History, chance and selection during phenotypic and genomic experimental evolution: Replaying the tape of life at different levels

Frontiers in Genetics

Volumn 5, Issue FEB, 2015, Pages

  Matos, Margarida ^a   Simões, Pedro ^a   Santos, Marta Alexandra ^a   Seabra, Sofia Gonçalves ^a   Faria, Gonçalo Silva ^a   Vala, Filipa ^a   Santos, Josiane ^a   Fragata, Inês ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LISBON   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Drosophila subobscura; Genetic background; Genomic convergence; Historical constraints; Phenotypic convergence

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; CONVERGENT EVOLUTION; DROSOPHILA; EVOLUTION; EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION; EVOLUTIONARY DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENOME; MUTATION; NATURAL SELECTION; NONHUMAN; PARALLEL EVOLUTION; PHENOTYPE;

DROSOPHILA SUBOBSCURA;

EID: 84923552403     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16648021     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2015.00071     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Arendt, J., and Reznick, D. (2008). Convergence and parallelism reconsidered: what have we learned about the genetics of adaptation? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 23(1), 26-32. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.09.011
2. Baldwin-Brown, J. G., Long, A. D., & Thornton, K. R. (2014). The power to detect quantitative trait loci using resequenced, experimentally evolved populations of diploid, sexual organisms. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 31(4), 1040-55. doi:10.1093/molbev/msu048
3. Barrick, J. E., & Lenski, R. E. (2013). Genome dynamics during experimental evolution. Nature Reviews. Genetics, 14(12), 827-39. doi:10.1038/nrg3564.
4. Bedhomme, S., Lafforgue, G., and Elena, S. F. (2013). Genotypic but not phenotypic historical contingency revealed by viral experimental evolution. BMC Evolutionary Biology 13:46. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-13-46.
5. Blount, Z. D., Borland, C. Z., and Lenski, R. E. (2008). Historical contingency and the evolution of a key innovation in an experimental population of Escherichia coli. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105(23), 7899-906. doi:10.1073/pnas.0803151105
6. Burke, M. K. (2012). How does adaptation sweep through the genome? Insights from long term selection experiments. Proc. R. Soc. B 279(1749), 5029-38. doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.0799.
7. Burke, M. K., Dunham, J. P., Shahrestani, P., Thornton, K. R., Rose, M. R., and Long, A. D. (2010). Genome-wide analysis of a long-term evolution experiment with Drosophila. Nature 467(7315), 587-90. doi:10.1038/nature09352.
8. Burke, M. K., and Long, A. D. (2012). What paths do advantageous alleles take during short-term evolutionary change? Molecular Ecology 21(20), 4913-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05745.x.
9. Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: John Murray.
10. De Visser, J. A. G. M., and Krug, J. (2014). Empirical fitness landscapes and the predictability of evolution. Nature reviews. Genetics 15(7), 480-90. doi:10.1038/nrg3744.
11. Dettman, J. R., Rodrigue, N., Melnyk, A. H., Wong, A., Bailey, S. F., and Kassen, R. (2012). Evolutionary insight from whole-genome sequencing of experimentally evolved microbes. Molecular Ecology 21(9), 2058-77. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05484.x.
12. Ellegren, H. (2014). Genome sequencing and population genomics in non-model organisms. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 29(1), 51-63. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2013.09.008.
13. Elmer, K. R., and Meyer, A. (2011). Adaptation in the age of ecological genomics: insights from parallelism and convergence. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 26(6), 298-306. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.02.008.
14. Fragata I., Lopes-Cunha M., Bárbaro M., Kellen B., Lima M., Santos M.A., Faria, G.S., Santos M., Matos M. and Simões P. (2014). How much can history constrain adaptive evolution? A real-time evolutionary approach of inversion polymorphisms in Drosophila subobscura. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 27, 2727-2738.
15. Fragata, I., Simões, P., Lopes-Cunha, M., Lima, M., Kellen, B., Bárbaro, M., et al. (2014a). Laboratory selection quickly erases historical differentiation. PLoS ONE 9(5):e96227. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0096227.
16. Garland, T., and Rose, M. R. (Eds.). (2009). Experimental Evolution -Concepts, Methods, and Applications of Selection Experiments. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
17. Gavrilets, S. (2010). 'High-Dimensional Fitness Landscapes and Speciation'. In Evolution: the extended synthesis eds. M. Pigliucci and G. Muller (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 45-80.
18. Gould, S. J. (1989). Wonderful Life: the Burgess Shale and the Nature of History. New York: W. W. Norton and Co.
19. Hoffmann, A. A, and Rieseberg, L. H. (2008). Revisiting the Impact of Inversions in Evolution: From Population Genetic Markers to Drivers of Adaptive Shifts and Speciation? Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 39, 21-42. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173532.
20. Kawecki, T. J., Lenski, R. E., Ebert, D., Hollis, B., Olivieri, I., and Whitlock, M. C. (2012). Experimental evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 27(10), 547-60. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2012.06.001.
21. Kirkpatrick, M. (2010). How and why chromosome inversions evolve. PLoS Biology 8(9): e1000501. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000501
22. Lenormand, T., Roze, D., and Rousset, F. (2009). Stochasticity in evolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 24(3), 157-65. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.09.014.
23. Lobkovsky, A. E., and Koonin, E. V. (2012). Replaying the tape of life: quantification of the predictability of evolution. Frontiers in Genetics 3:246. doi:10.3389/fgene.2012.00246.
24. Magalhães, S., and Matos, M. (2012). Strengths and weaknesses of experimental evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 27(12), 649-50. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2012.08.004.
25. Orr, H. A. (2005). The genetic theory of adaptation: a brief history. Nature Reviews Genetics 6(2), 119-27. doi:10.1038/nrg1523.
26. Rezende, E., Balanyà, J., Rodríguez-Trelles, F., Rego, C., Fragata, I., Matos, M., et al. (2010). Climate change and chromosomal inversions in Drosophila subobscura. Climate Research 43(1), 103-114. doi:10.3354/cr00869.
27. Santos, J, Pascual, M., Simões, P., Fragata, I., Lima, M., Kellen, B., et al. (2012). From nature to the laboratory: the impact of founder effects on adaptation. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 25(12), 2607-22. doi:10.1111/jeb.12008.
28. Santos, Josiane, Pascual, M., Simões, P., Fragata, I., Rose, M. R., and Matos, M. (2013). Fast evolutionary genetic differentiation during experimental colonizations. Journal of Genetics 92(2), 183-94. doi:10.1007/s12041-013-0239-x.
29. Schlötterer, C., Kofler, R., Versace, E., Tobler, R., & Franssen, S. U. (2014). Combining experimental evolution with next-generation sequencing: a powerful tool to study adaptation from standing genetic variation. Heredity, 1-10. doi:10.1038/hdy.2014.86.
30. Simões, P., Pascual, M., Santos, J., Rose, M. R., and Matos, M. (2008). Evolutionary dynamics of molecular markers during local adaptation: a case study in Drosophila subobscura. BMC Evolutionary Biology 8(1):66. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-8-66.
31. Simões, P., Pascual, M., Coelho, M. M., and Matos, M. (2010). Divergent evolution of molecular markers during laboratory adaptation in Drosophila subobscura. Genetica 138(9-10), 999-1009. doi:10.1007/s10709-010-9486-4.
32. Simões, P., Santos, J., Fragata, I., Mueller, L. D., Rose, M. R., and Matos, M. (2008a). How repeatable is adaptive evolution?. The role of geographical origin and founder effects in laboratory adaptation. Evolution 62(8), 1817-29. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00423.x.
33. Spor, A., Kvitek, D. J., Nidelet, T., Martin, J., Legrand, J., Dillmann, C., et al. (2014). Phenotypic and genotypic convergences are influenced by historical contingency and environment in yeast. Evolution 68(3), 772-90. doi:10.1111/evo.12302.
34. Stapley, J., Reger, J., Feulner, P. G. D., Smadja, C., Galindo, J., Ekblom, R., et al. (2010). Adaptation genomics: the next generation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 25(12), 705-12. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2010.09.002
35. Stern, D. L. (2013). The genetic causes of convergent evolution. Nature Reviews Genetics 14(11), 751-64. doi:10.1038/nrg3483.
36. Tenaillon, O., Rodríguez-Verdugo, A., Gaut, R. L., McDonald, P., Bennett, A. F., Long, A. D., et al. (2012). The molecular diversity of adaptive convergence. Science 335(6067), 457-61. doi:10.1126/science.1212986.
37. Teotónio, H., and Rose, M. R. (2000). Variation in the reversibility of evolution. Nature 408(6811), 463-6. doi:10.1038/35044070.
38. Teotónio, H., Chelo, I. M., Bradic, M., Rose, M. R., and Long, A. D. (2009). Experimental evolution reveals natural selection on standing genetic variation. Nature Genetics 41(2), 251-7. doi:10.1038/ng.289.