Beyond Territorial Innovation Models: The Pertinence of the Territorial Approach;Au-delà des modéles territoriaux d'innovation: La pertinence de l'approche territoriale

Regional Studies

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 551-561

  Crevoisier, Olivier ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEUCHÂTEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Innovative milieu; Institutionalist approach; Relational approach; Territorial economy; Territorial innovation models (TIMs)

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC THEORY; ECONOMICS; INNOVATION; MODELING; TERRITORIAL MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84923540694     PISSN: 00343404     EISSN: 13600591     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2011.602629     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Angeon V. and Crevoisier O. (2009). Régulation, institutionalisme et dévelopement territorial: une question d'échelle. In Mager C. (Ed.), Jeux d'échelle, développement territorial et enjeux méthodologiques, (pp. 1-16). Lausanne: Observatoire de la ville et du développement durable.
2. Aydalot P. (1986). Milieux innovateurs en Europe, Paris: Groupe de Recherche Européen sur les Milieux Innovateurs (GREMI).
3. Bathelt H. (2006). Geographies of production: growth regimes in spatial persepctive toward a relational view of economic action and policy. Progess in Human Geography, 30(2), 223-236. doi: 10.1191/0309132506ph603pr
4. Bathelt H. and Glücker J. (2003). Toward a relational economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 3(2), 117-144. doi: 10.1093/jeg/3.2.117
5. Becattini G. (1990). The Marshallian industrial district as a socio-economic notion. In Pyke F., Becattini G. and Sengenberger W. (Ed.), Industrial Districts and Inter-firms Cooperation in Italy, (pp. 37-51). Geneva: International Labour Organisation (ILO).
6. Billaudot B. (2001). Régulation et croissance: une macro-économie historique et institutionnelle, Paris: L'Harmattan.
7. Boschma R. (2005). Role of proximity in interaction and performance: conceptual and empirical challenges. Regional Studies, 39(1), 41-45. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320878
8. Boschma R. and Frenken K. (2006). Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science?. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(3), 273-302. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbi022
9. Boschma R. and Martin R. (2007). Editorial: Constructing an evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 7(5), 537-548. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbm021
10. Braudel F. (1979). Civilisation matérielle, économie et capitalisme: XVème au XVIIIème siècle, Paris: Armand Colin.
11. Braudel F. (1985). La dynamique du capitalisme, Paris: Flammarion.
12. Camagni R. and Maillat D. (2006). Millieux innovateurs: Théorie et politiques, Paris: Anthropos-Economica.
13. Capello R. and Faggian A. (2005). Collective learning and relational capital in local innovation processes. Regional Studies, 39(1), 75-87. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320851
14. Colletis-Wahl C. (2007). Dynamiques territoriales, micro et macro liens, un essai de construction d'une typologie. Paper presented at the XLIIIème colloque de L'ASRDLF.,Grenoble-Chambéry, France, 2007
15. Colletis-Wahl K., Corpataux J., Crevoisier O., Kebir L., Pecqueur B. and Peyrache-Gadeau V. (2008). The territorial economy: a general approach in order to understand and deal with globalisation. In Aranguren Querejeta M.-J., Iturrioz Landart C. and Wilson J. R. (Ed.), Networks, Governance and Economic Development: Bridging Disciplinary Frontiers, (pp. 21-29). Cheltenham: Networks.
16. Corpataux J. and Crevoisier O. (2007). Economics theories and spatial transformations: clarifyring the space-time premises and outcomes of economic theories. Journal of Economic Geography, 80(4), 367-379.
17. Corpataux J., Crevoisier O. and Theurillat T. (2009). The expansion of the finance industry and its impact on the economy: a territorial approach based on Swiss pension funds. Economic Geography, 85(3), 313-334. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01035.x
18. Crevoisier O. and Jeannerat H. (2009). Territorial knowledge dynamics: from the proximity paradigm to multi-location milieus. European Planning Studies, 17(8), 1223-1241. doi: 10.1080/09654310902978231
19. Garofoli G. (1992). Les systèmes de petites entreprises: un cas paradigmatique de développement endogène. In Benko G. and Lipietz A. (Ed.), Les régions qui gagnent - Districts et réseaux: les nouveaux paradigmes de la géographie économique, (pp. 81-102). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
20. Lagendijk A. (2006). Learning from conceptual flow in regional studies: framing present debates, unbracketing past debates. Regional Studies, 40(4), 385-399. doi: 10.1080/00343400600725202
21. Latour B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. Le Moigne J.-L. (2001). Le constructivisme, Paris: Coll. Ingenium. L'Harmattan.
23. Matteaccioli A. (2004). Philippe Aydalot, pionnier de l'économie territoriale, Paris: L'Harmattan.
24. Morin E. (2005). Introduction à la pensée complexe, Paris: Le Seuil.
25. Moulaert F. and Sekia F. (2003). Territorial innovation models: a critical survey. Regional Studies, 37(3), 289-302. doi: 10.1080/0034340032000065442
26. Rallet A. T. (2005). Proximity and localization. Regional Studies, 39(1), 47-59. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320842
27. Rallet A. and Torre A. (2005). Proximity and localization. Regional Studies, 39(1), 47-59. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320842
28. Ratti R., Bramanti A. and Gordon R. (1997). In Ratti R., Bramanti A. and Gordon R. (Ed.), The Dynamics of Innovative Regions: The GREMI Approach, Ashgate, Aldershot
29. Schumpeter J. (1912). The Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30. Scott A. (1986). High technology and territorial developpment: the rise of the Orange County complex. Urban Geography, 7, 3-45. doi: 10.2747/0272-3638.7.1.3
31. Simmie J. (2005). Innovation and space: a critical review of the literature. Regional Studies, 39(3), 26-40.
32. Storper M. and Walker R. (1989). The Capitalist Imperative. Territory, Technology, and Industrial Growth, New York, NY: Basil Blackwell.
33. Sunley P. (2008). Relational economic geography: a partial understanding or a new paradigm?. Economic Geography, 84(1), 1-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2008.tb00389.x
34. Varela F. (1989). Autonomie et connaissance, Paris: Le Seuil.