Implications of trait-activation theory for evaluating the construct validity of assessment center ratings

Personnel Psychology

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 137-163

  Haaland, Stephanie ^a   Christiansen, Neil D ^a  

^a CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036004314     PISSN: 00315826     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00106.x     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis
2. On predicting some of the people some of the time: The search for cross-situational consistencies in behavior
3. Predicting more of the people more of the time: Assessing the personality of situations
4. Situational specificity in assessment center ratings: A confirmatory factor analysis
5. Set correlation as a general multivariate data-analytic model
6. Investigation of the uses of self-reperts of abilities
7. An Sinventory of dominance for research on the nature of person-situations interactions
8. Validating the NEO Personality Inventory using assessor's ratings
9. Meta-analyses of assessment center validity
10. Number of assessment center dimensions as a determinant of assessor accuracy
11. The 16PF related to the five factor model of personality: Multiple-indicator measurement versus a priori scales
12. Personality testing and the assessment center: Incremental validity for managerial selection
13. The development of markers for the Big Five factor structure
14. The measurement of assessment center situations: Bem's template matching technique for examining exercise similarity
15. A reassessment of assessment centers: Challenges for the 21st century
16. Profiting from controversy: Lessons from the person-situation debate
17. Assessment centers-valid or merely prescient
18. Why do assesment centers work? The puzzle of assessment center validity
19. Linking personality and job behavior: Marker work activities for the five factor model
20. Assessor training strategies and their effects on accuracy, interrater reliability, and discriminant validity
21. Assessor's use of personality traits in descriptions of assessment centre candidates: A five factor model perspective
22. An analysis of situational dimensions
23. Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality
24. The interaction of person and situation
25. Assessment from a cognitive social learning perspective
26. Analyzing the construction of consistency in personality
27. A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure
28. Reconciling processing dynamics and personality dispositions
29. Constructs and assessment center dimensions: Some troubling empirical findings
30. A further examination of the constructs underlying assessment center ratings
31. The role of dimensions and exercises in assessment center judgments
32. Evidence for the Big Five in analyses of familiar English personality adjectives
33. The nomological network of the assessment center: A meta-analysis
34. Intuitive interactionism in person perception: Effects of situation-behavior relations on dispositional judgments
35. The role of situational demands and cognitive competencies in behavior organization and personality coherence
36. Assessment center validity: New perspectives on an old problem
37. Situation trait relevance, trait expression, and cross-situational consistency: Testing a principle of trait-activation
38. Broad and narrow measures on both sides of the personality-job performance relationship
39. A comparison of the predictive validity of assessment center evaluations versus traditional measures in forecasting supervisory job performance: Interpretive implications of criterion distortion for the assessment paradigm
40. A conditional approach to dispositional construct: The local predictability of social behavior
41. Conditional hedges and the intuitive psychology of traits
42. Psychological issues in personnel decisions