S. cerevisiae fermentation activity after moderate pulsed electric field pre-treatments

Bioelectrochemistry

Volumn 103, Issue , 2015, Pages 92-97

  Mattar, Jessy R ^a,b   Turk, Mohammad F ^c   Nonus, Maurice ^a   Lebovka, Nikolai I ^a,d   El Zakhem, Henri ^b   Vorobiev, Eugene ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TECHNOLOGIE DE COMPIÈGNE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BALAMAND   (Lebanon)

^c Allée du Réseau Jean Marie Buckmaster   (France)

^d INSTITUTE OF BIOCOLLOID CHEMISTRY   (Ukraine)

Author keywords

Biomass; Electrostimulation; Fermentation; Pulsed fields; S. cerevisiae

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; ELECTRIC FIELDS; SUSPENSIONS (FLUIDS); YEAST;

BATCH FERMENTATION PROCESS; CELL ELECTROPORATION; ELECTRIC FIELD STRENGTH; ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTROSTIMULATION; PULSED ELECTRIC FIELD; PULSED FIELDS; S.CEREVISIAE;

FERMENTATION;

CARBON; FRUCTOSE; GLUCOSE; GLUCOSE TRANSPORTER;

ARTICLE; BATCH FERMENTATION; BIOMASS FERMENTATION; CARBON SOURCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTROPORATION; ELECTROSTIMULATION; INCUBATION TEMPERATURE; INCUBATOR; INOCULATION; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; PULSED ELECTRIC FIELD; REDUCTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; YEAST; YEAST CELL; BATCH CELL CULTURE; FERMENTATION; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; KINETICS; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; WINE;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

BATCH CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTROPORATION; FERMENTATION; FRUCTOSE; GLUCOSE; KINETICS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; WINE;

EID: 84923335412     PISSN: 15675394     EISSN: 1878562X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2014.08.016     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Handbook of enology. The Microbiology of Wine and Vinifications 2006, Volume 1. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. P. Ribereau-Gayon, D. Dubourdieu, B. Doneche, A. Lonvaud (Eds.).
2. Klomklieng W., Prateepasen A. Molasses fermentation to ethanol by Saccharomyces cerevisiae M30 using low ultrasonic frequency stimulation. KKU Res. J. 2012, 17:950-957.
3. Muniz J.B., Marcelino M., Motta M., Schuler A., Motta M.A. Influence of static magnetic fields on S. cerevisae biomass growth. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2007, 50:515-520.
4. Fologea D., Vassu T., Stoica I., Csutak O., Sasarman E., Smarandache D., et al. Efficient electrotransformation of yeast using bipolar electric pulses. Rom. Biotechnol. Lett. 2004, 9:1505-1510.
5. Teissié J., Eynard N., Vernhes M.C., Bénichou A., Ganeva V., Galutzov B., et al. Recent biotechnological developments of electropulsation. A prospective review. Bioelectrochemistry 2002, 55:107-112.
6. Shen X., Chen Y., Liu T., Hu X., Gu Z. Development of a high-efficient transformation system of Bacillus pumilus strain DX01 to facilitate gene isolation via gfp-tagged insertional mutagenesis and visualize bacterial colonization of rice roots. Folia Microbiol. (Praha) 2013, 58(5):1-9.
7. Hu N., Zhang X., Yang J., Joo S., Qian S. A cell electrofusion microfluidic chip with micro-cavity microelectrode array. Microfluid. Nanofluid. 2013, 15(2):1-10.
8. Henshaw J.W., Zaharoff D.A., Mossop B.J., Yuan F. Electric field-mediated transport of plasmid DNA in tumor interstitium in vivo. Bioelectrochemistry 2007, 71(2):233-242.
9. Lubicki P., Jayaram S. High voltage pulse application for the destruction of the Gram-negative bacterium Yersinia enterocolitica. Bioelectrochem. Bioenerg. 1997, 43(1):135-141.
10. Montané M.H., Teissié J. Electrostimulation of plant protoplast division: part 1. Experimental results. Bioelectrochem. Bioenerg. 1992, 29(1):59-70.
11. Tanino T., Sato S., Oshige M., Ohshima T. Analysis of the stress response of yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae toward pulsed electric field. J. Electrost. 2012, 70:212-216.
12. Araujo O.Q.F., Oliveira A.A.C., Torres C.C.O., Rocha-Leao M.H., Margarit I.C.P., Coelho M.A.Z., et al. Glucose uptake in electrically stimulated cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Eur. Congr. Chem. Eng. Copenhagen 16-20 Sept. 2007, 1-9.
13. Nakanishi K., Tokuda H., Soga T., Yoshinaga T., Takeda M. Effect of electric current on growth and alcohol production by yeast cells. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 1998, 85:250-253.
14. Carlin W.W. Electrostimulation of Microbial Reactions 1981.
15. El Zakhem H., Lanoisellé J.L., Lebovka N.I., Nonus M., Vorobiev E., El Zakhem H. Behavior of yeast cells in aqueous suspension affected by pulsed electric field. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2006, 300:553-563.
16. Bradford M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72:248-254.
17. Zhang Q., Monsalve Gonzalez A., Qin B., Barbosa Canovas G.V., Swanson B.G. Inactivation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in apple juice by square wave and exponential decay pulsed electric fields. J. Food Process Eng. 1994, 17:469-478.
18. Cserhalmi Z., Vidacs I., Beczner J., Czukor B. Inactivation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Bacillus cereus by pulsed electric fields technology. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2002, 3:41-45.
19. Schrive L., Grasmick A., Moussiere S., Sarrade S. Pulsed electric field treatment of Saccharomyces cerevisiae suspensions: a mechanistic approach coupling energy transfer, mass transfer and hydrodynamics. Biochem. Eng. J. 2006, 27:212-224.
20. Ohshima T., Sato M., Saito M. Selective release of intracellular protein using pulsed electric field. J. Electrost. 1995, 35:103-112.
21. Ganeva V., Galutzov B., Teissié J. High yield electroextraction of proteins from yeast by a flow process. Anal. Biochem. 2003, 315:77-84.
22. Ohshima T., Sato M. Bacterial sterilization and intracellular protein release by a pulsed electric field. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 2004, 90:113-133.
23. El Zakhem H., Lanoisellé J.L., Lebovka N.I., Nonus M., Vorobiev E. The early stages of Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast suspensions damage in moderate pulsed electric fields. Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces 2006, 47:189-197.
24. Rosenheck K., Doty P. The far ultraviolet absorption spectra of polypeptide and protein solutions and their dependence on conformation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1961, 47:1775.
25. Liu M., Zhang M., Lin S., Liu J., Yang Y., Jin Y. Optimization of extraction parameters for protein from beer waste brewing yeast treated by pulsed electric fields (PEF). Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2012, 6:4739-4746.
26. Arbianti R., Hermansyah H., Utami T.T., Zahara N.C., Trisnawati I., Kristin E. The usage of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in microbial fuel cell system for electricity energy production. J. Chem. Chem. Eng. 2012, 6:814-819.
27. Handbook of enology. The Chemistry of Wine Stabilization and Treatments 2006, Volume 2. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. P. Ribereau-Gayon, Y. Glories, A. Maujean, D. Dubourdieu (Eds.).
28. Tronchoni J., Gamero A., Arroyo-lópez F.N., Barrio E., Querol A. Differences in the glucose and fructose consumption profiles in diverse Saccharomyces wine species and their hybrids during grape juice fermentation. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2009, 134:237-243.
29. Weaver J.C., Chizmadzhev Y.A. Theory of electroporation: a review. Bioelectrochem. Bioenerg. 1996, 41:135-160.
30. Cogalniceanu G., Radu M., Fologea D., Moisoi N., Aurelia B. Stimulation of tobacco shoot regeneration by alternating weak electric field. Bioelectrochem. Bioenerg. 1998, 44:257-260.
31. Angersbach A., Heinz V., Knorr D. Evaluation of process-induced dimensional changes in the membrane structure of biological cells using impedance measurement. Biotechnol. Prog. 2002, 18:597-603.
32. Serrano R. Transport across yeast vacuolar and plasma membranes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1991, 523-586. Yeast Saccharomyces, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Woodbury, NY, USA. J.R. Broach, J.R. Pringle, E.W. Jones (Eds.).
33. Castro I., Teixeira J.A., Vicente A.A. The effect of the electric field on lag-phase, ethanol and β-galactosidase production of a recombinant S. cerevisiae growing on lactose. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2012, 5(8):3014-3020.