Justice for earthlings: Essays in political philosophy

Justice for Earthlings: Essays in Political Philosophy

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1-254

  Miller, David ^a  

^a NUFFIELD COLLEGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84923629306     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139236898     Document Type: Book

References (287)

1. Ronald Dworkin Justice for Hedgehogs (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011)
2. ‘Distributing Responsibilities’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 9 (2001), 453-71.
3. ‘The Responsibility to Protect Human Rights’ in L. Meyer (ed.), Legitimacy, Justice and Public International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2009).
4. J. Rawls, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971), pp. 158-9.
5. G. A. Cohen, ‘Facts and Principles’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 31 (2003), p. 241.
6. G. A. Cohen, ‘Facts and Principles’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 31 (2003), p. 214.
7. G. A. Cohen, ‘Facts and Principles’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 31 (2003), p. 216.
8. G. A. Cohen, ‘Facts and Principles’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 31 (2003), p. 218.
9. D. D. Hume, A Treatise of Human Nature, (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978), p. 495.
10. D. D. Hume, A Treatise of Human Nature, L. A. Selby-Bigge (ed.), rev. P. H. Nidditch (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978).
11. D. Hume, An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals in Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals, L. A. Selby-Bigge (ed.), rev. P. H. Nidditch (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975), p. 194.
12. D. Hume, An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals in Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals, L. A. Selby-Bigge (ed.), rev. P. H. Nidditch (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975), p. 184.
13. M. Stears, ‘The Vocation of Political Theory: Principles, Empirical Inquiry and the Politics of Opportunity’, European Journal of Political Theory, 4 (2005), 325-50.
14. Joshua Cohen ‘Taking People as They Are?’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 30 (2002), 363-86.
15. J. Rawls, Justice as Fairness: A Restatement (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001), p. 31.
16. J. Rawls, ‘The Independence of Moral Theory’ in J. Rawls, Collected Papers, ed. S. Freeman (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), p. 288.
17. T. Scanlon, ‘Rawls on Justification’ in S. Freeman (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Rawls (Cambridge University Press, 2003).
18. J. Rawls, The Law of Peoples (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), section 1.
19. J. Rawls, Justice as Fairness: A Restatement (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001), sections 1 and 4.
20. J. Rawls, The Law of Peoples (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), p. 11.
21. J. Rawls, The Law of Peoples (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), p. 12.
22. J. Rawls, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971), sect. 46.
23. J. Rawls, Justice as Fairness: A Restatement (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001), sect. 50.
24. J. Rawls, Justice as Fairness: A Restatement (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001), p. 165.
25. J. Rawls, The Law of Peoples (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), p. 128.
26. T. Nagel, ‘What Makes a Political Theory Utopian?’, Social Research, 56 (1989), 903-20.
27. Principles of Social Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), ch. 1.
28. A. Swift and S. White, ‘Political Theory, Social Science and Real Politics’ in D. Leopold and M. Stears (eds.), Political Theory: Methods and Approaches (Oxford University Press, 2008).
29. D. Miller, Principles of Social Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), ch. 12.
30. A. MacIntyre, After Virtue (London: Duckworth, 1981), p. 235.
31. J. Rawls, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971), section 9.
32. N. Daniels, ‘Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance in Ethics’, Journal of Philosophy, 76 (1979), 256-82.
33. Jerry Cohen, ‘Rescuing Justice from Constructivism’, and at greater length in his book Rescuing Justice and Equality (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008).
34. J. J. Rawls, Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993) p. 43.
35. J. Rawls, The Law of Peoples (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), pp. 113-20.
36. D. Miller, Principles of Social Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), ch. 3.
37. R. Dworkin, ‘Equality of Resources’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 10 (1981), 283-345.
38. M. M. Walzer, Spheres of Justice (Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1983) (Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1983).
39. D. Miller, Principles of Social Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), ch. 2.
40. M. Walzer, Spheres of Justice (Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1983), ch. 2.
41. B. Barry, ‘International Society from a Cosmopolitan Perspective’ in D.R. Mapel and T. Nardin (eds.), International Society: Diverse Ethical Perspectives (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998).
42. B. Barry, Justice as Impartiality (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995).
43. T.M. Scanlon, What We Owe to Each Other (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998), p. 342.
44. R. Nozick, Anarchy, State, and Utopia (Oxford: Blackwell, 1974).
45. R. Nozick, Philosophical Explanations (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981), p. 503.
46. Hillel Steiner, ‘Justice is a moral rule assigning equal freedom to each of us through a structure of rights. How we use this freedom, whether for good or ill, is up to us so far as justice is concerned but not so far as other moral rules and values are concerned.’ An Essay on Rights (Oxford: Blackwell, 1994), p. 229.
47. T.D. Campbell, ‘Humanity Before Justice’, British Journal of Political Science, 4 (1974), 401-16.
48. Jerry Cohen, ‘The Future of a Disillusion’ in G.A. Cohen, Self-Ownership, Freedom and Equality (Cambridge University Press, 1995).
49. D. Miller, Principles of Social Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), ch. 4.
50. G.A. Cohen, ‘Where the Action is: On the Site of Distributive Justice’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 26 (1997), 3-30.
51. A. Williams, ‘Incentives, Inequality, and Publicity’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 27 (1998), 225-47.
52. J. Rawls, Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993), p. 261.
53. L. Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations (Oxford: Blackwell, 1963), section 66.
54. D. Miller, ‘Complex Equality’ in D. Miller and M. Walzer (eds.), Pluralism, Justice, and Equality (Oxford University Press, 1995).
55. D. Miller, Principles of Social Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), ch. 7.
56. D. Miller, ‘National Self-Determination and Global Justice’ in Citizenship and National Identity (Cambridge: Polity, 2000), p. 170.
57. J. Rawls, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971), p. 90.
58. J. J. Rawls, Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993), p. 12.
59. J. Rawls, The Law of Peoples (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), especially section 16.
60. J. Rawls, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971), p. 529.
61. C. Kukathas, ‘Social Justice and the Nation-State: A Modest Attack’ in D. Bell and A. De-Shalit (eds.), Forms of Justice (Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 2002).
62. L. Bobo, ‘Race, Interests, and Beliefs About Affirmative Action’, American Behavioural Scientist, 41 (1998), 985-1003.
63. D. Miller, Principles of Social Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), ch. 4.
64. ‘Popular Conceptions of Social Justice: A Comparative Approach’ in S. Svallfors (ed.), In the Eye of the Beholder (Umea: Bank of Sweden, 1995).
65. J.R. Kluegel, D.S. Mason and B. Wegener (eds.), Social Justice and Political Change: Public Opinion in Capitalist and Post-Communist States (New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 1995)
66. G. Marshall, A Swift, D. Routh and C. Burgoyne, ‘What Is and What Ought to Be: Popular Beliefs About Distributive Justice in Thirteen Countries’, European Sociological Review, 15 (1999), 349-67.
67. O. Listhaug and T. Aalberg, ‘Comparative Public Opinion on Distributive Justice: A Study of Equality Ideals and Attitudes toward Current Policies’, International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 40 (1999), 117-40.
68. G. Hofstede, Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values (London: Sage, 1980), ch. 5.
69. Y. Kashima, M. Siegal, K. Tanaka and H. Isaka, ‘Universalism in Lay Conceptions of Distributive Justice: a Cross-Cultural Examination’, International Journal of Psychology, 23 (1988), 51-64.
70. K. Leung and M. Bond, ‘The Impact of Cultural Collectivism on Reward Allocation’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47 (1984), 793-804.
71. K. Leung and M. Bond, ‘The Impact of Cultural Collectivism on Reward Allocation’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47 (1984), 802.
72. C.H. Hui, H.C. Triandis and C. Yee, ‘Cultural Differences in Reward Allocation: Is Collectivism the Explanation?’, British Journal of Social Psychology, 30 (1991), 145-57.
73. K. Leung, ‘Negotiation and Reward Allocation Across Cultures’ in P. C. Earley and M. Erez (eds.), New Perspectives on International Industrial/Organizational Psychology (San Francisco: New Lexington Press, 1997).
74. V. Murphy-Berman, J. Berman, P. Singh, A. Pachauri and P. Kumar, ‘Factors Affecting Allocation to Needy and Meritorious Recipients: a Cross-Cultural Comparison’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46 (1984), 1267-72.
75. M. Siegal and D. Shwalb, ‘Economic Justice in Adolescence: An Australian-Japanese Comparison’, Journal of Economic Psychology, 6 (1985), 313-26.
76. J. Gray, ‘Classical Liberalism, Positional Goods, and the Politicization of Poverty’ in A. Ellis and K. Kumar (eds.), Dilemmas of Liberal Democracies: Studies in Fred Hirsch’s ‘Social Limits to Growth’ (London: Tavistock, 1983), pp. 181-2.
77. M. Walzer, Spheres of Justice: A Defence of Pluralism and Equality (Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1983), ch. 3.
78. K Leung and W.G. Stephan, ‘Social Justice from a Cultural Perspective’ in D. Matsumoto (ed.), The Handbook of Culture and Psychology (Oxford University Press, 2001), p. 382.
79. J. Elster, Local Justice: How Institutions Allocate Scarce Goods and Necessary Burdens (Cambridge University Press, 1992), p. 75.
80. J.L. Sullivan, J. Piereson and G.E. Marcus, Political Tolerance and American Democracy (University of Chicago Press, 1982).
81. P.M. Sniderman, P.E. Tetlock, J.M. Glaser, D.P. Green and M. Hout, ‘Principled Tolerance and the American Mass Public’, British Journal of Political Science, 19 (1989), 25-45.
82. J.A. Piliavin, J.F. Dovidio, S.L. Gaertner and R.D. Clark, Emergency Intervention (New York: Academic Press, 1981), pp. 144-59.
83. J.F. Dovidio, ‘Helping Behavior and Altruism’ in L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 17 (London: Academic Press, 1984).
84. A. Alesina and E. La Ferrara, ‘Who Trusts Others?’, Journal of Public Economics, 85 (2002), 207-34, p. 222.
85. M.J.Marschall and D. Stolle, ‘Race in the City: Neighbourhood Context and the Development of Generalized Trust’, Political Behavior, 26 (2004), 125-53.
86. S.N. Soroka, R. Johnston and K. Banting, ‘Ethnicity, Trust and the Welfare State’ in P. Van Parijs (ed.), Cultural Diversity versus Economic Solidarity (Brussels: De Boeck, 2004).
87. A. Alesina, E.Glaeser and B. Sacerdote, ‘Why Doesn’t the United States Have a European-Style Welfare State?’, in Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2001 (2), 187-277.
88. S.N. Soroka, R. Johnston and K. Banting, ‘Ethnicity, Trust and the Welfare State’ in P. Van Parijs (ed.), Cultural Diversity versus Economic Solidarity (Brussels: De Boeck, 2004).
89. S.N. Soroka, R. Johnston and K. Banting, ‘Ethnicity, Trust and the Welfare State’ in P. Van Parijs (ed.), Cultural Diversity versus Economic Solidarity (Brussels: De Boeck, 2004), p. 50.
90. S.N. Soroka, R. Johnston and K. Banting, ‘Ethnicity, Trust and the Welfare State’ in P. Van Parijs (ed.), Cultural Diversity versus Economic Solidarity (Brussels: De Boeck, 2004), p. 51.
91. R. Putnam, Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community (New York: Simon and Schuster, 2000), ch. 22.
92. A. Alesina, R. Baqir and W. Easterly, ‘Public Goods and Ethnic Divisions’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114 (1999), 1243-84.
93. D. Miller, On Nationality (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995), chs. 4-5.
94. D. J. Habermas, ‘Citizenship and National Identity’ in J. Habermas, Between Facts and Norms (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000), ch. 4.
95. J. Rawls, The Law of Peoples (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), Part I, section 1.
96. B. Barry, Culture and Equality: An Egalitarian Critique of Multiculturalism (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001).
97. D. Miller, On Nationality (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995).
98. D. J. Habermas, ‘Citizenship and National Identity’ in J. Habermas, Between Facts and Norms (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000), ch. 4.
99. J. Habermas, ‘Citizenship and National Identity’ in J. Habermas, Between Facts and Norms (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996).
100. M. Canovan, ‘Patriotism is Not Enough’, British Journal of Political Science, 30 (2000), 413-32.
101. B. Barry, Culture and Equality: An Egalitarian Critique of Multiculturalism (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001), p. 37.
102. B. Parekh, Rethinking Multiculturalism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000), p. 241.
103. B. Barry, Culture and Equality: An Egalitarian Critique of Multiculturalism (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001), p. 37.
104. D. Miller, ‘Holding Nations Responsible’, Ethics, 114 (2003-4), 240-68.
105. D. Miller, National Responsibility and Global Justice (Oxford University Press, 2007), ch. 5.
106. B. Barry, Culture and Equality: An Egalitarian Critique of Multiculturalism (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001), pp. 36-7.
107. P. Jones, ‘Bearing the Consequences of Belief’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 2 (1994), 24-43.
108. B. Barry, Culture and Equality: An Egalitarian Critique of Multiculturalism (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001), p. 40.
109. B. Barry, Culture and Equality: An Egalitarian Critique of Multiculturalism (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001), pp. 301-5.
110. I.M. Young, Justice and the Politics of Difference (Princeton University Press, 1990), ch. 6.
111. J. Habermas, ‘Citizenship and National Identity’ in J. Habermas, Between Facts and Norms (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996), ch. 9.
112. P. Jones, ‘Political Theory and Cultural Diversity’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 1 (1998), 28-62.
113. S. Okin, Justice, Gender, and the Family (New York: Basic Books, 1989), p. 16.
114. S. Okin, Justice, Gender, and the Family (New York: Basic Books, 1989), ch. 5.
115. S. S. Okin, ‘Political Liberalism, Justice, and Gender’, Ethics, 105 (1994), 23-43.
116. ‘Justice and Gender: An Unfinished Debate’, Fordham Law Review, 72 (2003-4), 1537-67.
117. ‘“Forty Acres and a Mule” for Women: Rawls and Feminism’, Politics, Philosophy and Economics, 4 (2005), 233-48.
118. ‘The Idea of Public Reason Revisited’ in J. Rawls, Collected Papers, ed. S. Freeman (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999).
119. S. Okin, Justice, Gender, and the Family (New York: Basic Books, 1989), p. 180.
120. S. Okin, Justice, Gender, and the Family (New York: Basic Books, 1989), p. 183.
121. S. Okin, Justice, Gender, and the Family (New York: Basic Books, 1989), ch. 7.
122. J. Fishkin, Justice, Equal Opportunity, and the Family (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983), p. 6.
123. Andrew Mason ‘Equality of Opportunity, Old and New’, Ethics, 111 (2001), 760-81.
124. John Roemer Equality of Opportunity (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998), section 1.
125. J. Rawls, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971), p. 302.
126. J. Rawls, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971), p. 73.
127. J. Rawls, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971), section 43.
128. J. Rawls, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971), p. 74.
129. J. Rawls, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971), p. 301.
130. J. Rawls, Justice as Fairness (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001).
131. J. Rawls, ‘The Idea of Public Reason Revisited’ in J. Rawls, Collected Papers, ed. S. Freeman (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), section 5.
132. J. Rawls, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971), pp. 511-12.
133. R. Arneson, ‘Against Equality of Opportunity’, Philosophical Studies, 93 (1999), 77-112.
134. S. Okin, Justice, Gender, and the Family (New York: Basic Books, 1989), p. 103.
135. S. Okin, Justice, Gender, and the Family (New York: Basic Books, 1989), p. 103.
136. S. Okin, Justice, Gender, and the Family (New York: Basic Books, 1989), p. 107.
137. J. Cohen, ‘Okin on Justice, Gender, and the Family’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 22 (1992), 263-86.
138. S. Bowles and H. Gintis, ‘The Inheritance of Inequality’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16 (2002), pp. 21-2.
139. S. Bowles and H. Gintis, ‘The Inheritance of Inequality’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16 (2002), p. 7.
140. G. Duncan et al., ‘The Apple Does Not Fall Far from the Tree’ in S. Bowles, H. Gintis and M. Osborne Groves (eds.), Unequal Chances: Family Background and Economic Success (Princeton University Press, 2005).
141. B. Hart and T.R. Risley, Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experience of Young American Children (Baltimore: Brookes, 1995), p. 179.
142. B. Hart and T.R. Risley, Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experience of Young American Children (Baltimore: Brookes, 1995), p. 178.
143. J.R. Harris, The Nurture Assumption: Why Children Turn out the Way They Do (London: Bloomsbury, 1998), p. 353.
144. J.R. Harris, The Nurture Assumption: Why Children Turn out the Way They Do (London: Bloomsbury, 1998), pp. 188-92, 253-7.
145. S.M. Okin and R. Reich, ‘Families and Schools as Compensating Agents in Moral Development for a Multicultural Society’, Journal of Moral Education, 28 (1999), p. 289.
146. S. Okin, ‘Political Liberalism, Justice, and Gender’, Ethics, 105 (1994), p. 38.
147. D.C. Rowe, The Limits of Family Influence: Genes, Experience and Behaviour (New York: Guilford, 1994), ch. 6.
148. J.R. Harris, The Nurture Assumption: Why Children Turn out the Way They Do (London: Bloomsbury, 1998), ch. 10.
149. B. Risman, Gender Vertigo: American families in Transition (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998), ch. 6.
150. S. Okin, ‘Political Liberalism, Justice, and Gender’, Ethics, 105 (1994), pp. 35-6.
151. M.H. Benin and D.A. Edwards, ‘Adolescents’ Chores: The Difference between Dual-and Single-Earner Families’, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 12 (1990), 361-73.
152. V. Munoz-Dardé, ‘Is the family to be abolished then?’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 99 (1998-9), 37-56.
153. Adam Swift ‘Justice, Luck, and the Family: The Intergenerational Transmission of Economic Advantage from a Normative Perspective’, in S. Bowles, H. Gintis and M. Osborne Groves (eds.), Unequal Chances: Family Background and Economic Success (Princeton University Press, 2005).
154. B. Williams, ‘The Idea of Equality’ in P. Laslett and W.G. Runciman (eds.), Philosophy, Politics and Society, Series II (Oxford: Blackwell, 1964).
155. B. Barry, ‘Equal Opportunity and Moral Arbitrariness’ in N.E. Bowie (ed.), Equal Opportunity (Boulder: Westview Press, 1988).
156. S. Okin, Justice, Gender, and the Family (New York: Basic Books, 1989), ch. 7.
157. J. Fishkin, Justice, Equal Opportunity, and the Family (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983), p. 4.
158. D. Miller, Principles of Social Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), ch. 9.
159. ‘Complex Equality’ in D. Miller and M. Walzer (eds.), Pluralism, Justice, and Equality (Oxford University Press, 1995).
160. M. M. Walzer, Spheres of Justice (Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1983).
161. M. Walzer, Spheres of Justice: A Defence of Pluralism and Equality (Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1983), p. 31.
162. M. Walzer, Spheres of Justice (Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1983), p. 31.
163. M. Walzer, Thick and Thin: Moral Argument at Home and Abroad (University of Notre Dame Press, 1994), chs. 1-2.
164. D. Miller, National Responsibility and Global Justice (Oxford University Press, 2007), ch. 7, section 3.
165. S. Scheffler, ‘Conceptions of Cosmopolitanism’ in Scheffler, Boundaries and Allegiances: Problems of Justice and Responsibility in Liberal Thought (Oxford University Press, 2001).
166. P. van Parijs, ‘Global Distributive Justice’ in R. Goodin, P. Pettit and T. Pogge (eds.), A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy, 2nd edn (Oxford: Blackwell, 2007).
167. J. Rawls, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971), p. 4.
168. B. Barry, ‘Humanity and Justice in Global Perspective’, section 2 in Barry, Democracy, Power and Justice: Essays in Political Theory (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989).
169. Aristotle, The Politics, trans. T.A. Sinclair (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1962), p. 128.
170. J. Rawls, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971), pp. 88-9.
171. J. Rawls, Justice as Fairness: A Restatement (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001), pp. 51-2.
172. B. Barry, Theories of Justice (Harvester-Wheatsheaf: Hemel Hempstead, 1989), ch. 6.
173. J. Rawls, Justice as Fairness: A Restatement (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001), pp. 171-6.
174. R. Dworkin, Sovereign Virtue (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000).
175. M. Blake, ‘Distributive Justice, State Coercion, and Autonomy’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 30 (2001), 257-96.
176. T. T. Nagel, ‘The Problem of Global Justice’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 33 (2005), 113-47.
177. J. Cohen and C. Sabel, ‘Extra Rempublicam Nulla Justitia?’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 34 (2006), 147-75.
178. D. Miller, ‘Against Global Egalitarianism’, Journal of Ethics, 9 (2005), 55-79.
179. A. MacIntyre, After Virtue (London: Duckworth, 1981).
180. C. Kukathas, ‘The Mirage of Global Justice’, Social Philosophy and Policy, 23 (2006), 1-28.
181. D. Hume, A Treatise of Human Nature, L. A. Selby-Bigge (ed.), rev. P. H. Nidditch (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978), p. 495.
182. M. Sandel, Liberalism and the Limits of Justice (Cambridge University Press, 1982), p. 183.
183. J. Rawls, ‘Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory’ in J. Rawls, Collected Papers, ed. S. Freeman (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), p. 323.
184. D. Miller, Principles of Social Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), esp. ch. 2.
185. T. Nagel, ‘The Problem of Global Justice’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 33 (2005), p. 115.
186. D. Miller, ‘Global Justice and Climate Change: how should responsibilities be distributed? Parts I and II’, Tanner Lectures on Human Values, 28 (2009), 119-56.
187. J. Rawls, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971), p. 29.
188. I. Berlin, ‘European Unity and Its Vicissitudes’ in I. Berlin, The Crooked Timber of Humanity, ed. H. Hardy (London: Fontana, 1991), p. 197.
189. J. Rawls, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971).
190. R. Martin and D. Reidy (eds.), Rawls’s Law of Peoples: A Realistic Utopia? (Oxford: Blackwell, 2006).
191. Principles of Social Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), ch. 4.
192. J. Rawls, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971), section 9.
193. D. Miller, Principles of Social Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), especially ch. 2.
194. D. Miller, Principles of Social Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), ch. 1. and Chapter 6 in this book.
195. P. van Parijs, ‘Global Distributive Justice’ in R. Goodin, P. Pettit and T. Pogge (eds.), A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy, 2nd edn (Oxford: Blackwell, 2007).
196. J. Rawls, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971), p. 4.
197. D. Miller, National Responsibility and Global Justice (Oxford University Press, 2007), ch. 7.
198. T. T. Nagel, ‘The Problem of Global Justice’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 33 (2005), 113-47.
199. K.-C. Chan, Justice without Borders: Cosmopolitanism, Nationalism and Patriotism (Cambridge University Press, 2004).
200. T. Nagel, The View from Nowhere (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986).
201. R. Jolley, ‘The British Do Support Equality’, Fabian Review, 119 (3) (Autumn 2007), 4-7.
202. R.W. Emerson, Emerson’s Essays (London: Gibbings and Co., 1901), vol. 1, p. 59.
203. R.W. Emerson, Emerson’s Essays (London: Gibbings and Co., 1901), vol. 1, p. 60.
204. P. Kropotkin, Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution (London: Heinemann, 1910).
205. P. Laslett, The World We Have Lost, 3rd edn (London: Methuen, 1983).
206. P. Smith, Liberalism and Affirmative Obligation (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998), ch. 3.
207. J. Darley, and C. Batson, ‘“From Jerusalem to Jericho”: a Study of Situational and Dispositional Variables in Helping Behavior’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27 (1973), 100-8.
208. J.A. Piliavin, J.F. Dovidio, S.L. Gaertner, and R.D. Clark, Emergency Intervention (New York: Academic Press, 1981).
209. J.F. Dovidio, ‘Helping Behavior and Altruism’ in L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 17 (London: Academic Press, 1984), 361-427.
210. O. Hansson, ‘Altruism Towards a Deviant in City and Small Town’, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 7 (1977), 272-9.
211. J. Ehlert, N. Ehlert, and M. Merrens, ‘The Influence of Ideological Affiliation on Helping Behavior’, Journal of Social Psychology, 89 (1973), 315-16.
212. I.M. Piliavin, J. Rodin, and J.A. Piliavin, ‘Good Samaritanism: An Underground Phenomenon?’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13 (1969), 289-99.
213. B. Weiner, ‘A Cognitive (Attribution)-Emotion-Action Model of Motivated Behavior: An Analysis of Judgments of Help-Giving’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39 (1980), 186-200.
214. J.I. Shaw, H.W. Borough, and M.I. Fink, ‘Perceived Sexual Orientation and Helping Behavior by Males and Females: the Wrong Number Effect’, Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 6 (1994), 73-81.
215. B. Latane and J.M. Darley, The Unresponsive Bystander: Why Doesn’t He Help? (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1970).
216. B. Latane and S. Nida, ‘Ten Years of Research on Group Size and Helping’, Psychological Bulletin, 89 (1981), 308-24.
217. B. Latane and J.M. Darley, The Unresponsive Bystander: Why Doesn’t He Help? (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1970), ch. 11.
218. B. Latane and J.M. Dabbs, ‘Sex, Group Size and Helping in Three Cities’, Sociometry, 38 (1975), 180-94.
219. J.H. Bryan and M.A. Test, ‘Models and Helping: Naturalistic Studies in Aiding Behavior’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6 (1967), 400-7.
220. D.L. Krebs, ‘Altruism - An Examination of the Concept and a Review of the Literature’, Psychological Bulletin, 73 (1970), 258-302.
221. P. Smith, Liberalism and Affirmative Obligation (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998), pp. 53-6.
222. S.H. Schwartz and A. Gottlieb, ‘Bystander Anonymity and Reactions to Emergencies’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39 (1980), 418-30.
223. G. Rutkowski, C.L. Gruder and D. Romer, ‘Group Cohesiveness, Social Norms, and Bystander Intervention’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44 (1983), 545-52.
224. R. Misavage and J.T. Richardson, ‘The focusing of responsibility: an alternative hypothesis in help-demanding situations’, European Journal of Social Psychology, 4 (1974), 5-15.
225. P. Singer, Practical Ethics, 2nd edn (Cambridge University Press, 1993).
226. P. Unger, Living High and Letting Die: Our Illusion of Innocence (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996).
227. L.J. Cohen, ‘Who is starving whom?’, Theoria, 47 (1981), 65-81.
228. L. L. Murphy, Moral Demands in Nonideal Theory (New York:Oxford University Press, 2000).
229. J. Feinberg, Freedom and Fulfillment. (Princeton University Press, 1992), p. 195.
230. L. Murphy, Moral Demands in Nonideal Theory (New York:Oxford University Press, 2000), ch. 7.
231. J.M. Ratcliffe (ed.), The Good Samaritan and the Law (Garden City: Anchor Books, 1966).
232. E. Weinrib, ‘The Case for a Duty to Rescue’, Yale Law Journal, 90 (1980-1), 247-93.
233. J. Feinberg, TheMoral Limits of the Criminal Law, vol 1: Harm to Others (New York: Oxford University Press, 1984), ch. 4.
234. M.A. Menlowe and A. M. Smith (eds.), The Duty to Rescue: the Jurisprudence of Aid (Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1993).
235. H.H. Malm, ‘Bad Samaritan Laws: Harm, Help or Hype?’, Law and Philosophy, 19 (2000), 707-50.
236. C. Fabre, ‘Good Samaritanism: A Matter of Justice’ in J. Seglow (ed.), The Ethics of Altruism (London: Frank Cass, 2004), pp. 128-44.
237. J. Feinberg, TheMoral Limits of the Criminal Law, vol 1: Harm to Others (New York: Oxford University Press, 1984) vol. 1, ch. 4, section 3.
238. D. Miller, ‘Distributing Responsibilities’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 9 (2001), 453-71.
239. I.M. Piliavin, J. Rodin, and J.A. Piliavin, ‘Good Samaritanism: An Underground Phenomenon?’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13 (1969), p. 104.
240. F. Varese and M. Yaish, ‘The Importance of Being Asked: the Rescue of Jews in Nazi Europe’, Rationality and Society, 12 (2000), 307-34.
241. S. Scheffler, The Rejection of Consequentialism (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982)
242. J. Fishkin, The Limits of Obligation (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1982)
243. S. Kagan, The Limits of Morality (Oxford University Press, 1989)
244. L. L. Murphy, Moral Demands in Nonideal Theory (New York:Oxford University Press, 2000) (Oxford University Press, 2000)
245. T. Mulgan, The Demands of Consequentialism (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001)
246. G. Cullity, The Moral Demands of Affluence (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2004).
247. L. Murphy, Moral Demands in Nonideal Theory (New York:Oxford University Press, 2000), ch. 5.
248. National Responsibility and Global Justice (Oxford University Press, 2007), ch. 9.
249. S. Caney, ‘Cosmopolitan Justice, Rights and Global Climate Change’, Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 19 (2006), 255-78.
250. L. J. Cohen, ‘Who is Starving Whom?’, Theoria, 47 (1981), 65-81.
251. Temkin ‘Justice, Equality, Fairness, Desert, Rights, Free Will, Responsibility, and Luck’ in C. Knight and Z. Stemplowska (eds.), Responsibility and Distributive Justice (Oxford University Press, 2011)
252. A. Buchanan, ‘Justice and Charity’, Ethics, 97 (1987), 558-75.
253. F. Kamm, Morality, Mortality: Volume II (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996), ch. 12.
254. ‘The Responsibility to Protect Human Rights’ in L. Meyer (ed.), Legitimacy, Justice and Public International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2009).
255. Augustine, The City of God against the Pagans, ed. R.W. Dyson (Cambridge University Press, 1998).
256. R.A. Markus, Saeculum: History and Society in the Theology of St. Augustine, rev. ed. (Cambridge University Press, 1988).
257. R. Martin, ‘The Two Cities in Augustine’s Political Philosophy’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 33 (1972), 195-216.
258. H.A. Deane, The Political and Social Ideas of St Augustine (New York and London: Columbia University Press, 1963), pp. 97-8.
259. Augustine, The City of God against the Pagans, ed. R.W. Dyson (Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 925-6.
260. Augustine, The City of God against the Pagans, ed. R.W. Dyson (Cambridge University Press, 1998), p. 79.
261. Augustine, The City of God against the Pagans, ed. R.W. Dyson (Cambridge University Press, 1998), p. 80.
262. G.A. Cohen, Rescuing Justice and Equality (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008)
263. David Estlund Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework (Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2008), ch. 14.
264. ‘Human Nature and the Limits (if any) of Political Philosophy’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 39 (2011), 207-37.
265. Adam Swift ‘The Value of Philosophy in Nonideal Circumstances’, Social Theory and Practice, 34 (2008), 363-87
266. G.A. Cohen, Rescuing Justice and Equality (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008), pp. 306-7.
267. Augustine, The City of God against the Pagans, ed. R.W. Dyson (Cambridge University Press, 1998), p. 232.
268. Augustine, The City of God against the Pagans, ed. R.W. Dyson (Cambridge University Press, 1998), p. 130.
269. G.A. Cohen, Rescuing Justice and Equality (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008), chs. 1 and 4.
270. Amartya Sen The Idea of Justice (London: Penguin, 2010).
271. I. Robeyns, ‘Ideal Theory in Theory and Practice’, Social Theory and Practice, 34 (2008), 345.
272. L. Valentini, ‘On the Apparent Paradox of Ideal Theory’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 17 (2009), 332-55.
273. H.A. Deane, The Political and Social Ideas of St Augustine (New York and London: Columbia University Press, 1963), p. 134.
274. Augustine, The City of God against the Pagans, ed. R.W. Dyson (Cambridge University Press, 1998), p. 952.
275. T. Nagel, ‘Justice and Nature’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 17 (1997), 303-21.
276. A. Mason, Levelling the Playing Field: The Idea of Equal Opportunity and its Place in Egalitarian Thought (Oxford University Press, 2006), ch. 2, section 4.
277. G.A. Cohen, Rescuing Justice and Equality (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008), esp. chs. 6-7.
278. ‘Facts and Principles’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 31 (2003), 211-45.
279. T. Pogge, ‘Cohen to the Rescue’, Ratio, 21 (2008), 454-75.
280. G.A. Cohen, ‘The Future of A Disillusion’, New Left Review, 190 (1991), 5-20.
281. G.A. Cohen, Self-Ownership, Freedom, and Equality (Cambridge University Press, 1995), ch. 11.
282. D. Miller, ‘Our Unfinished Debate about Market Socialism’, Politics, Philosophy and Economics (forthcoming).
283. J. Rawls, A Theory of Justice, rev. edn (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), p. 398.
284. T. Nagel, ‘WhatMakes a Political Theory Utopian?’, Social Research, 56 (1989), 903-20
285. J. Raikka, ‘The Feasibility Condition in Political Theory’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 6 (1998), 27-40
286. A. Mason, ‘Just Constraints’, British Journal of Political Science, 34 (2004), 251-68
287. A. Swift and S. White, ‘Political Theory, Social Science and Real Politics’ in D. Leopold and M. Stears (eds.), Political Theory: Methods and Approaches (Oxford University Press, 2008).