The Federal Line-Item Veto: What Is It and What Will It Do?

Public Administration Review

Volumn 57, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 95-104

  Joyce, Philip G ^a   Reischauer, Robert D ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038709469     PISSN: 00333352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/977057     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Abney, Glenn, and Thomas Lauth (1985). "The Line-Item Veto in the States: An Instrument of Fiscal Control or an Instrument of Partisanship?" Public Administration Review 45 (May/June): 372-377.
2. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (1995). Significant Features of Fiscal Federalism: Budget Processes and Tax Systems. Washington, DC: ACIR.
3. Bendavid, Naftali, and Bruce D. Brown (1996). "Lined Up Against the Line-Item Veto." Legal Times, 15 April.
4. Blum, James L. (1995). "Proposals for a Lockbox." Testimony before a joint U.S. House of Representatives hearing of the Subcommittee on Government Management, Information, and Technology of the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, and the Subcommittee on Legislative and Budget Process of the Committee on Rules, 11 July.
5. Byrd, Robert C. (1996). Congressional Record, 27 March, 2937.
6. Fisher, Louis (1995). Statement before the Committee on Governmental Affairs, United States Senate, February 23, 1995. S. 4. and S. 14 Line-Item Veto, Hearings before the Committee on Governmental Affairs, U.S. Senate, 104th Congress: 104-391.
7. Fisher, Louis, and Neal Devins (1986). "How Successfully Can the States Item Veto be Transferred to the President?" Georgetown Law Journal 75 (1): 159-197.
8. Gosling, James J. (1986). "Wisconsin Item-Veto Lessons. Public Administration Review 46 (July/August): 292-299.
9. Gralmeyer, Rick, and Rob Bennett (1996). "How the Line-Item Veto Affects the Tax Legislative Process." Tax Notes, 29 April.
10. Hahm, Sung Duek, Mark S. Kamlet, and David C. Mowery (1992). "U.S. Defense Spending Under the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Act, 1986-1989." Public Administration Review 52 (January/February): 8-15.
11. Holtz-Eakin, Douglas (1988). "The Line-Item Veto and Public Sector Budgets: Evidence From the States." Journal of Public Economics 36: 269-292.
12. Joyce, Philip (1996). "Congressional Budget Reform: The Unanticipated Implications for Federal Policymaking." Public Administration Review 56 (July/August): 3-12.
13. McCain, John (1996). Congressional Record, 27 March, 2932.
14. McMurtry, Virginia (1995). "House and Senate Votes on Proposals to Give the President Item Veto or Expanded Item Veto Authority." Congressional Research Service Staff Memorandum, 1 February.
15. Moynihan, Daniel P. (1996). Congressional Record, 27 March, S2973.
16. Oak, Dale (1995). "An Overview of Adjustments to the Budget Enforcement Act Discretionary Spending Caps." Public Budgeting and Finance 15(3): 35-53.
17. Reischauer, Robert (1995). Statement before the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, U.S. House of Representatives, 12 January.
18. _ (1996). "Line-Item Veto: Little Beef and Mostly Bun." Washington Post, 10 April, A-19.
19. Schick, Allen (1980). Congress and Money. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
20. _ (1995). The Federal Budget: Politics, Process, Policy. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
21. Taylor, Andrew (1995a). "In the Senate, A GOP Standoff." Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, 11 February, 442.
22. _ (1995b). "Line-Item Veto Compromise Easily Passes Senate." Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, 25 March, 854-856.
23. Thompson, Pat, and Steven R. Boyd (1994). "Use of the Item Veto in Texas, 1940-1990." State and Local Government Review 26(1): 38-45.
24. U.S. House of Representatives (1996). Conference Report: The Line Item Veto Act. House Report 104-491, 21 March.
25. U.S. Senate, Committee on the Budget (1995). Report accompanying S. 4 and S. 14. February.
26. U.S. Senate, Committee on Governmental Affairs (1995). Report accompanying S. 4 and S. 14, February.