In search of tangible magic

Proceedings of the 22nd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Culture, Creativity, Interaction, BCS HCI 2008

Volumn 2, Issue , 2008, Pages 97-100

  Xu, Diana ^a   Read, Janet C ^a   Sheehan, Robert ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL LANCASHIRE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Children; Drawing; Evaluation; Reporting formats

Indexed keywords

DRAWING (GRAPHICS);

CHILDREN; CHILDREN'S DRAWING; CODING METHODS; EVALUATION; REPORTING FORMATS; TANGIBLE INTERACTION; TANGIBLE INTERFACES; USER EXPERIENCE;

INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS;

EID: 84923806483     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.14236/ewic/hci2008.42     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Markopoulos, P., et al., Evaluating Interactive Products for and with Children. 2008, San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
2. Markopoulos, P. and M. Bekker. Usability testing with children subjects: comparing Usability Testing methods. in Interaction Design and Children. 2002. Eindhoven.
3. Höysniemi, J., P. Hämäläinen, and L. Turkki, Using Peer Tutoring in Evaluating the Usability of a Physically Interactive Computer Game. Interacting with Computers, 2003. 15(2): p. 203-225.
4. Read, J.C., Validating the Fun Toolkit: an instrument for measuring children's opinions of technology. Cognition Technology and Work, 2007.
5. Dindler, C., et al., Mission from Mars: a method for exploring user requirements for children in a narrative space in Proceedings of the 2005 conference on Interaction design and children 2005 ACM: Boulder, Colorado p. 40-47
6. Piaget, J., Science of Education and the psychology of the child. 1970, New York: Orion Press.
7. Sheehan, R. Children's perception of computer programming as an aid to designing programming environments. in Interaction Design and Children Conference: IDC 2003. 2003. Preston, England: ACM Press.
8. Denham, P., Nine to fourteen-year-old children's conception of computers using drawings. Behaviour and Information Technology, 1993. 12(6): p. 346-358.
9. D. Xu, J. C. Read, E. Mazzone, S. MacFarlane, and M. Brown, "Evaluation of Tangible User Interfaces (TUIs) for and with Children-Methods and Challenges, " in Human-Computer Interaction. Interaction Platforms and Techniques, vol. 4551/2007, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 2007, pp. 1008-1017.
10. MicrosoftCorporation, A Brave New World of Computing, Microsoft's Next-Gen PC Design Competition winners create innovative designs that take traditional PCs outside the box. 2007.
11. VitraDesignMuseum, Kid Size: The Material World of Childhood, ed. A.v. Vegesack, L. Bullivant, and J. Oldiges. 1998, Milan: Skira Editore. 320.
12. O'Malley, C. and D.S. Fraser, Literature Review in Learning with Tangible Technologies. 2004, NESTA Futurelab.
13. Price, S. and Y. Rogers, Let's get physical: The learning benefits of interacting in digitally augmented physical spaces. Computers and Education, 2004. 43(1-2): p. 137-151.
14. Marshall, P., Y. Rogers, and E. Hornecker. Are Tangible Interfaces Really Any Better Than Other Kinds of Interfaces? in CHI'07 workshop on Tangible User Interfaces in Context & Theory. 2007. San Jose, CA, USA ACM Press.
15. Marshall, P., Do tangible interfaces enhance learning?, in The 1st international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction 2007, ACM Press: Baton Rouge, Louisiana
16. MacPhail, A. and G. Kinchin, The use of drawings as an evluative tool: students' experiences of Sport Education. Physical Education and Social Scince, 2004. 9(1): p. 88-108.