On Axiomatization of Inconsistency Indicators for Pairwise Comparisons

Fundamenta Informaticae

Volumn 132, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 485-500

  Koczkodaj, Waldemar W ^a   Szwarc, Ryszard ^b  

^a LAURENTIAN UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WROC AW   (Poland)

Author keywords

inconsistency axiomatization; pairwise comparisons

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

AXIOMATIZATION; COMPUTER INDUSTRY; PAIR-WISE COMPARISON;

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS;

EID: 84924177905     PISSN: 01692968     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/FI-2014-1055     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Banae Costa, C.A., Vansnick, J-C., A critical analysis of the eigenvalue method used to derive priorities in AHP, European Journal of Operational Research, 187(3): 1422-142, 2004.
2. Bozoki, S., Rapcsak, T., On Saaty's and Koczkodaj's inconsistencies of pairwise comparison matrices, J. of Global Optimization, 42(2): 157-175, 2008.
3. Brunelli, M., Canal, L., Fedrizzi, M., Inconsistency indices for pairwise comparison matrices: a numerical study, Annals of Operations Research (to appear), 2013.
4. de Condorcet, N.,"Essay on the Application of Analysis to the Probability of Majority Decisions", Paris: l'Imprimerie Royale, 1785.
5. Fechner, G.T., Elements of Psychophysics, Vol. 1, New York: Holt, Rinehart &Winston, 1965, translation by H.E. Adler of Elemente der Psychophysik, Leipzig: Breitkopf und Härtel, 1860.
6. Fulop, J., Koczkodaj, W.W., Szarek, S.J., A Different Perspective on a Scale for Pairwise Comparisons, Transactions on Computational Collective Intelligence in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6220, 71-84, 2010.
7. Gerard, HB, Shapiro, HN, Determining the Degree of Inconsistency in a Set of Paired Comparisons, Psychometrika, 23(1): 33-46 1958
8. Grzybowski, AZ, Note on a new optimization based approach for estimating priority weights and related consistency index, Expert Systems with Applications, 39(14): 11699-11708, 2012.
9. Herman,M., Koczkodaj,W.W.,Monte Carlo Study of Pairwise Comparisons, Information Processing Letters, 57(1), pp. 25-29, 1996.
10. Hill, RJ, A Note on Inconsistency in Paired Comparison Judgments, American Sociological Review, 18(5): 564-566, 1953.
11. Jensen, R.E., An Alternative Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 28: 317-332, 1984.
12. Kendall, M.G., Smith, B., On the Method of Paired Comparisons, Biometrika, 31(3/4): 324-345, 1940.
13. Koczkodaj, W.W., A New Definition of Consistency of Pairwise Comparisons. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 18(7), 79-84, 1993.
14. Koczkodaj, W.W., Testing the Accuracy Enhancement of Pairwise Comparisons by a Monte Carlo Experiment, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 69(1), pp. 21-32, 1998.
15. Koczkodaj, W.W., Szarek, S.J., On distance-based inconsistency reduction algorithms for pairwise comparisons, Logic J. of the IGPL, 18(6): 859-869, 2010.
16. Kuakowski, K., A heuristic rating estimation algorithm for the pairwise comparisons method, Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer-Verlag, (the online version accessed 2013-09-21)
17. Saaty, T.L., A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structure. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3): 234-281, 1977.
18. Slater, P., Inconsistencies in a Schedule of Paired Comparisons Biometrika, 48(3/4): 303-312, 1961.
19. Temesi, J., Pairwise comparison matrices and the error-free property of the decision maker, Central European Journal of Operations Research, 19(2): 239-249, 2011.
20. Thurstone, L.L., A Law of Comparative Judgments, Psychological Reviews, Vol. 34, 273-286, 1927.
21. Xu, WJ, Dong, YC, Xiao, WL, Is It Reasonable for Saaty's Consistency Test in the Pairwise Comparison Method in Proceedings of 2008 ISECS International Colloquium on Computing, Communication, Control, and Management, 3: 294-298, 2008.
22. Yuen, K.K.F., Pairwise opposite matrix and its cognitive prioritization operators: comparisons with pairwise reciprocal matrix and analytic prioritization operators, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 63(3): 322-338, 2012.