Current Theory and Practice of Assessment Centers: The Importance of Trait Activation

The Oxford Handbook of Personnel Psychology

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Lievens, Filip ^a   Koster, Liesbet De ^a   Schollaert, Eveline ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Assessment center; Candidate behavior; Interviews; Performance appraisal; Person situation interaction; Trait activation theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 84923547340     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199234738.003.0010     Document Type: Chapter

References (37)

1. ARTHUR, W., DAY, E. A., MC NELLY, T. L., and EDENS, P. S. 2003. A meta-analysis of the criterion-related validity of assessment center dimensions. Personnel Psychology, 56: 125-54.
2. ATKINS, P. W. B., and WOOD, R. E. 2002. Self-versus others' ratings as predictors of assessment center ratings: validation evidence for 360-degree feedback programs. Personnel Psychology, 55: 871-904.
3. COSTA, P. T., and MC CRAE, R. R. 1992. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
4. CRAIK, K. H., WARE, A. P., KAMP, J., O'REILLY, C. III, STAW, B., and ZEDECK, S. 2002. Explorations of construct validity in a combined managerial and personality assessment programme. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75: 171-93.
5. GAUG LER, B. B., ROSENTHAL D. B., THORNTON, G. C., and BENTSON, C. 1987. Meta-analysis of assessment center validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72: 493-511.
6. GOLDBERG, L. R. 1992. The development of markers for the big five-factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4: 26-42.
7. GOLDSTEIN, H. W., YUSKO, K. P., BRAVERMAN, E. P., SMITH, D. B., and CHUNG, B. 1998. The role of cognitive ability in the subgroup differences and incremental validity of assessment center exercises. Personnel Psychology, 51: 357-74.
8. HAALAND, S., and CHRISTIANSEN, N. D. 2002. Implications of trait-activation theory for evaluating the construct validity of assessment center ratings. Personnel Psychology, 55: 137-63.
9. HAG AN, C. M., KONOPASKE, R., BERNARDIN, H. J., and TYLER, C. L. 2006. Predicting assessment center performance with 360-degree, top-down, and customer-based competency assessments. Human Resource Management, 45: 357-90.
10. HAUSKNECHT, J. P., DAY, D. V., and THOMAS, S. C. 2004. Applicant reactions to selection procedures: an updated model and meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 57: 639-83.
11. HERMELIN, E., LIEVENS, F., and ROBERTSON, I. T. 2007. The validity of assessment centers for the prediction of supervisory performance ratings: a meta-analysis. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15: 405-11.
12. HIG HHOUSE, S., and HARRIS, M. M. 1993. The measurement of assessment-center situations: Bem Template Matching technique for examining exercise similarity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23: 140-55.
13. HOFFMAN, C. C., and THORNTON, G. C. I. 1997. Examining selection utility where competing predictors differ in adverse impact. Personnel Psychology, 50: 455-70.
14. INTERNATIONAL TASKFORCE ON ASSESSMENT CENTERS GUIDELINES. 2000. Guidelines and ethical considerations for assessment center operations. Public Personnel Management, 29: 315-31.
15. KLEINMANN, M., EXLER, C., KUPTSCH, C., and KÖLLER, O. 1995. Independence and Observability of Dimensions as Moderators of Construct-Validity in the Assessment-Center. Zeitschrift für Arbeits und Organisationspsychologie, 39: 22-8.
16. LANCE, C. E., LAMBERT, T. A., GEWIN, A. G., LIEVENS, F., and CONWAY, J. M. 2004. Revised estimates of dimension and exercise variance components in assessment center post-exercise dimension ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89: 377-85.
17. LIEVENS, F. 1998. Factors which improve the construct validity of assessment centers: a review. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 6: 141-52.
18. LIEVENS, F. 2001. Assessor training strategies and their effects on accuracy, inter-rater reliability, and discriminant validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 255-64.
19. LIEVENS, F. 2002. An examination of the accuracy of slogans related to assessment centers. Personnel Review, 31: 86-102.
20. LIEVENS, F. and CONWAY, J. 2001. Dimension and exercise variance in assessment center scores: a large-scale evaluation of multitrait-multimethod studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 1202-22.
21. LIEVENS, F. DE FRUYT, F., and VAN DAM, K. 2001. Assessors' use of personality traits in descriptions of assessment center candidates: a five-factor model perspective. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74: 623-36.
22. LIEVENS, F. SANCHEZ, J. I., and DE CORTE, W. 2004. Easing the inferential leap in competency modeling: the effects of task-related information and subjectmatter expertise. Personnel Psychology, 57: 881-904.
23. LIEVENS, F. CHASTEEN, C. S., DAY, E. A., and CHRISTIANSEN, N. D. 2006. Large-scale investigation of the role of trait activation theory for understanding assessment center convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91: 247-58.
24. MISCHEL, W. 1973. Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychological Review, 80: 252-83.
25. SACKETT, P. R., and TUZINSKI, K. 2001. The role of dimensions and exercises in assessment center judgements. Pp. 111-29 in How People Evaluate Others in Organizations, ed. M. London. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. SCHLEICHER, D. J., DAY, D. V., MAYES, B. T., and RIG G IO, R. E. 2002. A new frame for frame of reference training: enhancing the construct validity of assessment centers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 735-46.
27. SPECTOR, P. E., SCHNEIDER, J. R., VANCE, C. A., and HEZLETT, S. A. 2000. The relation of cognitive ability and personality traits to assessment center performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30: 1474-91.
28. TERPSTRA, D. E., MOHAMED, A. A., and KETHLEY, R. B. 1999. An analysis of federal court cases involving nine selection devices. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 7: 26-34.
29. TETT, R. P. 1999. Assessment center validity: new perspectives on an old problem. Paper presented at the 14th Annual Convention of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
30. TETT, R. P. and BURNETT, D. D. 2003. A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 500-17.
31. TETT, R. P. and GUTERMAN, H. A. 2000. Situation trait relevance, trait expression, and cross-situational consistency: testing a principle of trait activation. Journal of Research in Personality, 34: 397-423.
32. TETT, R. P. and SCHLEICHER, D. J. 2001. Assessment Center Dimensions as "traits": new concepts in AC design. In M. Born (Chair), Assessment Center Dimension Validation: Are We Asking the Wrong Questions? Symposium conducted at the 16th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Diego, CA, April.
33. THORNTON, G. C. 1992. Assessment Centers and Human Resource Management. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
34. THORNTON, G. C. and MUELLER-HANSON, R. A. 2004. Developing Organizational Simulations: A Guide for Practitioners and Students. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
35. THORNTON, G. C. LARSH, S. L., LAYER, S., and KAMAN, V. S. (1999). Reactions to attribute-versus exercise-based feedback in developmental assessment centers. Paper presented at the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Atlanta, GA, April.
36. THORNTON, G. C. TZINER, A., DAHAN, M., CLEVENG ER, J. P., MEIR, E. 1997. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12: 109-28.
37. WERNIMONT, P. F. and CAMPBELL, J. P. 1968. Signs, samples, and criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52: 372-6.