A different perspective on a scale for pairwise comparisons

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6220 LNCS, Issue , 2010, Pages 71-84

  Fulop J ^a   Koczkodaj, W W ^b   Szarek, S J ^c,d  

^a INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

^b LAURENTIAN UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

collective intelligence; inaccuracy; inconsistency; Pairwise comparisons; scale; subjective assessment

Indexed keywords

COLLECTIVE INTELLIGENCES; INACCURACY; INCONSISTENCY; PAIR-WISE COMPARISON; SCALE; SUBJECTIVE ASSESSMENTS;

SEMANTIC WEB;

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

EID: 77958479690     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-15034-0_5     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. Anholcer, M., Babiy, V., Bozóki, S., Koczkodaj, W. W.: A simplified implementation of the least squares solution for pairwise comparisons matrices. Central European Journal of Operations Research (to appear)
2. Basile, L., D'Apuzzo, L., Marcarelli, G., Squillante, M.: Generalized Consistency and Representation of Preferences by Pairwise Comparisons. In: Panamerican Conference of Applied Mathematics, Huatulco, Mexico (2006)
3. Blankmeyer, E.: Approaches to consistency adjustments. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 54, 479-488 (1987)
4. Bozóki, S.: A method for solving LSM problems of small size in the AHP. Central European Journal of Operations Research 11, 17-33 (2003)
5. Bozóki, S.: Solution of the least squares method problem of pairwise comparisons matrices. Central European Journal of Operations Research 16, 345-358 (2008)
6. Bozóki, S., Rapcsák, T.: On Saaty's and Koczkodaj's inconsistencies of pairwise comparison matrices. Journal of Global Optimization 42(2), 157-175 (2007)
7. Brunelli, M., Fedrizzi, M.: Fair Consistency Evaluation in Fuzzy Preference Relations and in AHP. In: Apolloni, B., Howlett, R. J., Jain, L. (eds.) KES 2007, Part II. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4693, pp. 612-618. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
8. Bullions, P.: The Principles of English Grammar, 16th edn. Pratt, Woodford, & Co. (1846)
9. Cavallo, B., D'Apuzzo, L.: A general unified framework for pairwise comparison matrices in multicriterial methods. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 24(4), 377-398 (2009)
10. Chu, A. T. W., Kalaba, R. E., Spingarn, K.: A comparison of two methods for determining the weight belonging to fuzzy sets. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 4, 531-538 (1979)
11. Choo, E. U., Wedley, W. C.: A common framework for deriving preference values from pairwise comparison matrices. Computers and Operations Research 31, 893-908 (2004)
12. Condorcet, M.: Essai sur l'Application de l'Analyse à la Probabilité des Décisions Rendues à la Pluralité des Voix, Paris (1785)
13. Crawford, G., Williams, C.: A note on the analysis of subjective judgment matrices. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 29, 387-405 (1985)
14. D'Apuzzo, L., Marcarelli, G., Squillante, M.: Generalized consistency and intensity vectors for comparison matrices. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 22(12), 1287-1300 (2007)
15. Debreu, G.: Topological methods in cardinal utility theory. In: Arrow, K. J., Karlin, S., Suppes, P. (eds.) Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences, pp. 16-26. Stanford University Press, Stanford (1960)
16. De Jong, P.: A statistical approach to Saaty's scaling method for priorities. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 28, 467-478 (1984)
17. Farkas, A., Lancaster, P., Rózsa, P.: Consistency adjustment for pairwise comparison matrices. Numer. Linear Algebra Applications 10, 689-700 (2003)
18. Fedrizzi, M., Fedrizzi, M., Marques Pereira, R. A.: On the issue of consistency in dynamical consensual aggregation. In: Bouchon Meunier, B., Gutierrez Rios, J., Magdalena, L., Yager, R. R. (eds.) Technologies for Constructing Intelligent Systems. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol. 1, 89, pp. 129-137. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
19. Fedrizzi, M., Giove, S.: Incomplete pairwise comparison and consistency optimization. European Journal of Operational Research 183(1), 303-313 (2007)
20. Fülöp, J.: A method for approximating pairwise comparison matrices by consistent matrices. Journal of Global Optimization 42, 423-442 (2008)
21. Golany, B., Kress, M.: A multicriteria evaluation method for obtaining weights from ratio-scale matrices. European Journal of Operational Research 69, 210-220 (1993)
22. Holsztynski, W., Koczkodaj, W. W.: Convergence of inconsistency algorithms for the pairwise comparisons. Information Processing Letters 59(4), 197-202 (1996)
23. Hubbard, D.: How to measure anything. Wiley, Chichester (2007)
24. Jensen, R. E.: Comparison of eigenvector, least squares, chi squares and logarithmic least squares methods of scaling a reciprocal matrix, working paper 153, Trinity, University (1983)
25. Jensen, R. E.: Alternative scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 28, 317-332 (1984)
26. Koczkodaj, W. W.: A new definition of consistency of pairwise comparisons. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 18(7), 79-84 (1993)
27. Koczkodaj, W. W., Szarek, S. J.: On distance-based inconsistency reduction algorithms for pairwise comparisons. Logic Journal of IGPL (2010) (advance access published January 17, 2010)
28. Luce, R. D., Edwards, W.: The derivation of subjective scales from just noticeable differences. Psychological Review 65(4), 222-237 (1958)
29. Luce, R. D., Tukey, J. W.: Simultaneous conjoint measurement: a new scale type of fundamental measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1, 1-27 (1964)
30. Llull, R.: Artifitium electionis personarum (before 1283)
31. Mikhailov, L.: A fuzzy programming method for deriving priorities in the analytic hiarerchy process. Journal of the Operational Research Society 51, 341-349 (2000)
32. Nagel, E.: Measurement. Erkenntnis 2(1), 313-335 (1931)
33. Nguyen, N. T.: Advanced method in Inconsistency Knowledge Management, p. 356. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
34. Saaty, T. L.: A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 15, 234-281 (1977)
35. Saaty, T. L.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980)
36. Stevens, S. S.: On the theory of scales of measurement. Science 103, 677-680 (1946)
37. Thurstone, L. L.: A law of comparative judgement. Psychological Review 34, 278-286 (1927)