Participants' recall and understanding of genomic research and large-scale data sharing

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 42-52

  Robinson, Jill Oliver ^a   Slashinski, Melody J ^a   Wang, Tao ^a   Hilsenbeck, Susan G ^a   McGuire, Amy L ^a  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Data sharing; Genome research; Informed consent; Participant perspectives; Understanding

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; CONFIDENTIALITY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; ETHICS; FEMALE; GENETICS; GENOMICS; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; INTERVIEW; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECALL; RESEARCH SUBJECT; SATISFACTION;

ADULT; AGED; COMPREHENSION; CONFIDENTIALITY; DECISION MAKING; DISCLOSURE; FEMALE; GENETIC RESEARCH; GENOMICS; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONAL SATISFACTION; RESEARCH SUBJECTS;

EID: 84887465623     PISSN: 15562646     EISSN: 15562654     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1525/jer.2013.8.4.42     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bergler, J. H., Pennington, A. C., Metcalfe, M., & Freis, E. D. (1980). Informed consent: How much does the patient understand? Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 27(4), 435-440.
2. Beskow, L. M., Friedman, J. Y., Hardy, N. C., Lin, L., & Weinfurt, K. P. (2010). Simplifying informed consent for biorepositories: Stakeholder perspectives. Genetics in Medicine, 12(9), 567-572.
3. Code of Federal Regulations. Title 45, Part 46, Protection of human subjects. Retrieved from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46. html.
4. Department of Health and Human Services. 2011. Human subjects research protections: Enhancing protections for research subjects and reducing burden, delay, and ambiguity for investigators. Advance notice of proposed rulemaking. Federal Register, 76(143), 44512-44531. Retrieved from http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/ pkg/FR-2011-07-26/html/2011-18792.htm.
5. Dixon-Woods, M., Ashcroft, R. E., Jackson, C. J., Tobin, M. D., Kivits, J., Burton, P. R., et al. (2007). Beyond misunderstanding: Written information and decisions about taking part in a genetic epidemiology study. Social Science and Medicine, 65(11), 2212-2222.
6. Faden, R. R., Beauchamp, T. L., & King, N. M. P. (1986). A history and theory of informed consent. New York: Oxford University Press.
7. Hall, M. A., Camacho, F., Lawlor, J. S., Depuy, V., Sugarman, J., & Weinfurt, K. (2006). Measuring trust in medical researchers. Medical Care, 44(11), 1048-1053.
8. Helgesson, G., Ludvigsson, J., & Gustafsson Stolt, U. (2005). How to handle informed consent in longitudinal studies when participants have a limited understanding of the study. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31(11), 670-673.
9. Hoeyer, K., Olofsson, B. O., Mjorndal, T., & Lynoe, N. (2005). The ethics of research using biobanks: Reason to question the importance attributed to informed consent. Archives of Internal Medicine, 165(1), 97-100.
10. Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288.
11. Joffe, S., Cook, E. F., Cleary, P. D., Clark, J. W., & Weeks, J. C. (2001a). Quality of informed consent in cancer clinical trials: A cross-sectional survey. Lancet, 358(9295), 1772-1777.
12. Joffe, S., Cook, E. F., Cleary, P. D., Clark, J. W., & Weeks, J. C. (2001b). Quality of informed consent: A new measure of understanding among research subjects. Journal of National Cancer Institute, 93(2), 139-147.
13. Kaye, J. (2012). The tension between data sharing and the protection of privacy in genomics research. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 13, 415-431.
14. Lea, D. H., Kaphingst, K. A., Bowen, D., Lipkus, I., & Hadley, D. W. (2011). Communicating genetic and genomic information: Health literacy and numeracy considerations. Public Health Genomics, 14(4-5), 279-289.
15. Matsui, K., Lie, R. K., Turin, T. C., & Kita, Y. (2012). A randomized controlled trial of short and standard-length consent forms for a genetic cohort study: Is longer better? Journal of Epidemiology, 22(4), 308-316.
16. McGuire, A. L., & Beskow, L. M. (2010). Informed consent in genomics and genetic research. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 11, 361-381.
17. McGuire, A. L., Hamilton, J. A., Lunstroth, R., McCullough, L. B., & Goldman, A. (2008). DNA data sharing: Research participants' perspectives. Genetics in Medicine, 10(1), 46-53.
18. McGuire, A. L., Oliver, J. M., Slashinski, M. J., Graves, J. L., Wang, T., Kelly, P. A., et al. (2011). To share or not to share: A randomized trial of consent for data sharing in genome research. Genetics in Medicine, 13(10).
19. National Institutes of Health. (2007). Policy for sharing of data obtained in NIH supported or conducted Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS). Retrieved from http://grants. nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-07-088. html.
20. O'Connor, A. M. (1995). Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Medical Decision Making, 15(1), 25-30.
21. Oliver, J. M., Slashinski, M. J., Wang, T., Kelly, P. A., Hilsenbeck, S. G., & McGuire, A. L. (2012). Balancing the risks and benefits of genomic data sharing: Genome research participants' perspectives. Public Health Genomics, 15(2), 106-114.
22. Sepucha, K. R., Fagerlin, A., Couper, M. P., Levin, C. A., Singer, E., & Zikmund-Fisher, B. J. (2010). How does feeling informed relate to being informed? The DECISIONS survey. Medical Decision Making, 30(5 Suppl), 77S-84S.
23. Stolt, U. G., Helgesson, G., Liss, P. E., Svensson, T., & Ludvigsson, J. (2005). Information and informed consent in a longitudinal screening involving children: A questionnaire survey. European Journal of Human Genetics, 13(3), 376-383.
24. The Wellcome Trust. (1996). Summary of principles agreed at the International Strategy Meeting in Human Genome Sequencing, Bermuda. Retrieved from http://www.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human-Genome/research/bermuda. shtml#1.
25. The Wellcome Trust. (2003). Sharing data from large-scale biological research projects: A system of tripartite responsibility, Fort Lauderdale. Retrieved from http://www.genome.gov/Pages/Research/WellcomeReport0303.pdf.
26. Wendler, D., & Grady, C. (2008). What should research participants understand to understand they are participants in research? Bioethics, 22(4), 203-208.