Jugular vein distensibility predicts fluid responsiveness in septic patients

Critical Care

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Guarracino, Fabio ^a   Ferro, Baldassarre ^a   Forfori, Francesco ^a   Bertini, Pietro ^a   Magliacano, Luana ^a   Pinsky, Michael R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF PISA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR MONITORING DEVICE; CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CRYSTALLOID; FEMALE; HEART INDEX; HEART RATE; HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HUMAN; INDWELLING CATHETER; INTERNAL JUGULAR VEIN; INTERNAL JUGULAR VEIN DISTENSIBILITY; INTERNAL JUGULAR VEIN SIZE; MALE; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; OPERATOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE PRESSURE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RELIABILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEPSIS; SPECIFICITY INFERIOR VENA CAVA DISTENSIBILITY; VEIN COMPLIANCE; VENTILATED PATIENT; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; ECHOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; FLUID THERAPY; JUGULAR VEIN; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROCEDURES; VASODILATATION;

AGED; FEMALE; FLUID THERAPY; HUMANS; JUGULAR VEINS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; SEPSIS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL; VASODILATION;

EID: 84924224952     PISSN: 13648535     EISSN: 1466609X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13054-014-0647-1     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Katz AM: Earnest Henry Starling, his processors, and the "Law of the Heart". Circulation 2002, 106:2986-2992.
2. Preisman S, Kogan S, Berkenstadt H, Perel A: Predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing cardiac surgery; functional hemodynamic parameters including the Respiratory Systolic Variation Test and static preload indicators. Br J Anaesth 2005, 95:746-755.
3. Osman D, Ridel C, Ray P, Monnet X, Anguel N, Richard C, Teboul JL: Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge. Crit Care Med 2007, 35:64-68.
4. Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, Anguel N, Mercat A, Lecarpentier Y, Richard C, Pinsky MR, Teboul JL: Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000, 162:134-138.
5. Barbier C, Loubieres Y, Schmidt C, Hayon J, Ricome JL, Jordin F, Veillard-Baron A: Respiratory changes in inferior vena cava diameter are helpful in predicting fluid responsiveness in ventilated septic patients. Intensive Care Med 2004, 30:1740-1746.
6. Veillard-Baron A, Chergni K, Rabiller A, Peyrouset O, Page B, Beanchet A, Jordin F: Superior vena cava collapsibility as a change of volume status in ventilated septic patients. Intensive Care Med 2004, 30:1734-1739.
7. Constant J: Using internal jugular pulsations as a manometer for right atrial pressure measurements. Cardiology 2000, 93:26-30.
8. Sankoff J, Zidulka A: Non-invasive method for the rapid assessment of central venous pressure: description and validation by a single examiner. West J Emerg Med 2008, 9:201-205.
9. Conn RD, O'Keefe JH: Simplified evaluation of the jugular venous pressure: significance of inspiratory collapse of jugular veins. Mo Med 2012, 109:150-152.
10. Chua Chiaco JM, Parikh NI, Fergusson DJ: The jugular venous pressure revisited. Cleve Clin J Med 2013, 80:638-644.
11. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, Gerlach H, Opal SM, Sevransky JE, Sprung CL, Douglas IS, Jaeschke R, Osborn TM, Nunnally ME, Townsend SR, Reinhart K, Kleinpell RM, Angus DC, Deutschman CS, Machado FR, Rubenfeld GD, Webb S, Beale RJ, Vincent JL, Moreno R: Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee including The Pediatric Subgroup. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012. Intensive Care Med 2013, 39:165-228.
12. Donati A, Carsetti A, Tondi S, Scorcella C, Domizi R, Damiani E, Gabbanelli V, Münch C, Adrario E, Pelaia P, Cecconi M: Thermodilution vs pressure recording analytical method in hemodynamic stabilized patients. J Crit Care 2014, 29:260-264.
13. Prekker ME, Scott NL, Hart D, Sprenkle MD, Leatherman JW: Point-of-care ultrasound to estimate central venous pressure: a comparison of three techniques. Crit Care Med 2013, 41:833-841.
14. Pinsky MR, Payen D: Functional hemodynamic monitoring. Crit Care 2005, 9:566-572.
15. Marik PE, Baram M, Vahid B: Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest 2008, 134:172-178.
16. Cannesson M, Le Manach Y, Hofer CK, Goarin JP, Lehot JJ, Vallet B, Tavernier B: Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of pulse pressure variations for the prediction of fluid responsiveness: a "gray zone" approach. Anesthesiology 2011, 115:231-241.