From nature to the laboratory: The impact of founder effects on adaptation

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 25, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 2607-2622

  Santos, J ^a   Pascual, M ^b   Simoes P ^a   Fragata, I ^a   Lima, M ^a   Kellen, B ^a   Santos, M ^a   Marques, A ^a   Rose, M R ^c   Matos, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LISBON   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Drosophila subobscura; Founder effects; Laboratory populations; Life history evolution; Molecular evolution

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ALLELE; COLONIZATION; ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE; FITNESS; FLY; FOUNDER EFFECT; GENETIC DRIFT; LIFE HISTORY THEORY; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION BOTTLENECK; POPULATION SIZE; WILD POPULATION;

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; DROSOPHILA; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; FOUNDER EFFECT; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION DENSITY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; DROSOPHILA; FEMALE; FOUNDER EFFECT; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION DENSITY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

DROSOPHILA SUBOBSCURA;

EID: 84869215946     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jeb.12008     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Allendorf, F.W. 1986. Genetic drift and the loss of alleles versus heterozygosity. Zoo Biology 5: 181-190.
2. Barton, N.H. & Turelli, M. 2004. Effects of genetic drift on variance components under a general model of epistasis. Evolution 58: 2111-2132.
3. Beaumont, M.A. & Nichols, R.A. 1996. Evaluating loci for use in the genetic analysis of population structure. Proc. R. Soc. Biol. Sci. Ser. B 263: 1619-1626.
4. Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Series B Stat. Methodol. 57: 289-300.
5. Berthier, P., Beaumont, M.A., Cornuet, J.-M. & Luikart, G. 2002. Likelihood-based estimation of the effective population size using temporal changes in allele frequencies: a genealogical approach. Genetics 160: 741-751.
6. Bryant, E.H., McComas, S.A. & Combs, L.M. 1986. THe effect of an experimental bottleneck upon quantitative genetic variation in the housefly. Genetics 114: 1191-1211.
7. Buskirk, J.V. & Willi, Y. 2006. The change in quantitative genetic variation with inbreeding. Evolution 60: 2428-2434.
8. Cabe, P.R. 1998. The effects of founding bottlenecks on genetic variation in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris) in North America. Heredity 80: 519-525.
9. Chapuis, M.-P. & Estoup, A. 2007. Microsatellite null alleles and estimation of population differentiation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24: 621-631.
10. Cheverud, J.M., Vaughn, T.T., Pletscher, L.S., King-Ellison, K., Bailiff, J., Adams, E. et al. 1999. Epistasis and the evolution of additive genetic variance in populations that pass through a bottleneck. Evolution 53: 1009-1018.
11. Crow, J.F. & Kimura, M. 1970. An Introduction to Population Genetic Theory. Harper & Row, New York.
12. Dlugosch, K.M. & Parker, I.M. 2008. Founding events in species invasions: genetic variation, adaptive evolution, and the role of multiple introductions. Mol. Ecol. 17: 431-449.
13. Dobzhansky, T. & Spassky, N.P. 1962. Genetic drift and natural selection in experimental populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 48: 148-156.
14. Edelaar, P., Burraco, P. & Gomez-Mestre, I. 2011. Comparisons between Q(ST) and F(ST) -how wrong have we been? Mol. Ecol. 20: 4830-4839.
15. England, P.R., Osler, G.H.R., Woodworth, L.M., Montgomery, M.E., Briscoe, D.A. & Frankham, R. 2003. Effects of intense versus diffuse population bottlenecks on microsatellite genetic diversity and evolutionary potential. Conserv. Genet. 4: 595-604.
16. Excoffier, L. & Lischer, H.E.L. 2010. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: A new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol. Ecol. Res. 10: 564-567.
17. Falconer, D.S. & Mackay, T.F.C. 1996. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman Scientific and Technical, Harlow, England.
18. Frankham, R. 1999. Quantitative genetics in conservation biology. Genet. Res. 74: 237-244.
19. Gilligan, D.M. & Frankham, R. 2003. Dynamics of genetic adaptation to captivity. Conserv. Genet. 4: 189-197.
20. Gilligan, D.M., Briscoe, D.A. & Frankham, R. 2005. Comparative losses of quantitative and molecular genetic variation in finite populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genet. Res. 85: 47-55.
21. Gloor, G.B., Preston, C.R., Johnson-Schlitz, D.M., Nassif, N.A., Phillis, R.W., Benz, W.K. et al. 1993. Type I repressors of P element mobility. Genetics 135: 81-95.
22. Goodnight, C.J. 1988. Epistasis and the effect of founder events on the additive genetic variance. Evolution 42: 441-454.
23. Goudet, J. 1995. FSTAT (Vers. 2.9.3.): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. J. Hered. 86: 485-486.
24. Griffiths, J.A., Schiffer, M. & Hoffmann, A.A. 2005. Clinal variation and laboratory adaptation in the rainforest species Drosophila birchii for stress resistance, wing size, wing shape and development time. J. Evol. Biol. 18: 213-222.
25. Harshman, L.G. & Hoffmann, A.A. 2000. Laboratory selection experiments using Drosophila: what do they really tell us? Trends Ecol. Evol. 15: 32-36.
26. Hedgecock, D. 1994. Does variance in reproductive success limit effective population sizes of marine organisms? In: Genetics and Evolution of Aquatic Organisms (A.R. Beaumont, ed.), pp. 122-134. Chapman & Hall, London.
27. Hill, W.G. 1981. Estimation of effective population size from data on linkage disequilibrium. Genet. Res. 38: 209-216.
28. Hoffmann, A.A., Hallas, R., Sinclair, C. & Partridge, L. 2001. Rapid loss of stress resistance in Drosophila melanogaster under adaptation to laboratory culture. Evolution 55: 436-438.
29. Kauer, M.O., Dieringer, D. & Schlötterer, C. 2003. A microsatellite variability screen for positive selection associated with the "Out of Africa" habitat expansion of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 165: 1137-1148.
30. Keller, S.R. & Taylor, D.R. 2008. History, chance and adaptation during biological invasion: separating stochastic phenotypic evolution from response to selection. Ecol. Lett. 11: 852-866.
31. Kirk, H. & Freeland, J.R. 2011. Applications and implications of neutral versus non-neutral markers in Molecular Ecology. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 12: 3966-3988.
32. Kolbe, J.J., Leal, M., Schoener, T.W., Spiller, D.S. & B. Losos, J.B. 2012. Founder effects persist despite adaptive differentiation: a field experiment with lizards. Science 335: 1086-1089.
33. Leberg, P.L. 1992. Effects of population bottlenecks on genetic diversity as measured by allozyme electrophoresis. Evolution 46: 477-494.
34. Maruyama, T. & Fuerst, P.A. 1985. Population bottlenecks and nonequilibrium models in population genetics. II. Number of alleles in a small population that was formed by a recent bottleneck. Genetics 111: 675-689.
35. Matos, M. & Avelar, T. 2001. Adaptation to the laboratory: comments on Sgrò and Partridge. Am Nat 158: 655-656.
36. Matos, M., Rego, C., Levy, A., Teotónio, H. & Rose, M.R. 2000. An evolutionary no man's land. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15: 206.
37. McKay, J.K. & Latta, R.G. 2002. Adaptive population divergence: markers, QTL and traits. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 285-291.
38. Merilä, J. & Sheldon, B.C. 1999. Genetic architecture of fitness and nonfitness traits: empirical patterns and development of ideas. Heredity 83: 103-109.
39. Nei, M. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89: 583-590.
40. Nei, M., Maruyama, T. & Chakraborty, R. 1975. The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution 29: 1-10.
41. Oberrath, R. & Böhning-Gaese, K. 2001. The Signed Mantel test to cope with autocorrelation in comparative analyses. J Appl Stat 28: 725-736.
42. Ovenden, J., Pee, D., Street, R., Courtney, A., Hoyle, S., Peel, S. et al. 2007. The genetic effective and adult census size of an Australian population of tiger prawns (Penaeus esculentus). Mol. Ecol. 16: 127-138.
43. Palo, J.U., O'Hara, R.B., Laugen, A.T., Laurila, A., Primmer, C.R. & Merilä, J. 2003. Latitudinal divergence of common frog (Rana temporaria) life history traits by natural selection: evidence from a comparison of molecular and quantitative genetic data. Mol. Ecol. 12: 1963-1978.
44. Pascual, M., Schug, M.D. & Aquadro, C.F. 2000. High density of long dinucleotide microsatellites in Drosophila subobscura. Mol. Biol. 17: 1259-1267.
45. Peakall, R. & Smouse, P.E. 2006. Genalex 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol. Ecol. Notes 6: 288-295.
46. Reed, D.H. & Frankham, R. 2001. How closely correlated are molecular and quantitative measures of genetic variation? A meta-analysis Evolution 55: 1095-1103.
47. Reed, D.H. & Frankham, R. 2003. Correlation between Fitness and Genetic Diversity. Conserv. Biol. 17: 230-237.
48. Regan, J.L., Meffert, L.M. & Bryant, E.H. 2003. A direct experimental test of founder-flush effects on the evolutionary potential for assortative mating. J. Evol. Biol. 16: 302-312.
49. Robertson, A. 1960. A theory of limits in artificial selection. Proc. R. Soc. Biol. Sci. Ser. B 153: 234-249.
50. Rose, M.R., Passananti, H.B., Chippindale, A.K., Phelan, J.P., Matos, M., Teotónio, H. et al. 2005. The effects of evolution are local: evidence from experimental evolution in Drosophila. Integr. Comp. Biol. 45: 486-491.
51. Rousset, F. 2008. GENEPOP'007: a complete re-implementation of the GENEPOP software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8: 103-106.
52. Sæther, S.A., Fiske, P., Kålås, J.A., Kuresoo, A., Luigujõe, L., Piertney, S.B. et al. 2007. Inferring local adaptation from QST-FST comparisons: neutral genetic and quantitative trait variation in European populations of great snipe. J. Evol. Biol. 20: 1563-1576.
53. Santos, J., Serra, L., Solé, E. & Pascual, M. 2010. FISH mapping of microsatellite loci from Drosophila subobscura and its comparison to related species. Chromosome Res. 18: 213-226.
54. Sgrò, C.M. & Partridge, L. 2000. Evolutionary responses of the life history of wild-caught Drosophila melanogaster to two standard methods of laboratory culture. Am Nat 156: 341-353.
55. Simões, P., Rose, M.R., Duarte, A., Gonçalves, R. & Matos, M. 2007. Evolutionary domestication in Drosophila subobscura. J. Evol. Biol. 20: 758-766.
56. Simões, P., Pascual, M., Santos, J., Rose, M.R. & Matos, M. 2008a. Evolutionary dynamics of molecular markers during local adaptation: a case study in Drosophila subobscura. BMC Evol. Biol. 8: 66.
57. Simões, P., Santos, J., Fragata, I., Mueller, L.D., Rose, M.R. & Matos, M. 2008b. How repeatable is adaptive evolution? The role of geographical origin and founder effects in laboratory adaptation. Evolution 62: 1817-1829.
58. Simões, P., Santos, J. & Matos, M. 2009. Experimental evolutionary domestication. In: Experimental Evolution: Concepts, Methods, and Applications of Selection Experiments (T. Garland, Jr. & M.R. Rose, eds), pp. 89-110. Regents of the University of California, California.
59. Simões, P., Pascual, M., Coelho, M.M. & Matos, M. 2010. Divergent evolution of molecular markers during laboratory adaptation in Drosophila subobscura. Genetica 138: 999-1009.
60. Spencer, C.C., Neigel, J.E. & Leberg, P.L. 2000. Experimental evaluation of the usefulness of microsatellite DNA for detecting demographic bottlenecks. Mol. Ecol. 9: 1517-1528.
61. Tallmon, D.A., Luikart, G. & Beaumont, M.A. 2004. Comparative evaluation of a new effective population size estimator based on approximate bayesian computation. Genetics 167: 977-988.
62. Templeton, A.R. 1980. The theory of speciation via the founder principle. Genetics 94: 1011-1038.
63. Waples, R.S. 1998. Separating the wheat from the chaff: patterns of genetic differentiation in high gene flow species. J. Hered. 89: 438-450.
64. Weber, K.E. 1990. Selection on wing allometry in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 126: 975-989.
65. Weber, K.E. & Diggins, L.T. 1990. Increased selection response in larger populations. II. Selection for ethanol vapor resistance in Drosophila melanogaster at two population sizes. Genetics 125: 585-597.
66. Weir, B.S. & Cockerham, C.C. 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38: 1358-1370.
67. Whitlock, M.C., Phillips, P.C. & Wade, M.J. 1993. Gene interaction affects the additive genetic variance in subdivided populations with migration and extinction. Evolution 47: 1758-1769.
68. Willi, Y., Buskirk, J.V. & Hoffmann, A.A. 2006. Limits to the adaptive potential of small populations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 37: 433-458.
69. Wright, S. 1931. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16: 97-159.
70. Wright, S. 1977. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations: Experimental Results and Evolutionary Deductions. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.