The influence of character correlations on phylogenetic analyses: A case study of the carnivoran cranium

Carnivoran Evolution: New Views on Phylogeny, Form, and Function

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 141-164

  Goswami, Anjali ^a   David Polly, P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84923445622     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139193436.006     Document Type: Chapter

References (76)

1. Ackermann, R. R. and Cheverud, J. M. (2000). Phenotypic covariance structure in tamarins (genus Saguinus): a comparison of variation patterns usingmatrix correlation and common principal components analysis. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 111, 489-501.
2. Ackermann, R.R. and Cheverud, J. M. (2004). Morphological integration in primate evolution. In Phenotypic Integration, ed. M. Pigliucci and K. Preston. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 302-19.
3. Atchley, W.R. and Hall, B. K. (1991). A model for development and evolution of complex morphological structures. Biological Reviews, 66, 101-57.
4. Atchley, W.R., Rutledge, J. J. and Cowley, D. E. (1982). A multivariate statistical analysis of direct and correlated response to selection in the rat. Evolution, 36, 677-98.
5. Badyaev, A.V. and Foresman, K.R. (2000). Extreme environmental change and evolution: stress-induced morphological variation is strongly concordant with patterns of evolutionary divergence in shrew mandibles. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Biological Sciences Series B, 267, 371-77.
6. Badyaev, A.V. and Foresman, K.R. (2004). Evolution of morphological integration. I. Functional units channel stress-induced variation in shrew mandibles. American Naturalist, 163, 868-79.
7. Bolker, J.A. (2000). Modularity in development and why it matters to evo-devo. American Zoologist, 40, 770-76.
8. Chernoff, B. and Magwene, P. M. (1999). Afterword. In Morphological Integration, ed. E. C. Olson and R. L. Miller. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 319-48.
9. Cheverud, J. M. (1982). Phenotypic, genetic, and environmental morphological integration in the cranium. Evolution, 36, 499-516.
10. Cheverud, J. M. (1988). Spatial-analysis in morphology illustrated by rhesus macaque cranial growth and integration. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 75, 195-96.
11. Cheverud, J. M. (1989). A comparative analysis of morphological variation patterns in the papionines. Evolution, 43, 1737-47.
12. Cheverud, J. M. (1995). Morphological integration in the saddle-back tamarin (Saguinus fuscicollis) cranium. American Naturalist, 145, 63-89.
13. Cheverud, J. M. (1996a). Quantitative genetic analysis of cranial morphology in the cottontop (Saguinus oedipus) and saddle-back (S. fuscicollis) tamarins. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 9, 5-42.
14. Cheverud, J. M. (1996b). Developmental integration and the evolution of pleiotropy. American Zoologist, 36, 44-50.
15. Eble, G. (2004). The macroevolution of phenotypic integration. In Phenotypic Integration, ed. M. Pigliucci and K. Preston. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 253-73.
16. Emerson, S. B. and Hastings, P. A. (1998). Morphological correlations in evolution: Consequences for phylogenetic analysis. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 73, 141-62.
17. Felsenstein, J. (1973). Maximum likelihood and minimum-steps methods for estimating evolutionary trees from data on discrete characters. Systematic Zoology, 22, 240-49.
18. Felsenstein, J. (1985). Phylogenies and the comparative method. American Naturalist, 125, 1-15.
19. Flynn, J. J. and Nedbal, M. A. (1998). Phylogeny of the carnivora (mammalia): Congruence versus incompatability among multiple data sets. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 9, 414-26.
20. Flynn, J. J. and Wesley-Hunt, G. D. (2005). Carnivora. In The Rise of Placental Mammals: Origins and Relationships of the Major Extant Clades, ed. D. Archibald and K. Rose. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 175-98.
21. Flynn, J. J., Nedbal, M. A., Dragoo, J.W. and Honeycutt, R. L. (2000). Whence the red panda? Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 17, 190-99.
22. Flynn, J. J., Finarelli, J. A., Zehr, S., Hsu, J. and Nedbal, M. A. (2005). Molecular phylogeny of the Carnivora (Mammalia): assessing the impact of increased sampling on resolving enigmatic relationships. Systematic Biology, 54, 317-37.
23. Gilbert, S. F., Opitz, J. M. and Raff, R. A. (1996). Resynthesizing evolutionary and developmental biology. Developmental Biology, 173, 357-72.
24. Gonzáles-José, R., Escapa, I., Neves, W. A., Cúneo, R. and Pucciarelli, H. M. (2008). Cladistical analysis of continuous modularized traits provides phylogenetic signal in Homo evolution. Nature, 453, 775-78.
25. Goswami, A. (2006a). Cranial modularity shifts during mammalian evolution. American Naturalist, 168, 270-80.
26. Goswami, A. (2006b). Morphological integration in the carnivoran skull. Evolution, 60, 169-83.
27. Goswami, A. (2007a). Cranial integration, phylogeny, and diet in australodelphian marsupials. PLoS One, 2, e995.
28. Goswami, A. (2007b). Cranial modularity and sequence heterochrony in mammals. Evolution & Development, 9, 290-98.
29. Goswami, A. and Polly, P. D. (2010). The influence of modularity on cranial morphological disparity in carnivora and primates (Mammalia). PLoS One, 5, e9517.
30. Gower, J. C. (1966). Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis. Biometrika, 53, 325-38.
31. Harris, S.R., Gower, D. J. andWilkinson, M. (2003). Intraorganismal homology, character construction, and the phylogeny of aetosaurian archosaurs (Reptilia, Diapsida). Systematic Biology, 52, 239-52.
32. Huelsenbeck, J. P. and Nielsen, R. (1999). Effect of nonindependence substitution on phylogenetic accuracy. Systematic Biology, 48, 317-28.
33. Hunt, R.M. J. and Tedford, R.H. (1993). Phylogenetic relationships within aeluroid Carnivora and implications of their temporal and geographic distribution. In Mammal Phylogeny ed. F.S. Szalay, M. J. Novacek andM.C. McKenna. New York, NY: Springer, pp. 53-73.
34. Kangas, A.T., Evans, A.R., Thesleff, I. and Jernvall, J. (2004). Non-independence of mammalian dental characters. Nature, 432, 211-14.
35. Kluge, A. G. (1989). A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Systematic Zoology, 38, 7-25.
36. Kluge, A. G. and Farris, J. S. (1969). Quantitative phyletics and evolution of anurans. Systematic Zoology, 18, 1-32.
37. Kluge, A. G. and Wolf, A. J. (1993). Cladistics: what's in a word? Cladistics - The International Journal of the Willi Hennig Society, 9, 183-99.
38. Maddison, W. P. (2000). Testing character correlation using pairwise comparisons on a phylogeny. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 202, 195-204.
39. Marroig, G. and Cheverud, J. M. (2001). A comparison of phenotypic variation and covariation patterns and the role of phylogeny, ecology, and ontogeny during cranial evolution of New World monkeys. Evolution, 55, 2576-600.
40. Marroig, G., Vivo, M. and Cheverud, J. M. (2004). Cranial evolution in Sakis (Pithecia, Platyrrhini) ii: evolutionary processes and morphological integration. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 17, 144-55.
41. Moss, M.O. and Young, R.W. (1960). A functional approach to craniology. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 18, 281-91.
42. Myers, P. (2000). Carnivora (on-line), animal diversity web. http://animaldiversity.ummz. umich.edu/site/accounts/information/carnivora.html.
43. Naylor, G. J. P. and Adams, D. C. (2001). Are the fossil data really at odds with the molecular data? Morphological evidence for Cetartiodactyla phylogeny reexamined. Systematic Biology, 50, 444-53.
44. Nowak, R. M. (1999). Walker's Mammals of the World, 6th ed. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
45. O'Keefe, F.R. and Wagner, P. J. (2001). Inferring and testing hypotheses of cladistic character dependence by using character compatibility. Systematic Biology, 50, 657-75.
46. Olson, E. C. and Miller, R. L. (1951). A mathematical model applied to the evolution of species. Evolution, 5, 325-38.
47. Olson, E. C. and Miller, R. L. (1958). Morphological Integration. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
48. Otto, S. P. and Day, T. (2007). A Biologist's Guide to Mathematical Modeling in Ecology and Evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
49. Pigliucci, M. and Preston, K. (2004). Phenotypic Integration.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
50. Polly, P. D. (2005). Development and phenotypic correlations: the evolution of tooth shape in Sorex araneus. Evolution & Development, 7, 29-41.
51. Polly, P.D., Head, J. J. and Cohn, M. J. (2001). Testing modularity and dissociation: the evolution of regional proportions in snakes. In Beyond Heterochrony: The Evolution of Development, ed. M. L. Zelditch. New York, NY: Wiley-Liss, pp. 305-35.
52. Read, A. F. and Nee, S. (1995). Inference from binary comparative data. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 173, 99-108.
53. Rieppel, O. and Kearney, M. (2002). Similarity. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 75, 59-82.
54. Sadleir, R.W. and Makovicky, P. J. (2008). Cranial shape and correlated characters in crocodile evolution. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 21, 1578-96.
55. Sanchez-Villagra, M.R. and Williams, B. (1998). Levels of homoplasy in the evolution of the mammalian skeleton. Journal of Mammalian Evolution, 5, 113-26.
56. Schlosser, G. andWagner, G. P. (2004). Modularity in Development and Evolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
57. Schwenk, K. (2001). Functional units and their evolution. In The Character Concept in Evolutionary Biology, ed. G. P. Wagner. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 165-98.
58. Shubin, N. and Davis, M. C. (2004). Modularity in the evolution of vertebrate appendages. In Modularity in Development and Evolution, ed. G. Schlosser and G. P. Wagner. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 429-40.
59. Steppan, S. J. (1997). Phylogenetic analysis of phenotypic covariance structure. II. Reconstructing matrix evolution. Evolution, 51, 587-94.
60. Strait, D. S. (2001). Integration, phylogeny, and the hominid cranial base. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 114, 273-97.
61. Tedford, R. H., Taylor, B. E. and Wang, X. (1995). Phylogeny of the Canidae (Carnivora: Canidae): the living taxa. American Museum Novitates, 3146, 1-37.
62. Thorogood, P. (1993). Differentiation and morphogenesis of cranial skeletal tissues. In The Skull, ed. J. Hanken and B. K. Hall. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 112-52.
63. Van Der Klaauw, C. J. (1948-1952). Size and position of the functional components of the skull. Archives Neerlandaises de Zoologie, 9, 1-559.
64. Vermeij, G. J. (1973). Adaptation, versatility, and evolution. Systematic Zoology, 22, 466-77.
65. Wagner, G. P. (1995). Adaptation and the modular design of organisms. Advances in Artificial Life, 929, 317-28.
66. Wagner, G. P. (1996). Homologues, natural kinds and the evolution of modularity. American Zoologist, 36, 36-43.
67. Wagner, G. P. and Altenberg, L. (1996). Perspective: complex adaptations and the evolution of evolvability. Evolution, 50, 967-76.
68. Wagner, P. J. (1998). A likelihood approach for evaluating estimates of phylogenetic relationships among fossil taxa. Palaeobiology, 24, 430-49.
69. Wesley-Hunt, G. D. and Flynn, J. J. (2005). Phylogeny of the Carnivora: basal relationships among the carnivoramorphans, and assessment of the position of 'Miacoidea' relative to crown-clade Carnivora. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, 3, 1-28.
70. Williams, B. (2007). Comparing levels of homoplasy in the primate skeleton. Journal of Human Evolution, 52, 480-89.
71. Wyss, A.R. and Flynn, J. J. (1993). A phylogenetic analysis and definition of the carnivora. In Mammal Phylogeny, ed. F. S. Szalay, M. J. Novacek and M. C. McKenna. New York, NY: Springer, pp. 32-52.
72. Yoder, A. D., Burns, M. M., Zehr, S., et al. (2003). Single origin of Malagasy Carnivora from an African ancestor. Nature, 421, 734-37.
73. Zelditch, M. L. (1988). Ontogenetic variation in patterns of phenotypic integration in the laboratory rat. Evolution, 42, 28-41.
74. Zelditch, M.L. and Carmichael, A.C. (1989a). Growth and intensity of integration through postnatal growth in the skull of Sigmodon fulviventer. Journal ofMammalogy, 70, 477-84.
75. Zelditch, M. L. and Carmichael, A. C. (1989b). Ontogenetic variation in patterns of developmental and functional integration in skulls of Sigmodon fuliviventer. Evolution, 43, 814-24.
76. Zelditch, M. L., Sheets, H.D. and Fink, W. L. (2001). The spatial complexity and evolutionary dynamics of growth. In Beyond Heterochrony: The Evolution of Development, ed. M. L. Zelditch. New York, NY: Wiley-Liss, pp. 145-94.