On distance-based inconsistency reduction algorithms for pairwise comparisons

Logic Journal of the IGPL

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 859-869

  Koczkodaj, W W ^a   Szarek, S J ^b,c  

^a LAURENTIAN UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

Algorithm; Convergence; Inconsistency; Pairwise comparisons

Indexed keywords

COMPARISON METHODS; CONVERGENCE; DISTANCE-BASED; GIVEN CRITERION; INCONSISTENCY; MATRIX; MEASUREMENT ASSESSMENT; PAIR-WISE COMPARISON; REDUCTION ALGORITHMS; SUBJECTIVE ASSESSMENTS;

FORMAL LOGIC;

EID: 77958513595     PISSN: 13670751     EISSN: 13689894     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jigpal/jzp062     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bana e Costa, C. A., Vansnick, J-C., A critical analysis of the eigenvalue method used to derive priorities in AHP, European J. Oper. Res., 187(3), pp. 1422-1428, 2008.
2. Barzilai, J., Deriving Weights from Pairwise Comparison Matrices. J. Oper. Res. Soc., 48(12), pp. 1226-1232, 1997.
3. Bauschke, H. H., Borwein, J. M., On Projection Algorithms for Solving Convex Feasibility Problems, SIAM Review, 38(3), pp. 367-426, 1996.
4. Bozóki, S., Rapcsák, T., On Saaty's and Koczkodaj's inconsistencies of pairwise comparison matrices, J. Global Optim., 42, pp. 157-175, 2008.
5. Flåm, S. D., Zowe, J., Relaxed outer projections, weighted averages and convex feasibility, BIT 30, pp. 289-300, 1990.
6. González-Pachón, J., Romero, C., A method for dealing with inconsistencies in pairwise comparisons. European J. Oper. Res. 158(2), pp. 351-361, 2004.
7. Haller, R., Szwarc, R., Kaczmarz algorithm in Hilbert space, Studia Math., 169(2), pp. 123-132, 2005.
8. Herman, M. W., Koczkodaj, W. W., Monte Carlo study of pairwise comparison, IPL. 57(1), pp. 25-29, 1996.
9. Holsztynski, W., Koczkodaj, W. W., Convergence of Inconsistency Algorithms for the Pairwise Comparisons, IPL. 59(4), pp. 197-202, 1996.
10. Kaczmarz, S., Angenäherte Auflösung von Systemen linearer Gleichungen. Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. Lett. A35, pp. 355-357, 1937.
11. English translation: Approximate solution of systems of linear equations, Internat. J. Control, 57, pp. 1269-1271, 1993.
12. Koczkodaj, W. W., A new definition of consistency of pairwise comparisons, Math. Comput. Modelling, (18)7, pp, 79-84, 1993.
13. Koczkodaj, W. W., Orlowski M., Computing a Consistent Approximation to a Generalized Pairwise Comparisons Matrix, Comput. Math. Appl., 37(3), pp.79-85, 1999.
14. Koczkodaj, W. W., Herman, W. M., Orlowski, M., Using Consistency-driven Pairwise Comparisons in Knowledge-based Systems, CIKM, pp. 91-96, 1997.
15. Kuo, M-S., Liang, G-S., Huang, W-C., Extensions of the multicriteria analysis with pairwise comparison under a fuzzy environment. Internat. J. Approx. Reason., 43(3), pp. 268-285, 2006.
16. Kwiesielewicz, M., van Uden, E., Inconsistent and contradictory judgements in pairwise comparison method in the AHP, Comput. Oper. Res. 31(5), pp. 713-719 2004.
17. Limayem, F., Yannou, B., Selective assessment of judgmental inconsistencies in pairwise comparisons for group decision rating. Comput. Oper. Res. 34(6), pp. 1824-1841, 2007.
18. Saaty, L. T., A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures, J. Math. Psych. 15(3), pp. 234-281, 1977.
19. Saaty, L. T., Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary, European J. Oper. Res., 145, n1, pp. 85-91, 2003.