Monosegmental anterior lumbar interbody fusion with the SynFix-LR™ device : A prospective 2-year follow-up study;Die monosegmentale ventrale Spondylodese mit dem SynFix-LR™ : Eine prospektive 2-Jahres-Studie

Orthopade

Volumn 39, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 1044-1050

  Hoff, E ^a   Strube, P ^a   Gross C ^a   Hartwig, T ^a   Putzier, M ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Fixation; Follow up; Osteochondrosis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE PLATE; EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOCHONDROSIS; PAIN; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPINE FUSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; BONE PLATES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOCHONDROSIS; PAIN; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL FUSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 78649447422     PISSN: 00854530     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00132-010-1654-9     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Blumenthal SL, Baker J, Dossett A et al (1988) he role of anterior lumbar fusion for internal disc disruption. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 13:566-569
2. Brodsky AE, Kovalsky ES, Khalil MA (1991) Correlation of radiologic assessment of lumbar spine fusions with surgical exploration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 16:261-265
3. Button G, Gupta M, Barrett C et al (2005) Three-to six-year follow-up of stand-alone BAK cages implanted by a single surgeon. Spine J 5:155-160
4. Cain CM, Schleicher P, Gerlach R et al (2005) A new stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion device: biomechanical comparison with established fixation techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:2631-2636
5. Cunningham BW, Polly DW Jr (2002) The use of interbody cage devices for spinal deformity: a biomechanical perspective. Clin Orthop Relat Res 394:73-83
6. Faciszewski T, Winter RB, Lonstein JE et al (1995) The surgical and medical perioperative complications of anterior spinal fusion surgery in the thoracic and lumbar spine in adults. A review of 1223 procedures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20:1592-1599
7. Fraser RD (1995) Interbody, posterior and combined lumbar fusions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20:167-177
8. Fritzell P, Hagg O, Wessberg P et al (2002) Chronic low back pain and fusion: a comparison of three surgical techniques: a prospective multicenter randomized study from the Swedish lumbar spine study group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:1131-1141
9. Gerbershagen HU, Lindena G, Korb J et al (2002) Health-related quality of life in patients with chronic pain. Schmerz 16:271-284
10. Glazer PA, Colliou O, Klisch SM et al (1997) Biomechanical analysis of multilevel fixation methods in the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22:171-182
11. Greenough CG, Taylor LJ, Fraser RD (1994) Anterior lumbar fusion: results, assessment techniques and prognostic factors. Eur Spine J 3:225-230
12. Kandziora F, Pflugmacher R, Kleemann R et al (2002) Biomechanical analysis of biodegradable interbody fusion cages augmented With poly (propylene glycol-co-fumaric acid). Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:1644-1651
13. Kozak JA, Heilman AE, O'Brien JP (1994) Anterior lumbar fusion options. Technique and graft materials. Clin Orthop Relat Res 300:45-51
14. Lane JD Jr, Moore ES Jr (1948) Transperitoneal approach to the intervertebral disc in the lumbar area. Ann Surg 127:537-551
15. Madan SS, Boeree NR (2003) Comparison of instrumented anterior interbody fusion with instrumented circumferential lumbar fusion. Eur Spine J 12:567-575
16. McAfee PC, Boden SD, Brantigan JW et al (2001) Symposium: a critical discrepancy-a criteria of successful arthrodesis following interbody spinal fusions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:320-334
17. Newman MH, Grinstead GL (1992) Anterior lumbar interbody fusion for internal disc disruption. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 17:831-833
18. Patel AA, Brodke DS, Pimenta L et al (2008) Revision strategies in lumbar total disc arthroplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:1276-1283
19. Penta M, Fraser RD (1997) Anterior lumbar interbody fusion. A minimum 10-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22:2429-2434
20. Pradhan BB, Nassar JA, Delamarter RB et al (2002) Single-level lumbar spine fusion: a comparison of anterior and posterior approaches. J Spinal Disord Tech 15:355-361
21. Putzier M, Strube P, Funk JF et al (2009) Allogenic versus autologous cancellous bone in lumbar segmental spondylodesis: a randomized prospective study. Eur Spine J 18:687-695
22. Ray CD (1997) Threaded titanium cages for lumbar interbody fusions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22:667-680
23. Santos ER, Goss DG, Morcom RK et al (2003) Radiologic assessment of interbody fusion using carbon fiber cages. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:997-1001
24. Sasso RC, Best NM, Mummaneni PV et al (2005) Analysis of operative complications in a series of 471 anterior lumbar interbody fusion procedures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:670-674
25. Scaduto AA, Gamradt SC, Yu WD et al (2003) Perioperative complications of threaded cylindrical lumbar interbody fusion devices: anterior versus posterior approach. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:502-507
26. Schleicher P, Gerlach R, Schar B et al (2008) Biomechanical comparison of two different concepts for stand alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 17:1757-1765
27. Spivak JM, Neuwirth MG, Giordano CP et al (1994) The perioperative course of combined anterior and posterior spinal fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19:520-525
28. Thaler M, Mayr E, Liebensteiner M et al (2009) Injury of the right and left inferior epigastric artery during the implantation of a stand-alone ALIF cage through a left retroperitoneal approach: a case report. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129(5):613-616
29. Turner JA, Herron L, Deyo RA (1993) Meta-analysis of the results of lumbar spine fusion. Acta Orthop Scand 251 (Suppl): 120-122
30. Williams AL, Gornet MF, Burkus JK (2005) CT evaluation of lumbar interbody fusion: current concepts. Am J Neuroradiol 26:2057-2066