Status, authority, and the end of the American century

Status in World Politics

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 246-270

  Lake, David A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84923572328     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781107444409.015     Document Type: Chapter

References (77)

1. Hans J. Morgenthau, Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, rev. fifth edn. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1978
2. Robert Gilpin, War and Change in World Politics Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981, 28;
3. Johann Galtung, “A Structural Theory of Aggression,” Journal of Peace Research 1, no. 2 1964, 95–119;
4. Michael D. Wallace, “Power, Status, and International War,” Journal of Peace Research 8, no. 1 1971, 23–35;
5. Maurice A. East, “Status Discrepancy and Violence in the International System: An Empirical Analysis,” in The Analysis of International Politics: Essays in Honor of Harold and Margaret Sprout, e d s. James N. Rosenau, V. Davis, and Maurice A. East New York: Free Press, 1972, 299–319
6. Thomas J. Volgy and Stacey Mayhall, “Status Inconsistency and International War: Exploring the Effects of Systemic Change,” International Studies Quarterly 39, no. 1 1995, 67–84.
7. Kenneth N. Waltz, Theory of International Politics Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1979.
8. Michael Barnett and Raymond Duvall, eds., Power in Global Governance New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
9. Richard Ned Lebow, Why Nations Fight New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010
10. William C. Wohlforth, “Unipolarity, Status Competition, and Great Power War,” World Politics 61, no. 1 2009, 28–57
11. Oliver Williamson, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, and Relational Contracting New York: Free Press, 1985.
12. David A. Lake, Entangling Relations: American Foreign Policy in its Century Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999, 26–27.
13. David C. Kang, China Rising: Peace, Power, and Order in East Asia New York: Columbia University Press, 2007;
14. David Kang, “Hierarchy and Stability in Asian International Relations,” in International Relations Theory and the Asia-Pacii c, eds. G. John Ikenberry and Michael Mastanduno New York: Columbia University Press, 2003, 163–189;
15. David C. Kang, “Hierarchy, Balancing, and Empirical Puzzles in Asian International Relations,” International Security 28, no. 3 2003, 165–180.
16. Christian Reus-Smit, American Power and World Order Malden: Polity Press, 2004, 43
17. Jack S. Levy, War in the Modern Great Power System Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1983
18. Charles S. Gochman and Zeev Maoz, “Militarized Interstate Disputes, 1816–1976: Procedures, Patterns, and Insights,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 28, no. 4 1984, 585– 616
19. Randolph M. Siverson and Harvey Starr, The Diffusion of War: A Study of Opportunity and Willingness Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1991;
20. Randolph M. Siverson and Juliann Emmons, “Birds of a Feather: Democratic Political Systems and Alliance Choices in the Twentieth Century,” Journal of Conl ict Resolution 35, no. 2 1991, 285–306;
21. Stuart A. Bremer, “Dangerous Dyads: Conditions Affecting the Likelihood of Interstate War, 1816–1965,” Journal of Conl ict Resolution 36, no. 2 1992, 309–341
22. Paul K. Huth, “Major Power Intervention in International Crises, 1918–1988,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 42, no. 6 1998, 744–770;
23. Douglas Lemke and William Reed, “War and Rivalry Among Great Powers,” American Journal of Political Science 45, no. 2 2001, 457–469.
24. Todd Sandler, Collective Action: Theory and Applications Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1992, 64.
25. Alexander Wendt, “Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics,” International Organization 46, no. 2 1992, 391–425.
26. Alexander Cooley, Logics of Hierarchy: The Organization of Empires, States, and Military Occupations Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2005;
27. Alexander Cooley and Hendrik Spruyt, Contracting States: Sovereignty Transfers in International Relations Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009
28. Jack Donnelly, “Sovereign Inequalities and Hierarchy in Anarchy: American Power and International Society,” European Journal of International Relations 12, no. 2 2006, 139–170
29. Kathleen J. Hancock, Regional Integration: Choosing Plutocracy New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009
30. John M. Hobson and J. C. Sharman, “The Enduring Place of Hierarchy in World Politics: Tracing the Social Logic of Hierarchy and Political Change,” European Journal of International Relations 11, no. 1 2005, 63–98
31. David A. Lake, Hierarchy in International Relations Ithaca, NJ: Cornell University Press, 2009
32. Katja Weber, Hierarchy Amidst Anarchy: Transaction Costs and Institutional Choice Albany: State University of New York Press, 2000.
33. Stephen M. Walt, Taming American Power: The Global Response to U.S. Primacy New York: W. W. Norton, 2005.
34. Deborah D. Avant, Martha Finnemore, and Susan K. Sell, eds., Who Governs the Globe? New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010;
35. David A. Lake, “Rightful Rules: Authority, Order, and the Foundations of Global Governance,” International Studies Quarterly 54, no. 3 2010, 587–613.
36. Thomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientii c Revolutions, sec. enlarg. edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.
37. G. John Ikenberry, After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001
38. David P. Calleo, The German Problem Reconsidered: Germany and the World Order, 1870 to the Present New York: Cambridge University Press, 1978
39. Dale Copeland, The Origins of Major War Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2000.
40. Michael W. Doyle, Empires Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1986.
41. John Gallagher and Ronald Robinson, “The Imperialism of Free Trade,” Economic History Review second series 6, no. 1 1953, 1–15.
42. P. J. Cain and A. G. Hopkins, British Imper ialism, 2 Vols. New York: Longman, 1993.
43. J. A. Hobson, Imperialism: A Study Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1965.
44. Robert Jervis, “Causation and Responsibility in a Complex World,” in Back to Basics: State Power in a Contemporary World, eds. Martha Finnemore and Judith Goldstein New York: Oxford University Press, 2013, 313–338
45. Melvyn P. Lefler, A Preponderance of Power: National Security, the Truman Administration, and the Cold War Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1992
46. John Lewis Gaddis, We Now Know: Rethinking Cold War History New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.
47. Robert P. Hager, Jr. and David A. Lake, “Balancing Empires: Competitive Decolonization in International Politics,” Security Studies 9, no. 3 2000, 108–148.
48. Jan. F. Triska, Dominant Powers and Subordinate States: The United States in Latin America and the Soviet Union in Eastern Europe Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1986.
49. Walter Feber, Inevitable Revolutions: The United States in Central America New York: W. W. Norton, 1983.
50. Kenneth N. Waltz, “The Emerging Structure of International Politics,” International Security 18, no. 2 1993, 44–79;
51. John J. Mearsheimer, “Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War,” International Security 15, no. 1 1990, 5–56;
52. Christopher Layne, “The Unipolar Illusion: Why New Great Powers Will Rise,” International Security 17, no. 4 1993, 5–51.
53. Geir Lundestad, The American “Empire” New York: Oxford University Press, 1990;
54. James M. Goldgeier, Not Whether But When: The U.S. Decision to Enlarge NATO Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 1999.
55. David A. Lake, “The Practice and Theory of U.S. Statebuilding,” Journal and Inter vention and Statebuilding 4, no. 3 2010, 257–284.
56. Fawaz A. Gerges, The Far Enemy: Why Jihad Went Global, sec. edn. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
57. C. Fred Bergsten et al., China’s rise: Challenges and Opportunities Washington, D.C.: Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2009.
58. Ronald L. Tammen et al., Power Transitions Strategies for the 21st Century New York: Chatham House Publishers, 2000;
59. John J. Mearsheimer, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics New York: W. W. Norton, 2001.
60. Mark Beeson, “Hegemonic Transition in East Asia? The Dynamics of Chinese and American Power,” Review of International Studies 35, no. 1 2009, 95–112.
61. Alastair Iain Johnston, “Is China a Status Quo Power?” International Security 27, no. 4 2003, 5–56
62. Edward Wong, “China’s Disputes in Asia Buttress Influence of U.S.: A Countervailing Force,” New York Times, 2010.
63. David C. Kang, East Asia Before the West: Five Centuries of Trade and Tribute New York: Columbia University Press, 2010.
64. Chih-Yu Shih, “Breeding a Reluctant Dragon: Can China Rise into Partnership and Away from Antagonism?” Review of International Studies 31, no. 4 2005, 755–774.
65. Evelyn Goh, What the Asian Debate about U.S. Hegemony Tells Us Honolulu, HI: Pacii c Forum Center for Strategic and International Studies, 2010.
66. Mark Landler, Jim Yardley, and Michael Wines, “As China Rises, Wary Neighbors Form Alliances,” New York Times, 2010.
67. Joshua Kurlantzick, Charm Offensive: How China’s Soft Power is Transforming the World New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2008.
68. Stefan Halper, The Beijing Consensus: How China’s Authoritarian Model Will Dominate the Twenty-First Century New York: Basic Books, 2010;
69. Martin Jacques, When China Rules the World: The End of the Western World and the Birth of a New Global Order New York: Penguin Press, 2009.
70. David P. Calleo and Benjamin Rowland, America and the World Political Economy: Atlantic Dreams and National Realities Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1973
71. Michael Mandelbaum, The Case for Goliath: How America Acts as the World’s Government in the 21st Century New York: Public Affairs, 2005.
72. Charles A. Kupchan, The End of the American Era: U.S. Foreign Policy and the Geopolitics of the Twenty-First Century New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2002.
73. Daniel W. Drezner, “The New New World Order,” Foreign Affairs 86, no. 2 2007, 34–46.
74. Thomas G. Moore and Dixia Yang, “Empowered and Restrained: Chinese Foreign Policy in the Age of Economic Interdependence,” in The Making of Chinese Foreign and Security Policy in the Era of Reform, ed. David M. Lampton Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2001, 191–229;
75. Susan Shirk, China: Fragile Superpower: How China’s Internal Politics Could Derail Its Peaceful Rise New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.
76. Mark Landler and Sewell Chan, “White House Tries to Build United Front To Face China: Lining Up Allies on Issues Like Trade and Security,” New York Times, October 26, 2010.
77. Stephen M. Walt, The Origins of Alliances Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1987, 289–291.