Pairwise opposite matrix and its cognitive prioritization operators: Comparisons with pairwise reciprocal matrix and analytic prioritization operators

Journal of the Operational Research Society

Volumn 63, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 322-338

  Yuen, K K F ^a  

^a ZIRVE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

analytic hierarchy network process (AHP ANP); cognitive decision system; decision analysis; optimization; utility theory

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; GRAPH THEORY; OPTIMIZATION;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY; DECISION SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL PROOF; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING PROBLEMS; PAIR-WISE COMPARISON; PAIRED COMPARISON; RECIPROCAL MATRIX; UTILITY THEORY;

DECISION THEORY;

EID: 84856647879     PISSN: 01605682     EISSN: 14769360     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/jors.2011.33     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Barzilai J (1997). Deriving weights from pairwise comparison matrices. J Opl Res Soc 48: 1226-1232. (Pubitemid 127624631)
2. Belton V and Gear T (1983). On a shortcoming of Saaty's method of analytic hierarchies. Omega 11(3): 228-230.
3. Blankmeyer E (1987). Approaches to consistency adjustment. J Optim Theory Appl 54: 479-488.
4. Bryson N (1995). A goal programming method for generating priority vectors. J Opl Res Soc 46: 641-648.
5. Budescu DV, Zwick R and Rapoport A (1986). A comparison of the eigenvalue method and the geometric mean procedure for ratio scaling. Appl Psychol Measure 10: 69-78.
6. Chandran B, Golden B and Wasil E (2005). Linear programming models for estimating weights in analytic hierarchy process. Comput Opns Res 32: 2235-2254. (Pubitemid 40114313)
7. Chu ATW, Kalaba RE and Spingarn K (1979). A comparison of two methods for determining the weights of belonging to fuzzy sets. J Optim Theory Appl 27: 531-541.
8. Costa CAB and Vansnick J-C (2008). A critical analysis of the eigenvalue method used to derive priorities in AHP. Eur J Opl Res 187: 1422-2428.
9. Crawford G and Williams C (1985). A note on the analysis of subjective judgement matrices. J Math Psychol 29: 387-405.
10. Dyer JS (1990a). Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process. Mngt Sci 36(3): 249-258.
11. Dyer JS (1990b). A clarification of 'Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process'. Mngt Sci 36(3): 274-275.
12. Figueira J, Greco S and Ehrgott M (eds). (2005). Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. Springer:New York.
13. Forman EH and Gass SI (2001). The analytic hierarchy process: An exposition. Opns Res 49(4): 469-486.
14. Forman EH and Selly MA (2001). Decision by Objectives: How to Convince Others That You Are Right. World Scientific: Singapore.
15. Golany B and Kress M (1993). A multicriteria evaluation of methods for obtaining weights from ratio-scale matrices. Eur J Opl Res 69: 210-220. (Pubitemid 23705141)
16. International Society on Multiple Criteria Decision Making (2009). Multiple criteria decision aid bibliography. http://www lamsade.dauphine.fr/ mcda/biblio.
17. Lin C-C (2006). An enhanced goal programming method for generating priority vectors. J Opl Res Soc 57: 1491-1496. (Pubitemid 44771086)
18. Mikhailov L (2000). A fuzzy programming method for deriving priorities in the analytic hierarchy. J Opl Res Soc 51(3): 341-349. (Pubitemid 30566162)
19. Murphy CK (1993). Limits on the analytic hierarchy process from its consistency index. Eur J Opl Res 65: 138-139.
20. Perez J (1995). Some comments on Saaty's AHP. Management Science 41: 1091-1095.
21. Saaty TL (1980). Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority, Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill: New York.
22. Saaty TL (1994). Fundamentals of Decision Making. RSW Publications: Pittsburgh.
23. Saaty TL (2000). Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. RWS Publications: Pittsburgh.
24. Saaty TL (2001). Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decisions in Complex World. 3rd edn, RWS Publications: Pittsburgh, (1st edn. in 1982).
25. Saaty TL (2005). Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process: Decision Making with Benefits Opportunities, Costs, and Risks. RWS Publications: Pittsburgh.
26. Saaty TL (2008). Relative measurement and its generalization in decision making: Why pairwise comparisons are central in mathematics for the measurement of intangible factors- The analytic hierarchy/network process. RACSAM (Rev Roy Spanish Acad Sci, Ser A, Math) 102(2): 251-318.
27. Saaty TL and Vargas LG (1984). Comparison of eigenvalue, logarithmic least squares and least squares methods in estimating ratios. Math Modelling 5: 309-324.
28. Srdjevic B (2005). Combining different prioritization methods in the analytic hierarchy process synthesis. Comput Opns Res 32: 1897-1919.
29. Thurstone LL (1927). A law of comparative judgment. Psychol Rev 34: 273-286.
30. Vaidya OS and Kumar S (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. Eur J Opl Res 169(1): 1-29. (Pubitemid 41336610)
31. Wang YM and Elhag TMS (2006). An Approach to avoiding rank reversal in AHP. Decis Supp Syst 42: 1474-1480. (Pubitemid 44648436)
32. Whitaker R (2007). Criticisms of the analytic hierarchy process: Why they often make no sense. Math Comput Modelling 46: 948-961. (Pubitemid 47302254)
33. Yuen KKF (2009). Cognitive network process with fuzzy soft computing technique for collective decision aiding. PhD thesis, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
34. Yuen KKF (2010). Analytic hierarchy prioritization process in the AHP application development: A prioritization operator selection approach. Appl Soft Comput 10(4): 975-989.
35. Zahedi F (1986). A simulation study of estimation methods in the analytic hierarchy process. Socio Econ Plan Sci 20: 347-354.