijmegen screening programmE. Br J Cancer 59:929-932 (Pubitemid 19155710)
11. Young K, Wallis M, Blank R, Moss S (1997) Influence of number of views and mammographic film density on the detection of invasive cancers: results from the NHS Breast Screening ProgrammE. Br J Radiol 70:482-488 (Pubitemid 27229268)
12. Buist DSM, Porter PL, Lehman C et al (2004) Factors contributing to mammography failure in women aged 40-49 years. J Natl Cancer Inst 96:1432-1440 (Pubitemid 39429667)
13. Caumo F, Vecchiato F, Pellegrini M et al (2009) Analysis of interval cancers observed in an Italian mammography screening programme (2000-2006). Radiol Med 114:907-914
14. Caumo F, Brunelli S, Zorzi M et al (2011) Benefits of double reading of screening mammograms: retrospective study on a consecutive series. Radiol Med 116:575-583
15. American College of Radiology (2003) The ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS®). American College of Radiology, Reston
16. Ciatto S, Bonardi R, Zappa M (2001) Impact of replacement hormone therapy in menopause on breast radiologic density and possible complications of mammography in the assessment of breast masses. Radiol Med 101:39-43
17. Boyd NF, Wolfson C, Moskowitz M et al (1986) Observer variation in the classification pf mammographic parenchymal patterns. J Chroinic Dis 39:465-472 (Pubitemid 16044159)
18. Berg WA, Campassi C, Langenberg P, Sexton MJ (2000) Breast imaging reporting and data system: inter-and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:1769-1777 (Pubitemid 30346755)
19. Vachon CM, Sellers TA, Vierkant RA et al (2002) Case control study of increased mammographic breast density response to hormone replacement therapY. Cancer epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11:1382-1388 (Pubitemid 35340373)
20. Zhou C, Chan HP, Petrick N et al (2001) Computerized image analysis estimation of breast density on mammograms. Med Phys 28:1056-1069 (Pubitemid 32574690)
21. Ciatto S, Houssami N, Apruzzese A et al (2005) Categorizing breast mammographic density: intra-and interobserver reproducibility of BI-RADS density categories. Breast 14:269-275 (Pubitemid 41110187)
22. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical datA. Biometrics 33:159-174 (Pubitemid 8054849)
23. Rosselli Del Turco M, Mantellini P, Ciatto S et al (2007) Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts. AJR Am J Roetgenol 189:860-866 (Pubitemid 47479768)
24. Pisano eD, Gatsonis C, Hendrick e et al (2005) Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screeninG. N engl J Med 353:1773-1783 (Pubitemid 41549889)
25. Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB et al (2008) Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. J Am Med Ass 299:2151-2163 (Pubitemid 351679706)
26. Corsetti V, Houssami N, Ferrari A et al (2008) Breast screening with ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: evidence on incremental cancer detection and false positives, and associated cost. eur J Cancer 44:539-544
27. Corsetti V, Houssami N, Ghirardi M et al (2011) evidence of the effect of adjunct ultrasound screening in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: Interval breast cancers at 1year follow-up. eur J Cancer 47:1021-1026
28. Rafferty e, Smith A, Niklason L (2009) Comparison of three methods of estimating breast density: BI-RADS density scores using full field digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and volumetric breast densitY. Proffered paper at Rad Soc North Am, Chicago, USA: ssM01
29. Tuncbilek N, Sezer A, Ugur U et al (2009) Qualitative and quantitative analysis of fibroglandular tissue in the digital environment. Proffered paper at 10th National Congress of Breast Diseases, Izmir, Turkey