Saving the constitution from lawyers: How legal training and law reviews distort constitutional meaning

Saving the Constitution from Lawyers: How Legal Training and Law Reviews Distort Constitutional Meaning

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 1-195

  Spitzer, Robert J ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924206250     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139167512     Document Type: Book

References (324)

1. William Michael Treanor, “Fame, the Founding, and the Power to DeclareWar,” Cornell Law Review 82(May 1997): 700.
2. Clinton Rossiter, The Supreme Court and the Commander in Chief (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1976; first published 1951), 66.
3. Simeon E. Baldwin, “The Share of the President of the United States in a Declaration of War,” The American Journal of International Law 12(January 1918), 1, 10.
4. Clarence A. Berdahl, War Powers of the Executive in the United States (Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1921).
5. Lee Epstein and Gary King, “The Rules of Inference,” The University of Chicago Law Review 69(Winter 2000): 7.
6. Daniel A. Farber and Suzanna Sherry, Seeking Certainty: The Misguided Quest for Constitutional Foundationalism (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002), 9.
7. Glenn H. Utter and Charles Lockhart, eds., American Political Scientists (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1993), 52.
8. Michael B. Rappaport, “The President’s Veto and the Constitution,” Northwestern University Law Review 87(Spring 1993): 736
9. John C. Yoo, “The President’s Constitutional Authority to Conduct Military Operations Against Terrorists and Nations Supporting Them,” Memorandum Opinion for the Deputy Counsel to the President, September 25, 2001, accessed at http://www.usdoj.olc/warpowers925.htm on September 12, 2006.
10. David Feige, “Lying Lawyers,” Slate Magazine, March 22, 1998, accessed at http://www. slate.com/id/1088/, viewed on January 21, 2006.
11. Michael Kinsley, “Why Lawyers Are Liars,” Slate Magazine, January 20, 2006, accessed at http://www.slate.com/id/2134510/, viewed on January 21, 2006.
12. David D. Kirkpatrick, “Group Fueled Effort to Shift Court to Right,” New York Times, January 30, 2006, A1.
13. Harold J. Berman, William R. Greiner, and Samir N. Saliba, The Nature and Functions of Law, 6th ed. (New York: Foundation Press, 2004), 13.
14. Steven Vago, Law and Society, 5th ed. (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1991), 279.
15. Ruggero J. Aldisert, Logic for Lawyers (New York: Clark Boardman Co., 1989).
16. Howard Lesnick, “Infinity in a Grain of Sand: The World of Law and Lawyering as Portrayed in the Clinical Teaching Implicit in the Law School Curriculum,” UCLA Law Review 37(August 1990): 1158.
17. D. Don Welch, “‘What’s Going On?’ in the Law School Curriculum,” Houston Law Review 41(Spring 2005): 1607.
18. John Bonsignore et al., Before the Law: An Introduction to the Legal Process, 8th ed. (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2006), 344.
19. Kenneth J. Vandevelde, Thinking Like a Lawyer: An Introduction to Legal Reasoning (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1996).
20. Karl E. Klare, “The Law-School Curriculum in the 1980s: What’s Left?,” Journal of Legal Education 32(September 1982): 337–38
21. Steven J. Burton, An Introduction to Law and Legal Reasoning (Boston: Little, Brown, 1985), 13.
22. Lawrence M. Friedman, American Law in the 20th Century (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2002), 33–35.
23. Tracey E. George, “An Empirical Study of Empirical Legal Scholarship: The Top Law Schools,” Indiana Law Journal 81(Winter 2006): 152–53.
24. Jonathan D. Glater, “Harvard Law Decides to Steep Students in 21st-Century Issues,” New York Times, October 7, 2006, A10.
25. Steve Sheppard, “Casebooks, Commentaries, and Curmudgeons: An Introductory History of Law in the Lecture Hall,” Iowa Law Review 82(January 1997): 643.
26. Marion Neef and Stuart Nagel, “The Adversary Nature of the American Legal System,” in Lawyers’ Ethics: Contemporary Dilemmas, ed. Allan Gerson (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 1980), 73–97.
27. Landsman, Readings on Adversarial Justice: The American Approach to Adjudication (St. Paul, MN: West Publishing, 1988), 38–39.
28. Kenney Hegland, Introduction to the Study and Practice of Law, 3rd ed. (St. Paul, MN: West Publishing, 2000), 16.
29. Stephen Gillers, “The American Legal Profession,” in Fundamentals of American Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996), 166–67.
30. Lon L. Fuller, “The Adversary System,” in Talks on American Law, ed. Harold J. Berman (New York: Vintage, 1971), 35.
31. Marvin E. Frankel, Partisan Justice (New York: Hill and Wang, 1980), 11, 21.
32. Geoffrey C. Hazard, Jr., Ethics in the Practice of Law (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1978), 133.
33. David Luban, “The Adversary System Excuse,” in The Good Lawyer: Lawyers’ Roles and Lawyers’ Ethics, ed. Luban (Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld, 1983), 86.
34. Oliver Wendell Holmes, “The Path of the Law,” Harvard Law Review 10(March 25, 1897): 459.
35. H. L. A. Hart, “Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals,” Harvard Law Review 71(February 1958): 593–629.
36. Lon L. Fuller, The Law in Quest of Itself (Chicago: Foundation Press, 1940); Henry M. Hart, Jr., “Holmes’ Positivism–An Addendum,” Harvard Law Review 64(April 1951): 929–37.
37. Anthony T. Kronman, The Lost Lawyer: Failing Ideals of the Legal Profession (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993), 7.
38. Arthur Selwyn Miller, “The Myth of Objectivity in Legal Research andWriting,” Catholic University of America Law Review 18(1969): 291.
39. Alfred H. Kelly, “Clio and the Court,” The Supreme Court Review, ed. Philip Kurland (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1965), 155.
40. Karl Popper, Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge (New York: Harper and Row, 1963).
41. Lee Epstein and Gary King, “The Rules of Inference,” The University of Chicago Law Review 69(Winter 2002): 9.
42. Carl G. Hempel, Philosophy of Natural Science (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1966).
43. Carl G. Hempel, Aspects of Scientific Explanation (New York: Free Press, 1965), 150–51.
44. Richard S. Rudner, Philosophy of Social Science (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1966).
45. Abraham Kaplan, The Conduct of Inquiry (New York: Chandler Publishing, 1964), 32–33.
46. E. Terrence Jones, Conducting Political Research (New York: Harper and Row, 1971), 11.
47. Alexander L. George and Andrew Bennett, Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005), 129.
48. John Gerring, Case Study Research: Principles and Practices (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006).
49. Gary King, Robert O. Keohane, and Sidney Verba, Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994)
50. Fred M. Frohock, Normative Political Theory (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1974).
51. Robert Brown, Explanation in Social Science (Chicago: Aldine, 1963);
52. Hubert M. Blalock, Jr., Causal Inferences in Nonexperimental Research (New York: W. W. Norton, 1964)
53. King, Keohane, and Verba, Designing Social Inquiry; Richard A. Seltzer, Mistakes that Social Scientists Make (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1996)
54. John Gerring, Social Science Methodology (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001)
55. Henry E. Brady, Rethinking Social Inquiry (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2004)
56. David Marsh and Gerry Stoker, eds., Theory and Methods in Political Science (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002).
57. Clayton Roberts, The Logic of Historical Explanation (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1996).
58. J. M. Sosin, “Historian’s History or Lawyer’s History?,” Reviews in American History 10(March 1982): 38–43
59. Martin S. Flaherty, “History ‘Lite’ in Modern American Constitutionalism,” Columbia Law Review 95(April 1995): 523–90.
60. Jack N. Rakove, “The Second Amendment: The Highest Stage of Originalism,” Chicago-Kent Law Review 76(2000): 106
61. Saul Cornell, “A New Paradigm for the Second Amendment,” Law and History Review 22(Spring 2004): 161–68.
62. Kenneth Mayer, “The Return of the King? Presidential Power and the Law,” PRG Report 26(Spring 2004): 13.
63. Jack Goldsmith and Adrian Vermeule, “Exchange: Empirical Research and the Goals of Legal Scholarship,” The University of Chicago Law Review 69(Winter 2002): 156.
64. Lee Epstein and Gary King, “A Reply,” The University of ChicagoLawReview 69(Winter 2002): 194.
65. Mary Ann Glendon, A Nation Under Lawyers (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1994), 208.
66. Philip Zelikow, “Legal Policy for a Twilight War,” Annual Lecture, Houston Journal of International Law, April 26, 2007, accessed at http://www.hnn.us/articles/39494.html on May 30, 2007.
67. Lawrence M. Friedman, American Law in the 20th Century (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2002), 497.
68. Garry Wills, “To Keep and Bear Arms,” New York Review of Books, September 21, 1995, 62.
69. Bernard J. Hibbitts, “Last Writes? Reassessing the Law Review in the Age of Cyberspace,” New York University Law Review 71(June 1996), 647.
70. Patricia B. Gray, “Harvard’s Faculty Stirs a Tempest with Plans for a New Law Journal,” Wall Street Journal, May 28, 1986, 37.
71. Rosa Ehrenreich, “Look Who’s Editing,” Lingua Franca (January/February 1996): 58–63.
72. Robert Stevens, Law School: Legal Education in America from the 1850s to the 1980s (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1983), 20.
73. Michael I. Swygert and Jon W. Bruce, “The Historical Origins, Founding, and Early Development of Student-Edited Law Reviews,” The Hastings Law Journal 36 (May 1985): 750–57.
74. Kermit L. Hall, The Magic Mirror (New York: Oxford University Press, 1989), 218.
75. Olavi Maru, “Measuring the Impact of Legal Periodicals,” American Bar Foundation Research Journal 1(1976): 227.
76. Samuel D.Warren and Louis D. Brandeis, “The Right to Privacy,” Harvard Law Review 4(December 1890): 193–216.
77. Douglas B. Maggs, “Concerning the Extent to Which the Law Review Contributes to the Development of the Law,” Southern California Law Review 3(1930): 181–207
78. Michael L. Closen and Robert J. Dzielak, “The History and Influence of the Law Review Institution,” Akron Law Review 30(Fall 1996): 26–27.
79. Benjamin Cardozo, Selected Readings on the Law of Contracts (New York: Macmillan, 1931), 186.
80. Charles E. Hughes, “Foreword,” Yale Law Journal 50(March 1941): 737.
81. Earl Warren, “Messages of Greeting to the U.C.L.A.LawReview,” U.C.L.A.LawReview 1(December 1953): 1.
82. Michael Ariens, “Modern Legal Times: Making a Professional Legal Culture,” Journal of American Culture, 15(March 1992): 25–35
83. John Jay McKelvey, “The Law School Review,” Harvard Law Review 50(April 1937): 871.
84. Afton Dekanal, “Faculty-Edited Law Reviews: Should the Law Schools Join the Rest of Academe?” University of Missouri at Kansas City Law Review 57(1989): 235.
85. Richard S. Harnsberger, “Reflections About Law Reviews and American Legal Scholarship,” Nebraska Law Review 76(1997): 691.
86. Richard A. Posner, “Against the Law Reviews,” Legal Affairs (November/December 2004), accessed at http://www.legalaffairs.org/issues/November-December-2004/toc. html. Accessed June 1, 2006.
87. Samuel Nirenstein, “The Law Review and the Law School,” New York University Annual Review 1(1924): 31.
88. Lyman P. Wilson, “The Law Schools, the Law Reviews and the Courts,” Cornell Law Quarterly 30(1945): 493.
89. Laura Kalman, The Strange Career of Legal Liberalism (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1996)
90. Richard A. Posner, “The Future of the Student-Edited Law Review,” Stanford Law Review 47(Summer 1995): 1133
91. Harry T. Edwards, “The Growing Disjunction Between Legal Education and the Legal Profession,” Michigan Law Review 91(October 1992): 50
92. George L. Priest, “Triumphs or Failings of Modern Legal Scholarship and the Conditions of Its Production,” University of Colorado Law Review 63(1992): 726.
93. Anthony T. Kronman, The Lost Lawyer: Failing Ideals of the Legal Profession (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993), 265.
94. Jordan H. Liebman and James P. White, “How the Student-Edited Law Journals Make Their Publication Decisions,” Journal of Legal Education 39(March 1989): 387–425.
95. Roger C. Cramton, “‘The Most Remarkable Institution’: The American Law Review,” Journal of Legal Education 35(1986): 5
96. Leo P. Martinez, “Babies, Bathwater, and Law Reviews,” Stanford Law Review 47(Summer 1995): 1142–43.
97. Clarence M. Updegraff, “Management of Law School Reviews,” University of Cincinnati Law Review 3(1929): 119.
98. Fred Rodell, “Goodbye to Law Reviews,” Virginia Law Review 23(1936): 38.
99. Carl T. Bogus, “The Death of an Honorable Profession,” Indiana Law Journal 71(Fall 1996): 911–47.
100. Alan W. Mewett, “Reviewing the Law Reviews,” Journal of Legal Education 8(1955): 188
101. Margaret A. Goldblatt, “Current Legal Periodicals: A Use Study,” Law Library Journal 78(1986): 55–72
102. Kenneth Lasson, “Scholarship Amok: Excesses in the Pursuit of Truth and Tenure,” Harvard Law Review 103(February 1990): 926–29
103. Elyce Zenoff, “I Have Seen the Enemy and They Are Us,” Journal of Legal Education 36(1986): 21
104. John E. Nowak, “Woe Unto You, Law Reviews!” Arizona Law Review 27(1985): 318.
105. Arthur Austin, “The Reliability of Citation Counts in Judgments on Promotion, Tenure, and Status,” Arizona Law Review 35(Winter 1993): 829–39
106. Harry T. Edwards, “The Growing Disjunction Between Legal Education and the Legal Profession,” Michigan Law Review 86(August 1988): 1835–1905
107. Carol Sanger, “Editing,” Georgetown Law Journal 82(December 1993): 513–27
108. Phil Nichols, “A Student Defense of Student Edited Journals,” Duke Law Journal (December 1987): 1124–25
109. James W. Harper, “Why Student-Run Law Reviews?” Minnesota Law Review 82(May 1988): 1274–76
110. Wendy J. Gordon, “Counter-Manifesto: Student-Edited Reviews and the Intellectual Properties of Scholarship,” University of Chicago Law Review 61(Spring 1994): 544–45
111. Richard S. Harnsberger, “Reflections About Law Reviews and American Scholarship,” Nebraska Law Review 76(1997): 693
112. Lisa Anderson, “Law Journals Attack ‘Shopping’ of Manuscripts,” New York Times, July 12, 1995, B6.
113. Scott M. Martin, “The Law Review Citadel: Rodell Revisited,” Iowa Law Review 71(May 1986): 1100–1101
114. Michael Vitiello, “In Defense of Student-Run Law Reviews,” Cumberland Law Review 17(1987): 862
115. Frank Cross, Michael Heise, and Gregory C. Sisk, “Above the Rules,” University of Chicago Law Review 69(Winter 2002): 148
116. Jack Goldsmith and Adrian Vermeule, “Empirical Methodology and Legal Scholarship,” University of Chicago Law Review 69(Winter 2002): 156
117. Lawrence K. Altman and William J. Broad, “Global Trend: More Science, More Fraud,” New York Times, December 20, 2005, F1
118. Horace F. Judson, The Great Betrayal: Fraud in Science (New York: Harcourt, 2004).
119. Ron Robin, Scandals and Scoundrels: Seven Cases That Shook the Academy (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2004).
120. Peter Charles Hoffer, Past Imperfect: Facts, Fictions, Fraud–American History from Bancroft and Parkman to Ambrose, Bellesiles, Ellis, and Goodwin (New York: Public Affairs Press, 2004).
121. Peter Novick, That Noble Dream: The ‘Objectivity Question’ and the American Historical Profession (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988)
122. Joyce Appleby, Lynn Hunt, and Margaret Jacob, Telling the Truth About History (New York: W. W. Norton, 1994).
123. Donald Kennedy, “Research Fraud and Public Policy,” Science 300(April 18, 2003): 393
124. Richard Morin, “Scholar Invents Fan to Answer His Critics,” Washington Post, February 1, 2003, C1. For a fuller chronicle of Lott’s ethical and other lapses, see http://timlambert.org/lott/.
125. Jerome P. Kassirer and Edward W. Campion, “Peer Review: Crude and Understudied, but Indispensable,” Journal of the American Medical Association 272(July 13, 1994): 96–97.
126. Lee Epstein and Gary King, “A Reply,” University of Chicago Law Review 69(Winter 2002): 195.
127. Fred R. Shapiro, “Origins of Bibliometrics, Citation Indexing, and Citation Analysis: The Neglected Legal Literature,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 43(1992): 337–39.
128. Richard A. Posner, “Law, Knowledge, and the Academy: Legal Scholarship Today,” Harvard Law Review 115(March 2002): 1315.
129. Robert J. Spitzer, “Lost and Found: Researching the Second Amendment,” Chicago- Kent Law Review 76(2000): 382.
130. Ann Raimes, Universal Keys for Writers (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2004), 744.
131. Wills, “To Keep and Bear Arms,” 71.
132. Robert J. Spitzer, The Presidential Veto (Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1988), chap. 5;
133. Philip G. Joyce and Robert D. Reischauer, “The Federal Line-Item Veto: What Is It and What Will It Do?,” Public Administration Review 57(March/April 1997): 95–104.
134. Robert J. Spitzer, “The ItemVeto Dispute and the Secular Crisis of the Presidency,” Presidential Studies Quarterly 28(Fall 1998): 799–805.
135. Richard A. Givens, “The Validity of a Separate Veto of Non-germane Riders to Legislation,” Temple Law Quarterly 39(Fall, 1965): 60–64.
136. Charlie Savage, Takeover: The Return of the Imperial Presidency and the Subversion of American Democracy (New York: Little, Brown, 2007), 230.
137. Oliver Morton Dickerson, American Colonial Government, 1696–1765 (New York: Russell and Russell, 1962; first published in 1912), chap. 5.
138. Leonard Woods Labaree, Royal Government in America (New York: Frederick Ungar, 1930), 234.
139. Oliver Morton Dickerson, American Colonial Government, 1696–1765 (New York: Russell and Russell, 1962; first published in 1912), 227.
140. Forrest McDonald, “The Framers’ Conception of the Veto Power,” in Pork Barrels and Principles (Washington, DC: National Legal Center for the Public Interest, 1988), 2–3.
141. Forrest McDonald, The American Presidency (Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 1994), 106.
142. John F. Burns, Controversies Between Royal Governors and Their Assemblies in the North American Colonies (New York: Russell and Russell, 1969; first published in 1923)
143. Diane-Michele Krasnow, “The Imbalance of Power and the Presidential Veto: A Case for the Item Veto,” Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 14(Spring, 1991): 586–87.
144. Ronald Moe, “The Founders and Their Experience with the Executive Veto,” Presidential Studies Quarterly 17(Spring, 1987): 416.
145. Frank W. Prescott and Joseph F. Zimmerman, The Politics of the Veto of Legislation in New York State, 2 vols. (Washington, DC: University Press of America, 1980), I, 5.
146. Elmer Beecher Russell, The Review of American Colonial Legislation by the King in Council (Buffalo, NY: William S. Hein, 1981; first published in 1915), 505–506.
147. Max Farrand, The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787, 4 vols. (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1966), 1, 98–99.
148. Henry C. Black, Black’s Law Dictionary (St. Paul, MN: West Publishers, 1991), 612.
149. Alan L. Clem, Congress: Powers, Processes, and Politics (Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1989), 7.
150. William J. Keefe and Morris S. Ogul, The American Legislative Process (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1985), 13.
151. J.Gregory Sidak and Thomas A. Smith, “Four Faces of the Item Veto: A Reply to Tribe and Kurland,” Northwestern University Law Review 84(Winter, 1990): 447.
152. Carl McGowan, “The President’s Veto Power: An Important Instrument of Conflict in Our Constitutional System,” San Diego Law Review 23(July–August, 1986): 810.
153. James P. Pfiffner, The President, the Budget, and Congress: Impoundment and the 1974 Budget Act (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1979).
154. John C. Fitzpatrick, ed., TheWritings of GeorgeWashington, 39 vols. (Washington, DC: GPO, 1940), 33, 94.
155. Benjamin Harrison, This Country of Ours (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1897), 132.
156. William Howard Taft, The President and His Powers (New York: Columbia University Press, 1916), 14.
157. Francis Newton Thorpe, ed., The Federal and State Constitutions, Colonial Charters, and other Organic Laws of the States, Territories, and Colonies, 7 vols. (Washington, DC: GPO, 1909).
158. Charles J. Zinn, The Veto Power of the President (Washington, DC: GPO, 1951), 34.
159. William A. Clineburg, “The Presidential Veto Power,” South Carolina Law Review 18(1966): 752.
160. Richard A. Riggs, “Separation of Powers: Congressional Riders and the Veto Power,” University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 6(Spring, 1973): 735–59.
161. Anthony Haswell, “Partial Veto Power–Does the President Have It Now?” Federal Bar News and Journal 36(March/April, 1989): 142, 144.
162. Thomas Pitt Taswell-Langmead, English Constitutional History (Boston: Houghton- Mifflin, 1946), 613–14.
163. Paul R. Q. Wolfson, “Is a Presidential Item Veto Constitutional?” Yale Law Journal 96(March, 1987): 841.
164. Lewis Deschler, Constitution, Jefferson’s Manual, and Rules of the House of Representatives(Washington, DC: GPO, 1973), 229
165. Russell M. Ross and Fred Schwengel, “An Item Veto for the President?,” Presidential Studies Quarterly 12(Winter, 1982): 67–68
166. Anthony Gressman, “Observation: Is the Item Veto Constitutional?” North Carolina Law Review 64(April, 1986): 819.
167. Michael B. Rappaport, “The President’s Veto and the Constitution,” Northwestern University Law Review 87(Spring, 1993): 762.
168. Max Farrand, The Framing of the Constitution of the United States (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1913), 179.
169. Vernon L.Wilkinson, “The Item Veto in the American Constitutional System,” Georgetown Law Journal 25(November, 1936): 108
170. Charles C. Thach, The Creation of the Presidency, 1775–1789 (New York: DaCapo Press, 1969; first published in 1923), 53–54
171. Robert J. Spitzer, “Presidential Prerogative Power: The Case of the Bush Administration and Legislative Power,” PS: Political Science and Politics 24(March, 1991): 38–42
172. Robert J. Spitzer, “The Veto King: The ‘Dr. No’ Presidency of George Bush,” in Honor and Loyalty: Inside the Politics of the Bush White House, eds. Leslie Feldman and Rosanna Perotti (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 2002), 233–53.
173. Robert J. Spitzer, “The Disingenuous Presidency: Reagan’sVeto and the ‘Make-My-Day’ President,” Congress & the Presidency 21(Spring, 1994): 1–10.
174. John B. Gilmour, Strategic Disagreement: Stalemate in American Politics (Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1995)
175. Richard A. Watson, Presidential Vetoes and Public Policy (Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 1993).
176. Christopher S. Kelley, “The Significance of the Presidential Signing Statement,” in Executing the Constitution: Putting the President Back into the Constitution, ed. Kelley (Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 2006), 73–89.
177. Robert J. Spitzer, “The ‘Protective Return’ Pocket Veto: Presidential Aggrandizement of Constitutional Power,” in Executing the Constitution, 109–25.
178. Richard A. Epstein, “Executive Power on Steroids,” Wall Street Journal, February 13, 2006, A16.
179. James Burnham, Congress and the American Tradition (Chicago: Regnery, 1959)
180. Willmoore Kendall, The Conservative Affirmation (Chicago: Regnery, 1963);
181. Alfred DeGrazia, Republic in Crisis (New York: Federal Legal Publications, 1965).
182. Raymond Tatalovich and Thomas S. Engeman, The Presidency and Political Science (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003), chap. 7.
183. Edward S. Corwin, The President: Office and Powers (New York: NYU Press, 1957)
184. Clinton Rossiter, The American Presidency (New York: New American Library, 1960)
185. Theodore J. Lowi, The Personal President (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1985)
186. Richard E. Neustadt, Presidential Power (New York: Free Press, 1990);
187. Stephen Skowronek, The Politics Presidents Make (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993)
188. Robert J. Spitzer, President and Congress (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1993);
189. Gordon Silverstein, Imbalance of Powers: Constitutional Interpretation and the Making of American Foreign Policy (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997)
190. Theodore B. Olson, “The Impetuous Vortex: Congressional Erosion of Presidential Authority,” in The Fettered Presidency: Legal Constraints on the Executive Branch, eds. L. Gordon Crovitz and Jeremy Rabkin (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute, 1989), 231.
191. Theodore J. Lowi, The End of Liberalism (New York: W.W. Norton, 1979)
192. J. Stillman II, The American Bureaucracy (Chicago: Nelson-Hall, 1987).
193. Peter L. Strauss, “The Place of Agencies in Government: Separation of Powers and the Fourth Branch,” Columbia Law Review 84(April 1984): 599–602
194. Steven G. Calabresi and Kevin H. Rhodes, “The Structural Constitution: Unitary Executive, Plural Judiciary,” Harvard Law Review 105(April 1992): 1153–1216
195. Gary Lawson, “Changing Images of the State: The Rise and Rise[AU: is this correct? Yes] of the Administrative State,” Harvard Law Review 107(April 1994): 1231–54
196. Abner S. Greene, “Checks and Balances in an Era of Presidential Lawmaking,” University of Chicago Law Review 61(Winter 1994): 123–96
197. Martin S. Flaherty, “The Most Dangerous Branch,” Yale Law Journal 105(May 1996): 1725–1839
198. Neil Kinkopf, “Of Devolution, Privatization, and Globalization: Separation of Powers Limits on Congressional Authority to Assign Federal Power to Non-Federal Actors,” Rutgers Law Review 50(Winter 1998): 331–96.
199. Steven G. Calabresi and Christopher S. Yoo, “The Removal Power: The Unitary Executive During the First Half-Century,” Case Western Reserve Law Review 47(Summer 1997): 1451–1561
200. StevenG. Calabresi and Christopher S. Yoo, “The Unitary Executive During the Second Half-Century,” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 26(Summer 2003): 667–801
201. Christopher S. Yoo, Steven G. Calabresi, and Lawrence D. Nee, “The Unitary Executive During the Third Half-Century,” Notre Dame Law Review 80(November 2004): 1–109
202. Christopher S. Yoo, Steven G. Calabresi, and Anthony J. Colangelo, “The Unitary Executive in the Modern Era, 1945–2004,” Iowa Law Review 90(January 2005): 601–731.
203. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, The Federalist Papers (New York: New American Library, 1961), 322.
204. Harold Hongju Koh, The National Security Constitution (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1990), 75–76.
205. Francis D.Wormuth and Edwin B. Firmage, To Chain the Dog ofWar: TheWar Power of Congress in History and Law (Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1989), 109.
206. David Gray Adler, “George Bush as Commander in Chief,” Presidential Studies Quarterly 36(September 2006): 527.
207. Johnny H. Killian, ed., The Constitution of the United States of America (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1987), 335.
208. Gaillard Hunt, ed., The Writings of James Madison, 9 vols. (New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1900–1910) 6: 248.
209. Louis Fisher, PresidentialWar Power (Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 2004), 12.
210. Max Farrand, The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787, 4 vols. (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1966), 2, 318
211. Louis Henkin, Constitutionalism, Democracy, and Foreign Affairs (New York: Columbia University Press, 1990), 25.
212. William Howard Taft, The President and His Powers (New York: Columbia University Press, 1916), 129.
213. Clinton Rossiter, The Supreme Court and the Commander in Chief (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1976; first published 1951);
214. Louis Henkin, Foreign Affairs and the Constitution (Mineola, NY: Foundation Press, 1972)
215. Charles A. Lofgren, “War-Making Under the Constitution,” Yale Law Journal 81(March 1972): 672–702
216. W. Taylor Reveley, War Powers of the President and Congress (Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press, 1981)
217. Louis Fisher, Congressional Abdication on War and Spending (College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press, 2000).
218. Louis Fisher, “Lost Constitutional Moorings: Recovering theWar Power,” Indiana Law Journal 81(Fall 2006): 1240–44.
219. Dana Priest and R. Jeffrey Smith, “Memo Offered Justification for Use of Torture,” Washington Post, June 8, 2004, A1
220. Daniel Klaidman, Stuart Taylor, Jr., and Evan Thomas, “Palace Revolt,” Newsweek, February 6, 2006, 38
221. John C. Yoo, “The Continuation of Politics by Other Means: The Original Understanding of War Powers,” California Law Review 84(March 1996): 170–305
222. John C. Yoo, “Kosovo, War Powers, and the Multilateral Future,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 148(May 2000): 1673–1731
223. Gordon S. Jones and John A. Marini, eds., The Imperial Congress (New York: Pharos Books, 1988)
224. Louis Fisher, “Unchecked Presidential Wars,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 148(May 2000): 1637–72
225. Peter M. Shane and Harold H. Bruff, Separation of Powers Law (Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 1996).
226. Louis Fisher, Military Tribunals and Presidential Power: American Revolution to the War on Terrorism (Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 2005).
227. Louis Fisher, “Congressional Checks on Military Initiatives,” Political Science Quarterly 109(Winter 1994–95): 756–58.
228. Michael A. Genovese and Robert J. Spitzer, The Presidency and the Constitution: Cases and Controversies (New York: Palgrave/Macmillan, 2005).
229. Daniel Levin, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice, “Memorandum for James B. Comey, Deputy Attorney General,” December 30, 2004
230. Eric Lichtblau, “Broad Influence for Justice Dept. Choice,”NewYorkTimes, November 21, 2004, 30.
231. Kenneth R. Mayer, With the Stroke of a Pen (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001)
232. Phillip J. Cooper, By Order of the President (Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 2002).
233. William G. Howell, Power Without Persuasion (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003).
234. David Mervin, “Demise of theWar Clause,” Presidential Studies Quarterly 30 (December 2000): 770–71.
235. Richard M. Pious, “Resolved, Presidents Have Usurped the War Power that Rightfully Belongs to Congress,” and the opposing essay by Nancy Kassop, in Debating the Presidency, eds. Richard J. Ellis and Michael Nelson (Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2006), 92–109.
236. Frederick A. O. Schwarz, and Aziz Z. Huq, Unchecked and Unbalanced: Presidential Power in a Time of Terror (New York: The New Press, 2007), 187.
237. Stanley I. Cutler, TheWars ofWatergate (New York: Knopf, 1990), 614.
238. Jeffrey Rosen, “Forced into a Gun Debate,” Time Magazine, May 7, 2007, 33
239. Robert J. Spitzer, “Working Hard to Misconstrue the 2nd Amendment,” History News Network, March 12, 2007, accessed at http://hnn.us/articles/36395.html.
240. Robert J. Spitzer, The Right to Bear Arms: Rights and Liberties Under Law (Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO, 2001).
241. Robert J. Spitzer, The Politics of Gun Control (Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2007).
242. Garry Wills, A Necessary Evil (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1999), 119–21.
243. Helen E. Veit, Kenneth R. Bowling, and Charlene Bangs Bickford, eds., Creating the Bill of Rights (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991), 182–84, 198–99.
244. Allan R. Millett and Peter Maslowski, For the Common Defense: A Military History of the United States (New York: Free Press, 1984), 129.
245. Stephen Skowronek, Building a New American State (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982), 315.
246. James M. McPherson, Battle Cry of Freedom (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988), 317
247. William Riker, Soldiers of the States: The Role of the National Guard in American Democracy (Washington, DC: Public Affairs Press, 1957), chap. 3.
248. Keith A. Ehrman and Dennis A. Henigan. “The Second Amendment in the Twentieth Century: Have You Seen Your Militia Lately?,” University of Dayton Law Review 15(Fall 1989): 36.
249. Jerry Cooper, The Rise of the National Guard (Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 1997).
250. Andrew A. Lipscomb, ed., The Writings of Thomas Jefferson (Washington, DC: The Thomas Jefferson Memorial Association, 1904), 16, 45.
251. Daniel A. Farber, William N. Eskridge, and Philip Frickey, Constitutional Law (St. Paul, MN: West Publishing, 1993), 398.
252. Louis Fisher, American Constitutional Law (Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 1999), 428–29.
253. Robert Hardaway, Elizabeth Gormley, and Bryan Taylor, “The Inconvenient Militia Clause of the Second Amendment: Why the Supreme Court Declines to Resolve the Debate Over the Right to Bear Arms,” St. John’s Journal of Legal Commentary 16(Winter 2002): 41–164.
254. Richard C. Cortner, The Supreme Court and the Second Bill of Rights (Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1981), 279.
255. Alexander DeConde, Gun Violence in America (Boston: Northeastern University Press, 2001), 17–25.
256. John Shy, A People Numerous and Armed (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1990), 31.
257. Saul Cornell, “Commonplace or Anachronism: The Standard Model, the Second Amendment, and the Problem of History in Contemporary Constitutional Theory,” Constitutional Commentary 16(Summer 1999): 235.
258. William Van Alstyne, “The Second Amendment and the Personal Right to Arms.” Duke Law Journal 43(April 1994): 1243
259. R. J. Larizza, “Paranoia, Patriotism, and the Citizen Militia Movement: Constitutional Right or Criminal Conduct?” Mercer Law Review 47(Winter 1996): 605.
260. Joel Samaha, Criminal Law (Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN:West, 1993), chap. 6;
261. Henry C. Black, Black’s Law Dictionary (St. Paul, MN: West, 1991), 947.
262. Roscoe Pound, The Development of Constitutional Guarantees of Liberty (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1957), 90–91.
263. Donald L. Beschle, “Reconsidering the Second Amendment: Constitutional Protection for a Right of Security,” Hamline Law Review 9(February 1986): 95.
264. Akhil Reed Amar and Alan Hirsch, For the People (New York: Free Press, 1998), 174.
265. Glenn Harlan Reynolds, “The Right to Keep and Bear Arms Under the Tennessee Constitution,” Tennessee Law Review 61(Winter 1994): 669
266. David E. Vandercoy, “The History of the Second Amendment,” Valparaiso University Law Review 28(Spring 1994): 1009
267. David C.Williams, “The Militia Movement and Second Amendment Revolution,” Cornell Law Review 81(May 1996): 886
268. Sanford Levinson, “The Embarrassing Second Amendment,” The Yale Law Journal 99(December 1989): 642, 650–51.
269. Nelson Lund, “The Second Amendment, Political Liberty, and the Right to Self- Preservation,” Alabama Law Review 39(Fall 1987): 103–30
270. Robert J. Spitzer, “Lost and Found: Researching the Second Amendment,” Chicago-Kent Law Review 76(2000): 385–401.
271. John Dunn, Modern Revolutions (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1972)
272. Colonel Charles J. Dunlap, “Revolt of the Masses: Armed Civilians and the Insurrectionary Theory of the Second Amendment,” Tennessee Law Review 62(Spring 1995): 643–77.
273. Robert G. Cottrol and Raymond T. Diamond, “The Second Amendment: Toward an Afro-Americanist Reconsideration,” The Georgetown Law Journal 80(December 1991): 311
274. Nicholas J. Johnson, “Beyond the Second Amendment: An Individual Right to Arms Viewed Through the Ninth Amendment,” Rutgers Law Journal 24(Fall 1992): 72
275. Scott Bursor, “Toward a Functional Framework for Interpreting the Second Amendment,” Texas Law Review 74(April 1996): 1126
276. Don B. Kates, “The Second Amendment and the Ideology of Self-Protection,” Constitutional Commentary 9(Winter 1992): 361.
277. Stephen A. Halbrook, “Jurisprudence of the Second and Fourteenth Amendments,” George Mason University Law Review 4(Spring 1981): 1
278. David T. Hardy, “Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies: Toward a Jurisprudence of the Second Amendment,” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 9(Summer 1986): 559
279. Akhil R. Amar, “The Bill of Rights and the Fourteenth Amendment,” Yale Law Journal 101(April 1992): 1264
280. Thomas M. Moncure, “The Second Amendment Ain’t About Hunting,” Howard Law Journal 34(1991): 592
281. Jay R. Wagner, “Gun Control Legislation and the Intent of the Second Amendment: To What Extent Is There an Individual Right to Keep and Bear Arms?” Villanova Law Review 37(1992): 1410.
282. T. Ansell, “Legal and Historical Aspects of the Militia,” Yale Law Journal 26(April 1917): 471–80.
283. Saul Cornell, “The Early American Origins of the Modern Gun Control Debate: The Right to Bear Arms, Firearms Regulation, and the Lessons of History,” Stanford Law and Policy Review 17(2006): 593.
284. Lucilius A. Emery, “The Constitutional Right to Keep and Bear Arms,” Harvard Law Review 28(March 1915): 473–77
285. Daniel J. McKenna, “The Right to Keep and Bear Arms,” Marquette Law Review 12(Fall 1928): 138–49
286. John Brabner-Smith, “Firearm Regulation,” Law and Contemporary Problems 1(October 1934): 400–14
287. Stuart R. Hays, “The Right to Bear Arms, AStudy in Judicial Misinterpretation,”William and Mary Law Review 2(1960): 403.
288. Lois G. Schworer, “To Hold and Bear Arms: The English Perspective,” Chicago-Kent Law Review 76(2000): 27–60.
289. Robert A. Sprecher, “The Lost Amendment,” American Bar Association Journal 51(June/July 1965): 554–57
290. Carl T. Bogus, “The History and Politics of Second Amendment Scholarship: A Primer,” Chicago-Kent Law Review 76(2000): 6–7.
291. Nicholas V. Olds, “Second Amendment and the Right to Keep and Bear Arms,” Michigan State Bar Journal 46(October 1967): 15–25.
292. Irving Brant, The Bill of Rights (Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill Co., 1965), 486.
293. Jack Peltason, Corwin and Peltason’s Understanding the Constitution (New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1988), 168.
294. Anthony J. Dennis, “Clearing the Smoke,” Akron Law Review 29(Summer 1995): 65
295. John Sexton and Nat Brandt, How Free AreWe? (New York: M. Evans and Co., 1986), 209–210.
296. Henry J. Abraham, Freedom and the Court (New York: Oxford University Press, 1972), chap. 3.
297. Stephen P. Halbrook, That Every Man Be Armed (Oakland, CA: The Independent Institute, 1984), 112.
298. Alfred Avins, The Reconstruction Amendments’ Debates (Richmond, VA: Virginia Commission on Constitutional Government, 1967), 219.
299. Andrea L. Bonnicksen, Civil Rights and Liberties (Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield Publishing, 1982), 12–14.
300. Akhil Reed Amar, The Bill of Rights (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1998), 259
301. Stephen P. Halbrook, Freedmen, the Fourteenth Amendment, and the Right to Bear Arms, 1866–1876 (Westport, CT: Praeger, 1998), 8.
302. Nicholas Lemann, Redemption: The Last Battle of the Civil War (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2006).
303. Antonin Scalia, “Common-Law Courts in a Civil-Law System,” in A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law, ed. Amy Gutmann (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997), 3, 43.
304. Mathew Nosanchuk, “The Embarrassing Interpretation of the Second Amendment,” Northern Kentucky Law Review 29(2002): 766
305. Akhil Reed Amar, The Bill of Rights and the Fourteenth Amendment, 101 Yale L.J. 1193 (1992)
306. Sandford Levinson, The Embarrassing Second Amendment, 99 Yale L.J. 637 (1989)
307. Don Kates, Handgun Prohibition and the Original Meaning of the Second Amendment, 82 Mich. L. Rev. 204 (1983).
308. Andrew D. Herz, “Gun Crazy: Constitutional False Consciousness and Dereliction of Dialogic Responsibility,” Boston University Law Review 75(January 1995): 138
309. Saul Cornell, “St. GeorgeTucker and the Second Amendment: Original Understandings and Modern Misunderstandings,” William and Mary Law Review 47(February 2006): 1124.
310. Jack N. Rakove, “The Second Amendment: The Highest Stage of Originalism,” Chicago-Kent Law Review 76(2000): 107.
311. Richard A. Posner, “The Future of the Student-Edited Law Review,” Stanford Law Review 47(Summer, 1995): 1135.
312. Harry T. Edwards, “The Growing Disjunction Between Legal Education and the Legal Profession,” Michigan Law Review (October 1992): 34–78
313. Adam Liptak, “When Rendering Decisions, Judges Are Finding Law Reviews Irrelevant,” New York Times, March 19, 2007, A8.
314. Lee Epstein and Gary King, “The Rules of Inference,” The University of Chicago Law Review 69(Winter 2002): 115.
315. Afton Dekanal, “Faculty-Edited Law Reviews: Should the Law Schools Join the Rest of Academe?,” University of Missouri Kansas City Law Review 57(1989): 233–40
316. James Lindgren, “An Author’s Manifesto,” University of Chicago Law Review 61(Spring 1994): 535–38
317. Richard A. Epstein, “Faculty-Edited Law Journals,” Chicago- Kent Law Review 70(1994): 87–94.
318. Kenneth Lasson, “Scholarship Amok: Excesses in the Pursuit of Truth and Tenure,” Harvard Law Review 103(February 1990): 935.
319. James Lindgren, “Reforming the American Law Review,” Stanford Law Review (Summer 1995): 1123–30
320. Carol Sanger, “Editing,” Georgetown Law Review 82(December 1993): 513–27
321. Nathan H. Saunders, “Reflections and Responses of an Inmate,” Duke Law Journal 49(April 2000): 1682–83.
322. Robert C. Berring, “Less Is More. Really,” Green Bag 8(Spring 2005): 231–34.
323. Mary Ann Glendon, Rights Talk (New York: Free Press, 1991)
324. Robert J. Spitzer, The Right to Bear Arms (Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO, 2001), 82–83.