Reframing the role of knowledge parks and science cities in knowledge-based urban development

Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 784-808

  Benneworth, Paul ^a   Ratinho, Tiago ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BALTIMORE   (United States)

Author keywords

Knowledge based development; Knowledge based urban development; Science parks; Technopoles; Urban innovation; Urban scale

Indexed keywords

INNOVATION; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEM; POLICY MAKING; STRATEGIC APPROACH; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN PLANNING;

NETHERLANDS;

EID: 84923608332     PISSN: 0263774X     EISSN: 14723425     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1068/c1266r     Document Type: Article

References (97)

1. Amin A, 1999, “An institutional perspective on regional development” International Journal of Urban and Regional Development 23 365-378
2. Amin A, Roberts J, 2008, “Knowing in action: beyond communities of practice” Research Policy 37 353-369
3. Amirahmadi H, Saff G, 1993, “Science parks: a critical assessment” Journal of Planning Literature 82 107-123
4. Asheim B, Coenen L, Vang J, 2007, “Face-to-face, buzz, and knowledge bases: sociospatial implications for learning, innovation, and innovation policy” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 25 655-670
5. Asheim B T, Boschma R, Cooke P, 2011, “Constructing regional advantage: platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases” Regional Studies 45 893-904
6. Bathelt H, Malmberg A, Maskell P, 2004, “Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation” Progress in Human Geography 28 31-56
7. Benner C, 2003, “Learning communities in a learning region: the soft infrastructure of cross-firm learning networks in Silicon Valley” Environment and Planning A 35 1809-1830
8. Benneworth P, Dassen A, 2011, “Strengthening global-local connectivity in regional innovation strategies” WP 01/2011, OECD Regional Development, Paris, http://www.oecd-ilibraryorg/governance/oecd-regional-development-working-papers_20737009
9. Benneworth P S, Hospers G J, 2007a, “Urban competitiveness in the knowledge economy: universities as new planning animateurs” Progress in Planning 23 3-102
10. Benneworth P, Hospers G J, 2007b, “The new economic geography of old industrial regions: universities as global-local pipelines” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 25 779-802
11. Benneworth P, Ratinho T, 2014, “Regional innovation culture in the social knowledge economy”, in The Social Dynamics of Innovation Networks Eds R Rutten, P Benneworth, D Irawati, F Boekema (Routledge, London) pp 239-256
12. Benneworth P, Hospers G J, Jongbloed B, Leiyste L, Zomer A, 2011, “The ‘science city’ as a system coupler in fragmented strategic urban environments?” Built Environment 37 317-335
13. Benneworth P, Irawati D, Rutten R, Boekema F, 2014, “The social dynamics of innovation networks: from learning region to learning in socio-spatial context”, in The Social Dynamics of Innovation Networks Eds R Rutten, P Benneworth, D Irawati, F Boekema (Routledge, London) (forthcoming)
14. Bigliardi B, Dormio A I, Nosella A, Petroni G, 2006, “Assessing science parks’ performances: directions from selected Italian case studies” Technovation 26 489-505
15. Blažek J, Žížalová P, 2010, “The biotechnology industry in the Prague metropolitan region: a cluster within a fragmented innovation system?” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 28 887-904
16. Bøllingtoft A, 2012, “The bottom-up business incubator: leverage to networking and cooperation practices in a self-generated, entrepreneurial-enabled environment” Technovation 32 304-315
17. Boogers M, 2013, “Het raadsel van de Regio waarom regionale samenwerking soms resultaten oplevert”, inaugural professorial lecture, 17 October, Universiteit Twente, Enschede, http://wwwutwentenl/mb/pa/staff/boogers/publications/7020%20Oratieboekje%20Boogers%20LRpdf
18. Brooker D, 2013, “From ‘wannabe’ Silicon Valley to global back office? Examining the socio-spatial consequences of technopole planning practices in Malaysia” Asia Pacific Viewpoint 54 1-14
19. Bruneel J, Ratinho T, Clarysse B, Groen A, 2012, “The evolution of business incubators: comparing demand and supply of business incubation services across different incubator generations” Technovation 32 110-121
20. Castells M, Hall P, 1994 Technopoles of the World: The Making of Twenty-first-century Industrial Complexes (Routledge, London)
21. Clarysse B, Wright M, Lockett A, Van de Velde E, Vohora A, 2005, “Spinning out new ventures: a typology of incubation strategies from European research institutions” Journal of Business Venturing 20 183-216
22. Clausen T, Rasmussen E, 2013, “Parallel business models and the innovativeness of research-based spin-off ventures” The Journal of Technology Transfer 38 836-849
23. Coe N M, Hess M, Yeung HW-C, Dicken P, Henderson J, 2004, “Globalizing’ regional development: a global production networks perspective” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series 29 468-484
24. Cooke P, 2002, “Biotechnology clusters as regional, sectoral innovation systems” International Regional Science Review 25 8-37
25. Cooke P, 2005, “Regionally asymmetric knowledge capabilities and open innovation: exploring ‘Globalisation 2’—a new model of industry organisation” Research Policy 34 1128-1149
26. Cooke P, Morgan K, 1998 The Associational Economy (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
27. Crevoisier O, 2014, “Beyond territorial innovation models: the pertinence of the territorial approach” Regional Studies 48(3), doi:10.1080/00343404.2011.602629
28. EC, 2002 Benchmarking of Business Incubators: Final Report (European Commission, Brussels)
29. Englis P D, Ratinho T, Englis B G, 2010, “Extensiveness of business planning and firm performance: an examination into the drivers of success and survival for startup firms”, Rent XXIV ‘The Entrepreneurial Process in a Changing Economy’, Maastricht, http://purl.otwente.nl/publications/74407
30. Etzkowitz H, 2012, “Triple helix clusters: boundary permeability at university-industry-government interfaces as a regional innovation strategy” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 30 766-779
31. Eurostat, 2009, “‘High-technology’ and ‘knowledge based services’ aggregations based on NACE Rev 2”, Luxembourg
32. Forsyth A, 2014, “Alternative forms of the high-technology district: corridors, clumps, cores, campuses, subdivisions, and sites” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 32 809-823
33. Garlick S, Benneworth P, Puukka J, Vaessen P, 2006, “‘Twente, the Netherlands’ the regional contribution of higher education institutions”, peer review report, Institutional Management in Higher Education programme, OECD, Paris
34. Gellekink A, 2001, “Drienerlo, van landgoed tot campusuniversiteit”, in Van landgoed tot kenniscampus 1961–2001 Ed. B Groenman (University of Twente Press, Enschede) pp 32–37
35. Gertler M S, 2003, “Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or the undefinable tacitness of being there” Journal of Economic Geography 3 75–99
36. Gertner D, Roberts J, Charles D, 2011, “University–industry collaboration: a CoPs approach to KTPs” Journal of Knowledge Management 15 625–647
37. Glückler J, 2007, “Economic geography and the evolution of networks” Journal of Economic Geography 75 619–634
38. Hansson F, Husted K, Vestergaard J, 2005, “Second generation science parks: from structural holes jockeys to social capital catalysts of the knowledge society”. Technovation 25 1039–1049
39. Håkanson L, 2005, “Epistemic communities and cluster dynamics: on the role of knowledge in industrial districts” Industry and Innovation 12 433–463
40. Hu T.-S., Lin, C.-Y., Chang S.-L., 2005, “Technology-based regional development strategies and the emergence of technological communities: a case study of HSIP, Taiwan” Technovation 25 367–380
41. Huggins R, Johnston A, 2009, “The economic and innovation contribution of universities: a regional perspective” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 27 1088–1106
42. Kasabov E, 2008, “The challenge of devising public policy for high-tech, science-based, and knowledge-based communities: evidence from a life science and biotechnology community” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 26 210–228
43. Kennispark Twente, 2013, “Twentse Innovatieroute 2007–13: Samen werken aan innovatie”, Enschede
44. Kim H, Lee Y-S, Hwang H-R, 2014, “Regionalization of planned S&T parks: the case of the Daedeok S&T Park in Daejeon, South Korea” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 32 843–862
45. Knopp L, 2007, “2006 state of the business incubation industry”, National Business Incubation Association, Athens, OH
46. Kraaijenbrink J, Ratinho T, 2012, “Causal and creative modes of entrepreneurial strategizing: a content analysis of business plans of small and micro firms”, Academy of Management Annual Meeting Conference, Boston, MA
47. Lagendijk A 2007, “The accident of the region: a strategic relational perspective on the construction of the region’s significance” Regional Studies 41 1193–1207
48. Lagendijk A, 2011, “Regional innovation policy between theory and practice”, in Handbook of Regional Innovation and Growth Eds P Cooke, B Asheim, R Boschma, R Martin, D Schwartz, F Tödtling (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos) pp 597–608
49. Lagendijk A, Oïnas P, 2005, “Proximity, external relationships and local economic development”, in Proximity, Distance and Diversity: Issues on Economic Interaction and Local Development Eds A Lagendijk, P Oïnas (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants) pp 3–22
50. Lawton Smith H, 2007, “Universities, innovation, and territorial development: a review of the evidence” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 25 98–114
51. Leibovitz J, 2003, “Institutional barriers to associative city-region governance: the politics of institution-building and economic governance in ‘Canada’s Technology Triangle’” Urban Studies 40 2613–2642
52. Lindkvist L, 2005, “Knowledge communities and knowledge collectivities: a typology of knowledge work in groups” Journal of Management Studies 42 1189–1210
53. Link A N, Scott J T, 2003, “US science parks: the diffusion of an innovation and its effects on the academic missions of universities” International Journal of Industrial Organization 21 1323–1356
54. Livi C, Hugues J, Crevoisier O, 2014, “From regional innovation to multi-local valuation milieus: the case of the Western Switzerland photovoltaic industry”, in The Social Dynamics of Innovation Networks Eds R Rutten, P Benneworth, D Irawati, F Boekema (Routledge, London) pp 23–41
55. Loasby B J, 1998, “The organisation of capabilities” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 35 139–160
56. Löfsten H, P Lindelöf, 2002, “Science parks and the growth of new technology-based firms: academic–industry links, innovation and markets” Research Policy 31 859–876
57. Longhi C, Quéré M, 1993, “Innovative networks and the technopolis phenomenon: the case of Sophia-Antipolis” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 11 317–330
58. Lovering J, 1999, “Theory led by policy: the inadequacies of the ‘new regionalism’ illustrated from the case of Wales” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 23 379–395
59. McAdam M, McAdam R, 2008, “High tech start-ups in university science park incubators: the relationship between the start-up’s lifecycle progression and use of the incubator’s resources” Technovation 28 277–290
60. McCann P, Ortega-Argilés R, 2013, “Modern regional innovation policy” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 62 187–216
61. Massey D, Quintas P, Wield D, 1992 High-tech Fantasies: Science Parks in Society, Science and Space (Routledge, London)
62. Mattes J, 2006, “Innovation in multinational companies: an empirical analysis of innovation networks between globalisation and localisation”, Bamberger Beiträge zur Europaforschung und zur internationalen Politik Nr. 14/2006, University of Bamberg, Bamberg
63. May T, Perry B, 2011, “Urban research in the knowledge economy: context, content and outlook” Built Environment 37 352–367
64. Miller S, 2014, “The Strathclyde technology and innovation centre in Scotland’s innovation system” Regional Studies (forthcoming)
65. Moulaert F, Sekia F, 2003, “Territorial innovation models: a critical survey” Regional Studies 37 289–302
66. Nijkamp P, 2003, “Entrepreneurship in a modern network economy” Regional Studies 37 395–405
67. Norrman C, Bager-Sjögren L, 2010, “Entrepreneurship policy to support new innovative ventures: is it effective?” International Small Business Journal 28 602–619
68. OECD, 2007 Higher Education and Regions: Globally Competitive, Regionally Engaged (OECD, Paris)
69. Patton D, Warren L, Bream D, 2009, “Elements that underpin high-tech business incubation processes” The Journal of Technology Transfer 34 621–636
70. Perry B, 2008, “Academic knowledge and urban development: theory, policy and practice”, in Knowledge-based Urban Development: Planning and Applications in the Information Era Eds T Yigitcanlar, K Velibeyoglu, S Baum (Information Science Reference, New York) pp 21–41
71. Perry B, May T, 2010, “Urban knowledge exchange: devilish dichotomies and active intermediation” International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development 1 6–24
72. Phan P H, Siegel D S, Wright M, 2005, “Science parks and incubators: observations, synthesis and future research” Journal of Business Venturing 20 165–182
73. Phelps N A, Tewdwr-Jones M, 1998, “Institutional capacity building in a strategic policy vacuum: the case of the Korean company LG in South Wales” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 16 735–755
74. Popp Berman E, 2011 Creating the Market University: How Academic Science became an Economic Engine (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
75. Quintas P, Wield D, Massey D, 1992, “Academic–industry links and innovation: questioning the science park model” Technovation 12 161–175
76. Rasmussen E, Mosey S, Wright M, 2011, “The evolution of entrepreneurial competencies: a longitudinal study of university spin-off venture emergence” Journal of Management Studies 48 1314–1345
77. Ratinho T, Henriques E, 2010, “The role of science parks and business incubators in converging countries: evidence from Portugal” Technovation 30 278–290
78. Regio Twente, 2009 De agenda van Twente Enschede
79. Regio Twente, 2013 Ontwikkelingsagenda Netwerkstad Twente Deel2 Werkprogramma: samen investeren voor Twente Enschede
80. Rekenkamer Oostnederland, 2010 Op koers? Een onderzoek naar de Innovatieroute Twente Almelo
81. Roberts J, 2014, “Community and the dynamics of spatially distributed knowledge production: the case of Wikipedia”, in The Social Dynamics of Innovation Networks Eds R Rutten, P Benneworth, D Irawati, F Boekema (Routledge, London) pp 180–200
82. Sarimin M, Yigitcanlar T, 2012, “Towards a comprehensive and integrated knowledge-based urban development model: status quo and directions” International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development 3 175–192
83. Shane S, 2009, “Why encouraging more people to become entrepreneurs is bad public policy” Small Business Economics 33 141–149
84. Smith R G, 2003, “World city actor networks” Progress in Human Geography 27 25–44
85. Smith R G, 2014, “Beyond the global city concept and the myth of ‘command and control’” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38 98–115
86. Storper M, 1995, “The resurgence of regional economies ten years later: the region as a nexus of untraded interdependencies” European Urban and Regional Studies 2 191–221
87. Stuurgroep Kennispark, 2008 Masterplan gebiedsontwikkeling Kennispark Twente [Masterplan for spatial development of the Kennispark Twente site] Kennispark Foundation, Enschede Tödtling, F, Prud’homme.
88. van Reine P, Dörhöfer S, 2011, “Open innovation and regional culture: findings from different industrial and regional settings” European Planning Studies 19 1885–1907
89. van Boom N, Mommaas H, 2009, “Case study 1: Tilburg/Enschede: urban regimes and evolutionary paths”, in Transformation Strategies for Former Industrial Cities Eds N van Boom, H Mommaas (NAi, Amsterdam) pp 74–97
90. van der Sijde P, Karnebeck S, van Benthem J, 2002, “The impact of a university spin off programme: the case of HTSFs established through TOP”, in New Technology Based Firms in the Millennium: Volume 2 Eds R Oakey, W During, S Kauser (Pergamon, London) pp 19–30
91. van Winden W, van den Berg L, Pol P, 2007, “European cities in the knowledge economy: towards a typology” Urban Studies 44 525–549
92. Vohora A, Wright M, Lockett A, 2004, “Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies” Research Policy 33 147–175
93. Wolfe D A, 2010, “The strategic management of core cities: path dependence and economic adjustment in resilient region” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 31 139–152
94. Yigitcanlar T, 2010, “Making space and place for the knowledge economy: knowledge-based development of Australian cities” European Planning Studies 18 1769–1786
95. Yigitcanlar T, Velibeyoglu K, 2008, “Knowledge-based urban development: the local economic development path of Brisbane, Australia” Local Economy 23 195–207
96. Yin R, 2008 Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA)
97. Zomer A H, Jongbloed B W A, Enders J, 2010, “Do spin-offs make the academics’ heads spin? The impacts of spin-off companies on their parent research organisation” Minerva 48 331–353