Impact of roles assignation on heterogeneous populations in evolutionary dictator game

Scientific Reports

Volumn 4, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Deng, Xinyang ^a   Liu, Qi ^b   Sadiq, Rehan ^c   Deng, Yong ^a,d,e  

^a SOUTHWEST UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^d NORTHWESTERN POLYTECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^e VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALTRUISM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COOPERATION; EVOLUTION; GAME; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MOTIVATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOLOGY; RECREATION;

ALTRUISM; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; GAMES, EXPERIMENTAL; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MOTIVATION; PLAY AND PLAYTHINGS;

EID: 84923335098     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep06937     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Axelrod, R. The Evolution of Cooperation (Basic Books, New York, 2006).
2. Trivers, R. Social evolution (Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Menlo Park, 1985).
3. Hammerstein, P. Genetic and cultural evolution of cooperation (MIT press, Cambridge, 2003).
4. Szabó, G. & Tõke, C. Evolutionary prisoner's dilemma game on a square lattice. Phys. Rev. E. 58, 69-73 (1998).
5. Santos, F. C. & Pacheco, J. M. Scale-free networks provide a unifying framework for the emergence of cooperation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 098104 (2005).
6. Santos, F. C., Rodrigues, J. F.& Pacheco, J. M. Graph topology plays a determinant role in the evolution of cooperation. Proc. R. Soc. B. 273, 51-55 (2006).
7. Nowak, M. A. Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science 314, 1560-1563 (2006).
8. Smith, J. M. Evolution and the Theory of Games (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1982).
9. Nowak, M. A. & May, R. M. Evolutionary games and spatial chaos. Nature 359, 826-829 (1992).
10. Nowak, M. A., Sasaki, A., Taylor, C. & Fudenberg, D. Emergence of cooperation and evolutionary stability in finite populations. Nature. 428, 646-650 (2004).
11. Nowak, M. A. Evolutionary Dynamics (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 2006).
12. Szabó, G. & Fáth, G. Evolutionary games on graphs. Phys. Rep. 446, 97-216 (2007).
13. Wang, Z., Zhu, X. & Arenzon, J. J. Cooperation and age structure in spatial games. Phys. Rev. E. 85, 011149 (2012).
14. Novak, S., Chatterjee, K.&Nowak, M. A. Density games. J. Theor. Biol. 334, 26-34 (2013).
15. Ichinose, G., Saito, M., Sayama, H. &Wilson, D. S. Adaptive long-range migration promotes cooperation under tempting conditions. Sci. Rep. 3, 02509 (2013).
16. Wang, Z.,Wang, L.,Yin,Z.Y.&Xia, C. Y. Inferring reputation promotes the evolution of cooperation in spatial social dilemma games. PLoS One. 7, e40218 (2012).
17. Nowak, M. A. Evolving cooperation. J. Theor. Biol. 299, 1-8 (2012).
18. Fu, F. et al. Evolution of in-group favoritism. Sci. Rep. 2, 00460 (2012).
19. Rong, Z., Yang, H.-X. & Wang, W.-X. Feedback reciprocitymechanism promotes the cooperation of highly clustered scale-free networks. Phys. Rev. E. 82, 047101 (2010).
20. Deng, X., Wang, Z., Liu, Q., Deng, Y. & Mahadevan, S. A belief-based evolutionarily stable strategy. J. Theor. Biol. 361, 81-86 (2014).
21. Szolnoki, A., Wang, Z. & Perc, M. Wisdom of groups promotes cooperation in evolutionary social dilemmas. Sci. Rep. 2, 00576 (2012).
22. Wang, Z., Szolnoki, A. & Perc, M. Rewarding evolutionary fitness with links between populations promotes cooperation. J. Theor. Biol. 349, 50-56 (2014).
23. Gómez-Gardeñes, J., Campillo, M., Floría, L. M. & Moreno, Y. Dynamical organization of cooperation in complex topologies. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 108103 (2007).
24. Szabo, G., Szolnoki, A. & Vukov, J. Selection of dynamical rules in spatial prisoner's dilemma games. Europhys. Lett. 87, 18007 (2009).
25. Jin, Q., Wang, L., Xia, C. & Wang, Z. Spontaneous symmetry breaking in interdependent networked game. Sci. Rep. 4, 4095 (2014).
26. Wang, Z., Xia, C.,Meloni, S., Zhou, C. &Moreno, Y. Impact of social punishment on cooperative behavior in complex networks. Sci. Rep. 3, 3055 (2013).
27. Nowak, M. A., Tarnita, C. E. &Wilson, E. O. The evolution of eusociality. Nature. 466, 1057-1062 (2010).
28. Abbot, P. et al. Inclusive fitness theory and eusociality. Nature. 471, E1-E4 (2011).
29. Boomsma, J. J. et al. Only full-sibling families evolved eusociality. Nature 471, E4-E5 (2011).
30. Strassmann, J. E., Page Jr, R. E., Robinson, G. E. & Seeley, T. D. Kin selection and eusociality. Nature. 471, E5-E6 (2011).
31. Ferriere, R. & Michod, R. E. Inclusive fitness in evolution. Nature. 471, E6-E8 (2011).
32. Herre, E. A. & Wcislo, W. T. In defence of inclusive fitness theory. Nature. 471, E8-E9 (2011).
33. Nowak, M. A., Tarnita, C. E. & Wilson, E. O. Nowak et al. reply. Nature. 471, E9-E10 (2011).
34. Gintis, H. Game Theory Evolving (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2000).
35. Trivers, R. L. The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Q. Rev. Biol. 46, 35-57 (1971).
36. Nowak, M. A. & Sigmund, K. Evolution of indirect reciprocity. Nature. 437, 1291-1298 (2005).
37. Fletcher, J. A. & Zwick, M. The evolution of altruism: game theory in multilevel selection and inclusive fitness. J. Theor. Biol. 245, 26-36 (2007).
38. Wang, Z., Kokubo, S., Tanimoto, J., Fukuda, E. & Shigaki, K. Insight into the socalled spatial reciprocity. Phys. Rev. E. 88, 042145 (2013).
39. Nowak, M. A., Page, K. M. & Sigmund, K. Fairness versus reason in the ultimatum game. Science. 289, 1773-1775 (2000).
40. Page, K. M. & Nowak, M. A. A generalized adaptive dynamics framework can describe the evolutionary ultimatum game. J. Theor. Biol. 209, 173-179 (2000).
41. Page, K. M., Nowak, M. A. & Sigmund, K. The spatial ultimatum game. Proc. R. Soc. B. 267, 2177-2182 (2000).
42. Sinatra, R. et al. The ultimatum game in complex networks. J. Stat. Mech.-Theory E. 9, P09012 (2009).
43. Li, Z., Gao, J., Suh, I. H. & Wang, L. Degree-based assignation of roles in ultimatum games on scale-free networks. Physica A. 392, 1885-1893 (2013).
44. Gao, J., Li, Z.,Wu, T. &Wang, L. The coevolutionary ultimatum game. Europhys. Lett. 93, 48003 (2011).
45. Szolnoki, A., Perc, M. & Szabó, G. Defense mechanisms of empathetic players in the spatial ultimatum game. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 078701 (2012).
46. Wu, T., Fu, F., Zhang, Y. &Wang, L. Adaptive role switching promotes fairness in networked ultimatum game. Sci. Rep. 3, 01550 (2013).
47. Rand, D. G., Tarnita, C. E., Ohtsuki, H. & Nowak, M. A. Evolution of fairness in the one-shot anonymous Ultimatum Game. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 2581-2586 (2013).
48. Engel, C. Dictator games: a meta study. Exp. Econ. 14, 583-610 (2011).
49. Camerer, C. Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2003).
50. Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. & Thaler, R. Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: entitlements in the market. Am. Econ. Rev. 76, 728-741 (1986).
51. Rycroft, R. The Lorenz Curve and the Gini Coefficient. J. Econ. Educ. 34, 296-296 (2003).
52. Hu, H.-B. & Wang, L. The Gini coefficient's application to general complex networks. Adv. Complex Syst. 8, 159-167 (2005).
53. Erdos, P. & Renyi, A. On the evolution of random graphs. Publ. Math. Inst. Hungar. Acad. Sci. 5, 17-61 (1960).
54. Barabasi, A.-L. & Albert, R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science. 286, 509-512 (1999).
55. Taylor, P. D. & Jonker, L. B. Evolutionary stable strategies and game dynamics. Math. Biosci. 40, 145-156 (1978).
56. Traulsen, A., Pacheco, J. M. & Nowak, M. A. Pairwise comparison and selection temperature in evolutionary game dynamics. J. Theor. Biol. 246, 522-529 (2007).
57. Bak, P. & Sneppen, K. Punctuated equilibrium and criticality in a simple model of evolution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 4083-4086 (1993).
58. Gould, S. J. & Eldredge, N. Punctuated equilibria: the tempo and mode of evolution reconsidered. Paleobiology 3, 115-151 (1977).
59. Hauert, C. & Doebeli, M. Spatial structure often inhibits the evolution of cooperation in the snowdrift game. Nature. 428, 643-646 (2004).
60. Santos, F. C., Pacheco, J. M. & Lenaerts, T. Evolutionary dynamics of social dilemmas in structured heterogeneous populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 3490-3494 (2006).
61. Masuda, N. Participation costs dismiss the advantage of heterogeneous networks in evolution of cooperation. Proc. R. Soc. B. 274, 1815-1821 (2007).
62. Szolnoki, A., Perc, M. & Danku, Z. Towards effective payoffs in the prisoner's dilemma game on scale-free networks. Physica A. 387, 2075-2082 (2008).
63. Tomassini, M., Pestelacci, E. & Luthi, L. Social dilemmas and cooperation in complex networks. Int. J. Mod. Phys. C. 18, 1173-1185 (2007).
64. Wu, Z. X., Guan, J. Y., Xu, X. J. & Wang, Y. H. Evolutionary prisoner's dilemma game on Barabasi-Albert scale-free networks. Physica A. 379, 672-680 (2007).
65. Santos, F. C., Santos, M. D. & Pacheco, J. M. Social diversity promotes the emergence of cooperation in public goods games. Nature. 454, 213-216 (2008).
66. Boccaletti, S., Latora, V., Moreno, Y., Chavez, M. & Hwang, D. U. Complex networks: Structure and dynamics. Phys. Rep. 424, 175-308 (2006).
67. Newman, M. E. The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev. 45, 167-256 (2003).
68. Wei, D. J. et al. Box-covering algorithm for fractal dimension of weighted networks. Sci. Rep. 3, 03049 (2013).
69. Zimmermann, M. G. & Eguiluz, V. M. Cooperation, social networks, and the emergence of leadership in a prisoner's dilemma with adaptive local interactions. Phys. Rev. E. 72, 056118 (2005).
70. Moreira, J. A., Pacheco, J. M. & Santos, F. C. Evolution of collective action in adaptive social structures. Sci. Rep. 3, 01521 (2013).
71. Souza, M. O., Pacheco, J. M. & Santos, F. C. Evolution of cooperation under Nperson snowdrift games. J. Theor. Biol. 260, 581-588 (2009).
72. Santos, M. D., Pinheiro, F. L., Santos, F. C.&Pacheco, J. M. Dynamics of N-person snowdrift games in structured populations. J. Theor. Biol. 315, 81-86 (2012).
73. Kellogg, D. E. The role of phyletic change in the evolution of Pseudocubus vema (Radiolaria). Paleobiology. 1, 359-370 (1975).
74. Bak, P. How nature works: the science of self-organized criticality (Copernicus Press, New York, 1996).
75. Bak, P., Tang, C. &Wiesenfeld, K. Self-organized criticality: an explanation of 1/f noise. Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 381-384 (1987).
76. Bak, P. & Chen, K. Self-organized criticality. Sci. Am. 264, 46 (1991).
77. Tamarit, F. A., Cannas, S. A. & Tsallis, C. Sensitivity to initial conditions in the Bak-Sneppen model of biological evolution. Eur. Phys. J. B. 1, 545-548 (1998).
78. Boettcher, S. & Percus, A. Nature's way of optimizing. Artif. Intell. 119, 275-286 (2000).
79. Meester, R. & Sarkar, A. Rigorous self-organized criticality in the modified Bak- Sneppen model. J. Stat. Phys. 149, 964-968 (2012).
80. Xiao, S. S. & Yang, C. B. (2012).Critical fluctuations in the Bak-Sneppen model. Eur. Phys. J. B. 85, 1-5 (2012).
81. Park, S. & Jeong, H. C. Emergence of cooperation with self-organized criticality. J. Korean. Phys. Soc. 60, 311-316 (2012).